Rice husk (RH), an abundant agricultural by-product, poses an environmental challenge if not properly managed. Through pyrolysis, this waste can be valorized into biochar (BC), a sustainable material with potential to modify asphalt binders. This study explored the use of RH-derived BC (RHB) as a modifier of an asphalt cement (AC) 60/70 asphalt binder to produce hot-mix asphalt (HMA) by the wet process and evaluate its mechanical performance. Initially, the physical and rheological properties of AC modified with 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% RHB by weight were evaluated. Conventional tests were conducted, and the performance grade (PG) was determined at high and intermediate temperatures. Aging resistance was assessed, multiple stress creep recovery and linear amplitude sweep tests were performed, and scanning electron microscope visualizations were carried out. Based on the results obtained from this binder characterization phase, an asphalt binder modified with 10% RHB was chosen to produce the HMA. Marshall stability, indirect tensile strength (ITS), Cantabro, resilient modulus (RM), permanent deformation, and fatigue resistance tests were carried out on the control HMA (RHB/AC = 0%) and the modified HMA (HMA-RHB). The results show that RHB tends to increase the stiffness, aging resistance, and rutting resistance of the asphalt binder, while maintaining the PG at intermediate temperatures. As an AC modifier, it helped improve all the evaluated mechanical properties of HMA. Specifically, it increased strength under monotonic loading, ITS, and RM, and enhanced resistance to rutting, fatigue, and raveling, while moisture damage resistance showed a slight improvement but remained statistically unchanged.
ChenY.GuoW.NgoH. H.WeiW.DingA.NiB.HoangN. B.ZhangH.Ways to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Production from Rice Cultivation. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 368, 2024, p. 122139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122139.
2.
RamamoorthyS. K.SkrifvarsM.PerssonA.A Review of Natural Fibers Used in Biocomposites: Plant, Animal and Regenerated Cellulose Fibers. Polymer Reviews, Vol. 55, 2015, pp. 107–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2014.971124.
3.
PeraltaY. M.MolinaR.MorenoS.Rice HUSK Silica: A Review from Conventional Uses to New Catalysts for Advanced Oxidation Processes. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 370, 2024, p. 122735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122735.
4.
KordiM.FarrokhiN.Pech-CanulM. I.AhmadikhahA.Rice Husk at a Glance: from Agro-Industrial to Modern Applications. Rice Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2024, pp. 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2023.08.005.
5.
Hidalgo-SalazarM. A.SalinasE.Mechanical, Thermal, Viscoelastic Performance and Product Application of PP- Rice Husk Colombian Biocomposites. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 176, 2019, p. 107135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107135.
6.
LoaizaS.VerchotL.ValenciaD.GuzmánP.AmezquitaN.GarcésG.PuentesO.TrujilloC.ChirindaN.PittelkowC. M.Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Through Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation in Colombian Rice Production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 360, 2024, p. 108787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108787.
7.
FooK. Y.HameedB. H.Utilization of Rice Husk Ash as Novel Adsorbent: A Judicious Recycling of the Colloidal Agricultural Waste. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 152, 2009, pp. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2009.09.005.
8.
OthmanF. E. C.NordinN. A. H.IsmailN.ZakriaH. S.JunohH.AzizM. H. A.A Review on Sustainable Graphene Production from Rice Husks: Strategies and Key Considerations. Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 497, 2024, p. 154408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.154408.
9.
CheahW. Y.Siti-DinaR. P.LengS. T. K.ErA. C.ShowP. L.Circular Bioeconomy in Palm Oil Industry: Current Practices and Future Perspectives. Environmental Technology Innovation, Vol. 30, 2023, p. 103050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103050.
10.
Salazar-CarreñoD.García-CáceresR. G.Ortiz-RodríguezO. O.Laboratory Processing of Colombian Rice Husk for Obtaining Amorphous Silica as Concrete Supplementary Cementing Material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 96, 2015, pp. 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.178.
11.
WangJ.XiaoJ.ZhangZ.HanK.HuX.JiangF.Action Mechanism of Rice Husk Ash and the Effect on Main Performances of Cement-Based Materials: A Review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 288, 2021, p. 123068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123068.
12.
