Evaluating the Impacts of Workmanship and Chemical Composition on Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Degradation

Abstract

Pavement markings must exhibit adequate retroreflectivity and durability to ensure they enhance traffic safety. Several previous studies investigated factors that influenced marking retroreflectivity and durability. Yet, a significant knowledge gap exists in the literature with respect to the effects of workmanship and chemical composition on pavement marking performance. This is because controls were implemented in previous studies to ensure that markings were applied correctly, which represented ideal conditions that are not present in real-world scenarios. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to quantify the impacts of workmanship and marking chemical composition on the retroreflectivity and durability of water-borne paints and thermoplastic pavement markings. To achieve this objective, six field experiments were conducted in Pennsylvania to understand how the performance of pavement markings was affected by the marking film thickness, glass bead drop rate, glass bead application method, pigment volume concentration (PVC) of paints, and paint binder type. In the field experiments, the durability, edge retroreflectivity, and wheel-track retroreflectivity (R_W) were monitored at four different intervals. Key results indicated that the R_W of water-borne paints can significantly change, by up to 100%, because of variations in binder type, film thickness, PVC, and/or bead application method. These findings highlight the importance for state departments of transportation to include specifications for key factors such as paint binder type, paint PVC, film thickness, and bead application methods in their standards. The findings also emphasize the necessity of implementing data-logging practices to help road authorities verify that contractors apply pavement markings while ensuring adherence to specified standards.

Keywords

pavement markings water-borne paint thermoplastic markings workmanship chemical formulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Migletz

Graham

Long-Term Pavement Marking Practices: A Synthesis of Highway Practice. NCHRP Synthesis 306, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2002, p. 162

Mousa

M. R.

Mousa

S. R.

Hassan

Carlson

Elnaml

I. A.

Predicting the Retroreflectivity Degradation of Waterborne Paint Pavement Markings using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 483–494.

Abboud

Bowman

B. L.

Cost- and Longevity-Based Scheduling of Paint and Thermoplastic Striping. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1794: 55–62.

Thamizharasan

Sarasua

W. A.

Clarke

D. B.

Davis

W. J.

A Methodology for Estimating the Lifecycle of Interstate Highway Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity. The Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC, 2003.

Kopf

Reflectivity of Pavement Markings: Analysis of Retroreflectivity Degradation Curves. No. WA-RD 592.1, Olympia: Washington State Department of Transportation, 2004.

Sitzabee

W. E.

Hummer

J.E.

Rasdorf

Pavement Marking Degradation Modeling and Analysis. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, pp. 190–199.

Hummer

J. E.

Rasdorf

Zhang

G. H.

Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Paint Pavement-Marking Retroreflectivity Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 10, 2011, pp. 705–716.

Mull

D. M.

Sitzabee

W. E.

Paint Pavement Marking Performance Prediction Model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 5, 2012, pp. 618–624.

Robertson

Sarasua

Johnson

Davis

A Methodology for Estimating and Comparing the Lifecycles of High-Build and Conventional Waterborne Pavement Markings on Primary and Secondary Roads in South Carolina. Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2012, pp. 360–378.

10.

Ozelim

Turochy

R. E.

Modeling Retroreflectivity Performance of Thermoplastic Pavement Markings in Alabama. Journal of Transportation Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 140(6).

11.

Idris

I. I.

Mousa

Hassan

Carlson

Greyson

Development of a Machine Learning-Based Tool to Predict Retroreflectivity of Pavement Markings Across the U.S. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024, in press.

12.

Transportation Research Board. Machine Learning-Based Tool to Predict the Retroreflectivity of Pavement Markings in the U.S. https://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=5239. Accessed July, 2024.

13.

FHWA. National Standards for Traffic Control Devices; the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways; Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity. Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 150, 2022, pp. 47921–47931.