Public transportation has the potential to provide a safe, convenient, affordable, and eco-friendly mobility service. However, because of its fixed routes and limited network coverage, it is sometimes difficult or impossible for passengers to walk from a transit stop to their destination. This inaccessibility problem is also known as the “transit last-mile connectivity problem.” Such a lack of connectivity can force travelers to drive, consequently increasing vehicle ownership and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on the roads. The autonomous mobility-on-demand (AMoD) service, with characteristics such as quick fleet repositioning and demand responsiveness, has the potential to provide last-mile coverage where fixed-route transit can only provide limited coverage. This study aims to address the last-mile problem by developing an online demand-responsive AMoD service integrated with fixed-route transit. A linear time-delay dynamical system is proposed to model the AMoD system, and a model predictive control methodology is adopted to regulate the system around an equilibrium point with minimum vehicle rebalancing. To assess the impact of this new mobility service on travel demand, a simulation study is developed and integrated with a mode choice model capturing a combined transit-AMoD model. The experiment results reveal the potential to enhance transit efficiency, reduce VMT, and accommodate the increased transit demand while maintaining the quality of service.
OhnemusM.PerlA.Shared Autonomous Vehicles: Catalyst of New Mobility for the Last Mile?Built Environment, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2016, pp. 589–602.
2.
SongM. V.ChitturiC.McCahillY. D.NoyceD. A.People’s Attitudes Toward Automated Vehicle and Transit Integration: Case Study of Small Urban Areas. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2021, pp. 449 –469.
3.
CheeP. N. E.SusiloY. O.WongY. D.PernestålA.Which Factors Affect Willingness-To-Pay for Automated Vehicle Services? Evidence from Public Road Deployment in Stockholm, Sweden. European Transport Research Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1–17.
4.
YapM. D.CorreiaG.Van AremB.Preferences of Travellers for Using Automated Vehicles as Last Mile Public Transport of Multimodal Train Trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 94, 2016, pp. 1–16.
5.
MoorthyA.De KleineR.KeoleianG.GoodJ.LewisG.Shared Autonomous Vehicles as a Sustainable Solution to the Last Mile Problem: A Case Study of Ann Arbor-Detroit area. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2017-01-1276, 2017, pp. 328–336.
6.
MoniruzzamanM.PáezA.Accessibility to Transit, by Transit, and Mode Share: Application of a Logistic Model with Spatial Filters. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 198–205.
7.
BronsM.GivoniM.RietveldP.Access to Railway Stations and its Potential in Increasing Rail Use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2009, pp. 136–149.
8.
KalaanidhiS.GunasekaranK.Estimation of Bus Transport Ridership Accounting Accessibility. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 104, 2013, pp. 885–893.
9.
LiuZ.JiaX.ChengW.Solving the Last Mile Problem: Ensure the Success of Public Bicycle System in Beijing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 43, 2012, pp. 73–78.
10.
MartinE. W.ShaheenS. A.Evaluating Public Transit Modal Shift Dynamics in Response to Bikesharing: A Tale of Two US Cities. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 315–324.
11.
MartensK.The Bicycle as a Feedering Mode: Experiences from Three European Countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2004, pp. 281–294.
12.
WangH.Routing and Scheduling for a Last-Mile Transportation System. Transportation Science, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2019, pp. 131–147.
13.
KhattakA. J.YimY.Traveler Response to Innovative Personalized Demand-Responsive Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp. 42–55.
14.
LeeA.SavelsberghM.An Extended Demand Responsive Connector. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2017, pp. 25–50.
15.
MasoudN.JayakrishnanR.A Decomposition Algorithm to Solve the Multi-Hop Peerto-Peer Ride-Matching Problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 99, 2017, pp. 1–29.
16.
StiglicM.AgatzN.SavelsberghM.GradisarM.Enhancing Urban Mobility: Integrating Ride-Sharing and Public Transit. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 90, 2018, pp. 12–21.