De SilvaG. H. M. J. S.NaveenP.Effect of Rice Husk Ash and Coconut Coir Fiber on Cement Mortar: Enhancing Sustainability and Efficiency in Buildings. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 440, 2024, p. 137326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137326.
13.
TahamiS. A.ArabaniM.MirhosseiniA. F.Usage of Two Biomass Ashes as Filler in Hot Mix Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 170, 2018, pp. 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.102.
14.
HeL.TaoM.LiuZ.CaoZ.ZhuJ.GaoJ.den berghW. V., et al. Biomass Valorization Toward Sustainable Asphalt Pavements: Progress and Prospects. Waste Management, Vol. 165, 2023, pp. 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.035.
15.
MahtoS. K.SinhaS.Influence of Rice Husk Ash on Moisture Susceptibility of Warm Mix Asphalt Using Chemical Based Additive. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.118.
16.
Camargo-PerezR.Moreno-NavarroF.AlvarezA. E.WalubitaL. F.FuentesL.Influence of Recycled Rice Husk Ash Filler on the Mechanical Performance of Asphalt Mixtures: A Mortar Scale Analysis. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 414, 2024, p. 134832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134832.
17.
AmeliA.BabagoliR.NorouziN.JalaliF.MamaghaniF. P.Laboratory Evaluation of the Effect of Coal Waste Ash (CWA) and Rice Husk Ash (RHA) on Performance of Asphalt Mastics and Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) Mixture. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 236, 2020, p. 117557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117557.
18.
ArabaniM.TahamiS. A.Assessment of Mechanical Properties of Rice Husk Ash Modified Asphalt Mixture. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 149, 2017, pp. 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.127.
19.
HanZ.ShaA.TongZ.LiuZ.GaoJ.ZouX.YuanD.Study on the Optimum Rice Husk Ash Content Added in Asphalt Binder and Its Modification with Bio-Oil. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 147, 2017, pp. 776–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.004.
20.
FareedA.ZaidiS. B. A.AhmadN.HafeezI.AliA.AhmadM. F.Use of Agricultural Waste Ashes in Asphalt Binder and Mixture: A Sustainable Solution to Waste Management. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 259, 2020, p. 120575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120575.
21.
AbdelmagidA. A. A.QiuY.YangE.Using Agricultural Residue Sustainably: Enhancing Asphalt Properties with Rice Husk Ash and Analyzing Its Mixture Performance Using Response Surface Methodology. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 19, 2023, p. e02476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02476.
22.
ZhangY.HeM.WangL.YanJ.MaB.ZhuX.OkY. S.MechtcherineV.TsangD. C. W.Biochar as Construction Materials for Achieving Carbon Neutrality. Biochar, Vol. 4, 2022, p. 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00182-x.
23.
MillaO. V.WangH. H.HuangW. J.Feasibility Study Using Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash and Biochar from Binary Mixtures of Organic Waste as Agronomic Materials. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2013, pp. 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000186.
24.
GuptaS.KuaH. W.Factors Determining the Potential of Biocharas a Carbon Capturing and Sequestering Construction Material: Critical Review. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2017, p. 04017086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001924.
25.
ChenL.ZhouT.YangJ.QiJ.ZhangL.LiuT.DaiS., et al. A Review on the Roles of Biochar Incorporated into Cementitious Materials: Mechanisms, Application and Perspectives. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 409, 2023, p. 134204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134204.
26.
GeL.YaoY.XuL.ZhouZ.LiJ.ZhangX.LiuC.LvH.Mitigation of Asphalt Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions and Health Hazards Using a TiO2-Doped Biochar Composite: Microscopic and Physiological Insights. Environmental Technology & Innovation, Vol. 36, 2024, p. 103763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103763.
27.
GurjarS.KumarA. R.Recent Advances in Synthesis and Application of Modified Biochar for Mitigation of Heavy Metals from Soil and Water: A Critical Review. Environmental Technology Reviews, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2024, pp. 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2024.2409397.
28.
RavindiranG.RajamanickamS.JanardhanG.HayderG.AlagumalaiA.MahianO.LamS. S.SonneC.Production and Modifications of Biochar to Engineered Materials and Its Application for Environmental Sustainability: A Review. Biochar, Vol. 6, 2024, p. 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-024-00350-1.
