For effective maritime traffic emergency rescue (MTER) operations in the event of maritime traffic accidents (MTAs) and to improve rescue efficiency, it is necessary to analyze the MTER synergy problem and the cooperation between port states. First, the spatial information of accidents under the geographic information system data structure is clarified from the global integrated shipping information system of the International Maritime Organization, and the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise algorithm is used to conduct hotspot mapping analysis of MTAs to establish the clustering and classification of accident characteristics in key areas. Second, the classification characteristics of accident samples are extracted based on spatial information, and the correlation attributes between MTA hotspots are analyzed. Furthermore, by introducing complex network measurement technology, a topological model of the MTER network is established considering the correlation of accident hotspots, and this model is combined with the sample data of MTAs in Southeast Asian waters from 1990 to 2022. Third, the MTER topological network model is quantitatively analyzed under the accident space of Southeast Asia, and the degree of correlation of traffic accidents in key areas is obtained to reveal the inevitable demand for MTER between regions. The results of the analysis show that there is a network correlation between inter-regional accident hotspots, and thus the degree of correlation between accident hotspots needs to be considered for MTER in key areas. Countries in densely connected regions would set up joint rescue exercises and consider rescue assistance between port country stakeholders, thus improving protection for accident emergency responses. The method of complex network topology based on spatial correlation between accident hotspots suggests a new approach for solving the MTER problem.
LuoM. F.ShinS. H.Half-Century Research Developments in Maritime Accidents: Future Directions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 123, 2019, pp. 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.010.
2.
Dominguez-PéryC.TassabehjiR.CorsetF.ChreimZ.A Holistic View of Maritime Navigation Accidents and Risk Indicators: Examining IMO Reports from 2011 to 2021. Journal of Shipping and Trade, Vol. 8, 2023, p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-023-00135-y.
3.
DongW.JinJ.LuM.DingH.LvQ.FanH.HouS.FanB.Analysis of Emergency Medical Rescue in the “8-12” Tianjin Port Heavy Fire Explosion Accident. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2021, pp. 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x20001478.
4.
HuangJ.HanN.JiangB. Q.CaoY.HanX. T.Water Search and Rescue (SAR) for Ship Accidents in China: Analysis of 12 Years’ Data. Annals of Translational Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 22, 2022, p. 1207. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-4530.
5.
WenH.WuJ.DuanY.QiW.ZhaoS.A Methodology of Timing Co-Evolutionary Path Optimization for Accident Emergency Rescue Considering Future Environmental Uncertainty. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 131459–131472. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2940315.
6.
MaQ.ZhangD.WanC.ZhangJ.LyuN.Multi-Objective Emergency Resources Allocation Optimization for Maritime Search and Rescue Considering Accident Black-Spots. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 261, 2022, p. 112178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112178.
7.
ZhouX.A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Navigation Risk and Deploying Maritime Emergency Resources in the South China Sea. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 248, 2022, p. 110797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110797.
8.
SunY.LingJ.ChenX.KongF.HuQ.BiancardoS. A.Exploring Maritime Search and Rescue Resource Allocation via an Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization Method. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2022, p. 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10070906.
9.
ZhangL. Y.LuJ.YangZ. L.Dynamic Optimization of Emergency Resource Scheduling in a Large-Scale Maritime Oil Spill Accident. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 152, 2021, p. 107028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107028.
10.
GuoY.YeY.YangQ.YangK.A Multi-Objective INLP Model of Sustainable Resource Allocation for Long-Range Maritime Search and Rescue. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2019, p. 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030929.
11.
MaQ. D.ZhouY.LiuL.Review and Comparison of the Demand Analysis Methods of Maritime Emergency Resources. Brodogradnja, Vol. 73, No. 1, 2022, pp. 141–162. https://doi.org/10.21278/brod73108.
12.
AcharyaT. D.YooK. W.LeeD. H.GIS-Based Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Marine Accidents Database in the Coastal Zone of Korea. Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 79, 2017, pp. 114–118. https://doi.org/10.2112/si79-024.1.
13.
ZhangY.SunX.ChenJ.ChengC.Spatial Patterns and Characteristics of Global Maritime Accidents. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 206, 2021, p. 107310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107310.
14.
