Evaluation of Pedestrian Networks in Urban Rail Transit Station Catchment Areas Using Entropy Weight Method and TOPSIS Models: Empirical Evidence from Nanjing,China

Abstract

Analyzing the pedestrian networks within the catchment areas of urban rail transit stations is crucial. It serves as a vital link between residents and these stations, playing a key role in optimizing travel dynamics and fostering a rail transit–oriented green transportation system. By gathering multisource data, including points of interest, road networks, and street views from areas around urban rail transit stations in Nanjing, China, an entropy weight method (EWM)-technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) model is constructed in this study to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the pedestrian networks in the area influenced by rail transit stations. The results show that the EWM-TOPSIS model can meet the actual needs of the evaluation of pedestrian networks in urban rail transit station catchment areas. The relative walking width has the largest weight in the pedestrian networks evaluation, accounting for 17.390%, and the integration has the minimal weight, accounting for 3.467%. The overall spatial distribution of the pedestrian networks’ comprehensive score index presents a root-spreading state radiating outward from the station as the center. Targeted optimization strategies are formulated based on the comprehensive analysis of each sub-dimension’s specific conditions.

Keywords

evaluation of pedestrian networks EWM-TOPSIS urban rail transit station catchment area comprehensive evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

L. Q.

Sun

T. S.

Wang

L. L.

Evolving Urban Spatial Structure and Commuting Patterns: A Case Study of Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 59, 2018, pp. 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.007.

Yin

Shao

Wang

Exploring the Impact of Built Environment on Car Use: Does Living Near Urban Rail Transit Matter?

Transportation Letters, 2020, Vol. 12, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2019.1611196.

Zhang

Individual Mobility Prediction Review: Data, Problem, Method and Application. Multimodal Transportation, Vol. 1, 2022, p. 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2022.100002.

Cai

Sun

G. Y.

Guo

L. M.

Ding

Z. M.

Visual Analysis Of Land Use Characteristics Around Urban Rail Transit Stations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Vol. 22, No. 10, 2021, pp. 6221–6231. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2020.2989811.

Chen

Dong

Tao

Peng

Liu

Integrated Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) With Suburban Rail Network Design Problem For Maximizing Profits. Transportation Letters, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2024, pp, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2024.2304999.

Gao

Yang

L. C.

Han

C. Y.

Tang

J. J.

Z. T.

A Network-Distance-Based Geographically Weighted Regression Model to Examine Spatiotemporal Effects of Station-Level Built Environments on Metro Ridership. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 105, 2022, p. 103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103472.

Doulet

J. F.

Delpirou

Delaunay

Taking Advantage of a Historic Opportunity? A Critical Review of the Literature on TOD in China. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 10, 2017, pp. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2016.633.

Jiang

Zegras

Mehndiratta

Walk the Line: Station Context, Corridor Type and Bus Rapid Transit Walk Access in Jinan, China. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.09.007.

Sun

Zacharias

Oreskovic

How do Metro Stations Integrate with Walking Environments? Results from Walking Access Within Three Types of Built Environment in Beijing. Cities, Vol. 56, 2016, pp. 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.001.

10.

Silvennoinen

Kuliga

Herthogs

Recchia

D. R.

Tunçer

Effects of Gehl’s Urban Design Guidelines on Walkability: A Virtual Reality Experiment in Singaporean Public Housing Estates. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, Vol. 49, No. 9, 2022, p. 23998083221091822. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221091822.

11.

Wang

Chen

Factors Affecting Neighborhood Walkability: A Pilot Empirical Study in Qingdao, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 149, No. 1, 2023, p. 05022044. https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4138.

12.

Xuan

Zhao

Research on Correlation between Spatial Quality of Urban Streets and Pedestrian Walking Characteristics in China Based on Street View Big Data. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 148, No. 4, 2022, p. 05022035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000888.

13.

Yang

Sun

Huang

Fang

A Framework of Community Pedestrian Network Design Based on Urban Network Analysis. Buildings, Vol. 12, 2022, p. 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060819.

14.

Yue

Guo

Zhao

Wang

Graph Convolutional Networks for Street Network Analysis with a Case Study of Urban Polycentricity in Chinese Cities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2024, pp. 931–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2321229.

15.

Yang

Sun

Huang

Fang

A Framework of Community Pedestrian Network Design Based on Urban Network Analysis. Buildings, Vol. 12, 2022, p. 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060819.

16.

Cervero

Kockelman

Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.

17.

Ewing

Cervero

Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 1780, No. 1, 2010, p. 154771879. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766.

18.

Cheng

Chen

X. W.

Yang

Cao

De Vos

Witlox

Active Travel For Active Ageing in China: The Role of Built Environment. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 76, 2019, pp. 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.010.

19.

Jiang

Chen

Grekousis

Xiao

Spatial Disparity of Individual and Collective Walking Behaviors: A New Theoretical Framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 101, 2021, p. 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103096.

20.

Sun

G. B.

Sarkar

Gou

Z. H.

Xiao

Commuting Mode Choice in a High-Density City: Do Land-Use Density and Diversity Matter in Hong Kong?