29.
ThakurN.KaurJ.KurbahI.Aakriti. Unlocking the Potential of Biochar: A Comprehensive Review of Enhancing Vegetable Production in Challenging Soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, Vol. 47, No. 17, 2024, pp. 2897–2912. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2369080.
30.
YapharyY. L.HeM.LuG.ZouF.LiuP.TsangD. C. W.LengZ.Experiment and Multiscale Molecular Simulations on the Cu Absorption by Biochar-Modified Asphalt: An Insight into Removal Capability and Mechanism of Heavy Metals from Stormwater Runoff. Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 462, 2023, p. 142205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142205.
31.
XuL.WuK. C.DengZ. N.HuangC. M.VermaK. K.PangT.HuangH. R.Biochar and Its Impact on Soil Profile and Plant Development. Journal of Plant Interactions, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2024, p. 2401356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2024.2401356.
32.
ZhouY.ShenC.WangT.XueY.Inhibition Effect of Three Types of Biochar on Volatile Organic Compounds from Asphalt: Revealing Chemical Adsorption as the Primary Mechanism. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 411, 2024, p. 134322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134322.
33.
ZhouH.ShenY.ZhangN.LiuZ.BaoL.XiaY.Wood Fiber Biomass Pyrolysis Solution as a Potential Tool for Plant Disease Management: A Review. Heliyon, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2024, p. e25509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25509.
34.
AwogbemiO.Von KallonD. V.Application of Biochar Derived from Crops Residues for Biofuel Production. Fuel Communications, Vol. 15, 2023, p. 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2023.100088.
35.
MaljaeeH.MadadiR.PaivaH.TarelhoL.FerreiraV. M.Incorporation of Biochar in Cementitious Materials: A Roadmap of Biochar Selection. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 283, 2021, p. 122757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122757.
36.
Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Reyes-LizcanoF. A.Chaves-PabónS. B.Bastidas-MartínezJ. G.Zafra-MejíaC. A.Use of Biochar in Asphalts: Review. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2022, p. 4745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084745.
37.
ZakariaM. R.FaridM. A. A.AndouY.RamliI.HassanM. A.Production of Biochar and Activated Carbon from Oil Palm Biomass: Current Status, Prospects, and Challenges. Industrial Crops and Products, Vol. 199, 2023, p. 116767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116767.
38.
ZhuH.AnQ.NasirA. S. M.BabinA.SaucedoS. L.VallenasA.LiL.BaldwinS. A.LauA.BiX.Emerging Applications of Biochar: A Review on Techno-Environmental-Economic Aspects. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 388, 2023, p. 129745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129745.
39.
SinghalS.Biochar as a Cost-Effective and Eco-Friendly Substitute for Binder in Concrete: A Review. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2023, pp. 984–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2022.2068658.
40.
JavedM. H.SikandarM. A.AhmadW.BashirM. T.AlrowaisR.WadudM. B.Effect of Various Biochars on Physical, Mechanical, and Microstructural Characteristics of Cement Pastes and Mortars. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 57, 2022, p. 104850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104850.
41.
AhmedS.RehmanA.AmjadA.HasibM. H.HussainF.KhanA. Q.KhushnoodR. A.Development of Multifunctional Cementitious Composite Using Biochar. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 96, 2024, p. 110598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110598.
42.
ZhouJ.DongZ.YuY.SunZ.ZhouT.ChenZ.Utilization of Biochar Derived from Rice Straw in Petroleum Bitumen: Agricultural Waste Recycling and Pavement Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 490, 2025, p. 144808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144808.
43.
YiY.ChenY.ShiS.ZhaoY.WangD.LeiT.DuanP.CaoW.WangQ.LiH.Study on Properties and Micro-Mechanism of RHB-SBS Composite-Modified Asphalt. Polymers, Vol. 15, 2023, p. 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071718.
44.
INVIAS (Instituto Nacional de Vías). Especificaciones Generales de Construcción de Carreteras. INVIAS, Bogotá, Colombia, 2022.
45.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials. ASTM D5/D5M. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
46.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Ductility of Bituminous Materials. ASTM D113. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1999.
