Characterization of Degraded Ballast Strength: A Field Application of Ground Penetrating Radar and Dynamic Cone Penetration

Abstract

Ballast performance and lifecycle are influenced by aggregate breakdown-related degradation or fouling and moisture accumulating in track substructure, necessitating effective monitoring and characterization methods. Recent research supported by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center has focused on investigating condition assessment technologies and developing innovative solutions to ensure railway infrastructure performance. This paper presents a combined application of ground penetrating radar (GPR), the Smart Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) with an automatic depth measurement system, and the PANDA^® penetrometer for comprehensive ballast condition evaluations. The GPR scans covered 43.5 km (27 mi) of railway track, and two types of DCP tests were executed at 15 distinct locations within the Fort Campbell Army installation in Kentucky. The analyses focused on understanding the depth profiles of the track substructure with particular attention given to ballast depth, fouling index (FI), moisture content, and ballast strength. The GPR surveys yielded relative moisture content (RMC) and FI depth profile heatmaps, revealing a correlation between these two variables. A comparative analysis of the Smart DCP and PANDA penetrometer results was conducted, identifying interfaces between the ballast and subballast layers. The study explores the impact of RMC and FI on ballast strength, particularly beyond a critical penetration depth from the ballast surface. Finally, a Gaussian function model is proposed to represent the California Bearing Ratio as a function of the FI and RMC. These findings offer potential for predictive assessments of ballast strength based on FI and moisture content.

Keywords

dynamic cone penetrometer ground penetrating radar railway track ballast subgrade crossties fouled

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Canadian National Railway. Ballast Performance in Concrete Tie Track: Prairie Region, Edmonton, Geotechnical Service. Internal Report. Canadian National Railway, 1987.

Collingwood

B. I.

An Investigation of the Cause of Railroad Ballast Fouling. Master of Science Degree Project Report No. AAR88-350P. University of Massachusetts, 1988.

Selig

E. T.

DelloRusso

Laine

K. J.

Sources and Causes of Ballast Fouling. Report No. R-805. Association of American Railroads, Technical Center, Chicago, Ill., 1992.

Selig

E. T.

Waters

J. M.

Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford Publications, London, 1994.

Kashani

H. F.

C. L.

Oden

C. P.

Smith

S. S.

Model Track Studies by Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on Ballast with Different Fouling and Geotechnical Properties. Proc., 2015 Joint Rail Conference, Manuscript JRC2015-5643, March 23-26, San Jose, CA, 2015.

Han

Selig

E. T.

Effects of Fouling on Ballast Settlement. Proc. 6th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 1997.

Huang

Tutumluer

Dombrow

Laboratory Characterization of Fouled Railroad Ballast Behavior. Transportation Research Record No. 2117, TRB, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 93–101.

Ebrahimi

Tinjum

J. M.

Edil

T. B.

Large-Scale Cyclic Triaxial Testing of Rail Ballast. Proc. AREMA Annual Conference, Orlando, Florida, 2010.

Trinh

V. N.

Tang

A. M.

Cui

Y. J.

Dupla

Canou

Calon

Lambert

Robinet

Schoen

Mechanical Characterization of the Fouled Ballast in Ancient Railway Track Substructure by Large-scale Triaxial Test. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2012, pp. 511–523.

10.

Tennakoon

Indraratna

Rujikiatkamjorn

Nimbalkar

Neville

The Role of Ballast Fouling Characteristics on the Drainage Capacity of Rail Substructure. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1–12.

11.

Duong

T. V.

Trinh

V. N.

Cui

Y. J.

Tang

A. M.

Calon

Development of a Large-scale Infiltration Column for Studying the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Fouled Ballast. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1–10.

12.

Indraratna

Tennakoon

Nimbalkar

S. C.

Rujikiatkamjorn. Behavior of Clay-fouled Ballast under Drained Triaxial Testing. Géotechnique, Vol. 63, No. 5, 2013, pp. 410–419.

13.

Indraratna

Nimbalkar

Coop

Sloan

S. W.

A Constitutive Model for Coal-Fouled Ballast Capturing the Effects of Particle Degradation. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 61, 2014, pp. 96–107.

