Work zones have long been cited as a significant cause of road fatalities and traffic delays, with evident negative impacts on traffic safety and mobility. This review outlines the mobility measures reported in the work zone delay context in three thrusts: 1) work zone travel delay, 2) queueing length, and 3) user cost. Through a critical comparison of reported findings, the current review illuminates the possibilities of more guided research that would expedite the goal of achieving an optimal work zone layout with minimal fatalities, maximum mobility, and efficiency. Additionally, we expanded our review to include other engineering disciplines to identify potential technologies that could be used to make work zones smarter. Finally, policy interventions necessary to improve the safety and mobility of work zones are discussed, followed by a critical discussion of the way forward.
MarksE.VereenS.AwolusiI.Active Work Zone Safety Using Emerging Technologies 2017. UTCA Theme: Management and Safety of Transportation Systems. No. 15412. University Transportation Center for Alabama, AL, 2017.
2.
JiangY.A Model for Estimating Traffic Delays and Vehicle Queues at Freeway Work Zones. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2001, pp. 65–81.
3.
RahimM. A.HassanH. M.A Deep Learning Based Traffic Crash Severity Prediction Framework. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol 154, 2021, p. 106090.
4.
DehmanA.FarooqB.Are Work Zones and Connected Automated Vehicles Ready for a Harmonious Coexistence? A Scoping Review and Research Agenda. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 133, 2021, p. 103422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103422.
5.
MengX. H.QiW.WangH.Capacity of One-Way Feeway Work Zone Lane Closure. Journal of Highway and Transporation Research and Development, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2012, pp. 109–113.
6.
ClarkJ. B.FontaineM. D.Exploration of Work Zone Crash Causes and Implications for Safety Performance Measurement Programs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2485: 61–69.
7.
BeacherA. G.FontaineM. D.GarberN. J.Field Evaluation of Late Merge Traffic Control in Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1911: 33–41.
8.
AlgomaiahM.LiZ.Enhancing Work Zone Capacity by a Cooperative Late Merge System Using Decentralized and Centralized Control Strategies. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 148, No. 2, 2022, p. 4021107. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000632.
9.
GrilloL. F.DattaT. K.HartnerC.Dynamic Late Lane Merge System at Freeway Construction Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2055: 3–10.
10.
ChenD.AhnS.Variable Speed Limit Control for Severe Non-Recurrent Freeway Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. Vol. 51, 2015, pp. 210–230.
11.
AbdelmohsenA. Z.El-RayesK.Optimizing the Planning of Highway Work Zones to Maximize Safety and Mobility. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000570.
12.
BenekohalR. F.RamezaniH.AvrenliK. A.Queue and User’s Costs in Highway Work Zones. FHWA-ICT-10-075. Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana, IL2010.
13.
El-RayesK.HyariK.Optimal Lighting Requirements for Nighttime Highway Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 5, 2006, pp. 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2006)132:5(435).
MashhadiA. H.FarhadmaneshM.RashidiA.MarkovićN.Review of Methods for Estimating Construction Work Zone Capacity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 382–397.
17.
WengJ.MengQ.Estimating Capacity and Traffic Delay in Work Zones: An Overview. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol 35, 2013, pp. 34–45.
18.
MoherD.ShamseerL.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1177–1185.
19.
Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.HaqueM. M.KingM.WashingtonS.Understanding the Impacts of Mobile Phone Distraction on Driving Performance: A Systematic Review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 72, 2016, pp. 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.006.
20.
KhatunR.XiangH.YangY.WangJ.YildizG.Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on the Thermochemical Conversion of Plastics During 1990–2020. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 317, 2021, p. 128373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128373.
21.
van EckN. J.WaltmanL.Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics, Vol. 84, No. 2, 2010, pp. 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
22.
YeN.KuehT. B.HouL.LiuY.YuH.A Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 272, 2020, p. 122679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122679.
23.
WengJ.MengQ.Analysis of Driver Casualty Risk for Different Work Zone Types. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1811–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.016.
24.
SaitoM.AdamsM. R.JinT. G.Development of a User Cost Estimation Procedure for Work Zones. Report No. UT-05.11. Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, 2005.
25.
Abdel-RahimA.KhanalM.CooleyH.GouldS.Synthesis of Research on Work Zone Delays and Simplified Application of QuickZone Analysis Tool. No. FHWA-ID-10-179. Idaho. Transportation Department, Boise, 2010.
26.