47.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring and- Ball Apparatus). ASTM D36. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006.
48.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Viscosity Determination of Asphalt Binder Using Rotational Viscometer. AASHTO T 316. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2022.
49.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester. ASTM D92. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2024.
50.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. AASHTO T 85. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1991.
51.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. AASHTO T 84. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2000.
52.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate. ASTM D5821. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.
53.
ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM D4318. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.
54.
DNER (Departamento Nacional de Estradas de Rodagem). Avaliação da Resistência Mecânica Pelo Método Dos 10% de Finos [Evaluation of Mechanical Resistance to Coarse Aggregate Using 10% Method]. DNER-ME 096. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transporte, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1998.
55.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Coarse Aggregate to Degradation by Abrasion in the Micro-Deval Apparatus. AASHTO T 327. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2005.
56.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine. AASHTO T 96. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2002.
57.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate. ASTM D4791. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
58.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt Binder (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test). AASHTO T 240. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2023.
59.
AASHTO. Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV). AASHTO R 28. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2022.
60.
Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Zafra-MejíaC. A.Urazán-BonellsC. F.Aging Resistance Evaluation of an Asphalt Mixture Modified with Zinc Oxide. Infrastructures, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2024, p. 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9050081.
61.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T 315. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2020.
62.
AASHTO. Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. AASHTO M 320. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2023.
63.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T 350. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.
64.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Estimating Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep. AASHTO TP 101. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2014.
65.
AASHTO. Standard Method of Test for Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus. AASHTO T 245. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2015.
66.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Asphalt Mixtures. ASTM D6931. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
67.
CoxB. C.SmithB. T.HowardI. L.JamesR. S.State of Knowledge for Cantabro Testing of Dense Graded Asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 10, 2017, p. 04017174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002020.
68.
KaratiS.RoyT. K.Assessment of Temperature Impact on SDA Modified Bituminous Concrete by Non-Destructive Test. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 65, Part 8, 2022, pp. 3417–3423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.551.
69.
LiaoG.FangX.WangH.TangJ.SzaryP.ChenJ.Durability Improvement of Poroelastic Road Surface with Treated Rubber: Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Experimental Observations. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 369, 2022, p. 133334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133334.
70.
TxDOT. Test Procedure for Cantabro Loss. Tex-245-F. Austin Texas, Department of Transportation, 2021.
71.
ASTM. Standard Test Method for Indirect Tension Test for Resilient Modulus of Bituminous Mixtures. ASTM D4123. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1995.
72.
UNE-EN (Una Norma Española-Norma Europea). Mezclas Bituminosas. Métodos de Ensayo. Parte 25: Ensayo de Compresión Cíclico. UNE-EN 12697-25:2019. 1NLT, Madrid, Spain, 2019.
73.
UNE-EN (Una Norma Española-Norma Europea). Mezclas Bituminosas. Métodos de Ensayo. Parte 24: Resistencia a La Fatiga. UNE-EN 12697-24:2019. 1NLT, Madrid, Spain, 2019.
74.
ZhaoS.HuangB.YeX. P.ShuX.JiaX.Utilizing Bio-Char as a Bio-Modifier for Asphalt Cement: A Sustainable Application of Bio-Fuel by-Product. Fuel, Vol. 133, 2014, pp. 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.002.
75.
KumarA.ChoudharyR.NarzariR.KatakiR.ShuklaS. K.Evaluation of Bio-Asphalt Binders Modified with Biochar: A Pyrolysis By-Product of Mesua Ferrea Seed Cover Waste. Cogent Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018, p. 1548534. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1548534.
ZhouX.MoghaddamT. B.ChenM.WuM. S.ZhangY.ZhangX.AdhikariS.ZhangX.Effects of Pyrolysis Parameters on Physicochemical Properties of Biochar and Bio-Oil and Application in Asphalt. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 780, 2021, p. 146448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146448.
78.
MaF.DaiJ.FuZ.LiC.WenY.JiaM.WangY.ShiK.Biochar for Asphalt Modification: A Case of High-Temperature Properties Improvement. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 804, 2022, p. 150194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150194.
79.
