Current research lacks focus on the vulnerability of urban river-crossing passages related to the impact of disruptions on travel. We propose a method to assess their vulnerability and impact areas by evaluating vehicle detour degrees and public transport substitution effects during possible interruptions. Applied to Wuhan, China, known for its water and bridges, the study reveals significant variations in vulnerability among different river-crossing passages. Passages in outer urban areas are more vulnerable than those in core areas, with larger impact zones and higher impact degrees. Additionally, the vulnerability-affected areas display a strip distribution, and it is harder for outer-area residents to switch from driving to public transport during interruptions. The study’s methods and findings offer valuable references for sustainable river-crossing transportation planning in riverine cities.
WuQ.HanZ.CuiC.LiuF.ZhaoY.XieZ.Vulnerability Identification and Cascading Failure Spatiotemporal Patterns on Road Network Under the Rainstorm Disaster. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 11, No. 11, 2022, p. 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110564.
2.
ChenY. J.ChangK.-H.SheuJ.-B.LiuC.-H.ChangC.-C.ChangC.-H.WangG.-X.Vulnerability-Based Regionalization for Disaster Management Considering Storms and Earthquakes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 169, 2023, p. 102987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102987.
3.
SantosL. B. L.SoaresG. G. G.GargT.JorgeA. A. S.LondeL. R. R.ReaniR. T. T.BacelarR. B. B.OliveiraC. E. S.FreitasV. L. S.SokolovI. M. M.Vulnerability Analysis in Complex Networks under a Flood Risk Reduction Point of View. Frontiers in Physics, Vol. 11, 2023, p. 1064122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1064122.
4.
JinL.WangH.XieB.YuL.LiuL.A User Exposure Based Approach for Non-Structural Road Network Vulnerability Analysis. PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 11, 2017, p. e0188790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188790.
5.
LinJ.LinW.Transportation System Vulnerability Assessment Considering Environmental Impact. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2022, 2022, p. e8711894. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8711894.
6.
LengJ.ZhaiJ.LiQ.ZhaoL.Construction of Road Network Vulnerability Evaluation Index Based on General Travel Cost. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 493, 2018, pp. 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.018.
7.
DengZ.HuangD.LiuJ.MiB.LiuY.An Assessment Method for Traffic State Vulnerability Based on a Cloud Model for Urban Road Network Traffic Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 22, No. 11, 2021, pp. 7155–7168. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3002455.
8.
StaritaS.ScaparraM. P.Assessing Road Network Vulnerability: A User Equilibrium Interdiction Model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 72, No. 7, 2021, pp. 1648–1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1740621.
9.
SunY.XieB.WangS.WuD.Dynamic Assessment of Road Network Vulnerability Based on Cell Transmission Model. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2021, 2021, p. e5575537. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5575537.
10.
BerdicaK.An Introduction to Road Vulnerability: What Has Been Done, Is Done and Should Be Done. Transport Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2002, pp. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2.
11.
MattssonL.-G.JeneliusE.Vulnerability and Resilience of Transport Systems – A Discussion of Recent Research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 81, 2015, pp. 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002.
12.
NiuC.NairD. J.ZhangT.DixitV.Murray-TuiteP.Are Wildfire Fatalities Related to Road Network Characteristics? A Preliminary Analysis of Global Wildfire Cases. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 80, 2022, p. 103217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103217.
13.
LuathepP.SumaleeA.HoH. W.KurauchiF.Large-Scale Road Network Vulnerability Analysis: A Sensitivity Analysis Based Approach. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2011, pp. 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9350-0.
14.
XiangH.Urban Road Network Emergency: An Integrative Vulnerability Identification Method. Complexity, Vol. 2021, 2021, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6325578.
15.
ChenX.WangY.ZhangY.A Trial-and-Error Toll Design Method for Traffic Congestion Mitigation on Large River-Crossing Channels in a Megacity. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2021, p. 2749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052749.
16.