14.

Qian

Integrated Computational and Experimental Framework for the Assessment of Railroad Ballast Life-Cycle Behavior. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014.

15.

Loram Geotechnical Services. https://loram.com/inspection-and-optimization/geotechnical-services/. Accessed July 30, 2023.

16.

VertekCPT. Smart Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (SmartDCP). https://www.vertekcpt.com/smart-dcp/. Accessed July 30, 2023.

17.

Sol Solution. PANDA Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. https://www.sol-solution.com/en/our-materials/panda-en/. Accessed July 30, 2023.

18.

Kashani

H. F.

C. L.

Clement

W. P.

Oden

C. P.

Evaluating the correlation between the geotechnical index and the electromagnetic properties of fouled ballasted track by a full-scale laboratory model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2545, 2016, pp. 66–78.

19.

Roberts

Al-Qadi

Tutumluer

Track Substructure Characterization Using 500 MHz and 2 GHz Ground Penetrating Radar: Results from over 250 Miles of Track in Wyoming and Alaska, in proceedings of the AREMA 2008 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, September 21–24, 2008.

20.

ASTM D6951/D6951M-09. Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA, 2009.

21.

AREMA. Manual for Railway Engineering. Roadway and Ballast, Lanham, MD, 2010.

22.

Hong

W. T.

Kim

S. Y.

Lee

S. J.

Lee

J. S.

Strength and Stiffness Assessment of Railway Track Substructures Using Crosshole-Type Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 100, 2017, pp. 88–97.

23.

Lefevre

Panda Compaction Control Methodology for a Proposed ASTM Adaptation: Engineer Report for the CUST. Blaise-Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 1999.

24.

Haddani

Nebieridze

Trackbed Investigations Using Different Approaches: GPR, Seismic Acquisition, Panda and Endoscopy. SNCF-RailTEC Workshop, Paris, France, 2014.

25.

Ball

Soil and water relationships. The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation. Ag News and Views, 2001. http://www.noble.org/ag/soils/soilwaterrelationships.

26.

Benz-Navarrete

M. A.

Breul

Bacconet

Moustan

The PANDA^®, Variable Energy Lightweight Dynamic Cone Penetrometer: A Quick State of Art, Engineering Geology, 2020. https://api.semanticscholar.org/Corpus.

27.

Sawangsuriya

Edil

T. B.

Evaluating Stiffness and Strength of Pavement Materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 158, No. 4, 2005, pp. 217–230.

28.

Haddani

Breul

Saussine

Navarrete

M. A. B.

Ranvier

Gourvès

Trackbed Mechanical and Physical Characterization Using PANDA/Geoendoscopy Coupling. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 143, 2016, pp. 1201–1209.

29.

Breul

Saussine

On-Site Mechanical Characterization of the Ballast State. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2011, pp. 31–38.

30.

Mishra

Gallier

Tutumluer

Haddani

Gourves

Application of PANDA and Geo-Endoscopy Techniques for Improved Assessment of Track Substructure Conditions at Railroad Bridge Approaches. ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, 2015, p. V001T01A027.

31.

Livneh

Ishai

Livneh

N. A.

Effect of Vertical Confinement on Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Strength Values in Pavement and Subgrade Evaluations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1473, 1995, pp. 1–8.

32.

Siekmeier

Pinta

Merth

Jensen

Davich

Camargo

F. F.

Beyer

Using the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Light Weight Deflectometer for Construction Quality Assurance. Minnesota. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Materials and Road Research, 2009.

33.

Lee

J. S.

Kim

S. Y.

Hong

W. T.

Byun

Y. H.

Assessing Subgrade Strength Using an Instrumented Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2019, pp. 930–941.

34.

Kang

Wang

Qamhia

I. I.

Tutumluer

Haddani

Bankston

Degraded Ballast Stiffness Characterization Using Bender Element Field Sensor and PANDA Penetrometer. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677: 428–438.

35.

Vivanco

J. R.

Barbier

Navarrete

M. A. B.

Breul

Statistical Analysis of the Influence of Ballast Fouling on Penetrometer and Geoendoscope Data. Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics Volume 2, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 915–930.