ZhangR.WangH.JiJ.WangH.Viscoelastic Properties, Rutting Resistance, and Fatigue Resistance of Waste Wood-Based Biochar-Modified Asphalt. Coatings, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2022, p. 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12010089.
80.
YaroN. S. A.SutantoM. H.HabibN. Z.UsmanA.TanjungL. E.AliyuI.JagabaA. H.Optimizing Biochar-Based Geopolymer Composites for Enhanced Water Resistance in Asphalt Mixes: An Experimental, Microstructural, and Multi-Objective Analysis. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, Vol. 70, 2023, p. 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00323-4.
81.
SmithB. T.HowardI. L.Comparing Laboratory Conditioning Protocols to Long-Term Aging of Asphalt Mixtures in the Southeast United States. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002556.
82.
ZadshirM.HosseinnezhadS.FiniE. H.Deagglomeration of Oxidized Asphaltenes as a Measure of True Rejuvenation for Severely Aged Asphalt Binder. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 209, 2019, pp. 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.090.
83.
ShiauJ. M.TiaM.RuthB. E.PageG. C.Characterization of Age-Hardening Potential of Asphalt by Using Corbett-Swarbrick Asphalt Fractionation Test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1991. 1323: 53–60.
HouX.XiaoF.WangJ.AmirkhanianS.Identification of Asphalt Aging Characterization by Spectrophotometry Technique. Fuel, Vol. 226, 2018, pp. 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.030.
86.
TausteR.Moreno-NavarroF.Sol-SánchezM.Rubio-GámezM. C.Understanding the Bitumen Ageing Phenomenon: A Review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 192, 2018, pp. 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.169.
87.
ZhangR.DaiQ.YouZ.WangH.PengC.Rheological Performance of Bio-Char Modified Asphalt with Different Particle Sizes. Applied Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2018, p. 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091665.
88.
ZhouX.AdhikariS.Flow-Induced Crystallization of Biochar in Bio-Asphalt Under Various Aging Conditions. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 695, 2019, p. 133943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133943.
89.
DongW.MaF.LiC.FuZ.HuangY.LiuJ.Evaluation of Anti-Aging Performance of Biochar Modified Asphalt Binder. Coatings, Vol. 10, No. 11, 2020, p. 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111037.
90.
SaadehS.Al-ZubiY.ZaatarahB.Performance Testing of Hot Mix Asphalt Containing Biochar. Final Report 20–28. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA, 2020.
91.
RajibA.SaadehS.KatawalP.MobasherB.FiniE. H.Enhancing Biomass Value Chain by Utilizing Biochar as a Free Radical Scavenger to Delay Ultraviolet Aging of Bituminous Composites Used in Outdoor Construction. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Vol. 168, 2021, p. 105302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105302.
92.
ZhouX.ZhaoG.WuS.TigheS.PickelD.ChenM.AdhikariS.GaoY.Effects of Biochar on the Chemical Changes and Phase Separation of Bio-Asphalt Under Different Aging Conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 263, 2020, p. 121532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121532.
93.
Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Ruge-CárdenasJ. C.Reyes-LizcanoF. A.Bastidas-MartínezJ. G.Zafra-MejíaC. A.Mechanical Resistance of Hot-Mix Asphalt Using Phosphorite as Filler. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2023, p. 04023274. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15720.
94.
Chaves-PabónS. B.Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Bastidas-MartínezJ. G.Mechanical Performance Assessment of a Hot-Mix Asphalt Modified with Biochar Obtained from Pinewood Shavings. Coatings, Vol. 14, No. 9, 2024, p. 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14091212.
95.
Chaves-PabónS. B.Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Bastidas-MartínezJ. G.Mechanical Performance of a Hot Mix Asphalt Modified with Biochar Obtained from Oil Palm Mesocarp Fiber. Infrastructures, Vol. 9, No. 9, 2024, p. 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9090156.
96.
Rondón-QuintanaH. A.RomeroN. E.Bastidas-MartínezJ. G.Performance Properties of a Hot-Mix Asphalt Modified with Oil Palm Kernel Shell–Based Biochar for Road Pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, Vol. 151, No. 1, 2025, p. 05024003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1619.
97.
ZhaoS.HuangB.ShuX.YeP.Laboratory Investigation of Biochar-Modified Asphalt Mixture. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2445: 56–63.
