Open-graded friction course (OGFC) is a thin asphalt mixture surface layer designed primarily to improve the functionality of a roadway. It is designed with a special aggregate structure with high air voids and stone-on-stone contact that accelerates rainwater drainage. It has many advantages, such as reducing hydroplaning, splashing, and spray, and enhancing roadway visibility and skid resistance under wet weather conditions. However, these mixtures exhibit premature failures and moisture damage that limit their usage in pavement construction. Further, the current specifications might inaccurately reflect field conditions. Therefore, this study was aimed at evaluating and comparing the effect of various asphalt binder types on the performance of OGFC mixtures under different aging and moisture conditions. Three types of asphalt binder were utilized: conventional styrene-butadiene-styrene asphalt binder performance grading (PG) 76-22M and diluted epoxy asphalt (EA) binder with two different dosages. A suite of physical and mechanical tests was conducted to evaluate OGFC mixtures, namely, draindown, permeability, Hamburg wheel tracking (HWT) test for rutting and moisture susceptibility, Cantabro abrasion loss test for durability, semi-circular beam (SCB) for fracture resistance, and indirect tensile strength (ITS) test for tensile strength and moisture susceptibility. Results indicated that EA mixtures exhibited improved draindown results, compared with 76M mixture. Further, the developed cross-linked network associated with EA binder might explain the improved rutting and abrasion loss resistance. EA mixtures showed significantly better moisture resistance, as measured by HWT, ITS, and SCB tests. Cost-effectiveness ratio results showed higher effectiveness for EA mixtures than conventional 76M mixture.
YinF.AnandA.MoraesR.TranN.WestR.GuF.BE702 Final Report: Design and Performance of Open-Graded Friction Course (OGFC) Mixtures Containing Epoxy Asphalt. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, AL, 2021.
2.
WatsonD.TranN.RodeznoC.TaylorA.JamesT.Jr. NCHRP Project 1-55: Performance-Based Mix Design of Porous Friction Courses. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2018.
3.
AbohamerH.ElseifiM. A.MayeuxC.CooperS. B.IIICooperS.Jr.Laboratory Evaluation of Warm-Mix Asphalt Open-Graded Friction Courses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 507–519.
4.
WuH.YuJ.SongW.ZouJ.SongQ.ZhouL.A Critical State-of-the-Art Review of Durability and Functionality of Open-Graded Friction Course Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 237, 2020, p. 117759.
5.
GuF.WatsonD.MooreJ.TranN.Evaluation of the Benefits of Open Graded Friction Course: Case Study. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 189, 2018, pp. 131–143.
6.
KabirM. S.KingW.JrAbadieC.IcenogleP.CooperS. B.Jr.Louisiana’s Experience with Open-Graded Friction Course Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2295: 63–71.
7.
ShiriniB.ImaninasabR.Performance Evaluation of Rubberized and SBS Modified Porous Asphalt Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 107, 2016, pp. 165–171.
8.
ZhangJ.HuangW.HaoG.YanC.LvQ.CaiQ.Evaluation of Open-Grade Friction Course (OGFC) Mixtures with High Content SBS Polymer Modified Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 270, 2021, p. 121374.
9.
ChenM.GengJ.XiaC.HeL.LiuZ.A Review of Phase Structure of SBS Modified Asphalt: Affecting Factors, Analytical Methods, Phase Models and Improvements. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 294, 2021, p. 123610.
10.
GalooyakS. S.DabirB.NazarbeygiA. E.MoeiniA.Rheological Properties and Storage Stability of Bitumen/SBS/Montmorillonite Composites. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2010, pp. 300–307.
11.
LiuZ.XuanM.ZhaoZ.CongY.LiaoK.A Study of the Compatibility Between Asphalt and SBS. Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 7–8, 2003, pp. 1317–1325.
12.
PolaccoG.FilippiS.MerusiF.StastnaG.A Review of the Fundamentals of Polymer-Modified Asphalts: Asphalt/Polymer Interactions and Principles of Compatibility. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 224, 2015, pp. 72–112.
13.
WangT.YiT.YuzhenZ.The Compatibility of SBS-Modified Asphalt. Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2010, pp. 764–772.
14.
NiH.HuM.SunD.XuL.LingS.LuT.DengY.Degradation Characteristics of SBS Polymer and Its Contribution to Weathering Aging of Modified Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 369, 2023, p. 130549.
15.
YanC.HuangW.MaJ.XuJ.LvQ.LinP.Characterizing the SBS Polymer Degradation Within High Content Polymer Modified Asphalt Using ATR-FTIR. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 233, 2020, p. 117708.
16.
LiJ.YangS.LiuY.MuhammadY.SuZ.YangJ.Studies on the Properties of Modified Heavy Calcium Carbonate and SBS Composite Modified Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 218, 2019, pp. 413–423.
