Development of an Integrated Small Aircraft Runway Length Analysis Tool

Abstract

The Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5325-4B provides the current method for estimating runway length requirements in airport design. The design curves and necessary runway length adjustments published two decades ago may not reflect the performance of many new-generation aircraft operating in the National Airspace System. Moreover, this AC offers limited information about the trade-offs between runway length, useful load, and mission range. This paper presents an integrated computer model called the Small Aircraft Runway Length Analysis Tool (SARLAT) to improve the existing methodology. The SARLAT incorporates 76 individual aircraft performance characteristics based on robust data processing, consolidation, and validation workflow. A regression-based model has been developed to account for nonzero runway gradients and different runway surface conditions. An analysis indicates that the current design curves are conservative for modern mid-size and super mid-size business jets, but cannot accommodate light jets, consequently constraining operators’ operational flexibility and possibly reducing airport revenue. SARLAT provides aircraft stage length and payload-range analysis to assist airport designers and improve decision-making. The stage length analysis estimates the cumulative distribution of distances flown by individual aircraft in the United States. Using a time-step numerical simulation, SARLAT includes payload-range analysis to quantify the trade-offs between the aircraft’s useful load and mission range. Finally, SARLAT determines the critical aircraft operation at the airport based on runway length and geometric design requirements. Since SARLAT leads to more accurate and cost-effective estimates of runway length requirements, the FAA plans to mandate the use of this tool in the Airport Improvement Program.

Keywords

runway length requirements aircraft performance payload-range diagram

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Van Es

G. W. H.

Running Out of Runway: Analysis of 35 Years of Landing Overrun Accidents. NLR TP, Vol. 498, 2005, pp. 18–19.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008.

Federal Aviation Administration. Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design (Advisory Circular 150/5325-4B). Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Cirrus Aircraft. FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual Cirrus Vision SF50. Cirrus Aircraft, Duluth, M.N., 2016.

Wang

Air Transportation Modeling to Evaluate Airport Runway Infrastructure and Supersonic Transport Demand. Phd dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, V.A., 2025.

Bombardier Aerospace. FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual Learjet 45. Bombardier Aerospace, Wichita, K.S., 2004.

Raytheon Aircraft Company. FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual Raytheon Aircraft Hawker 800XP. Textron Aviation Inc., Wichita, K.S., 2001.

Lush

K. J.

Standardization of Take-off Performance Measurements for Airplane. Technical Note R-12, Air Force Flight Test Center, Air Research and Development Command, United States Air Force, Edward Air Force Base, C.A., 1953.

Orleans

K. J.

Woolf

R. K.

A Method of Standardizing Takeoff Performance Data Using Modeling and Simulation. In 28th Aerodynamic Measurement Technology, Ground Testing, and Flight Testing Conference, AIAA, New Orleans, L.A., 2013, pp. 2725–2736.

10.

Brown

F. S.

Determining Conventional Aircraft Takeoff Performance and Adjusting the Results to a Reference Set of Conditions. Technical Information Handbook No. 412TW-TIH-19-03. 412th Test Wing, Air Force Material Command, United States Air Force, Edward Air Force Base, C.A., 2020.

11.

Gerthoffert

Cerez

Bouteldja

M. T.

Modeling Aircraft Braking Performance on Wet and Snow/Ice-contaminated Runways. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, Vol. 229, No. 9, 2015, pp. 1065–1078.

12.

Jiang

Wang

An Integrated Analytical Model for Friction Characteristics of Aircraft Tire on Wet Runway Pavement. Tribology International, Vol. 185, 2023, p. 108501.

13.

Federal Aviation Administration. Critical Aircraft and Regular Use Determination (Advisory Circular 150/5000-17). Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 2017.

14.

Textron Aviation Inc. Super King Air 350ER Pilot’s Operating Handbook and FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual. Textron Aviation Inc., Wichita, K.S., 2007.

15.

Federal Aviation Administration. Title 14, Code of Federal Aviation Regulation Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Airplanes. Office of the Federal Register, Washington, D.C., 2024.

16.

Federal Aviation Administration. Title 14, Code of Federal Aviation Regulation Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. Office of the Federal Register, Washington, D.C., 2024.

17.

Textron Aviation Inc. Citation CJ3 Flight Planning Guide. Textron Aviation Inc., Wichita, K.S., 2006.

18.

Mooney International Corp. Mooney Model M20V Acclaim Ultra Pilot’s Operating Handbook and FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual. Mooney International Corporation, Kerrville, T.X., 2017.

19.

Textron Aviation Inc. Citation Longitude Flight Planning Guide. Textron Aviation Inc., Wichita, K.S., 2019.

20.

Federal Aviation Administration. Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design (Advisory Circular 150/5325-4A). Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 1990.

21.

Federal Aviation Administration. Title 14, Code of Federal Aviation Regulations Operating Requirements: Commuter and on Demand Operations and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft. Office of the Federal Register, Washington, D.C., 2024.