Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is increasingly used in modern infrastructure because of its outstanding strength and durability, but accurately measuring its tensile behavior remains a significant challenge. Direct-tension testing using AASHTO T 397, particularly with a 220 kip wedge grip machine, has been documented to yield success rates as low as 36%. This paper addresses direct-tension testing challenges by evaluating non-proprietary UHPC mixtures with steel fiber dosages from 0.0% to 2.0% and silica fume contents of 9%, 12%, and 15% of total binder content, all tested at 28 days. Through a two-phase experimental program, this study covers improvements to specimen preparation, machine alignment, and grip pressure. These refinements increased the test success rate to 75% with the same testing equipment. The results show that the amount of fiber is the primary factor influencing tensile strength and post-cracking performance of UHPC, while moderate changes in silica fume content have only a minor effect. This study provides a practical and repeatable test protocol for direct-tension evaluation and demonstrates that optimizing fiber dosage is essential to achieve the desirable tensile behavior of UHPC. The proposed approach enables confident material selection and promotes wider use of UHPC.
ASTM C1856/C1856M-17. Standard Specification for Fabricating and Testing Specimens of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
2.
MicelliF.RenniA.KandalaftA. G.MoroS.Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and Ultrahigh-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Materials. In New Materials in Civil Engineering (SamuiP.KimD.IyerN. R.ChaudharyS., eds.), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2020, pp. 273–314.
3.
AzmeeN. M.ShafiqN.Ultra-High Performance Concrete: From Fundamental to Applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 9, 2018, p. e00197.
4.
GraybealB. A.VargaI. D. L.YuanJ.HaberZ.Material Property Evaluation of Different Commercially-Available UHPC-Class Materials. International Interactive Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Concrete, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2016.
5.
DuJ.GuoP.LiuZ.MengW.Highly Thixotropic Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) as an Overlay. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 366, 2023, p. 130130.
6.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Structural Design with Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Report No. FHWA-HRT-23-077, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2023.
7.
GraybealB. A.Development of Non-Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete for Use in the Highway Bridge Sector. Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-100, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2013.
8.
BerryM.SnidarichR.WoodC.Development of Non-Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Final Report. Report No. FHWA/MT-17-010/8237-001, Montana Department of Transportation, Helena, MT, 2017.
9.
WilleK.Boisvert-CotulioC.Development of Non-Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete for Use in the Highway Bridge Sector. Report No. PB2013110587, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2013.
10.
WilleK.NaamanA. E.El-TawilS.Parra-MontesinosG. J.Ultra-High Performance Concrete and Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Achieving Strength and Ductility Without Heat Curing. Materials and Structures, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2012, pp. 309–324.
11.
GraybealB.Ultra High Performance Concrete. Report No. FHWA-HRT-11-038, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2011.
12.
CarnovaleD.VecchioF.Effect of Fiber Material and Loading History on Shear Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 111, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1137–1146.
13.
GaliS.SritharanS.Evaluation of AASHTO T 397: Standard Method of Test for Uniaxial Tensile Response of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 121, No. 1, 2024, pp. 105–118.
14.
BehrouzS.RizwanK.Development of Non-Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) for Iowa Bridges: Final Report. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA, 2019.
15.
El-TawilS.AlkaysiM.NaamanA. E.HansenW.LiuZ.Development, Characterization and Applications of a Non Proprietary Ultra High Performance Concrete for Highway Bridges. Report No. RC-1637, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI, 2016.
16.
FloydR.VolzJ. S.McDanielA. S.LooneyT.ChoateJ.RoswurmS., et al. Evaluation of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete for Use in Bridge Connections and Repair. Report No. FHWA-OK-21-03, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK, 2021.
17.
El-HelouR. G.GraybealB. A.The Ultra Girder: A Design Concept for a 300-Foot Single Span Prestressed Ultra-High Performance Concrete Bridge Girder. International Interactive Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Concrete, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2019.
18.
De BelieN.GruyaertE.Al-TabbaaA.AntonaciP.BaeraC.BajareD., et al. A Review of Self-Healing Concrete for Damage Management of Structures. Advanced Materials Interfaces, Vol. 5, No. 17, 2018, p. 1800074.
19.
ShafieifarM.FarzadM.AzizinaminiA.Experimental and Numerical Study on Mechanical Properties of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 156, 2017, pp. 402–411.
20.
MousavinezhadS.GonzalesG. J.ToledoW. K.GarciaJ. M.NewtsonC. M.AllenaS.A Comprehensive Study on Non-Proprietary Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Materials, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2023, p. 2622.
21.
VossM.RidingK. A.AlrashidiR.FerraroC.HamiltonH.Comparison Between Direct Tension, Four-Point Flexure, and Simplified Double-Punch Tests for UHPC Tensile Behavior. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 11, 2022, p. 04022316.
22.
ZhangY.ZhuY.QuS.KumarA.ShaoX.Improvement of Flexural and Tensile Strength of Layered-Casting UHPC with Aligned Steel Fibers. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 251, 2020, p. 118893.
23.
GraybealB.BabyF.Tension Testing of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Publication FHWA-HRT-17-053, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2019.
24.
AASHTO T397. Standard Method of Test for Uniaxial Tensile Response of Ultra High Performance Concrete. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
25.
El HelouR.HaberZ.GraybealB.Mechanical Behavior and Design Properties of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 119, No. 1, 2022, pp. 181–194.
26.
HiewS. Y.TeohK. B.RamanS. N.HungC. C.ChaenY. X.KongD., et al. A Unified Tensile Constitutive Model for Mono/Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC). Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 150, 2024, p. 105553.
27.
RidingK. A.FerraroC. C.HamiltonH. R.VossM. S.AlrashidiR. S.Requirements for Use of Field-Cast, Proprietary Ultra-High-Performance Concrete in Florida Structural Applications. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2019.
28.
SritharanS.GaliS.Evaluation of AASHTO T 397, Standard Method of Test for Uniaxial Tensile Response of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Tech Transfer Summary, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA, 2024.
29.
AlkaysiM.El-TawilS.Effects of Variations in the Mix Constituents of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) on Cost and Performance. Materials and Structures, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2016, pp. 4185–4200.
30.
MendoncaF.El-KhierM. A.MorcousG.HuJ.Feasibility Study of Development of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) for Highway Bridge Applications in Nebraska. Report No. SPR-P1(18) M072, Nebraska Department of Transportation, Lincoln, NE, 2020.
31.
ACI Committee 239. What Is Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC)?—TechNote. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2024.
32.
AbokifaM.MoustafaM. A.Mechanical Characterization and Material Variability Effects of Emerging Non-Proprietary UHPC Mixes for Accelerated Bridge Construction Field Joints. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 308, 2021, p. 125064.
33.
ASTM C33/C33M-24A. Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2024.
34.
HaberZ. B.De la VargaI.GraybealB. A.NakashojiB.El-HelouR.Properties and Behavior of UHPC-Class Materials. Report No. FHWA-HRT-18-036, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2018.
35.
WilsonE. B.Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 22, 1927, pp. 209–212.
36.
AgrestiA.An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed.John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
37.
AgrestiA.CoullB. A.Approximate Is Better Than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions. The American Statistician, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1998, pp. 119–126.
38.
BlandJ. M.AltmanD. G.Multiple Significance Tests: The Bonferroni Method. BMJ, Vol. 310, No. 6973, 1995, p. 170.
39.
ASTM C1609/C1609M-24. Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2024.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
