The Florida Reef is under intense pressure from excessive human disturbance and climate change. A group of Florida residents including boaters and fishers was surveyed about their concerns and willingness to pay (WTP) for restorative services. A discrete choice valuation experiment was conducted, involving nearly 1,300 respondents, to estimate WTP for coral reef restoration, wide beaches, and clean water. The boaters demonstrated a somewhat higher WTP for a more extensive beach size and coral restoration. The analysis allowed quantification of maritime transportation passengers’ preferences for sustainable resource management. The findings provide useful insights for maritime transportation and coastal management agencies wishing to finance conservation initiatives. Furthermore, the study offers valuable methodological contributions and policy relevant information to incorporate ecosystem service valuations into the decision-making process beyond the study areas.
LowryM. B.LaningaT.ZimmermanM.KingsburyK. T.Using Traffic Simulation Software to Manage Recreational River Boats on Public Lands. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2244: 107–115.
2.
WuL.ZhangJ.FujiwaraA.Dynamic Analysis of Japanese Tourists’ Three Stage Choices: Tourism Participation, Destination Choice, and Travel Mode Choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2322: 91–101.
3.
ParamatiS. R.ShahbazM.AlamM. S.Does Tourism Degrade Environmental Quality? A Comparative Study of Eastern and Western European Union. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 50, 2017, pp. 1–3.
4.
RitchieW. J.MelnykS. A.NiJ. Z.Environmental Standard Adoption in Marinas: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of a Special Form of Maritime Transportation Hubs. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 55, 2017, pp. 1–11.
Hoegh-GuldbergO.Coral Reef Ecosystems and Anthropogenic Climate Change. Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 11, 2011, pp. 215–227.
7.
KeithD. A.RodríguezJ. P.Rodríguez-ClarkK. M.NicholsonE.AapalaK.AlonsoA.AsmussenM., et al. Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2013, p. e62111.
8.
BurkeL.ReytarK.SpaldingM.PerryA.Reefs at Risk Revisited. World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington, D.C., 2011.
9.
BrouwerR.BrouwerS.EleveldM. A.VerbraakM.WagtendonkA. J.Van Der WoerdH. J.Public Willingness to Pay for Alternative Management Regimes of Remote Marine Protected Areas in the North Sea. Marine Policy, Vol. 68, 2016, pp. 195–204.
10.
HuntingtonH. P.OlsenJ.ZdorE.ZagorskiyA.ShinH. C.RomanenkoO.KaltenbornB.DawsonJ.DaviesJ.Abou-AbbsiE.Effects of Arctic Commercial Shipping on Environments and Communities: Context, Governance, Priorities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 118, 2023, p. 103731.
11.
PecorariE.SquizzatoS.FerrariA.CuzzolinG.RampazzoG.WATERBUS: A Model to Estimate Boats’ Emissions in “Water Cities”. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 23, 2013, pp. 73–80.
12.
OrtizJ. C.BozecY. M.WolffN. H.DoropoulosC.MumbyP. J.Global Disparity in the Ecological Benefits of Reducing Carbon Emissions for Coral Reefs. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, No. 12, 2014, pp. 1090–1094.
13.
BanksK. W., B. M.RieglV. P.RichardsB. K.WalkerK. P.HelmleL. K.JordanJ.PhippsM. S.ShivjiR. E.SpielerDodgeR. E.The Reef Tract of Continental Southeast Florida (Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties, USA). In Coral Reefs of the USA (RieglB. M.DodgeR. E., eds.), Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2008, pp. 175–220.
14.
Van BeukeringP.BranderL.van ZantenB.VerbruggeE.LemsK.The Economic Value of the Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States Virgin Islands. Report R11/06. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
15.
PanL.WaygoodE. O.PattersonZ.Public Transit Itinerary Choice Analysis Considering Various Incentives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677: 722–733.
16.
ShoyamaK.ManagiS.YamagataY.Public Preferences for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate-Change Mitigation: A Choice Experiment Using Ecosystem Services Indicators. Land Use Policy, Vol. 34, 2013, pp. 282–289. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003.
17.
ShivlaniM.EstevanezM.Development of Management Alternatives for the Southeast Florida Region According to Stakeholder Working Panels. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Miami Beach, 2011.
18.