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2018, p. 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050920.

21.

Chen

Meng

Q. Y.

Zhang

L. L.

Yang

Evaluating Greenery around Streets Using Baidu Panoramic Street View Images and the Panoramic Green View Index. Forests, Vol. 10, No. 12, 2019, p. 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10121109.

22.

Liao

Berg

Wesemael

Arentze

Empirical Analysis of Walkability Using Data from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 85, 2020, p. 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102390.

23.

Zeng

Liu

Guo

Shi

Xing

Walkability Assessment of Metro Catchment Area: A Machine Learning Method Based on the Fusion of Subject-Objective Perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 10, 2022, p. 1086277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086277.

24.

Gupta

Bivina

G. R.

Parida

Does Neighborhood Design Matter for Walk Access to Metro Stations? An Integrated SEM-Hybrid Discrete Mode Choice Approach. Transport Policy, Vol. 121, No. 6, 2022, pp. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.03.010.

25.

S. Y.

Using Open Data and Deep Learning to Explore Walkability in Shenzhen, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 118, 2023, p. 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103696.

26.

Arellana

Saltarin

Larranaga

Alvarez

Henao

B. C.

Urban Walkability Considering Pedestrians’ Perceptions of the Built Environment: A 10-Year Review and a Case Study in a Medium-Sized City in Latin America. Transport Reviews, Vol. 40, 2020, pp. 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842.

27.

Lucchesi

S. T.

Silva

J. D. E.

Larranaga

A. M.

Zechin

Cybis

H. B. B.

Machine Learning and Image Recognition Technologies to Identify Built Environment Barriers and Incentives to Walk. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2677: 14–24.

28.

Jiang

Y. X.

Chen

Grekousis

Xiao

Spatialdisparity of Individual and Collective Walking Behaviors: A New Theoretical Framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 11, 2021, p. 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103096.

29.

Koo

B. W.

Guhathakurta

Botchwey

How are Neighborhood and Street-Level Walkability Factors Associated with Walking Behaviors? A Big Data Approach Using Street View Images. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 54, 2021, p. 001391652110146. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211014609.

30.

Nagata

Nakaya

Hanibuchi

Amagasa

Kikuchi

Inoue

Objective Scoring of Streetscape Walkability Related to Leisure Walking: Statistical Modeling Approach with Semantic Segmentation of Google Street View Images. Health & Place, Vol. 66, 2020, p. 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428.

31.

Han

Y. Q.

Zhong

Yeh

A. G. O.

Zhong

X. M.

Chen

Lü

G. N.

Mapping Seasonal Changes of Street Greenery Using Multi-Temporal Street-View Images. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 92, 2023, p. 104498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104498.

32.

Yang

Sun

Gou

Associations Between Overhead-View and Eye-Level Urban Greenness and Cycling Behaviors. Cities, Vol. 88, 2019, pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2019.01.003.

33.

Wang

J. B.

Liu

Gou

A. P.

Numerical Characteristics and Spatial Distribution of Panoramic Street Green View Index Based on Segnet Semantic Segmentation in Savannah. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 69, 2022, p. 127488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127488.

34.

Basu

Oviedo-Trespalacios

King

M. J.

Kamruzzaman

Haque

M. M.

The Influence of the Built Environment on Pedestrians’ Perceptions of Attractiveness, Safety and Security. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 87, 2022, pp. 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.006.

35.

Zhu

Cui

Zhu

Liu

Semantic Segmentation of Urban Street Scene Images Based on Improved U-Net Network. Optoelectronics Letters. Vol. 19, 2023, pp. 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-023-2128-8.

36.

Gou

Zhang

Wang

Study on the Identification and Dynamics of Green Vision Rate in Jing’an District, Shanghai Based on Deeplab V3 + Model. Earth Science Informatics, Vol. 15, 2022, pp. 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00691-6.

37.

J. L.

Zhang

R. Z.

Huang

X. J.

G. L.

Walking Access Distance of Metro Passengers and Relationship with Demographic Characteristics: A Case Study of Nanjing Metro. Chinese Geographical Science, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2018, pp. 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0970-6.

38.

Rahman

. A GIS-Based, Microscale Walkability Assessment Integrating the Local Topography. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 103, 2022, p. 103405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103405.

39.

Chen

Lee

Lieu

A Novel Walkability Index Using Google Street View and Deep Learning. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 99, 2023, p. 104896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104896.

40.

Yang

Zheng

Cao

Chen

Tang

Yang

Connectivity Analysis in Pedestrian Networks: A Case Study in Wuhan, China. Applied Geography, Vol. 151, 2023, p. 102843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102843.

41.

Ren

Zhao

Duan

Zhang

Two dimensional accessibility analysis of metro stations in Xi’an, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.014.

42.

D’’Orso

Migliore

A GIS-based Method For Evaluating the Walkability of A Pedestrian Environment and Prioritised Investments. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555.

43.

