Chip seal construction has received increased attention recently because of rising construction costs and reduced funding for new asphalt pavement projects. The cost and carbon footprint of chip seal applications can be reduced using reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). In this paper, the suitability of RAP material for chip seal applications was evaluated through laboratory experiments. Aggregate retention performance and bleeding susceptibility of chip seal samples were investigated using two different aggregate sources and emulsion types. The gradation of the collected aggregates was matched with RAP aggregates using sieving and batching. Modified sweep, Vialit, and pull-off tests were conducted to determine the aggregate retention performance of RAP-modified chip seal samples. To evaluate the effect of RAP on bleeding susceptibility, a Hamburg wheel tracker (HWT) device with a rubber wheel was used. Macrotexture values were measured at specific HWT passes using a laser texture scanner, and the number of passes until chip seal failure was iterated. According to the results, the aggregate retention performance of RAP was found to be comparable with that of natural aggregates when a binder with an appropriate charge was used. RAP material showed higher aggregate retention with the cationic binder compared to the anionic binder. The bleeding test results indicated that RAP is more susceptible to bleeding. Overall, laboratory test results showed that RAP can be a good alternative to virgin aggregate and may reduce the need for virgin binders used in chip seal construction.
GransbergD.JamesD. M. B.Chip Seal Best Practices. NCHRP Synthesis 342. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2.
CoplantzJ.2022 Pavement Condition Report. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2023.
3.
BussA.GuriguisM.ClaypoolB.GransbergD.WilliamsR. C.SPR 777 Chip Seal Design and Specifications. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2016.
4.
ColeriE.GibsonS.BaranS.SukhijaM.The Impact of Declining Roadway Conditions on Road User Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2025.
5.
WeaverJ.ChitnisV.ColeriE.Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Determining Optimum Design and Evaluating Performance of Center Line Rumble Strips (CLRS). International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2024, pp. 1402–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-023-00308-9.
6.
PierceL. M.KebedeN.Chip Seal Performance Measures—Best Practices. Report No. WA-RD 841.1. The State of Washington Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA, 2015.
7.
Transit New Zealand (TNZ). Chipsealing in New Zealand. Transit New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 2005.
8.
GheniA. A.LusherS. M.ElGawadyM. A.Retention Behavior of Crumb Rubber as an Aggregate in Innovative Chip Seal Surfacing. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 197, 2018, pp. 1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.188.
9.
GuirguisM.BussA.Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Chip Seal Evaluation and Field Correlation Using Sweep Test. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2019, pp. 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0030-3.
10.
ZhaoG.LiS.JiangY.LeeJ.Quality Assurance Procedures for Chip Seal Operations Using Macrotexture Metrics. Joint Transportation Research Program Publication No. FHWA/IN/JTRP2018/12. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2018.
11.
LeeJ. S.KimY. R.Understanding the Effects of Aggregate and Emulsion Application Rates on Performance of Asphalt Surface Treatments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2044: 71–78.
12.
BussA.GuirguiM.GransbergD.Chip Seal Aggregate Evaluation and Successful Roads Preservation. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 180, 2018, pp. 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.255.
13.
JohnsonA. M.Best Practices Handbook on Asphalt Pavement Maintenance. Minnesota Technology Transfer Center LTAP Program Center for Transportation Studies, Minneapolis, 2000.
14.
LewisS.ColeriE.SukhijaM.SreedharS.Blending of Virgin and RAP Binder for Asphalt Mixes with High RAP Contents: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 17, 2024, pp. 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-023-00405-9.
15.
SreedharS.ColeriE.Effects of Binder Content, Density, Gradation, and Polymer Modification on Cracking and Rutting Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures Used in Oregon. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 11, 2018, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002506.
16.
AlbayatiA.Al-MosaweH.SukhijaM.Appraising the Synergistic Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Recycled Concrete Aggregate for the Production of Sustainable Asphalt Concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 19, 2023, p. e02237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02237.
17.
DuncanG.SibajaL.SeedsS.DavidP.Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Pavement-Preservation Treatments. Publication No. FHWA-HRT-21-007. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2020.
18.
RobbinsM.GreenR.BussA.DurraniA.PintoI.MadsonK.Design of Microsurfacing and Chip Seal Mixes with RAP for Local Roadway Application. FHWA/OH-2021/26. Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment, 2021.
19.
GarfaA.DonyA.CarterA.Performance Evaluation and Behavior of Microsurfacing with Recycled Materials. Proc., 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2016.
20.
WangA.ShenS.LiX.SongB.Micro-Surfacing Mixtures with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement: Mix Design and Performance Evaluation. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 201, 2019, pp. 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.164.
21.
SaghafiM.TabatabaeeN.NazarianS.Performance Evaluation of Slurry Seals Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 358–368.
22.
UpdykeB. E.RuhD.Abundance of RAP Spurs New Uses in Preservation Treatments. Pavement Preservation Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2016, pp. 25–27.