17.
WuW.CavalliM. C.JiangW.KringosN.Differing Perspectives on the Use of High-Content SBS Polymer-Modified Bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 411, 2024, p. 134433.
18.
ZhuJ.BirgissonB.KringosN.Polymer Modification of Bitumen: Advances and Challenges. European Polymer Journal, Vol. 54, 2014, pp. 18–38.
19.
WuJ. P.HerringtonP. R.AlabasterD.Long-Term Durability of Epoxy-Modified Open-Graded Porous Asphalt Wearing Course. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2019, pp. 920–927.
20.
JamshidiA.WhiteG.KurumisawaK.Functional and Field Performance of Epoxy Asphalt Technology–State-of-the-Art. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2023, pp. 881–918.
21.
CongP.TianY.LiuN.XuP.Investigation of Epoxy-Resin-Modified Asphalt Binder. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 133, No. 21, 2016, p. 43401.
22.
LuQ.BorsJ.Alternate Uses of Epoxy Asphalt on Bridge Decks and Roadways. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 78, 2015, pp. 18–25.
23.
XuO.LiY.XuR.LiuY.DongY.Performance Evaluation of Waterborne Epoxy Resin Modified Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures for Asphalt Pavement Pothole Repair. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 325, 2022, p. 126709.
24.
BonaquistR.AdamsJ. J.AndersonD. A.NCHRP Report 967: Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2021.
25.
WangY.LengZ.WangG.Structural Contribution of Open-Graded Friction Course Mixes in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2014, pp. 731–741.
26.
ASTM D7064. Standard Practice for Open-Graded Friction Course (OGFC) Mix Design. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
27.
Louisiana Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridges: 2018 Edition. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, 2018.
28.
AbualiaA.AkentunaM.MohammadL. N.CooperS. B.IIICooperS. B.Jr.Improving Asphalt Binder Durability Using Sustainable Materials: A Rheological and Chemical Analysis of Polymer-, Rubber-, and Epoxy-Modified Asphalt Binders. Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 13, 2024, p. 5379.
29.
AbualiaA.LiuJ.MohammadL. N.CooperS. B.IIICooperS. B.Jr. Effect of High Polymer, Crumb Rubber, and Epoxy-Modified Asphalt Binders on Laboratory Performance of Open-Graded Friction Course Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241254387.
30.
AASHTO M 320. Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder of the Studied Asphalt Binders. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
31.
AASHTO T 278. Standard Method of Test for Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1999.
32.
AASHTO T 279. Standard Method of Test for Accelerated Polishing of Aggregates Using the British Wheel. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2018.
33.
AASHTO T 19. Standard Method of Test for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
34.
AASHTO T 85. Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
35.
ASTM D6752. Standard Test Method for Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Automatic Vacuum Sealing Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023.
36.
ASTM D2041. Standard Test Method for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
37.
ASTM D6390. Standard Test Method for Determination of Draindown Characteristics in Uncompacted Asphalt Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023.
38.
AASHTO T 324. Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
39.
AASHTO T 283. Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
40.
Tex-245-F, Test Procedure for Cantabro Loss. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2021.
41.
ASTM D8044. Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Asphalt Mixture Cracking Resistance Using the Semi-Circular Bend Test (SCB) at Intermediate Temperatures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023.
42.
AkentunaM.LiuJ.MohammadL. N.SachdevaS.CooperS. B.IIICooperS. B.Jr.Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures: Conditioning and Testing Protocols. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023: 03611981221147214. DOI: 10.1177/03611981221147214.
43.
AkentunaM.MohammadL. N.SachdevaS.CooperS. B.IIICooperS. B.Jr.Effectiveness of Loaded Wheel Tracking Test to Ascertain Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 421–434.
44.
AASHTO R 30. Standard Practice for Laboratory Conditioning of Asphalt Mixtures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2022.
45.
FM5-565. Florida Method of Test for Measurement of Water Permeability of Compacted Asphalt Paving Mixtures. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2015.
46.
KhasawnehM. A.AlsheyabM. A.Effect of Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size and Aggregate Gradation on the Surface Frictional Properties of Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 244, 2020, p. 118355.
47.
GohS. W.YouZ.Mechanical Properties of Porous Asphalt Pavement Materials with Warm Mix Asphalt and RAP. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 1, 2012, pp. 90–97.
48.
AASHTO PP 77. Standard Practice for Materials Selection and Mixture Design of Permeable Friction Courses (PFCs). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2014.
49.
AkentunaM.MohammadL. N.KimM.CooperS. B.IIICooperS. B.Jr.Improving Durability of Asphalt Pavements in Louisiana Through Increased In-Place Field Density. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 806–816.
