Using multiple hurricane surveys collected from different areas in the U.S., this study estimates how much distance and how much time were traveled by evacuees to reach safer destinations during a hurricane event. Regression results indicate that flood risk, respondents’ age, income, and education levels are correlated with both the distance and travel time of hurricane evacuation trips. Moreover, to gain deeper insights, we estimated the price and income elasticities of hurricane evacuation trip characteristics. The estimated elasticities of travel distance reveal that travel distance is a necessary and ordinary good, implying that safety is essential and less responsive to price changes. In addition, the estimated elasticities of travel time suggest that travel time is an inferior good, indicating that as income goes up, people tend to spend less time traveling for evacuation. This finding provides logistic implications for emergency management agencies to analyze the evacuation travel demand and ensure safety in vulnerable communities.
HuangS. K.LindellM. K.PraterC. S.Who Leaves and Who Stays? A Review and Statistical Meta-Analysis of Hurricane Evacuation Studies. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 48, No. 8, 2016, pp. 991–1029.
2.
GudishalaR.WilmotC.Modeling Emergency Managers’ Hurricane Evacuation Decisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2604: 82–87.
3.
HalimN.JiangF.KhanM.MengS.MozumderP.Household Evacuation Planning and Preparation for Future Hurricanes: Role of Utility Service Disruptions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 1000–1011.
4.
GreerA.HuntsmanD.WuH. C.MurphyH.ClayL.Household Hurricane Evacuation During a Dual-Threat Event: Hurricane Laura and COVID-19. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 121, 2023, p. 103820.
5.
ChatterjeeC.FlugmanE.JiangF.MozumderP.ChowdhuryA. G.Insights from a Stated Preference Experiment of Florida Residents: Role of Information and Incentives in Hurricane Risk Mitigation. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018029.
6.
GhorbanzadehM.BurnsS.RugminiammaL. V.Erman OzguvenE.HuangW.Spatiotemporal Analysis of Highway Traffic Patterns in Hurricane Irma Evacuation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 321–334.
7.
MengS.JiangF.AsadiM.HalimN.MozumderP.A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Storm-Induced Property Damage: Evidence from Hurricane Sandy. SSRN 4531972. August4, 2023. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4531972.
8.
LindellM. K.Murray-TuiteP.WolshonB.BakerE. J.Large-Scale Evacuation: The Analysis, Modeling, and Management of Emergency Relocation from Hazardous Areas. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018.
9.
LindellM. K.KangJ. E.PraterC. S.The Logistics of Household Hurricane Evacuation. Natural Hazards, Vol. 58, 2011, pp. 1093–1109.
10.
WuH. C.LindellM. K.PraterC. S.Logistics of Hurricane Evacuation in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2012, pp. 445–461.
11.
WuH. C.LindellM. K.PraterC. S.HuangS. K.Logistics of Hurricane Evacuation During Hurricane Ike. Logistics: Perspectives, Approaches and Challenges (CheungJ.SongH., eds.), Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, 2013, pp. 127–140.
12.
ChenC.WangH.LindellM. K.JungM. C.SiamM. R.Tsunami Preparedness and Resilience: Evacuation Logistics and Time Estimations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 109, 2022, p. 103324.
13.
VarianH. R.Intermediate Microeconomics with Calculus: A Modern Approach. WW Norton & Company, New York, 2014.
14.
RoseA.Behavioral Economic Consequences of Disasters: A Basis for Inclusion in Benefit–Cost Analysis. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2022, pp. 213–233.
15.
SafitriN. D.ChikaraishiM.Monitoring the Elasticity of Travel Demand with Respect to Changes in the Transport Network for Better Policy Decisions During Disasters. PLoS One, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2023, p. e0288969.
16.
JiangF.MengS.KhanM.HalimN.MozumderP.Estimating Willingness to Pay and Costs Associated with Hurricane Evacuation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 121, 2023, p. 103826.
17.
MengS.HalimN.KarraM.MozumderP.Understanding Household Evacuation Preferences During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Puerto Rico. Safety Science, Vol. 171, 2024, p. 106405.
18.
HuangS. K.LindellM. K.PraterC. S.WuH. C.SiebeneckL. K.Household Evacuation Decision Making in Response to Hurricane Ike. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2012, pp. 283–296.
19.
JiangF.MengS.HalimN.MozumderP.Departure Timing Preference During Extreme Weather Events: Evidence from Hurricane Evacuation Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 358–372.
20.
YinW.Murray-TuiteP.UkkusuriS. V.GladwinH.An Agent-Based Modeling System for Travel Demand Simulation for Hurricane Evacuation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 42, 2014, pp. 44–59.
21.
AlawadiR.Murray-TuiteP.BianR.Determinants of Departure Timing for Hurricane Matthew and Anticipated Consistency in Future Evacuation Departures. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2022, p. 04022005.
22.
FuH.WilmotC. G.Sequential Logit Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Hurricane Evacuation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004. 1882: 19–26.
23.
