This study employed the empirical Bayes before-and-after crash analysis for the safety assessment of the continuous wide area (CWA) sensor-based dilemma zone protection (DZP) system deployed at multiple rural, high-speed signalized intersections in Alabama. Six intersections treated with the DZP system were selected as the treatment group, while thirty-three untreated intersections with similar characteristics with regard to traffic, geometry, and speed limit were selected as the reference group. Safety performance functions and crash modification factors (CMFs) were developed using police-reported crash data. Red-light running (RLR) crashes were identified from the crash database by categorizing crashes into two groups (strict definition [SD-RLR] and extended definition [ED-RLR] crashes) for a comprehensive safety analysis. The analysis results showed that SD-RLR and ED-RLR crashes would decrease by 35% (CMF = 0.65, SE = 0.06) and 24% (CMF = 0.76, SE = 0.05), respectively, if a rural high-speed intersection is treated with the CWA sensor-based DZP system.
JantosutP.SatiennamW.SatiennamT.JaensirisakS.Factors Associated with the Red-Light Running Behavior Characteristics of Motorcyclists. IATSS Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2021, pp. 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.10.003.
3.
RettingR. A.UlmerR. G.WilliamsA. F.Prevalence and Characteristics of Red Light Running Crashes in the United States. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 31, No. 6, 1999, pp. 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00029-9.
4.
BonnesonJ. A.BrewerM.ZimmermanK.Review and Evaluation of Factors That Affect the Frequency of Red-Light-Running. Report No. 4027-1. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2001.
5.
QuirogaC.KrausE.van SchalkwykI.BonnesonJ.Red Light Running: A Policy Review. Project No. 150206. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2003.
6.
AbbasM. M.WangQ.HiggsB. J.SarabiD. Z.MachianiS. G.MladenovicM. N.FulariS.Addressing Dilemma Zone Issues with Control Solutions. Report No. FHWA/VTRC 17-R14. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), United States Federal Highway Administration, 2017, pp. 1–20. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32156.
7.
KangM.-W.RahmanM.LeeJ.Determination and Utilization of Dilemma Zone Length and Location for Safety Assessment of Rural High-Speed Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 272–280.
8.
ChauhanR.DhamaniyaA.ArkatkarS.Analysing Driver’s Decision in Dilemma Zone at Signalized Intersections under Disordered Traffic Conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 89, 2022, pp. 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.016.
9.
GatesT. J.NoyceD. A.LaracuenteL.NordheimE. V.Analysis of Dilemma Zone Driver Behavior at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2030: 29–39.
10.
ChangG.-L.FranzM. L.LiuY.LuY.TaoR.Design and Evaluation of an Intelligent Dilemma-Zone Protection System for a High-Speed Rural Intersection. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2356: 1–8.
11.
RahmanM.KangM.-W.BiswasP. Predicting Time-Varying, Speed-Varying Dilemma Zones Using Machine Learning and Continuous Vehicle Tracking. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 130, 2021, p. 103310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103310.
12.
TarkoA.LiW.LaracuenteL.Probabilistic Approach to Controlling Dilemma Occurrence at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1973: 55–63.
13.
MorelandM.LeuerD.DeVoeE.MwangiR.Traffic Safety Evaluation of Signalized Intersections with Retroreflective Backplates in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN, 2024.
14.
PantP. D.XieY.Comparative Study of Advance Warning Signs at High-Speed Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1995. 1495: 28–35.
15.
SayedT.VahidiH.RodriguezF.Advance Warning Flashers: Do They Improve Safety?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1692: 30–38.
16.
BurnettN. P.SharmaA.Role of Information on Probability of Traffic Conflict on the Onset of Yellow. Advances in Transportation Studies, Special Issue, 2011, pp. 29–40.
17.
FactorR.PrashkerJ. N.MahalelD.The Flashing Green Light Paradox. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2012, pp. 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.01.003.
18.
BonnesonJ. A.ZimmermanK.Identifying Intersections with Potential for Red Light–Related Safety Improvement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1953: 128–136.
19.
RettingR. A.FergusonS. A.FarmerC. M.Reducing Red Light Running Through Longer Yellow Signal Timing and Red Light Camera Enforcement: Results of a Field Investigation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.011.
20.
RettingR. A.GreeneM. A.Influence of Traffic Signal Timing on Red-Light Running and Potential Vehicle Conflicts at Urban Intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1997. 1595: 1–7.
21.
BonnesonJ.MiddletonD.ZimmermanK.ChararaH.AbbasM.Intelligent Detection-Control System for Rural Signalized Intersections. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2002.