WangH.LiuZ.LiuZ.WangX.WangJ.GIS-Based Analysis on the Spatial Patterns of Global Maritime Accidents. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 245, 2022, p. 110569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110569.
15.
YangY.LiuW.XuX.Identifying Important Ports in Maritime Silk Road Shipping Network from Local and Global Perspective. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 798–810.
16.
UgurluO.ErolS.BasarE.The Analysis of Life Safety and Economic Loss in Marine Accidents Occurring in the Turkish Straits. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2016, pp. 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.1000992.
17.
ByeR. J.AalbergA. L.Maritime Navigation Accidents and Risk Indicators: An Exploratory Statistical Analysis Using AIS Data and Accident Reports. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 176, 2018, pp. 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.033.
18.
WengJ. X.LiG. R.Exploring Shipping Accident Contributory Factors Using Association Rules. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2019, pp. 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2017.1341440.
19.
ÇakırE.FışkınR.SevgiliC.Investigation of Tugboat Accidents Severity: An Application of Association Rule Mining Algorithms. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 209, 2021, p. 107470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107470.
20.
ÖzaydinE.FışkınR.UğurluÖ.WangJ.A Hybrid Model for Marine Accident Analysis Based on Bayesian Network (BN) and Association Rule Mining (ARM). Ocean Engineering, Vol. 247, 2022, p. 110705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110705.
21.
ZouY.DonnerR. V.MarwanN.DongesJ. F.KurthsJ.Complex Network Approaches to Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters, Vol. 787, 2019, pp. 1–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.005.
22.
HussainO. A.AhmadM. B.ZaidiF.Benchmarking the Influential Nodes in Complex Networks. Advances in Complex Systems, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2022, p. 2250010. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525922500102.
23.
LüJ.WenG.LuR.WangY.ZhangS.Networked Knowledge and Complex Networks: An Engineering View. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2022, pp. 1366–1383. https://doi.org/10.1109/jas.2022.105737.
24.
DingR.UjangN.HamidH. B.MananM. S. A.LiR.AlbadareenS. S. M.NochianA.WuJ.Application of Complex Networks Theory in Urban Traffic Network Researches. Networks & Spatial Economics, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2019, pp. 1281–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-019-09466-5.
25.
HossainM. M.AlamS.A Complex Network Approach Towards Modeling and Analysis of the Australian Airport Network. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 60, 2017, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.12.008.
26.
ZhangM.HuangT.GuoZ.HeZ.Complex-Network-Based Traffic Network Analysis and Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, Vol. 607, 2022, p. 128063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128063.
27.
DengJ.LiuS.ShuY.HuY.XieC.ZengX.Risk Evolution and Prevention and Control Strategies of Maritime Accidents in China’s Coastal Areas Based on Complex Network Models. Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 237, 2023, p.106527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106527.
28.
MouN.SunS.YangT.WangZ.ZhengY.ChenJ.ZhangL.Assessment of the Resilience of a Complex Network for Crude Oil Transportation on the Maritime Silk Road. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 181311–181325. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3028214.
29.
YangY.ShaoZ.HuY.MeiQ.PanJ.SongR.WangP.Geographical Spatial Analysis and Risk Prediction Based on Machine Learning for Maritime Traffic Accidents: A Case Study of Fujian Sea Area. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 266, 2022, p. 113106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113106.
30.
YuE. Y.WangY. P.FuY.ChenD. B.XieM.Identifying Critical Nodes in Complex Networks via Graph Convolutional Networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 198, 2020, p. 105893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105893.
31.
ZhouJ.YuX. H.LuJ. A.Node Importance in Controlled Complex Networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II-Express Briefs, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2019, pp. 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsii.2018.2845940.
32.
MaX.LanH.QiaoW.HanB.HeH.On the Causation Correlation of Maritime Accidents Based on Data Mining Techniques. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, Vol. 236, No. 5, 2022, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x221131717
33.
AiY. F.LuJ.ZhangL. L.The Optimization Model for the Location of Maritime Emergency Supplies Reserve Bases and the Configuration of Salvage Vessels. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 83, 2015, pp. 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.09.006.
34.
HuS.LiW.XiY.LiW.HouZ.WuJ.HanB.Evolution Pathway of Process Risk of Marine Traffic with the STAMP Model and a Genetic Algorithm: A Simulation of LNG-Fueled Vessel In-and-Out Harbor. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 253, 2022, p. 111133.