GudishalaR.WilmotC.Comparison of Time-Dependent Sequential Logit and Nested Logit for Modeling Hurricane Evacuation Demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2312: 134–140.
24.
BianR.WilmotC. G.GudishalaR.BakerE. J.Modeling Household-Level Hurricane Evacuation Mode and Destination Type Joint Choice Using Data from Multiple Post-Storm Behavioral Surveys. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 99, 2019, pp. 130–143.
25.
SadriA. M.UkkusuriS. V.Murray-TuiteP.GladwinH.Analysis of Hurricane Evacuee Mode Choice Behavior. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 37–46.
26.
“Rebecca” BianR.Murray-TuiteP.TrainorJ. E.EdaraP.TriantisK.Sequentially Modeling Household Accommodation, Destination, and Departure Time Choices. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, Vol. 41, No. 2–3, 2023, pp. 223–240.
27.
ChengG.WilmotC.BakerE. J.Development of a Time-Dependent Disaggregate Hurricane Evacuation Destination Choice Model. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2013, pp. 163–174.
28.
RadwanE.MollaghasemiM.MitchellS.YildirimG.Framework for Modeling Emergency Evacuation. The TRIS and ITRD database by The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2005. https://trid.trb.org/View/756740
29.
DekaD.CarnegieJ. A.Forecasting Shelter Accessibility and Vehicle Availability for Hurricane Evacuation in Northern New Jersey Using Sample Enumeration. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2012, pp. 275–300.
30.
Mesa-ArangoR.HasanS.UkkusuriS. V.Murray-TuiteP.Household-Level Model for Hurricane Evacuation Destination Type Choice Using Hurricane Ivan Data. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2013, pp. 11–20.
31.
CzajkowskiJ.Is It Time to Go Yet? Understanding Household Hurricane Evacuation Decisions from a Dynamic Perspective. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2011, pp. 72–84.
32.
BakerE. J.Hurricane Evacuation Behavior. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1991, pp. 287–310.
33.
GladwinC. H.GladwinH.PeacockW. G.Modeling Hurricane Evacutaion Decisions with Ethnographic Methods. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2001, pp. 117–143.
34.
SarwarM. T.AnastasopoulosP. C.UkkusuriS. V.Murray-TuiteP.ManneringF. L.A Statistical Analysis of the Dynamics of Household Hurricane-Evacuation Decisions. Transportation, Vol. 45, 2018, pp. 51–70.
35.
MozumderP.VásquezW. F.Understanding Hurricane Evacuation Decisions Under Contingent Scenarios: A Stated Preference Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 71, 2018, pp. 407–425.
36.
KhanM.MozumderP.HalimN.MengS.Understanding Evacuation Behavior During Cyclones: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change. 2024, pp.1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-024-00157-1.
37.
DowK.CutterS. L.Emerging Hurricane Evacuation Issues: Hurricane Floyd and South Carolina. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2002, pp. 12–18.
38.
SiebeneckL. K.CovaT. J.An Assessment of the Return-Entry Process for Hurricane Rita 2005. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, pp. 91–111.
39.
LazoL.PowersM.HalseyA.III. Transportation Remains at a Standstill Following Hurricane Harvey. The Washington Post, August2017.
40.
GregA.Lessons from Hurricane Irma: When to Evacuate and When to Shelter in Place. NPR, June2018.
41.
EllisR.LevensonE.Floridians Jam Highways to Flee Wrath of Hurricane Irma. CNN, September2017.
42.
BurchA.RojasR.One Week After Harvey, Texas Residents Exhausted, Still Stranded. The New York Times, September2017.
43.
Associated Press. Irma Evacuation Nightmare: Next Time Some May Not Leave. The Florida Times-Union, September2017.
44.
OumT. H.WatersW. G.YongJ. S.Concepts of Price Elasticities of Transport Demand and Recent Empirical Estimates: An Interpretative Survey. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1992, pp. 139–154.
45.
LitmanT.Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, February2017.
46.
HolmgrenJ.Meta-Analysis of Public Transport Demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 10, 2007, pp. 1021–1035.
47.
FouquetR.Trends in Income and Price Elasticities of Transport Demand (1850–2010). Energy Policy, Vol. 50, 2012, pp. 62–71.
48.
YamanF.OffiaeliK.Is the Price Elasticity of Demand Asymmetric? Evidence from Public Transport Demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 203, 2022, pp. 318–335.
49.
TalleyW. K.NgM.Shipper Economic Demand Function for Cargo Port Services: A Note. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 170, 2023, p. 102995.
50.
Costliest U.S. Tropical Cyclones Tables Update (Report). United States National Hurricane Center, January12, 2018. Archived from the original on January27, 2018. Accessed January 12, 2018. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/news/UpdatedCostliest.pdf
51.
Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters: Table of Events (Report). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, January8, 2018. Archived from the original on January 21, 2018. Accessed January 8, 2018. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/events/US/1980-2017
52.