23.
JahangirnejadS.DennisM.FanninN.Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) as Coarse Aggregate in Bituminous Seal Coat. Presented at 2019 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2019.
24.
TarefderR. A.AhmadM.Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chip Seal With and Without Millings. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 10, 2018, pp. 893–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1219599.
25.
AhmadM.TarefderR. A.Mechanistic Performance Evaluation of Chip Seal. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2020, pp. 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-020-1102-0.
26.
KarasahinM.AktasB.GungorA. G.OrhanF.GurerC.Laboratory and In Situ Investigation of Chip Seal Surface Condition Improvement. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000470.
27.
ASTM D7000. Standard Test Method for Sweep Test of Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatment Samples. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
28.
BS EN 12272-3. Surface Dressing-Test Method Part 3: Determination of Binder Aggregate Adhesivity by the Vialit Plate Shock Test Method. British Standards Institution, 2003.
29.
ShulerS.When to Broom or Remove Traffic Control Safely on Fresh Emulsified Asphalt Chip Seals. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2235: 82–87.
30.
BaranS.SukhijaM.ColeriE.Development of Procedures and Technologies for Chip Seal Construction Quality Control in Oregon. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2025.
31.
ColeriE.SreedharS.ObaidI. A.Development of a Balanced Mix. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2020.
32.
KumbargeriY. S.BozI.KutayM. E.Performance Based Design Procedure for Chip Seal Projects. In Advances in Materials and Pavement Performance Prediction (E.MasadBhasinA.ScarpasT.MenapaceI.KumarA., eds.), CRC Press, London, 2018, pp. 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429457791-139.
33.
KimY. R.AdamsJ.CastorenaC.IliasM.ImJ. H.BahiaH.ChaturabongP.HanzA.JohannesP. T.Performance-Related Specifications for Emulsified Asphaltic Binders Used in Preservation Surface Treatments. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2017.
34.
ASTM C778. Standard Specification for Standard Sand. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
35.
JacksonD. C.JacksonN. C.MahoneyJ. P.Washington State Chip Seal Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1990. 1259: 1–10.
36.
PlatiC.PomoniM.StergiouT.Development of a Mean Profile Depth to Mean Texture Depth Shift Factor for Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2641: 156–163.
37.
BozI.KumbargeriY.KutayM. E.HaiderS. W.Establishing Percent Embedment Limits to Improve Chip Seal Performance. Report No. SPR-1679. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, 2018.
38.
AdamsJ.CastorenaC.KimY. R.Construction Quality Acceptance Performance-Related Specifications for Chip Seals. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 6, No. 4, 2019, pp. 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.05.003.
39.
KutayM. E.OzdemirU.HibnerD.KumbargeriY.LanotteM.Development of an Acceptance Test for Chip Seal Projects. Report No. SPR-1649. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, 2016.
40.
ASTM E1845. Standard Practice for Calculating Pavement Macrotexture Mean Profile Depth. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
41.
BozI.KumbargeriY. S.KutayM. E.Performance-Based Percent Embedment Limits for Chip Seals. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 182–192.
42.
KimY.TienP.MinhT.ParkD.Case Studies in Construction Materials Evaluation of Chip Seal Mixture Design Methods Using Modified Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test and Sweep Test. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 18, 2023, p. e02108.
43.
ImJ. H.Richard KimY.Performance Evaluation of Chip Seals for Higher Volume Roads Using Polymer-Modified Emulsions: Laboratory and Field Study in North Carolina. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2016, pp. 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140544.
44.
LeeJ.KimR. Y.Evaluation of Polymer-Modified Chip Seals at Low Temperatures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2014, pp. 228–237.
45.
IgnataviciusS.KavanaghA.BrennanM. J.ColleranD.SheahanJ.NewellS.Experimental Investigation of Optimum Adhesion Properties for Anionic Emulsions in Road Maintenance Applications. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 304, 2021, p. 124678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124678.
46.
MertensE. W.WrightJ. R.Cationic Asphalt Emulsions: How They Differ from Conventional Emulsions in Theory and Practice. Highway Research Board, Vol. 38, 1959, pp. 386–397.
47.
LeeJ.KimY. R.Optimizing Rolling Patterns for Chip Seals Using Laboratory Aggregate Loss Performance Tests on Field Fabricated Samples. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2010, pp. 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000096.
48.
AdamsJ.IliasM.CastorenaC.KimY. R.Performance-Graded Specifications for Asphalt Emulsions Used in Chip Seal Preservation Treatments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 20–31.
49.
PoursoltaniM.HesamiS.Performance Evaluation of Microsurfacing Mixture Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 12, 2020, pp. 1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1551544.
50.
BaranS.SukhijaM.ColeriE.Assessment of Aggregate-Binder Adhesion Through Field-Applicable Modified Sweep, Vialit, and Pull-Off Tests. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 490, 2025, p. 142495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142495.