MengQ.WengJ.Optimal Subwork Zone Operational Strategy for Short-Term Work Zone Projects in Four-Lane Two-Way Freeways. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2013, pp. 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.
27.
DudekC. L.RichardsS. H.Traffic Capacity Through Work Zones on Urban Freeways. Research Report No. TTI-2-18-78-228-6. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University System, College Station, 1981.
28.
CassidyM. J.HanL. D.Proposed Model for Predicting Motorist Delays at Two-Lane Highway Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 1, 1993, pp. 27–42.
29.
JiangY.Traffic Capacity, Speed, and Queue-Discharge Rate of Indiana’s Four-Lane Freeway Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1657: 10–17.
30.
JiangY.A Model for Estimating Excess User Costs at Highway Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1657: 31–41.
31.
SonY. T.Queueing Delay Models for Two-Lane Highway Work Zones. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 33, No. 7, 1999, pp. 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00043-5.
32.
ChienS.SchonfeldP.Optimal Work Zone Lengths for Four-Lane Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, 2001, pp. 124–131.
33.
RamezaniH.BenekohalR. F.Analysis of Queue Formation and Dissipation in Work Zones. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 16, 2011, pp. 450–459.
34.
RamezaniH.BenekohalR. F.AvrenliK. A.Determining Queue and Congestion in Highway Work Zone Bottlenecks. United States Department of Transportation, Region V Regional University Transportation Center, West Lafayette, IN, 2011.
35.
BaeB.LiuY.HanL. D.BozdoganH.Spatio-Temporal Traffic Queue Detection for Uninterrupted Flows. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 129, 2019, pp. 20–34.
36.
JiangY.LiS.Measuring and Analyzing Vehicle Position and Speed Data at Work Zones Using Global Positioning System. ITE Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2002, pp. 48–53.
37.
BhutaniR.RamS.RavinderK.Impact of Metro Rail Construction Work Zone on Traffic Environment. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 17, 2016, pp. 586–595.
38.
KrammesR. A.MarsdenB. G.DudekC. L.Microcomputer Tool for Freeway Work Zone Planning and Scheduling. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 4, 1987, pp. 348–356.
39.
MartinelliD. R.XuD.Delay Estimation and Optimal Length for Four-Lane Divided Freeway Workzones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 2, 1996, pp. 114–122.
40.
SonY. T.CassidyM. J.ModanatS. M.Evaluating Steady-State Assumption for Highway Queueing System. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 2, 1995, pp. 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:2(182).
41.
HuangQ.ShiJ.Optimizing Work Zones for Two-Lane Urban Road Maintenance Projects. Tsinghua Science and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2008, pp. 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70106-8.
42.
UllmanG. L.DudekC. L.Theoretical Approach to Predicting Traffic Queues at Short-Term Work Zones on High-Volume Roadways in Urban Areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1824: 29–36.
43.
KarimA.AdeliH.Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Work Zone Capacity and Queue Estimation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 5, 2003, pp. 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(494).
44.
JiangX. H.AdeliH.Freeway Work Zone Traffic Delay and Cost Optimization Model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 3, 2003, pp. 230–241.
45.
Ghosh-DastidarS.AdeliH.Neural Network-Wavelet Microsimulation Model for Delay and Queue Length Estimation at Freeway Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 4, 2006, pp. 331–341.
46.
DuB.ChienS.LeeJ.SpasovicL.MouskosK.Artificial Neural Network Model for Estimating Temporal and Spatial Freeway Work Zone Delay Using Probe-Vehicle Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2573: 164–171.
47.
BaeJ.ChoiK.OhJ. H.Multicontextual Machine-Learning Approach to Modeling Traffic Impact of Urban Highway Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2645: 184–194.
48.
DuB.ChienS.LeeJ.SpasovicL.Predicting Freeway Work Zone Delays and Costs with a Hybrid Machine-Learning Model. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2017, 2017, p. 6937385. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6937385.
49.
MengQ.WengJ.Cellular Automata Model for Work Zone Traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2188: 131–139.
50.
MengQ.WengJ.An Improved Cellular Automata Model for Heterogeneous Work Zone Traffic. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1263–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.011.
51.
MartinP. T.ChaudhuriP.Development of a Statewide User Cost Manual for Rural Work Zones. University Transportation Centers Program (U.S.), Utah Department of Transportation, UT, 2010.
52.
GanX.WengJ.ZhangJ.Evaluation of Travel Delay and Accident Risk at Moving Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2021, pp. 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1659464.
53.
