This paper challenges the popular narrative whereby the contribution of a base layer under a concrete pavement slab can be accommodated by augmenting the subgrade modulus, k. Following a close reading of the primary sources, it is demonstrated that the roots of this concept hail to a tentative suggestion in 1955 by Yoder, whose idea was catapulted to prominence by its immediate adoption by the Portland Cement Association. Subsequent implementations by the American Association of State Highway Officials, the Federal Aviation Administration, and agencies in the U.S. Department of Defense have resulted in the widespread and uncritical proliferation of Yoder’s proposal, even though Yoder himself never acknowledged it again. It is submitted in this paper that generating “bump-the-k-value” charts is a misguided violation of the immiscibility principle that proscribes mingling the dense liquid subgrade idealization by Westergaard with that of the elastic solid analog by Burmister. Mathematical relationships are derived and used to prove the interdependence of all available charts of this type, despite any differences in appearance. It is concluded that pavement engineers are well advised to abandon this methodology for accommodating base layers and to pursue alternatives grounded on fundamental principles, thereby exploiting computational tools that are currently available.
WestergaardH. M.Theory of Stresses in Road Slabs. Proc., 4th Annual Meeting 1924, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1925, pp. 60–61.
2.
WestergaardH. M.Stresses in Concrete Runways of Airports. Proc., 19th Annual Meeting 1939, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1939, pp. 197–202. Also in Stresses in Concrete Runways of Airports, Portland Cement Association, Chicago, IL, December, 1941.
3.
USACE. Design of Runways, Aprons and Taxiways at Army Air Force Stations. Engineering Manual, Chapter XX. Part IV: Subgrade Treatment and Base Courses for Rigid Type Pavements. War Department, Chief of Engineers, Washington, D.C., May1943.
4.
ORDL. Report on Special Field Bearing Tests Natural Subgrade and Prepared Subbase Using Different Size Bearing Plates. Ohio River Division, Cincinnati Testing Laboratory, Soils Division, January. War Department, Corps of Engineers, 1943.
5.
FineL.RemingtonJ. A.The Corps of Engineers: Construction in the United States. United States Army in World War II – The Technical Services. Center of Military History, United States Army, Washington, D.C., 1972.
6.
IoannidesA. M.TingleJ. S.Secrets of the Plate Load Test. Proc., 13th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, International Society for Concrete Pavements, Minneapolis, MN, August25–29, 2024, pp. 581–595.
7.
StrattonJ. H.Construction and Design Problems. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 110, 1945, pp. 670–696.
8.
CasagrandeA.Discussion of Construction and Design Problems. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 110, 1945, pp. 780–783.
9.
ParmerE. D.Discussion of Construction and Design Problems. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 110, 1945, pp. 776–780.
10.
TurnbullW. J.JervisW. H.Discussion of Construction and Design Problems. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 110, 1945, pp. 797–799.
11.
ORDL. Investigation of Concrete Pavements on Different Subgrades. Final Report. War Department, Corps of Engineers. Ohio River Division Laboratories, Mariemont, OH, January1946.
12.
OdemarkN.Investigation of the Elastic Properties of Different Soil Types and Theory for Calculation of Pavements According to the Theory of Elasticity. Meddelande 77 Statens Vaginstitutut, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish), 1949. Translation by A.M. Ioannides (Editor), English Translation from the Swedish Original by Nils Odemark (Date of Original: 1949), May, 1989.
13.
IoannidesA. M.KhazanovichL.BecqueJ. L.Structural Evaluation of Base Layers in Concrete Pavement Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1992. 1370: 20–28.
14.
PackardR. G.Design of Concrete Airport Pavement. Engineering Bulletin EB050.03P, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 1973 (reprinted in 1995).
15.
IoannidesA. M.KhazanovichL.Backcalculation Procedures for Three-Layered Concrete Pavements. Proc., 4th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Vol. 1, July17–21, 1994, pp. 77–91.
16.
KothandramS.IoannidesA. M.DIPLODEF: Unified Backcalculation System for Asphalt and Concrete Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 1764: 20–29.
17.
IoannidesA. M.TingleJ. S.Reflections on the Use of Transfer Functions in Pavement Engineering. Proc., International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022, Seattle, WA, May31–June3, 2022, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, Vol. 5: Pavements, pp. 119–132.
18.
KhazanovichL.IoannidesA. M.Glasnost and Concrete Pavement Engineering: Insights Concerning Slabs-On-Grade from the Former Soviet Union. Proc., 5th International Conference on Concrete Pavement Design and Rehabilitation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, April20–22, 1993, Vol. 1, pp. 3–18.
19.
ORDL. Determination of High Values of the Subgrade Modulus, k, from the Plate Bearing Test. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers. Ohio River Division Laboratories, Mariemont, OH, October1953.
BurmisterD. M.The Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Systems and Applications to the Design of Airport Runways. Proc., Highway Research Board, Chicago, IL, 1943, Vol. 23, pp. 126–148 (published 1944).
22.