QiL.ZhouM.LuanW.A Dynamic Road Incident Information Delivery Strategy to Reduce Urban Traffic Congestion. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2018, pp. 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2018.7511165.
17.
HeX.LiuH. X.Modeling the Day-to-Day Traffic Evolution Process After an Unexpected Network Disruption. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2012, pp. 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.012.
18.
ZhuS.LevinsonD.LiuH.Measuring Winners and Losers from the New I-35W Mississippi River Bridge. Transportation, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2017, pp. 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9684-8.
19.
NieZ.ZhuS.WangH.MaL.Diagnosis and Countermeasures Study on Cross-River Traffic Problem Based on Analysis of Traffic Supply and Demand Coupling. Proc., ICTIS 2011: Multimodal Approach to Sustained Transportation System Development: Information, Technology, Implementation, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2012, pp. 2638–2644. https://doi.org/10.1061/41177(415)332.
MorelliA. B.CunhaA. L.Measuring Urban Road Network Vulnerability to Extreme Events: An Application for Urban Floods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 93, 2021, p. 102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102770.
22.
JoS.GaoL.LiuF.LiM.ShenZ.XuL.GaoZ.-Y.Cascading Failure with Preferential Redistribution on Bus–Subway Coupled Network. International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 32, No. 08, 2021, p. 2150103. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183121501035.
23.
Rahimi SiegristM.CormanF.Modeling and Quantifying Interaction of Information and Capacity in Public Transport Disruptions. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2021, 2021, p. e5398316. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5398316.
24.
QiX.MeiG.PiccialliF.Resilience Evaluation of Urban Bus-Subway Traffic Networks for Potential Applications in IoT-Based Smart Transportation. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 21, No. 22, 2021, pp. 25061–25074. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3046270.
25.
XuZ.ZhangC.ChopraS. S.Robustness Assessment of Public Bus Transit System with a Response-Integrated Approach for a Resilient Public Transport System in Hong Kong. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2023, pp. 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2022.2071354.
26.
JiangM.MourabitiO. E.MiwaT.MorikawaT.Vulnerability Analysis of Casablanca Road Network by Capacity Weighted Spectral Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677: 1189–1199.
27.
WangZ.PeiY.LiuJ.LiuH.Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Road Networks Based on Traffic Situation. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Vol. 41, 2023, p. 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2023.100590.
28.
ZhuX.SongW.GaoL.Topological Characteristics and Vulnerability Analysis of Rural Traffic Network. Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2019, 2019, p. e6530469. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6530469.
29.
TuY.YangC.ChenX.Road Network Topology Vulnerability Analysis and Application. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, Vol. 166, No. 2, 2013, pp. 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.10.00007.
30.
CantilloV.MaceaL. F.JallerM.Assessing Vulnerability of Transportation Networks for Disaster Response Operations. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2019, pp. 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-017-9382-x.
31.
ZhaoL.WangS.WeiJ.ChenR.Impacts of Land Use on Urban Road Network Vulnerability. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 148, No. 3, 2022, p. 04022032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000862.
32.
GeccheleG.CeccatoR.GastaldiM.Road Network Vulnerability Analysis: Case Study Considering Travel Demand and Accessibility Changes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 145, No. 7, 2019, p. 05019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000252.
33.
EsfehM. A.KattanL.LamW. H. K.SalariM.EsfeR. A.Road Network Vulnerability Analysis Considering the Probability and Consequence of Disruptive Events: A Spatiotemporal Incident Impact Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 136, 2022, p. 103549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103549.
34.
ChenC.WangS.ZhangJ.GuX.Modeling the Vulnerability and Resilience of Interdependent Transportation Networks under Multiple Disruptions. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2023, p. 04022043. https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2185.
35.
ZhangQ.YuH.LiZ.ZhangG.MaD. T.Assessing Potential Likelihood and Impacts of Landslides on Transportation Network Vulnerability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102304.
36.