98.
LiQ.XuL.ChenX.LiW.LiY.WangH.LiuK.Study on the Adhesion Performance of Biochar-Modified Asphalt Based on Surface Free Energy and Atomic Force Microscopy. Coatings, Vol. 14, No. 11, 2024, p. 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ coatings14111390.
99.
Chaves-PabónS. B.Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Zafra-MejíaC. A.Influence of Gradation on the Mechanical Properties of Aged Hot-Mix Asphalts. Buildings, Vol. 11, No. 12, 2021, p. 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120632.
100.
ElmagarheA.LuQ.AlamriM.AlharthaiM.ElnihumA.Laboratory Performance Evaluation of Porous Asphalt Mixture Containing Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Fly Ash. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 20, 2024, p. e02849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02849.
101.
LimS. M.HeM.HaoG.NgT. C. A.OngG. P.Recyclability Potential of Waste Plastic-Modified Asphalt Concrete with Consideration to Its Environmental Impact. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 439, 2024, p. 137299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137299.
102.
Bastidas-MartínezJ. G.Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Assessment of Asphalt Binder Content, Temperature and Loading Rate in Indirect Tensile Strength and Resilient Modulus Tests of a Hot-Mix Asphalt—Comparison with Marshall Design Method. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 426, 2024, p. 136158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136158.
103.
SaadehS.Al-ZubiY.KatawalP.ZaatarahB.FiniE.Biochar Effects on the Performance of Conventional and Rubberized HMA. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2023, pp. 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2021.2012238.
104.
BiY.JakarniF.Evaluating Properties of Wood Ash Modified Asphalt Mixtures. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 512, 2019, p. 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/512/1/012004.
105.
WuY.CaoP.ShiF.LiuK.WangX.LengZ.TanZ.ZhouC.Modeling of the Complex Modulus of Asphalt Mastic with Biochar Filler Based on the Homogenization and Random Aggregate Distribution Methods. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2020, 2020, p. 2317420. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2317420.
106.
ElseifiM. A.FlintschG. W.Al-QadiI. L.Quantitative Effect of Elastomeric Modification on Binder Performance at Intermediate and High Temperatures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2003, pp. 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(32).
107.
Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Zafra-MejíaC. A.Reyes-LizcanoF. A.Fatigue in Asphalt Mixtures - A Summary to Understand the Complexity of Its Mathematical Modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 2118, 2021, p. 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2118/1/012009.
108.
AlaeM.ZhaoY.ZareiS.FuG.CaoD.Effects of Layer Interface Conditions on Top-Down Fatigue Cracking of Asphalt Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2018, pp. 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1461870.
109.
BarmanM.GhabchiR.SinghD.ZamanM.CommuriS.An Alternative Analysis of Indirect Tensile Test Results for Evaluating Fatigue Characteristics of Asphalt Mixes. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 166, 2018, pp. 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.049.
110.
Bastidas-MartinezJ. G.Camapum de CarvalhoJ.CristhianeL. L.Muniz de FariasM.Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Effects of Iron Ore Tailing on Performance of Hot-Mix Asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2022, p. 04021405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004034.
111.
BharathG.ReddyK. S.TandonV.ReddyM. A.Aggregate Gradation Effect on the Fatigue Performance of Recycled Asphalt Mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 22, 2021, pp. 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1620116.
112.
Muniz de FariasM.QuiñonezF.Rondón-QuintanaH. A.Behavior of a Hot-Mix Asphalt Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Crumb Rubber. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 46, 2019, pp. 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0443.
113.
Gómez-MeijideB.AjamH.Lastra-GonzálezP.GarciaA.Effect of Ageing and RAP Content on the Induction Healing Properties of Asphalt Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 179, 2018, pp. 468–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.121.
114.
JiangH.ZhangJ.SunC.LiuS.LiangM.YaoZ.Experimental Assessment on Engineering Properties of Aged Bitumen Incorporating a Developed Rejuvenator. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 179, 2018, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.211.
115.
QuX.LiuQ.GuoM.WangD.OeserM.Study on the Effect of Aging on Physical Properties of Asphalt Binder from a Microscale Perspective. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 187, 2018, pp. 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.188.
