Abstract
This study investigates the environmental impacts of two urban freight-distribution strategies: in-store pickup with returns and last-mile delivery by professional logistics service providers. With the rapid growth of e-commerce, understanding the carbon footprint of alternative delivery and return channels is critical for sustainable urban logistics. A Monte Carlo simulation-based approach is employed to evaluate CO2 emissions generated by these two strategies under stochastic operational conditions. The simulation model incorporates real-world logistics data, including transportation distances, vehicle types, fuel-consumption rates, and the number of packages handled per trip. A total of 10,000 individuals and delivery operations were modeled under probabilistic scenarios to estimate emissions under varying conditions. The results indicate that in-store pickup and return activities conducted by individual consumers generate higher CO2 emissions than optimized last-mile delivery services when the number of collected packages is low. The break-even analysis reveals that in-store pickup becomes environmentally preferable only when at least 24 packages are collected per trip under baseline conditions. When return-related emissions are allocated to courier-based delivery, this threshold shifts downward to approximately 17–20 packages, depending on the assumed return rate. Therefore, in-store pickup can be considered an environmentally sustainable option only under specific conditions, such as high levels of package consolidation or the use of low-emission transport modes. The findings provide important implications for consumer behavior, logistics system design, and urban freight policy-making. The results highlight the need for strategies that promote electric delivery fleets, shared mobility solutions, and behavioral awareness to reduce urban transport emissions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
