Over the coming decades, the aviation sector is expected to witness substantial growth driven by increasing global demand for air travel, necessitating efficient and precise technical documentation to manage the growing complexity of maintenance. As technical authoring processes remain labor-intensive and prone to inconsistencies, this study investigates the potential of Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to automate the creation of Engineering Orders (EOs), which are derived from Airworthiness Directives (ADs) and Service Bulletins (SBs). A three-phase approach is adopted to generate EOs from ADs and SBs, enabling a structured evaluation of GenAI’s performance in technical authoring. Expert reviews are integral to refining AI outputs, emphasizing the importance of integrating AI capabilities with human expertise. This study validates the effectiveness of GenAI in aviation technical authoring and introduces a scoring tool to evaluate the quality of AI-generated documentation across several dimensions: (1) technical knowledge; (2) accuracy; (3) comprehensiveness; and (4) usability and flexibility. The findings highlight that the synergy between AI-generated content and expert review significantly improves documentation quality by mitigating AI limitations, reducing the time required to produce technical documentation and ensuring practical applicability. The proposed approach provides a scalable framework that can be adapted for use in various industries requiring precise technical documentation.
Queiroz Júnior, H. da S., M. A. de S., Celestino, C. F. F., de Souza, V. A., Falcão, and F. de C. Camioto. CO2 Emissions in Air Transport: A Comparative Study Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024. 2678: 872–883.
5.
KinnisonH. A.“Terry” SiddiquiT.Aviation Maintenance Management. McGraw-Hill Education, Columbus, OH; New York, NY; Chicago, IL, 2013.
MaraisK. B.RobichaudM. R.Analysis of Trends in Aviation Maintenance Risk: An Empirical Approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 106, 2012, pp. 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.003.
SöllnerM.ArnoldT.BenlianA.BretschneiderU.KnightC.OhlyS.RudkowskiL.SchreiberG.WendtD.ChatGPT and Beyond: Exploring the Responsible Use of Generative AI in the Workplace. Business & Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 67, 2025. pp. 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-025-00932-8.
12.
LinT.PfisterH.WangJ.-H.GenLens: A Systematic Evaluation of Visual GenAI Model Outputs. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2402.03700, 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03700. Accessed January 15, 2025.
13.
FeuerriegelS.HartmannJ.JanieschC.ZschechP.Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2024, pp. 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7.
14.
KumarS.MusharafD.MusharafS.SagarA. K.A Comprehensive Review of the Latest Advancements in Large Generative AI Models. In Advanced Communication and Intelligent Systems. ICACIS 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science (ShawR. N.PaprzyckiM.GhoshA., eds.), Springer, Cham, Vol. 1920, 2023, pp. 90–103.
15.
KocE.HatipogluS.KivrakO.CelikC.KocK.Houston, We Have a Problem!: The Use of ChatGPT in Responding to Customer Complaints. Technology in Society, Vol. 74, 2023, p. 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102333.
16.
DubeyR.GunasekaranA.PapadopoulosT.Benchmarking Operations and Supply Chain Management Practices Using Generative AI: Towards a Theoretical Framework. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 189, 2024, p. 103689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103689.
17.
DeckerT.BhattaraiA. R.LebacherM.Towards Scenario-Based Safety Validation for Autonomous Trains with Deep Generative Models. In Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (GuiochetJ.TonettaS.BitschF., eds.), Springer, Champ, 2023, p. 273–281.
18.
MetinN. A.ÇakanS. S.BerkolA.A Survey on the Use of Generative AI in Aviation. Proc., SETSCI - Conference Proceedings, Ankara, Türkiye, June 7–8, 2024, SETSCI, Vol. 18, pp. 106–113. https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.18.1.00106.
19.
ZaouiA.TchuenteD.WambaS. F.Kamsu-FoguemB.Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Aeronautics: An Industry-Wide Review. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 71, 2024, p. 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101800.
ZiakkasD.PechlivanisK.Artificial Intelligence Applications in Aviation Accident Classification: A Preliminary Exploratory Study. Decision Analytics Journal, Vol. 9, 2023, p. 100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100358.
22.
WandeltS.SunX.ZhangA.AI-Driven Assistants for Education and Research? A Case Study on ChatGPT for Air Transport Management. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 113, 2023, p. 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102483.
23.
AliO.MurrayP. A.MominM.Al-AnziF. S.The Knowledge and Innovation Challenges of ChatGPT: A Scoping Review. Technology in Society, Vol. 75, 2023, p. 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102402.
24.
HeringF.HinzO.PfeifferJ.van der AalstW.The Damocles Sword of Cyber Attacks. Business & Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 67, 2025, pp. 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-025-00933-7.
25.
HuangK.HuangG.DawsonA.WuD.GenAI Application Level Security. In Generative AI Security. Future of Business and Finance, (HuangK.WangY.GoertzelB.LiY.WrightS.PonnapalliJ., eds.), Springer, Cham, 2024, pp. 199–237.
26.
SimkuteA.TankelevitchL.KewenigV.ScottA. E.SellenA.RintelS.Ironies of Generative AI: Understanding and Mitigating Productivity Loss in Human-AI Interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2024, pp. 2898–2919. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2405782.
27.
RiceS.CrouseS. R.WinterS. R.RiceC.The Advantages and Limitations of Using ChatGPT to Enhance Technological Research. Technology in Society, Vol. 76, 2024, p. 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102426.
KhogaliH. O.MekidS.The Blended Future of Automation and AI: Examining Some Long-Term Societal and Ethical Impact Features. Technology in Society, Vol. 73, 2023, p. 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102232.
LoL. S.The CLEAR Path: A Framework for Enhancing Information Literacy through Prompt Engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2023, p. 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720.
32.
HsuC.-C.SandfordB. A.The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2007. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90.