Brevard County Natural Resources Management Office. The Apportionment of Probable Benefits and Fees Under a Proposed MSBU for Brevard County’s South Beaches. Prepared by PRÆCIPIO EFS, Inc., PMG Associates Inc., Olsen Associates Inc. 2009. http://www.brevardcounty.us/NaturalResources/Beaches/RestorationProjects.
HoyosD.The State of the Art of Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments. Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1595–1603.
24.
McFaddenD.Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics (ZarembkaP., ed.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 1974, pp. 105–142.
25.
BlameyR. K.BennettJ. W.LouviereJ. J.MorrisonM. D.RolfeJ. C.Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 23, 2002, pp. 167–186.
26.
BellK. P.HuppertD.JohnsonR. L.Willingness to Pay for Local Coho Salmon Enhancement in Coastal Communities. Marine Resource Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2003, pp. 15–31.
27.
BirolE.KarousakisK.KoundouriP.Using a Choice Experiment to Account for Preference Heterogeneity in Wetland Attributes: The Case of Cheimaditida Wetland in Greece. Ecological Economics, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2006, pp. 145–156.
28.
MarielP.HoyosD.MeyerhoffJ.CzajkowskiM.DekkerT.GlenkK.JacobsenJ. B., et al. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2021, p. 129.
29.
TrainK. E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2009.
30.
LeeD.DerribleS.PereiraF. C.Comparison of Four Types of Artificial Neural Network and a Multinomial Logit Model for Travel Mode Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 101–112.
31.
HossainS.HabibK. N.Inferring the Purposes of Using Ride-Hailing Services Through Data Fusion of Trip Trajectories, Secondary Travel Surveys, and Land Use Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 558–573.
32.
SarriasM.DazianoR.Multinomial Logit Models with Continuous and Discrete Individual Heterogeneity in R: The gmnl Package. Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 79, 2017, pp. 1–46.
33.
SeeteramN. A.EngelV.MozumderP.Implications of a Valuation Study for Ecological and Social Indicators Associated with Everglades Restoration. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 627, 2018, pp. 792–801.
CaseyJ. F.BrownC.SchuhmannP.Are Tourists Willing to Pay Additional Fees to Protect Corals in Mexico?Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2010, pp. 557–573.
36.
XiaoJ.WangM.GaoX.Valuing Tourists’ Willingness to Pay for Conserving the Non-Use Values of Marine Tourism Resources: A Comparison of Three Archipelagic Tourism Destinations in China. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2020, pp. 678–710.
37.
WallmoK.LewD. K.A Comparison of Regional and National Values for Recovering Threatened and Endangered Marine Species in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 179, 2016, pp. 38–46.
38.
Cazabon-MannetteM.SchuhmannP. W.HaileyA.HorrocksJ.Estimates of the Non-Market Value of Sea Turtles in Tobago Using Stated Preference Techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 192, 2017, pp. 281–291.
39.
WallmoK.LewD. K.Public Willingness to Pay for Recovering and Downlisting Threatened and Endangered Marine Species. Conservation Biology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2012, pp. 830–839.
40.
SchuhmannP. W.SkeeteR.WaiteR.LordeT.Bangwayo-SkeeteP.OxenfordH. A.GillD.MooreW.SpencerF.Visitors’ Willingness to Pay Marine Conservation Fees in Barbados. Tourism Management, Vol. 71, 2019, pp. 315–326.
41.
LondoñoL. M.JohnstonR. J.Enhancing the Reliability of Benefit Transfer Over Heterogeneous Sites: A Meta-Analysis of International Coral Reef Values. Ecological Economics, Vol. 78, 2012, pp. 80–89.
42.
JohnstonR. J.BauerD. M.Using Meta-Analysis for Large-Scale Ecosystem Service Valuation: Progress, Prospects, and Challenges. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2020, pp. 23–63.
43.
MoeltnerK.PuriR.JohnstonR. J.BesedinE.BalukasJ. A.LeA.Locally-Weighted Meta-Regression and Benefit Transfer. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 121, 2023, p. 102871.
44.
KellerB. D.CauseyB. D.Linkages Between the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary and the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Initiative. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2005, 48, No. 11–12, pp. 869–900.
HarperJ. W.The New Man and the Sea: Climate Change Perceptions and Sustainable Seafood Preferences of Florida Reef Anglers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2015, pp. 299–328.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
