With the rapid expansion of global trade, port operations’ environmental impact becomes more evident, making it crucial to evaluate the coastal port carbon emission efficiency (PCEE). This study explores the spatiotemporal characteristics of PCEE and its development trends from multiple perspectives. The results reveal that China lacks active ports that possess high carbon emission efficiency and high growth potential. The average contribution rate of the inter-group difference amounts to 60.90%. The center of gravity of PCEE shifts northward slightly, staying within the southern zone. The core factors governing the spatiotemporal differentiation of PCEE encompass technology inputs, educational inputs, openness to the outside world, and government support. Forecasting results indicate that PCEE is ascending year by year, but the growth is sluggish, with an average growth rate of merely 1.490%. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the low-carbon transformation of China’s coastal ports.
ChenK.GuoJ.XinX.ZhangT.ZhangW.Port Sustainability Through Integration: A Port Capacity and Profit-Sharing Joint Optimization Approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 245, 2023, p. 106867.
2.
CastellanoR.FerrettiM.MusellaG.RisitanoM.Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Efficiencyof Ports: Evidence From Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 271, 2020, p. 122560.
3.
WangL.ZhouZ.YangY.WuJ.Green Efficiency Evaluation and Improvement of Chinese Ports: A Cross-Efficiency Model. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 88, 2020, p. 102590.
4.
WangZ.WuX.GuoJ.WeiG.DoolingT. A.Efficiency evaluation and PM emission reallocation of China ports based on improved DEA models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102317.
5.
LinX.JingX.ChengF.WangM.Exploration of Port Environmental Efficiency Measurement and Influential Factors in the Yangtze River Delta Pilot Free Trade Zone. Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 206, 2024, p. 116766.
6.
CullinaneK.SongD.-W.Estimating the Relative Efficiency of European Container Ports: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 16, 2006, pp. 85–115.
7.
CullinaneK.WangT.-F.SongD.-W.JiP.The Technical Efficiency of Container Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 354–374.
8.
RollY.HayuthY.Port Performance Comparison Applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 20, 1993, pp. 153–161.
9.
YuenA.C.-l.ZhangA.CheungW.Foreign Participation and Competition: A Way to Improve the Container Port Efficiency in China?Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 220–231.
10.
CheonS.Productive Efficiency of World Container Ports: A Global Perspective. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2062: 10–18.
11.
YenB.T.H.HuangM.-J.LaiH.-J.ChoH.-H.HuangY.-L.How Smart Port Design Influences Port Efficiency – A DEA-Tobit Approach. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 46, 2023, p. 100862.
12.
ToneK.Dealing with Undesirable Putputs in DEA: A Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) Approach. Nippon Opereshonzu, Risachi Gakkai Shunki Kenkyu Happyokai Abusutorakutoshu, Vol. 2004, 2004, pp. 44–45.
13.
ToneK.A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, 2001, pp. 498–509.
14.
ChangY.-T.ParkH.LeeS.KimE.Have Emission Control Areas (ECAs) Harmed Port Efficiency in Europe?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 58, 2018, pp. 39–53.
15.
NaJ.-H.ChoiA.Y.JiJ.ZhangD.Environmental Efficiency Analysis of Chinese Container Ports with CO2 Emissions: An Inseparable Input-Output SBM model. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 65, 2017, pp. 13–24.
16.
LiuJ.WangX.GuoJ.Port Efficiency and its Influencing Factors in the context of Pilot Free Trade Zones. Transport Policy, Vol. 105, 2021, pp. 67–79.
17.
FriedH. O.LovellC. A. K.SchmidtS. S.YaisawarngS.Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 17, 2002, pp. 157–174.
18.
HuangX.WangY.DaiX.LuoJ. X.ChenJ.Evaluation of Port Efficiency in Shanghai Port and Busan Port based on Three-Stage DEA model with environmental concerns. Transport, Vol. 35, 2020, pp. 454–461.
19.
ZhangJ.YangD.LuoM.Port Efficiency Types and Perspectives: A Literature Review. Transport Policy, Vol. 156, 2024, pp. 13–24.
20.
ZhengS.YinC.Technical, Allocative and Cost Efficiencies of Chinese ports. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 42, 2015, pp. 746–758.
21.
TovarB.WallA.Dynamic Cost Efficiency in Port Infrastructure Using a Directional Distance Function: Accounting for the Adjustment of Quasi-Fixed Inputs Over Time. Transportation Science, Vol. 51, 2017, pp. 296–304.
22.
QuintanoC.MazzocchiP.RoccaA.Examining Eco-Efficiency in the Port Sector via Non-Radial Data Envelopment Analysis and the Response Based Procedure for Detecting Unit Segments. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 259, 2020, p. 120979.
23.
FengM.ShawS.-L.PengG.FangZ.Time Efficiency Assessment of Ship Movements in Maritime Ports: A Case Study of Two Ports Based on AIS data. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 86, 2020, p. 102741.
24.
Martínez-MoyaJ.Mestre-AlcoverA.Sala-GarridoR.Furió-PruñonosaS.Are Transhipment Ports More Efficient in the Mediterranean Sea? Analysing the Role of Time at Ports Using DEA Metafrontier Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 116, 2024, p. 103866.
25.
TongzonJ. L.Determinants of Port Performance and Efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 29, 1995, pp. 245–252.
26.
JuS.-M.LiuN.Efficiency and its Influencing Factors in Port Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Port-Listed Companies. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 42, 2015, pp. 571–590.
27.
CheonS.DowallD. E.SongD.- W.Evaluating Impacts of Institutional Reforms on Port Efficiency Changes: Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Total Factor Productivity Changes of World Container Ports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46, 2010, pp. 546–561.
28.
OhD.-h.A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 34, 2010, pp. 183–197.
29.
DagumC.A New Approach to the Decomposition of the Gini Income Inequality Ratio. Empirical Economics, Vol. 22, 1997, pp. 515–531.
30.
SongY.WangJ.GeY.XuC.An Optimal Parameters-Based Geographical Detector Model Enhances Geographic Characteristics of Explanatory Variables for Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis: Cases with Different Types of Spatial Data. GIScience & Remote Sensing, Vol. 57, 2020, pp. 593–610.
GeY.WangS.Total Factor Productivity and Influencing Factors Analysis for Ports Considering Carbon Emissions. Journal of Transporation Systems Engineering & Information Technology, Vol. 21, 2021, pp. 22–29.