BiswasP. K.KhanS. M.PiratlaK.ChowdhuryM.Development and Evaluation of Statistical and Machine-Learning Models for Queue-Length Estimation for Lane Closures in Freeway Work Zones. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 149, No. 5, 2023, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-12648.
54.
DenneyR. W.Jr.LevineS. Z.Developing a Scheduling Tool for Work Zones on Houston Freeways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1984. 979: 7–11.
55.
VemuriA. T.PolycarpouM. M.PantP. D.Short-Term Forecasting of Traffic Delays in Highway Construction Zones Using on-Line Approximators. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1998, pp. 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(98)00066-1.
56.
SchnellT.MohrorJ. S.AktanF.Evaluation of Traffic Flow Analysis Tools Applied to Work Zones Based on Flow Data Collected in the Field. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1811: 57–66.
57.
ChienS. I.-J.GouliasD. G.YahalomS. Y.ChowhuryS. M.Simulation-Based Estimates of Delays at Freeway Work Zones. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 131–156.
58.
BenekohalR. F.Kaja-MohideenA.-Z.ChitturiM. V.Evaluation of Construction Work Zone Operational Issues: Capacity , Queue , and Delay. Publication ITRC FR 00/01-4. Illinois Transportation Research Center, Edwardsville, December2003, p. 238.
59.
JiangX.AdeliH.Object-Oriented Model for Freeway Work Zone Capacity and Queue Delay Estimation. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00344.x.
60.
HardyM. H.LarkinJ. J.WunderlichK. E.NedzeskyA. J.Estimating User Costs and Economic Impacts of Roadway Construction in Six Federal Lands Projects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 1997: 48–55.
61.
WashburnS. S.HilesT.HeaslipK.Impact of Lane Closures on Roadway Capacity: Development of a Two-Lane Work Zone Lane Closure Analysis Procedure (Part A). No. TRC-FDOT-59056-a-2008. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2008.
62.
LeeC.NoyceD. A.QinX.Development of Traffic Delay Assessment Tool for Short-Term Closures on Urban Freeways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2055: 39–48.
63.
ChitturiM. V.BenekohalR. F.Kaja-MohideenA. Z.Methodology for Computing Delay and User Costs in Work Zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2055: 31–38.
64.
BorchardtD. W.PestiG.SunD.DingL.Capacity and Road User Cost Analysis of Selected Freeway Work Zones in Texas. No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5619-1. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2009.
65.
BatsonR. G.TurnerD. S.RayP. S.WangM. M.WangM. P.FincherR.LanctotJ.Work Zone Lane Closure Analysis Model. No. ALDOT 930-721. University Transportation Center for Alabama, Birmingham, 2009.
66.
ZhuY.AhmadI.WangL.Estimating Work Zone Road User Cost for Alternative Contracting Methods in Highway Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135, No. 7, 2009, pp. 601–608.
67.
GouJ.ZhangL.AltmanJ. C.DavisW.QuickZone Improvement for Rural Freeway and Model Validation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2107: 34–45.
68.
JiangY.ChenH.LiS.Determination of Contract Time and Incentive and Disincentive Values of Highway Construction Projects. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2010, pp. 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2010.521540.
69.
SchroederB. J.RouphailN. M.Estimating Operational Impacts of Freeway Work Zones on Extended Facilities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2169: 70–80.
70.
HasemanR. J.WassonJ. S.BullockD. M.Real-Time Measurement of Travel Time Delay in Work Zones and Evaluation Metrics Using Bluetooth Probe Tracking. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2169: 40–53.
71.
ChitturiM. V.BenekohalR. F.Work Zone Queue Length and Delay Methodology. Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2010, pp. 273–283.
72.
MartinP. T.NadimpalliB.User Delay Costs Due to Work Zone Operations Near Echo Junction. University Transportation Centers Program (U.S.), Utah Department of Transportation, UT, 2010.
73.
RamezaniH.BenekohalR. F.Work Zones as a Series of Bottlenecks: Methodology to Estimate Delay and Queue Length. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2272: 67–77.
74.
RamezaniH.BenekohalR. F.Computing Moving and Intermittent Queue Propagation in Highway Work Zones. Project No. 071IY03. NEXTRANS Center (US), Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2012.
75.
RamezaniH.BenekohalR. F.INTQ: A Mesoscopic Simulation to Analyze Intermittent Queues in Work Zones. Proc., T&DI Congress 2014: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2014, pp. 400–409. https://trid.trb.org/view/1311296.
76.
