Food delivery riders (FDRs) rely on motorized two-wheelers that are innately unstable, resulting in safety risks. FDRs perform several traffic violations because of delivery time restrictions that result in concern for road safety. In this study, the available Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (MRBQ) is modified by considering the opinion of focus groups, to study the riding behavior of FDRs using a sample of 431 participants. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor solution loaded with 31 items. This research emphasizes that the risky behavior of FDRs is influenced by surrounding traffic and the road environment, in addition to their individual riding behavior. The self-reported crash, near crash, and traffic offenses data of FDRs showed a higher variance when compared with the mean (i.e., over-dispersed). Therefore, the relationship between the target variables—crash in past year, near crash in past year, and penalized traffic offenses in past year—and MRBQ factor scores were established using negative binomial regression analysis. Negative binomial regression analysis shows that the surrounding traffic factor has the highest incidence rate ratio, proving it to be the most significant predictor of crash risk for FDRs in addition to their own aberrant riding behavior. Based on this research, the enforcement of road safety policies can be effective in reducing aberrant riding behavior performed by FDRs such as traffic violation. The risky driving behavior of surrounding traffic can be properly dealt with by imposing hefty penalties and strict enforcement measures, and by spreading awareness.
KhanT.MohapatraS. S.Effect of Operational Attributes on Lateral Merging Position Characteristics at Mid-Block Median Opening. Transportation Letters, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2021, pp. 83–96.
2.
KhanT.MohapatraS. S.Modelling Lateral Width for Merging of U-Turning Vehicles in Divided Urban Roads. Current Science, Vol. 120, No. 11, 2022, pp. 1768–1777.
3.
DongC.RichardsS. H.HuangB.JiangX.Identifying the Factors Contributing to the Severity of Truck-Involved Crashes. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2015, pp. 116–126.
LiC.MirosaM.BremerP.Review of Online Food Delivery Platforms and Their Impacts on Sustainability. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 14, 2020, p. 5528.
6.
Nguyen-PhuocD. Q.NguyenN. A. N.NguyenM. H.NguyenL. N. T.Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.Factors Influencing Road Safety Compliance Among Food Delivery Riders: An Extension of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 166, 2022, pp. 541–556.
7.
QinH.WeiY.ZhangQ.MaL.An Observational Study on the Risk Behaviors of Electric Bicycle Riders Performing Meal Delivery at Urban Intersections in China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 79, 2021, pp. 107–117.
8.
ZhangF.JiY.LvH.MaX.Analysis of Factors Influencing Delivery E-Bikes’ Red-Light Running Behavior: A Correlated Mixed Binary Logit Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 152, 2021, p. 105977.
9.
WangX.ChenJ.QuddusM.ZhouW.ShenM.Influence of Familiarity with Traffic Regulations on Delivery Riders’ E-Bike Crashes and Helmet Use: Two Mediator Ordered Logit Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 159, 2021, p. 106277.
10.
Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.RubieE.HaworthN.Risky Business: Comparing the Riding Behaviors of Food Delivery and Private Bicycle Riders. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 177, 2022, p. 106820.
11.
ElliottM. A.BaughanC. J.SextonB. F.Errors and Violations in Relation to Motorcyclists’ Crash Risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2007, pp. 491–499.
12.
ParkerD.ReasonJ. T.MansteadA. S.StradlingS. G.Driving Errors, Driving Violations and Accident Involvement. Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1995, pp. 1036–1048.
13.
NewnamS.MamoW. G.TuluG. S.Exploring Differences in Driving Behaviour Across Age and Years of Education of Taxi Drivers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Safety Science, Vol. 68, 2014, pp. 1–5.
14.
GuptaA.ChoudharyP.ParidaM.Understanding and Modelling Risky Driving Behavior on High-Speed Corridors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 82, 2021, pp. 359–377.
15.
ChouhanS. S.KathuriaA.SekharC. R.Examining Risky Riding Behavior in India Using Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 160, 2021, p. 106312.
16.
BuiH. T.SaadiI.CoolsM.Investigating On-Road Crash Risk and Traffic Offenses in Vietnam Using the Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (MRBQ). Safety Science, Vol. 130, 2020, p. 104868.
17.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS.1993. The psychology of attitudes, Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers.
18.
GoodsC.VeenA.BarrattT.“Is Your Gig Any Good?” Analysing Job Quality in the Australian Platform-Based Food-Delivery Sector. Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2019, pp. 502–527.
19.
AbergL.Drinking and Driving: Intentions, Attitudes, and Social Norms of Swedish Male Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1993, pp. 289–296.
20.
ChenH. K.YanD. W.Interrelationships Between Influential Factors and Behavioral Intention with Regard to Autonomous Vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2019, pp. 511–527.
21.
HensherD. A.GreeneW. H.LiZ.Embedding Risk Attitude and Decision Weights in Non-Linear Logit to Accommodate Time Variability in the Value of Expected Travel Time Savings. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 45, No. 7, 2011, pp. 954–972.
22.
GuptaM.PawarN. M.VelagaN. R.MishraS.Modeling Distraction Tendency of Motorized Two-Wheeler Drivers in Time Pressure Situations. Safety Science, Vol. 154, 2022, p. 105820.
23.
NdagireM.KiwanukaS.PaichadzeN.KobusingyeO.Road Safety Compliance Among Motorcyclists in Kawempe Division, Kampala, Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2019, pp. 315–321.
24.