TaylorM. A. P.SekharS. V. C.D’EsteG. M.Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2006, pp. 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-006-9284-9.
37.
OliveiraE. L. D.PortugalL. D. S.Porto JuniorW.Indicators of Reliability and Vulnerability: Similarities and Differences in Ranking Links of a Complex Road System. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 88, 2016, pp. 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.004.
38.
PouryariM.Mahboobi ArdakaniA. R.HassaniN.A Multi-Criteria Vulnerability of Urban Transportation Systems Analysis Against Earthquake Considering Topological and Geographical Method: A Case Study. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2022, pp. 2147–2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00699-4.
39.
LópezF. A.PáezA.CarrascoJ. A.RuminotN. A.Vulnerability of Nodes Under Controlled Network Topology and Flow Autocorrelation Conditions. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 59, 2017, pp. 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.02.002.
40.
LiuJ.ZhuJ.LuD.YuanD.AzadiH.The Effectiveness of Improvement Measures in Road Transport Network Resilience: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 13, 2023, p. 10544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310544.
41.
AlsultanM.CollierZ. A.LambertJ. H.Risk-Based Priority Setting for Large-Scale Access Management Programs with Uncertain Mobility Benefits and Costs. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2021, p. 04020046. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001094.
LiaoY.GilJ.PereiraR. H. M.YehS.VerendelV.Disparities in Travel Times Between Car and Transit: Spatiotemporal Patterns in Cities. Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2020, p. 4056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61077-0.
44.
UlakM. B.YaziciA.AljarrahM.Value of Convenience for Taxi Trips in New York City. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 142, 2020, pp. 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.016.
45.
Land Transport Master Plans 2013. The Land Transport Authority, Singapore, 2013.
46.
SunC.ChenX.ZhangH. M.HuangZ.An Evaluation Method of Urban Public Transport Facilities Resource Supply Based on Accessibility. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2018, 2018, p. e3754205. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3754205.
47.
ZhangH. M.ChenY.-R.LimR.QianZ.What Happens When a Major Freeway Is Closed for Repair?: The Case of Fix I-5 in Downtown Sacramento, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2278: 134–144.
48.
HensherD. A.BrewerA. M.Going for Gold at the Sydney Olympics: How Did Transport Perform?Transport Reviews, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2002, pp. 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640110121112.
49.
OhY.ChungK.ParkS.KimC.KangS.Evaluating the Impact of the Sudden Collapse of Major Freeway Connectors on Rapid Transit and Adjacent Freeway Systems: San Francisco Bay Area Case Study. Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 7, 2017, p. 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070726.
50.
TennøyA.HagenO. H.Urban Main Road Capacity Reduction: Adaptations, Effects and Consequences. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 96, 2021, p. 102848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102848.
51.
PengR.DingK.GuoH.LiuX.LiuY.WengH.LiR.The Impact of Rivers and Lakes on Urban Transportation Expansion: A Case Study of the Century-Long Evolution of the Road Network in Wuhan, China. PLoS One, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2024, p. e0298678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298678.
52.
TanveerH.BalzT.CignaF.TapeteD.Monitoring 2011–2020 Traffic Patterns in Wuhan (China) with COSMO-SkyMed SAR, Amidst the 7th CISM Military World Games and COVID-19 Outbreak. Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, No. 10, 2020, p. 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101636.
53.
China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd. Wuhan Municipal Traffic Project (Phase 2) World Bank Loan - Public Traffic Priority Corridors Improvement. Publication Grade. No. 2605. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China, 2009.
DongY.ZhangB.ZhouZ.XuZ.Assessing the Accessibility of Swimming Pools in Nanjing by Walking and Cycling Using Baidu Maps. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 11, No. 10, 2022, p. 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11100515.
56.
HuangH.HuangJ.ChenB.XuX.LiW.Recognition of Functional Areas in an Old City Based on POI: A Case Study in Fuzhou, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 150, No. 1, 2024, p. 04024001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4593.