17.
KumarP.KhaniA.An Algorithm for Integrating Peer-to-Peer Ridesharing and Schedule-Based Transit System for First Mile/Last Mile Access. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 122, 2021, p. 102891.
18.
AbeR.Preferences of Urban Rail Users for First-and Last-Mile Autonomous Vehicles: Price and Service Elasticities of Demand in a Multimodal Environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 126, 2021, p. 103105.
19.
LauS. T.SusilawatiS.Shared Autonomous Vehicles Implementation for the First and Last-Mile Services. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 11, 2021, p. 100440.
20.
ZhangY.KhaniA.Integrating Transit Systems with Ride-Sourcing Services: A Study on the System Users’ Stochastic Equilibrium Problem. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 150, 2021, pp. 95–123.
21.
ShuP.SunY.XieB.XuS. X.XuG.Data-Driven Shuttle Service Design for Sustainable Last Mile Transportation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 49, 2021, p. 101344.
22.
RaghunathanA.BergmanD.HookerJ.SerraT.KoboriS.The Integrated Last-Mile Transportation Problem (ILMTP). Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Vol. 28, 2018, pp. 388–397.
23.
LiangX.de Almeida CorreiaG. H.Van AremB.Optimizing the Service Area and Trip Selection of an Electric Automated Taxi System Used for the Last Mile of Train Trips. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 93, 2016, pp. 115–129.
24.
ShehadehK. S.WangH.ZhangP.Fleet Sizing and Allocation for On-Demand Last-Mile Transportation Systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 132, 2021, p. 103387.
25.
SerraT.RaghunathanA. U.BergmanD.HookerJ.KoboriS.Last-Mile Scheduling Under Uncertainty. Proc., Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research: 16th International Conference, CPAIOR 2019, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 4–7, 2019, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 519–528.
26.
ZhangZ.TafreshianA.MasoudN.Modular Transit: Using Autonomy and Modularity to Improve Performance in Public Transportation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 141, 2020, p. 102033.
27.
KumarP.KhaniA.Planning of Integrated Mobility-on-Demand and Urban Transit Networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 166, 2022, pp. 499–521.
28.
CalabroG.AraldoA.OhS.SeshadriR.InturriG.Ben-AkivaM.Adaptive Transit Design: Optimizing Fixed and Demand Responsive Multi-Modal Transportation Via Continuous Approximation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 171, 2023, p. 103643.
29.
LiuY.OuyangY.Mobility Service Design Via Joint Optimization of Transit Networks and Demand-Responsive Services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 151, 2021, pp. 22–41.
30.
RichJ.SeshadriR.JomehA. J.ClausenS. R.Fixed Routing or Demand-Responsive? Agent-Based Modelling of Autonomous First and Last Mile Services in Light-Rail Systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 173, 2023, p. 103676.
31.
SteinerK.IrnichS.Strategic Planning for Integrated Mobility-on-Demand and Urban Public Bus Networks. Transportation Science, Vol. 54, No. 6, 2020, pp. 1616–1639.
32.
CarronA.SeccamonteF.RuchC.FrazzoliE.ZeilingerM. N.Scalable Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2019, pp. 635–644.
33.
AalipourA.KhaniA. Modeling, Analysis, and Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Discrete-Time Linear Dynamical System and a Model Predictive Control Approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.339856.
34.
MayneD. Q.RawlingsJ. B.RaoC. V.ScokaertP. O.Constrained Model Predictive Control: Stability and Optimality. Automatica, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2000, pp. 789–814.
AalipourA.KhaniA.Data-Driven H-Infinity Control with a Real-Time and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Algorithm: An Application to Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2309.08880, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08880
37.
AalipourA.KhaniA.Efficient and Real-Time Reinforcement Learning for Linear Quadratic Systems with Application to H-Infinity Control. Proc., 2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Marina Bay Sands, Singapore, IEEE, New York, 2023, pp. 6277–6282.