OlumideA. O.OwoajeE. T.Young Age as a Predictor of Poor Road Safety Practices of Commercial Motorcyclists in Oyo State, Nigeria. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2015, pp. 691–697.
25.
ZhengY.MaY.GuoL.ChengJ.ZhangY.Crash Involvement and Risky Riding Behaviors Among Delivery Riders in China: The Role of Working Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 1011–1022.
26.
RusliR.Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.Abd SalamS. A.Risky Riding Behaviors Among Motorcyclists in Malaysia: A Roadside Survey. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 74, 2020, pp. 446–457.
27.
Nguyen-PhuocD. Q.De GruyterC.Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.NgocS. D.TranA. T. P.Turn Signal Use Among Motorcyclists and Car Drivers: The Role of Environmental Characteristics, Perceived Risk, Beliefs and Lifestyle Behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105611.
28.
StantonN. A.SalmonP. M.Human Error Taxonomies Applied to Driving: A Generic Driver Error Taxonomy and its Implications for Intelligent Transport Systems. Safety Science, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2009, pp. 227–237.
29.
SabeyB. E.TaylorH.The Known Risks We Run: The Highway. In Societal Risk Assessment (SchwingR. C.AlbersW. A., eds.), Springer, Boston, MA, 1980, pp. 43–70.
30.
ZhaoN.MehlerB.ReimerB.D’AmbrosioL. A.MehlerA.CoughlinJ. F.An Investigation of the Relationship Between the Driving Behavior Questionnaire and Objective Measures of Highway Driving Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2012, pp. 676–685.
31.
HelmanS.ReedN.Validation of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire Using Behavioral Data from an Instrumented Vehicle and High-Fidelity Driving Simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 75, 2015, pp. 245–251.
32.
WengJ.MengQ.Effects of Environment, Vehicle and Driver Characteristics on Risky Driving Behavior at Work Zones. Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1034–1042.
33.
YiL.YurenC.FanW.The Impact of Traffic Environmental Vision Pressure on Driver Behavior. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2018, 2018, p. 12.
34.
SalmonP. M.LennéM. G.StantonN. A.JenkinsD. P.WalkerG. H.Managing Error on the Open Road: The Contribution of Human Error Models and Methods. Safety Science, Vol. 48, No. 10, 2010, pp. 1225–1235.
35.
TopolšekD.DraganD.Relationships Between the Motorcyclists’ Behavioral Perception and Their Actual Behavior. Transport, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2018, pp. 151–164.
36.
SakashitaC.SenserrickT.LoS.BoufousS.de RomeL.IversR.The Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Application Amongst Novice Riders in Australia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 22, 2014, pp. 126–139.
37.
SundayO. K.The Performance of the Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire Among Commercial Motorcycle Riders in Nigeria. Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, 2010, p. A194.
38.
OzkanT.LajunenT.DoğruyolB.YıldırımZ.ÇoymakA.Motorcycle Accidents, Rider Behavior, and Psychological Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 49, 2012, pp. 124–132.
39.
KhanT.DuttaP.MohapatraS. S.Categorization of Gaps at Mid-Block Median Openings in Heterogeneous Traffic: Adjudging the Applicability of Support Vector Machine and Occupancy Time Methods. Transportation Letters, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2023, pp. 1126–1139.
40.
KhanT.VivekA. K.MohapatraS. S.PatnaikA. K.Realistic Approach for Capacity Estimation of U-Turns Under Heterogeneous Traffic Condition. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2678: 989–1006.
MORT&H, 2019. Road Accidents in India - 2019. Ministry of Road Transport & Highway, India.
44.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS
45.
StreinerD. L.Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2003, pp. 99–103.
46.
DenhamB. E.Categorical Statistics for Communication Research. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2016.
47.
GruyterC.TruongL. T.NguyenH. T.Who’s Calling? Social Networks and Mobile Phone Use Among Motorcyclists. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 103, 2017, pp. 143–147.
StephensA. N.BrownJ.de RomeL.BaldockM. R. J.FernandesR.FitzharrisM.The Relationship Between Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire Scores and Crashes for Riders in Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 102, 2017, pp. 202–212.
50.
DongH.ZhongS.XuS.TianJ.FengZ.The Relationships Between Traffic Enforcement, Personal Norms and Aggressive Driving Behaviors Among Normal E-Bike Riders and Food Delivery E-Bike Riders. Transport Policy, Vol. 114, 2021, pp. 138–146.
51.
RusliR.MohammadM. Z.KamaluddinN. A.BakarH.IsaM. H. M.A Comparison of Characteristics Between Food Delivery Riders with and Without Traffic Crash Experience During Delivery in Malaysia. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2022, pp. 2244–2250.
52.
Nguyen-PhuocD. Q.NguyenL. N. T.SuD. N.NguyenM. H.Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.Deadly Meals: The Influence of Personal and Job Factors on Burnout and Risky Riding Behaviors of Food Delivery Motorcyclists. Safety Science, Vol. 159, 2023, p. 106007.
53.
JingZ.YuruL.YueZ.More Reliance, More Injuries: Income Dependence, Workload and Work Injury of Online Food-Delivery Platform Riders. Safety Science, Vol. 167, 2023, p. 106264.
54.
QianQ.HeJ.ShiJ.Analysis of Factors Influencing Aberrant Riding Behavior of Food Delivery Riders: A Perspective on Safety Attitude and Risk Perception. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 100, 2024, pp. 273–288.