SchroederB. J.RouphailN. M.WilliamsB. M.HajbabaieA.AghdashiB.KimS.TabriziK.NarronB.Delay and User Cost Estimation for Work Zones on Urban Arterials. Final Project Report, No. FHWA/NC/2013-09. North Carolina. Department of Transportation. Research and Analysis Group, North Carolina State University, NC, 2015.
77.
ZhuW.LiZ.AshJ.WangY.HuaX.Capacity Modeling and Control Optimization for a Two-Lane Highway Lane-Closure Work Zone. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 143, No. 12, 2017, p. 4017059. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000078.
78.
PestiG.BrydiaR. E.Work Zone Impact Assessment Methods and Applications. Transportation Research: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2617: 52–59.
79.
LiY.Martínez MoriJ. C.WorkD. B.Estimating Traffic Conditions from Smart Work Zone Systems. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2018, pp. 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2018.1438274.
80.
RamadanO. E.SisiopikuV. P.Modeling Highway Performance under Various Short-Term Work Zone Configurations. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 144, No. 9, 2018, pp. 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000176.
81.
SinghM. K.PandeyG.Ramachandra RaoK.Optimization of Work Zone Segments on Urban Roads Using Cellular Automata Model in Mixed Traffic. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2019, pp. 29–35.
82.
Mousazadeh GilandehM.Sharif AliS.Javad GoodarziM.AminiN.LatifiH.Modelling of Queue Length in Freeway Work Zones – Case Study Karaj-Tehran Freeway. PROMET-Traffic & Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2021, pp. 49–59. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v33i1.3582.
83.
Zuniga-GarciaN.MachemehlR. B.KhwajaN. A.PrunerK. D.FuM.Estimation of Road User Costs for Work Zones in Data-Limited or Time-Constrained Environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 147, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001987.
84.
KedarisettyS.KimC.HarveyJ. T.Regression Models of Road User Cost Prediction for Highway Maintenance and Rehabilitation for Life Cycle Planning in California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 18–29.
85.
LighthillM. J.WhithamG. B.On Kinematic Waves II. A Theory of Traffic Flow on Long Crowded Roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 229, No. 1178, 1955, pp. 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0089.
GongL.FanW.Optimizing Scheduling of Long-Term Highway Work Zone Projects. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 17–27.
88.
YuY.WengJ.ZhuW.Optimizing Strategies for the Urban Work Zone with Time Window Constraints. Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 11, No. 15, 2019, p. 4218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154218.
89.
RayaproluP.IshakS.QiY.WolshonB.Operational Assessment of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurations for Freeway Work Zones. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2013, pp. 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2012.707052.
90.
IdewuW.ChanpiwatP.NaghawiH.Identifying Optimum Taper Lengths for Zipper Merging Applications Using Real Data and Microscopic Simulation. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2020, pp. 210–220. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.13044.
91.
DickersonC. L.WangJ.WitherspoonJ.CrumleyS. C.Work Zone Management in the District of Columbia: Deploying a Citywide Transportation Management Plan and Work Zone Project Management System. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2554: 37–45.
92.
BlackmanR.LeggeM.Kumar DebnathA.Comparison of Three Traffic Management Plans Showing Shadow and Police Vehicle Effects on Driver Behavior at Highway Ingle Lane Closures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 15–25.
93.
UllmanG.SchroederJ.GopalakrishnaD.Work Zone Intelligent Transportation Systems Implementation Guide: Use of Technology and Data for Effective Work Zone Management. No. FHWA-HOP-14-008. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2014.
94.
Dau-NgoT.GonzalezI.HildeL.JimM.Construction Ahead: Moving Toward Sustainable Transportation Management Plans. Proc., Green Streets, Highways, and Development 2013: Advancing the Practice, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2013, pp. 368–387.
95.
HanY.RamezaniM.HegyiA.YuanY.HoogendoornS.Hierarchical Ramp Metering in Freeways: An Aggregated Modeling and Control Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 110, 2020, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2019.09.023.
96.
El-RayesK.LiuL.El-GoharyN.AbdelmohsenA. Z.Effect of Flaggers and Spotters in Directing Work Zone Traffic for Illinois Expressways and Freeways. Civil Engineering Studies, Illinois Center for Transportation Series, No. 14–001. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation, Rantoul, IL, 2014, 146p.
97.
AhmedA.KhaledE. R.LiangL.Impact of Flaggers on Safety and Mobility of Highway Work Zones. Proc., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Annual Conference and General Meeting 2017: Leadership in Sustainable Infrastructure, Vancouver, Canada, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Quebec, 2017, pp. 264–271.