Tang

B. S.

Wong

Tang

Wong

Walking Accessibility to Neighbourhood Open Space in a Multi-Level Urban Environment of Hong Kong. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, Vol. 48, 2020, p. 239980832093257. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320932575.

44.

Alawadi

Khanal

Doudin

Abdelghani

Revisiting Transit-Oriented Development: Alleys as Critical Walking Infrastructure. Transport Policy, Vol. 100, 2020, pp. 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.11.007.

45.

Tong

Liu

Chan

Understanding the Impact of BuiltEnvironment on Metro Ridership Using Open Source in Shanghai. Cities, Vol. 93, 2019, pp. 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.013.

46.

Mohurd. 2015. Guidelines for Planning and Design of Areas Along The Urban Rail Transit. https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201512/20151210_225899.html. 2015.

47.

Santi

Courtney

T. K.

Verma

S. K.

Ratti

Investigating the Association Between Streetscapes and Human Walking Activities Using Google Street View and Human Trajectory Data. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12472.

48.

Zhu

Sapra

Reda

Shih

Newsam

Tao

Catanzaro

Improving Semantic Segmentation via Video Propagation and Label Relaxation, In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, IEEE, New York, 2019.

49.

Wang

Liu

Yao

Relationship between Eye-Level Greenness and Cycling Frequency Around Metro Stations in Shenzhen, China: A Big Data Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 59, 2020, p. 102201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102201.

50.

Omer

Kaplan

Using Space Syntax and Agent-Based Approaches for Modeling Pedestrian Volume at the Urban Scale. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 64, 2017, pp. 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.007.

51.

Cordts

Omran

Ramos

Rehfeld

Enzweiler

Benenson

Franke

Roth

Schiele

The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, IEEE, New York, 2016, pp. 3213–3223.

52.

Ajzen

The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1991, pp. 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

53.

Koohsari

Sugiyam

Mavoa

Villanueva

Badland

Giles

Owen

Street Network Measures and Adults’’ Walking for Transport: Application of Space Syntax. Health & Place, Vol. 38, 2016, pp. 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.12.009.

54.

Koohsari

Owen

Cerin

Giles

Sugiyama

Walkability and Walking for Transport: Characterizing the Built Environment Using Space Syntax. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 13, 2016, p. 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0448-9.

55.

Garau

Annunziata

Yamu

A Walkability Assessment Tool Coupling Multi-Criteria Analysis and Space Syntax: The Case Study of Iglesias, Italy. European Planning Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2020, pp. 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1761947.

56.

Jiao

Chen

Plan Pedestrian Friendly Environments Around Subway Stations: Lessons from Shanghai, China. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2017, pp. 796–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336060.

57.

Zeng

Song

Shen

Spatially Explicit Assessment on Urban Vitality: Case Studies in Chicago and Wuhan. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 40, 2018, pp. 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.021.

58.

Jiang

Han

Liu

Street Vitality and Built Environment Features: A Data-Informed Approach from Fourteen Chinese Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 79, 2022, p. 103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103724.

59.

Chen

Xiao

Yang

Examining the Association Between the Built Environment and Pedestrian Volume Using Street View Images. Cities, Vol. 127, 2022, p. 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103734.

60.

Singleton

P. A.

Wang

Safety and Security in Discretionary Travel Decision Making: Focus on Active Travel Mode and Destination Choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2430: 47–58.

61.

Nesoff

E. D.

Pollack

K. M.

Bailey

Gielen

A. C.

Knowledge and Beliefs About Pedestrian Safety in an Urban Community: Implications for Promoting Safe Walking. Journal of Community Health, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2019, pp. 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0559-0.

62.

Yang

Qian

Street Network or Functional Attractors? Capturing Pedestrian Movement Patterns and Urban Form with the Integration of Space Syntax and MCDA. Urban Design International, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2023, pp. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00178-w.

63.

Zheng

Sun

Chen

Yin

Wang

Liu

Wang

Exploring the Association Between Openness Scale of Campus Street Spaces, Street Greenery, Campus Walkability and Physical Activity of College Students. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 38, 2024, p. 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101897.

64.

Ding

Song

Y. J.

Qiao

Zhang

Integrating Land Use and Greenway Network for Metro Station Area Transit-Oriented Development. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 113, 2022, p. 103539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103539.

65.

Qiang

Zhang

Huang

Quantitative Evaluation of TOD Performance Based on Multi-Source Data: A Case Study of Shanghai. Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 10, 2022, p. 820694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.820694.

66.

Zhang

Y, X.

Mehta

Anat

Collecting Sidewalk Network Data at Scale for Accessible Pedestrian Travel. Proc., 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2021.

67.

Sun

G. B.

Webster

Chiaradia

Objective Assessment of Station Approach Routes: Development and Reliability of an Audit for Walking Environments Around Metro Stations in China. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 4, 2017, pp. 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.01.010.

68.

Pearce

D. M.

Matsunaka

Oba

Analysing the Impact of Pedestrian Network Centrality on Segment-Level Pedestrian Density. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2021, 2021, p. 3061567. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3061567.