WestergaardH. M.Computation of Stresses in Concrete Roads. Proc., Highway Research Board (5th Annual Meeting, 1925), National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1926, Vol. 5, Part I, pp. 90–112.
23.
WestergaardH. M.Stresses in Concrete Pavements Computed by Theoretical Analysis. Public Roads, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1926, pp. 25–35.
24.
IoannidesA. M.Subgrade Characterization for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements. Proc., International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Coastal Development -Theory and Practice, Port and Harbour Institute, Ministry of Transport, Yokohama, Japan, September3–6, 1991, pp. 809–814.
25.
DarterM. I.HallK. T.KuoC.-M.Support Under Portland Cement Concrete Pavements. NCHRP Report 372. National Cooperative Highway Research Council, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.
26.
CostiganR. R.ThompsonM. R.Discussion of Response and Performance of Alternate Launch and Recovery Surfaces That Contain Layers of Stabilized Material. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1987. 1095: 70–71.
27.
IoannidesA. M. Discussion of Thickness Design of Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavements, by S.D. Tayabji and D.J. Halpenny. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1987. 1136: 31–32.
28.
PCA. Design of Concrete Airport Pavement. Designation EB050.02P. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 1955, 48 pp.
29.
PCA. Thickness Design for Concrete Pavements. Designation IS010.03P. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 1966, 32 pp.
30.
AASHO. Interim Guide for Design of Flexible Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C., 1961.
31.
AASHO. Interim Guide for Design of Rigid Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C., 1962.
32.
AASHTO. Interim Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1972.
33.
Van TilC. J.McCulloughB. F.VallergaB. A.HicksR. G.Evaluation of AASHO Interim Guides for Design of Pavement Structures. NCHRP Report 128. National Cooperative Highway Research Council, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1972.
34.
TerzaghiK.Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction. Geotechnique, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1955, pp. 41–50.
35.
NAVDOCKS DM-21. Design Manual: Airfield Pavements. Department of the Navy, Bureau of Yards and Docks, Washington, D.C., 1961.
36.
DAAF. Airfield Rigid Pavement Evaluation-Air Force Emergency Construction. Manual TM-5-888-9/AFM 88-40, Chap. 37. Departments of the Army and the Air Force, Washington, D.C., December1966.
37.
DAAF. Rigid Pavements for Airfields Other than Army. Manual TM-5-824-3/AFM 88-6, Chap. 3. Departments of the Army and the Air Force, Washington, D.C., January1970.
38.
FAA. Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation. Advisory Circular AC 150/5320-6B. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., May28, 1974.
39.
GreenJ. L.HallJ. W.Nondestructive Vibratory Testing of Airport Pavements. Volume I: Experimental Test Results and Development of Evaluation Methodology and Procedure. Technical Report, TR S-75-14 v. 1. 1975. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1975. Also published as FAA-RD-73-205-I (1975), Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
40.
HammittG. M.II. Comparative Performance of Structural Layers in Pavement Systems. Volume III: Design and Construction of MESL. Technical Report, TR S-74-8 v.3. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1974. Also published as FAA-RD-73-198-III (1974), Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
41.
HutchinsonR. L.UleryH. H.Jr.LaddD. M.BarkerW. R.HammittG. M.IIChouY. T.RoneC.L.Comparative Performance of Structural Layers in Pavement Systems. Volume II: Analysis of Test Section Data and Presentation of Design and Construction Procedures. Technical Report, TR S-74-8 v.2. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1977. Also published as FAA-RD-73-198-II (1977), Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
42.
BarkerW. R.AlexanderD. R.Determining Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction for Design of Rigid Airfield Pavements Having Base Layers. Technical Report ERDC/GSL TR-12-20. U.S. Army Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, May2012.
43.
DAAF. Army-Air Force Manual for Conventional Rigid Pavement Design. Technical Manual TM 5-824-3/AFM 88-6 Ch. 3. Departments of the Army and the Air Force, Washington, D.C., 1979.
44.
WitczakM. W.UzanJ.JohnsonM.Development of Probabilistic Rigid Pavement Design methodologies for Military Airfields. Technical Report GL-83-18. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1983.
45.
UzanJ.WitczakM. W.Composite Subgrade Modulus for Rigid Airfield Pavement Design Based Upon Multilayer Theory. Proc., 3rd International Conference on Concrete Pavement Design and rehabilitation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, April23–25, 1985, pp. 157–166.
46.
DAAF. Rigid Airfield Pavements. Technical Manual TM 5-825-3/AFM 88-6. Departments of the Army and the Air Force, Washington, D.C., 1958 (as cited by Barker and Alexander, 42).
47.
DAAF. Rigid Airfield Pavements. Technical Manual TM 5-825-3/AFM 88-6, Chap. 3. Departments of the Army and the Air Force, Washington, D.C., August1988.
48.
KhazanovichL.IoannidesA. M.DIPLOMAT: Analysis Program for Bituminous and Concrete Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1995. 1482: 52–60.
49.
SanjeeviraoK.IoannidesA. M.Closed-Form and Graphical Solutions for Three-Layered Concrete Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1809: 23–31.