CangialosiP.LattoA. S.BergR. J.Hurricane Irma (AL112017) (PDF) (Report). Tropical Cyclone Report. National Hurricane Center. March 9, 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 31, 2018. Retrieved March 12, 2018. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL112017_Irma.pdf
WolshonB.“One-Way-Out”: Contraflow Freeway Operation for Hurricane Evacuation. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2001, pp. 105–112.
56.
WolshonB.Planning for the Evacuation of New Orleans. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, Vol. 72, No. 2, 2002, p. 44.
57.
UrbinaE.WolshonB.National Review of Hurricane Evacuation Plans and Policies: A Comparison and Contrast of State Practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2003, pp. 257–275.
58.
WolshonB.McArdleB.. Traffic Impacts and Dispersal Patterns on Secondary Roadways During Regional Evacuations. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, pp. 19–27.
59.
StiglitzJ. E.Selected Works of Joseph E. Stiglitz: Volume III: Rethinking Microeconomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019.
60.
OumT. H.WatersW. G.IIFuX.Transport Demand Elasticities. In Handbook of Transport Modelling (HensherD. A.ButtonK. J., eds.), Vol. 1, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, 2007, pp. 239–255.
61.
WangC.YarnalB.The Vulnerability of the Elderly to Hurricane Hazards in Sarasota, Florida. Natural Hazards, Vol. 63, 2012, pp. 349–373.
62.
BianR.WilmotC. G.Measuring the Vulnerability of Disadvantaged Populations During Hurricane Evacuation. Natural Hazards, Vol. 85, 2017, pp. 691–707.
63.
HornerM. W.OzguvenE. E.MarcelinJ. M.KocatepeA.Special Needs Hurricane Shelters and the Ageing Population: Development of a Methodology and a Case Study Application. Disasters, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2018, pp. 169–186.
64.
YabeT.UkkusuriS. V.Effects of Income Inequality on Evacuation, Reentry and Segregation After Disasters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102260.
65.
VásquezW. F.MurrayT. J.MozumderP.Understanding Hurricane Evacuation Planning in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2016, p. 04015018.
66.
WuH. C.MurphyH.GreerA.ClayL.Evacuate or Social Distance? Modeling the Influence of Threat Perceptions on Hurricane Evacuation in a Dual-Threat Environment. Risk Analysis, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2024, pp. 724–737.
67.
AlawadiR.Murray-TuiteP.MarascoD.UkkusuriS.GeY.Determinants of Full and Partial Household Evacuation Decision Making in Hurricane Matthew. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 83, 2020, p. 102313.
68.
LipseyR. G.RosenbluthG.A Contribution to the New Theory of Demand: A Rehabilitation of the Giffen Good. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’Economique, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1971, pp. 131–163.
69.
MasudaE.NewmanP.Gray and Giffen Goods. The Economic Journal, Vol. 91, No. 364, 1981, pp. 1011–1014.
70.
LindellM. K.SorensenJ. H.BakerE. J.LehmanW. P.Community Response to Hurricane Threat: Estimates of Household Evacuation Preparation Time Distributions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 85, 2020, p. 102457.
71.
HasanS.Mesa-ArangoR.UkkusuriS.A Random-Parameter Hazard-Based Model to Understand Household Evacuation Timing Behavior. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 27, 2013, pp. 108–116.
72.
ImanS.GeY.KlenowD. J.SavittA.Murray-TuiteP.Understanding the Decision-Making Process for Hurricane Evacuation Orders: A Case Study of Florida County Emergency Managers. Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 24, 2023, p. 16666.
73.
LiA. C.NozickL.XuN.DavidsonR.Shelter Location and Transportation Planning Under Hurricane Conditions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2012, pp. 715–729.
74.
YangJ.VijayanL.GhorbanzadehM.AlisanO.OzguvenE. E.HuangW.BurnsS.Integrating Storm Surge Modeling and Accessibility Analysis for Planning of Special-Needs Hurricane Shelters in Panama City, Florida. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2023, pp. 241–261.
75.
YangJ.OzguvenE. E.Spatial Accessibility to Shelters Report: A Case Study of Hurricane Irma. (No. TRBAM-24-05292). 2024.
76.
AsgaryA.AzimiN.Choice of Emergency Shelter: Valuing Key Attributes of Emergency Shelters. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol. 10, No. 2/3, 2019, pp. 130–150.
77.
WongS. D.PelA. J.ShaheenS. A.ChorusC. G.Fleeing from Hurricane Irma: Empirical Analysis of Evacuation Behavior Using Discrete Choice Theory. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 79, 2020, p. 102227.
78.
FarmerA. K.DeYoungS. E.The Pets of Hurricane Matthew: Evacuation and Sheltering with Companion Animals. Anthrozoös, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2019, pp. 419–433.
79.
DameraA.GehlotH.UkkusuriS.Murray-TuiteP.GeY.LeeS.Estimating the Sequencing of Evacuation Destination and Accommodation Type in Hurricanes. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2020, p. 20180071.
80.
MengS.MozumderP.Hurricane Sandy: Damages, Disruptions and Pathways to Recovery. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Vol. 5, 2021, pp. 223–247.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