35.
LiuW.HuG.LiJ.Emergency Resources Demand Prediction Using Case-Based Reasoning. Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2012, pp. 530–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.007.
36.
WangW.HuangL.ZhangX. S.Optimization of Maritime Emergency Materials Allocation Based on Network Reliability. Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 83, 2018, pp. 691–696. https://doi.org/10.2112/si83-115.1.
37.
SunB. Z.MaW. M.ZhaoH. Y.A Fuzzy Rough Set Approach to Emergency Material Demand Prediction Over Two Universes. Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 37, No. 10–11, 2013, pp. 7062–7070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.02.008.
38.
WangY. Y.Multiperiod Optimal Allocation of Emergency Resources in Support of Cross-Regional Disaster Sustainable Rescue. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2021, pp. 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00347-5.
39.
SeoS. H.ChoiJ. I.SongJ.Secure Utilization of Beacons and UAVs in Emergency Response Systems for Building Fire Hazard. Sensors, Vol. 17, No. 10, 2017, p. 2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102200.
40.
ShahparvariS.BodaghiB.Risk Reduction for Distribution of the Perishable Rescue Items; A Possibilistic Programming Approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 31, 2018, pp. 886–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.018.
41.
HuS.LiZ.XiY.GuX.ZhangX.Path Analysis of Causal Factors Influencing Marine Traffic Accident via Structural Equation Numerical Modeling. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2019, p. 96.
42.
ChakrabortyN.HartungG.KatragaddaM.KaminskiC. F.Comparison of 2D and 3D Density-Weighted Displacement Speed Statistics and Implications for Laser Based Measurements of Flame Displacement Speed Using Direct Numerical Simulation Data. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 158, No. 7, 2011, pp. 1372–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.11.014.
43.
KimM.LeeJ.LeeC.JeongJ.Framework of 2D KDE and LSTM-Based Forecasting for Cost-Effective Inventory Management in Smart Manufacturing. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 5, 2022, p. 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052380.
44.
PandaS.NandaP. K.Kernel Density Estimation and Correntropy Based Background Modeling and Camera Model Parameter Estimation for Underwater Video Object Detection. Soft Computing, Vol. 25, No. 15, 2021, pp. 10477–10496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05919-7.
45.
JinyinC.XiangL.HaibingZ.XintongB.A Novel Cluster Center Fast Determination Clustering Algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 57, 2017, pp. 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.031.
46.
GaneshA.MaggsB. M.PanigrahiD.Universal Algorithms for Clustering Problems. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2023, pp. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572840.
47.
Al-mamoryS. O.KamilI. S.A New Density Based Sampling to Enhance DBSCAN Clustering Algorithm. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2019, pp. 315–327. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol32no4.5.
LiB.LuJ.LuH.LiJ.Predicting Maritime Accident Consequence Scenarios for Emergency Response Decisions Using Optimization-Based Decision Tree Approach. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2023, pp. 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1959074.
50.
LuchiD.RodriguesA. L.VarejaoF. M.Sampling Approaches for Applying DBSCAN to Large Datasets. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 117, 2019, pp. 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.12.010.
51.
QiaoW. L.MaX. X.LiuY.DengW.Resilience Evaluation of Maritime Liquid Cargo Emergency Response by Integrating FRAM and a BN: A Case Study of a Propylene Leakage Emergency Scenario. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 247, 2022, p. 110584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110584.
52.
PengZ.WangC.XuW.ZhangJ.Research on Location-Routing Problem of Maritime Emergency Materials Distribution Based on Bi-Level Programming. Mathematics, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2022, p. 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081243.
53.
XiongW. T.van GelderP.YangK. W.A Decision Support Method for Design and Operationalization of Search and Rescue in Maritime Emergency. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 207, 2020, p. 107399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107399.
LiH.YangZ.Towards Safe Navigation Environment: The Imminent Role of Spatio-Temporal Pattern Mining in Maritime Piracy Incidents Analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 238, 2023, p. 109422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109422.
56.
HuS.FangQ.XiaH.XiY.Formal Safety Assessment Based on Relative Risks Model in Ship Navigation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2007, pp. 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.011.