AgentK. R.PigmanJ. G.Evaluation of Change Interval Treatments for Traffic Signals at High-Speed Intersections. Kentucky Transportation Center, Lexington, 1994.
25.
PetersonA.BerghT.SteenK.LHOVRA—A New Traffic Signal Control Strategy for Isolated Junctions. Traffic Engineering & Control, Vol. 27, No. 7–8, 1986, pp. 388–389.
26.
VincentR. A.PeirceJ. R.MOVA: Traffic Responsive, Self-Optimising Signal Control for Isolated Intersections. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, 1988. https://trid.trb.org/View/295257
27.
KronborgP.DavidssonF.EdholmJ.SOS–Self Optimising Signal Control: Development and Field Trials of the SOS Algorithm for Self-Optimizing Signal Control at Isolated Intersections. TFK (Transport Research Institute) Report 1997: 2E, Stockholm, Sweden. 1997.
28.
ZimmermanK. H.BonnesonJ. A.In-Service Evaluation of a Detection-Control System for High-Speed Signalized Intersections. No. FHWA/TX-05/5-4022-01-1, College Station, TX, 2005.
29.
RahmanM.KangM.-W.BiswasP.Dynamic Dilemma Zone Protection System for High-Speed Signalized Intersections: A Comprehensive Safety-Operational Assessment. Transportation Engineering, Vol. 12, 2023, p. 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2023.100174.
SharmaA.BullockD. M.VelipasalarS.CasaresM.SchmitzJ.BurnettN.Improving Safety and Mobility at High-Speed Intersections with Innovations in Sensor Technology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2259: 253–263.
32.
ChenY.-H.ChangG.-L.ParkS. Y.KimM.An Integrated Intelligent Intersection Control System for Preventing Rear-End and Angled Crashes: System Design and Deployment Results. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 191, 2023, p. 107219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107219.
33.
WangJ.-H.Abdel-AtyM.WangL.Examination of the Reliability of the Crash Modification Factors Using Empirical Bayes Method with Resampling Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 104, 2017, pp. 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.022.
34.
LimI.-K.KweonY.-J.Identifying High-Crash-Risk Intersections: Comparison of Traditional Methods with the Empirical Bayes–Safety Performance Function Method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2364: 44–50.
KangM.-W.MomtazS. U.BarnettT. E.Crash Analysis and Public Survey for Drowsy-Driving Advisory Systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 141, No. 9, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000777.
37.
RahmanM.KangM.-W.Safety Evaluation of Drowsy Driving Advisory System: Alabama Case Study. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 74, 2020, pp. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.04.005.
38.
GrossF.PersaudB. N.LyonC.A Guide to Developing Quality Crash Modification Factors. Report No. FHWA-SA-10-032. United States Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/41025.
39.
HauerE.Observational Before/After Studies in Road Safety. Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Elsevier Science Incorporated, Tarrytown, NY, 1997.
40.
El-BasyounyK.SayedT.Safety Performance Functions Using Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2013, pp. 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015.
41.
GoudaM.El-BasyounyK.Before-and-After Empirical Bayes Evaluation of Achieving Bare Pavement Using Anti-Icing on Urban Roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 92–101.
42.
HauerE.HarwoodD. W.CouncilF. M.GriffithM. S.Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1784: 126–131.
43.
AsaduzzamanM.ThapaR.CodjoeJ. A.Safety and Operational Effectiveness of Protected Only Versus Protected/Permitted Left-Turn Signal Phase. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 347–356.
44.
ThompsonW. J.Poisson Distributions. Computing in Science & Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2001, pp. 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/5992.919271.
45.
LyonC.PersaudB. N.GrossF. B.The Calibrator—An SPF Calibration and Assessment Tool User Guide. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, Washington, D.C., 2016.
46.
HauerE.BamfoJ.Two Tools for Finding What Function Links the Dependent Variable to the Explanatory Variables. Proceedings of the ICTCT Conference, Vol. 18, 1997, pp. 1–19.
AhmedM. M.Abdel-AtyM.ParkJ.Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of the Conversion of Two-Lane Roadways to Four-Lane Divided Roadways: Bayesian Versus Empirical Bayes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2515: 41–49.
49.
BiswasP.KangM.-W.RahmanM.Safety Evaluation of the Combined Effect of Offset Left-Turn Lanes and Flashing-Yellow-Arrow Signals at Signalized Intersections on Multilane Divided Highways in Alabama Using the Empirical Bayes Method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2678: 31–45.
50.
PersaudB. N.RettingR. A.GarderP. E.LordD.Safety Effect of Roundabout Conversions in the United States: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-After Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 1751: 1–8.
