High-Load Elastomeric Bridge Bearings

Abstract

The use of elastomeric bearings as high-load bridge bearings for steel and concrete bridges is discussed. The Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT's) experience with high-load multirotational bearings and search for simpler, more durable, and more economical high-load bridge bearings are described. The results of a survey of state departments of transportation indicate that bridge designers have been slow to design elastomeric bearings for the higher stresses permitted by AASHTO Method B. High-load steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings are defined as bearings that are designed for a compressive service stress of 11 MPa (AASHTO Method B maximum) to 15 MPa (German maximum). Design criteria for elastomeric bearings are discussed. A recent WSDOT project is presented. In the case study a four-span continuous curved steel plate bridge is designed for a seismic acceleration coefficient of 0.22 g. At the intermediate piers, high-load steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings are designed for a service load of 339 Mg with a compressive stress of 11 MPa (AASHTO Method B). The seismic forces at the piers are reduced by 50 percent when compared with those with fixed pin or spherical bearings. Constructibility issues, quality control, testing requirements, design loads, and costs are presented. Future research needs are identified. In addition to supporting high loads, elastomeric bearings are durable, simple to install, and maintenance-free and can reduce seismic loads at bridge piers. These bearings are an economical alternative to more expensive disc, pot, and spherical bridge bearings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 15th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 294–299.

Grote

Over 20 Years of Elastomeric Bearings Without Trouble: A Scheme for Safety and Reliability. In Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Vol. 2, SP-70. American Concrete Institute, 1982, pp. 865–886.

Mistry

Economical Steel Bridge Design. Modern Steel Construction, Vol. 34, No. 3, March 1994, p. 47.

How to Choose Bridge Bearings. Better Roads, Vol. 64, No. 5, May 1994, pp. 27–28.

Van Lund

J. A.

Bridge Bearing Replacement. Conference Proceedings 7: 4th International Bridge Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 122–129.

Stanton

J. F.

, and Roeder

C. W.

. NCHRP Report 248: Elastomeric Bearings Design, Construction, and Materials. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Aug. 1982.

Roeder

C. W.

, Stanton

J. F.

, and Taylor

A. W.

. NCHRP Report 298: Performance of Elastomeric Bearings. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1987.

Roeder

C. W.

, Stanton

J. F.

, and Feller

. NCHRP Report 325: Low Temperature Behavior and Acceptance Criteria for Elastomeric Bridge Bearings. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1987.

Roeder

C. W.

, Stanton

J. F.

, and Taylor

A. W.

. Failure Modes of Elastomeric Bearings and the Influence of Manufacturing Methods. In Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Vol. 1, SP-94. American Concrete Institute, 1986, pp. 279–295.

10.

Yura

J. M.

Elastomeric Bearing Background Information and Field Study. Presented to AASHTO Technical Committee for Bearings and Expansion Devices (T2), 1995 Annual Meeting of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures, Portland, Oreg., May 9, 1995.

11.

Malik

A. H.

Replacement of Twenty-Year Old Elastomeric Bearings. Preprint. Proc., Third World Congress on Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Vol. 2, SP-94. American Concrete Institute, 1991, pp. 1109–1120.

12.

Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. Part 1. Specifications, 16th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 538–541.