Examining ΔT c : Variability Factors and Relationships with Other Rheological Shape Parameters

Abstract

The Illinois Department of Transportation implemented a minimum ΔT_c specification requirement of −5°C after 40 h of pressure aging vessel (PAV) aging for neat asphalt binders in 2023. Unfamiliarity with the ΔT_c parameter and unknowns with regard to variability from extended PAV aging created an opportunity for multiple interlaboratory studies to quantify variability and identify any potential bias within the Illinois asphalt binder testing community. Additionally, a small-scale experiment was conducted to directly compare the impact on ΔT_c results after multiple extended PAV aging conditions: two 20-h PAV aging cycles and one continuous 40-h PAV cycle. Various rheological shape parameter results after standard 20-h PAV aging were evaluated to determine correlation with ΔT_c results after extended PAV aging. Findings show that variability in ΔT_c is primarily driven by bending beam rheometer stiffness, but m-value d2s% values more often exceeded allowable ranges in AASHTO T 313. Estimated creep stiffness, S, had higher d2s% magnitude, but more often fell within the allowable range, whereas m-value had a lower d2s% magnitude, but fell out of the allowable range more frequently. The control sample results indicated that PAV aging is a minimal factor in reproducibility. Two 20-h PAV cycles showed slightly more aging than the continuous 40-h PAV aging, but the difference was not statistically significant. It was found that the PG58-28 samples were more sensitive to the two 20-h PAV cycles than the PG64-22 samples. The R-value after 20 h of PAV aging was shown to be the most reliable indicator of ΔT_c after extended aging for binders studied.

Keywords

infrastructure binders asphalt binder aging binder specifications low-temperature binder testing rheology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

R. M.

King

G. N.

Hanson

D. I.

Blankenship

P. B.

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 615–648.

Asphalt Institute. State-of-the-Knowledge: Use of the Delta Tc Parameter to Characterize Asphalt Binder Behavior. Asphalt Institute Informational Series, IS-240, 2019. https://www.asphaltinstitute.org/engineering/delta-tc-technical-documents/.

Illinois Department of Transportation. Memorandum: Special Provision for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder. idot.illinois.gov/doing-business/procurements/engineering-architectural-professional-services/consultant-resources/highways/letting-specific-items/design-and-environment-bde-special-provisions.html. Accessed July 2024.

AASHTO PP 113. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Standard Practice for Characterizing the Relaxation Behavior of Asphalt Binders Using the Delta Tc (ΔT_c) Parameter, 2021.

Illinois Center for Transportation. Rheology-Chemical Based Procedure to Evaluate Additives/ Modifiers Used in Asphalt Binder for Performance Enhancements: Phase 2. Illinois Center for Transportation Series No. 21-020, Research Report No. FHWA-ICT-21-015 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, June 2021.

Azari

Akisetty

Recommended Changes to the Precision Estimates of T 313. Presentation at the 56th Mid-Atlantic Quality Assurance Workshop, Washington, DC, February7, 2024.

Harder

G. A.

Delta Tc Extended Aging Interlaboratory Study. Presentation at Northeast Asphalt User Producer Group Meeting, Hopkinton, MA, April9, 2019.

Overview of the Statistical Analysis Process. AASHTO re:source, Frederick, MD. https://aashtoresource.org/psp/analysis-process. Accessed October 10, 2024.

AASHTO T 313. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR), 2012.

10.

Christensen

D. W.

Tran

NCHRP Report 982: Relationships Between the Fatigue Properties of Asphalt Binders and the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17226/26302.

11.

Baumgaertel

Winter

H. H.

Determination of Discrete Relaxation and Retardation Time Spectra From Dynamic Mechanical Data. Rheologica Acta, Vol. 28, 1989, pp. 511–519.

12.

Kriz

Campbell

C. M.

Kucharek

A. S.

Varamini

A Simple Binder Specification Tweak to Promote Best Performers. Proc. Sixty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association (CTAA), 2020, pp. 380–411.

13.

Bennert

Garg

Ericson

Cytowicz

Evaluation of Test Methods to Identify Asphalt Binders Prone to Surface-Initiated Cracking. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2677(3): 897–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221119191

14.

Kriz

Noël

J. A.

Quddus

M. R.

Shirts

R. D.

Rheological Properties of Phase-Incompatible Bituminous Binders. Proc. 7th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress v1.0, first published 1st July 2020, Madrid, Spain, 2020.

15.

Didier

Elwardany

M. D.

Planche

J.-P.

Christensen

King

G. N.

Impact of the Asphalt Binder Rheological Behavior on the Value of the ΔTc Parameter. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 293, 2021, pp. 123464.

16.

Christensen

D. W.

Anderson

D. A.

Interpretation of Dynamic Mechanical Test Data for Paving Grade Asphalt Cements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 61, 1992, pp. 67–116.