98.
IslamM.HadiuzzamanM.FangJ.QiuT.El-BasyounyK.Assessing Mobility and Safety Impacts of a Variable Speed Limit Control Strategy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2364: 1–11.
99.
DuB.StevenI.ChienJ. Y.Feasibility of Shoulder Use for Highway Work Zone Optimization. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 1, No. 4, 2014, pp. 235–246.
100.
FiawoyifeK. K.An Empirical Study of Work-Zone Safety and Mobility Using Surveys and Anonymous User Generated Trip Information. Masters thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, 2019.
101.
BeacherA. G.FontaineM. D.GarberN. J.Guidelines for Using Late Merge Traffic Control in Work Zones: Results of a Simulation-Based Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1911: 42–50.
102.
KimK.KimS.ShchurD.A UAS-Based Work Zone Safety Monitoring System by Integrating Internal Traffic Control Plan (ITCP) and Automated Object Detection in Game Engine Environment. Automation in Construction, Vol. 128, 2021, p. 103736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103736.
103.
DayalS.MortazaviA.HuynhK. H.GergesR. L.ShynkJ. J.A Cooperative High-Accuracy Localization Algorithm for Improved Road Workers’ Safety. Proc., Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, IEEE, New York, 2013, pp. 1709–1713. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2013.6810592.
104.
RenT.XieY.JiangL.New England Merge: A Novel Cooperative Merge Control Method for Improving Highway Work Zone Mobility and Safety. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2021, pp. 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2020.1822747.
105.
RenT.XieY.JiangL.Cooperative Highway Work Zone Merge Control Based on Reinforcement Learning in a Connected and Automated Environment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 363–374.
106.
AlgomaiahM.LiZ.Exploring Work Zone Late Merge Strategies With and Without Enabling Connected Vehicles Technologies. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 9, 2021, p. 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100316.
107.
YuanY.LiuY.LiuW.Dynamic Lane-Based Signal Merge Control for Freeway Work Zone Operations. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 145, No. 12, 2019, p. 04019053. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000256.
108.
TheissL. A.LindheimerT.UllmanG. L.Closed Course Performance Testing of a Work Zone Intrusion Alarm System. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 57–67.
109.
ThapaD.MishraS.Using Worker’s Naturalistic Response to Determine and Analyze Work Zone Crashes in the Presence of Work Zone Intrusion Alert Systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 156, 2021, p. 106125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106125.
110.
SakhakarmiS.ParkJ. W.Improved Intrusion Accident Management Using Haptic Signals in Roadway Work Zone. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 80, 2022, pp. 320–329.
111.
MarksE. D.TeizerJ.Method for Testing Proximity Detection and Alert Technology for Safe Construction Equipment Operation. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2013, pp. 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.783705.
112.
ParkJ.MarksE.ChoY. K.SuryantoW.Performance Test of Wireless Technologies for Personnel and Equipment Proximity Sensing in Work Zones. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 142, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001031.
113.
QingZ.ZhangS.BrownH.SunC.Evaluation of Truck-Mounted Automated Flagger Assistance Devices in Missouri: Case Study. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 145, No. 12, 2019, p. 05019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000271.
114.
DuS.RazaviS.Variable Speed Limit for Freeway Work Zone with Capacity Drop Using Discrete-Time Sliding Mode Control. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000815.
115.
RahmanM. M.StrawdermanL.GarrisonT.EakinD.WilliamsC. C.Work Zone Sign Design for Increased Driver Compliance and Worker Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.023.
116.
ChengG.ChengR.Optimizing Speed Limits Upstream of Freeway Reconstruction and Expansion Work Zones Based on Driver Characteristics. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 146, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000389.
117.
FlynnD. F. B.BreckA.GillhamO.AtkinsR. G.FisherD. L.Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs Are Effective in Reducing Driver Speeds: A Meta-Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 481–492.
118.
MudigondaS.OzbayK.Robust Calibration of Macroscopic Traffic Simulation Models Using Stochastic Collocation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 59, 2015, pp. 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.015.
119.
BlackmanR.DebnathA. K.HaworthN.Understanding Vehicle Crashes in Work Zones: Analysis of Workplace Health and Safety Data as an Alternative to Police-Reported Crash Data in Queensland, Australia. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2020, pp. 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1734190.
120.
NnajiC.KarakhanA. A.GambateseJ.LeeH. W.Case Study to Evaluate Work-Zone Safety Technologies in Highway Construction. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000498.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
