The study described in this paper aims to establish the relationship between the chemical composition and rheological properties of asphalt binders in both the linear viscoelastic (LVE) and nonlinear viscoelastic (NLVE) domains. Two asphalt binders with different penetration grades were subjected to four distinct aging treatments of varying severity, resulting in changes in their chemical fingerprints. Chemical characteristics of the asphalt binders were analyzed using thin-layer chromatography (TLC), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). Frequency sweep tests were conducted to evaluate the LVE behavior of the asphalt binders, while multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) tests were employed to assess their NLVE properties. With regard to the LVE properties, rheological index (R) and zero shear viscosity (ZSV) derived from the Christensen-Anderson-Marasteanu (CAM) model exhibited high correlations with FTIR and molecular weight distribution (MWD) parameters. Additionally, the polydispersity index (PDI) displayed a stronger correlation with LVE-based parameters. Findings from the MSCR tests revealed that the sensitivity of the percentage recovery (%R) to chemical composition, as opposed to nonrecoverable creep compliance (Jnr), can be largely attributed to the degree of nonlinearity. Furthermore, it was observed that lower molecular weight molecules exert a greater influence on %R in the nonlinear domain. Finally, it was found that Jnrslope is a more reliable parameter than Jnrdiff for assessing the effects of chemical makeup on stress and temperature sensitivity.
PetersenJ. C.Chapter 14 Chemical Composition of Asphalt as Related to Asphalt Durability. In Developments in Petroleum Science (T. F.YenChilingarianG.V., eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000, pp. 363–399.
2.
LesueurD.The Colloidal Structure of Bitumen: Consequences on the Rheology and on the Mechanisms of Bitumen Modification. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 145, 2009, pp. 42–82.
3.
WangT.WangJ.HouX.XiaoF.Effects of SARA Fractions on Low Temperature Properties of Asphalt Binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2021, pp. 539–556.
4.
MansourkhakiA.AmeriM.HabibpourM.UnderwoodB. S.Fractional Composition and High Temperature Rheological Properties of 23 Modified RAP Binder. Presented at 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2019.
5.
MichalicaP.KazatchkovI. B.StastnaJ.ZanzottoL.Relationship Between Chemical and Rheological Properties of Two Asphalts of Different Origins. Fuel, Vol. 87, 2008, pp. 3247–3253.
6.
LeeS. J.AmirkhanianS.ShatanawiK.KimK.Short-Term Aging Characterization of Asphalt Binders Using Gel Permeation Chromatography and Selected Superpave Binder Tests. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 22, 2008, pp. 2220–2227.
7.
EberhardsteinerL.FusslJ.HofkoB.HandleF.HospodkaM.BlabR.GrotheH.Towards a Microstructural Model of Bitumen Aging Behavior. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2014, pp. 939–949.
8.
WangY.WangW.WangL.Understanding the Relationships Between Rheology and Chemistry of Asphalt Binders: A Review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 329, 2022, p. 127161.
9.
HuY.XiaW.XueY.ZhaoP.WenX.SiW.WangH.ZhouL.AireyG. D.Evaluating the Ageing Degrees of Bitumen by Rheological and Chemical Indices. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24, 2023, pp. 19–36.
10.
SantagataE.BaglieriO.DalmazzoD.TsantilisL.Rheological and Chemical Investigation on the Damage and Healing Properties of Bituminous Binders. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78, 2009, pp. 567–595.
11.
XuY.ZhangE.ShanL.Effect of SARA on Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2019, pp. 04019086-1:04019086-7.
12.
EberhardsteinerL.FusslJ.HofkoB.HandleF.HospodkaM.BlabR.GrotheH.Influence of Asphaltene Content on Bitumen Behavior: Experimental Investigation and Micromechanical Modeling. Material Structure, Vol. 48, No. 10, 2014, pp. 3099–3112.
13.
SultanaS.BhasinA.Effect of Chemical Composition on Rheology and Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Binder. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 72, 2014, pp. 293–300.
14.
ElkashefM.ElwardanyM.LiangY.JonesD.HarveyJ.BoltonN. D.PlancheJ. P.Effect of Using Rejuvenators on the Chemical, Thermal, and Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder. Energy & Fuels, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2020, pp. 2152–2159.
15.
MarsacP.PiérardN.PorotL.Van den berghW.GrenfellJ.MouilletV.PougetS., et al. Potential and Limits of FTIR Methods for Reclaimed Asphalt Characterisation. Material Structure, Vol. 47, 2014, pp. 1273–1286.
16.
KimW. K.KimK.DohY. S.AmirkhanianS. N.Estimation of RAP’s Binder Viscosity Using GPC Without Binder Recovery. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2006, pp. 561–567.
17.
WangH.LiuX.ApostolidisP.ScarpasT.Rheological Behavior and its Chemical Interpretation of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Containing Warm-Mix Additives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 337–348.
18.
ZhaoS.BowersB. F.HuangB.ShuX.Characterizing Rheological Properties of Binder and Blending Efficiency of Asphalt Paving Mixtures Containing RAS Through GPC. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2014, pp. 941–946.
19.
SunD.YuF.LiL.LinT.ZhuX. Y.Effect of Chemical Composition and Structure of Asphalt Binders on Self-Healing. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 133, 2017, pp. 495–501.
20.
MasadE.SomadevanN.Microstructural Finite-Element Analysis of Influence of Localized Strain Distribution on Asphalt Mix Properties. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 1105–1114.
21.
GordonA.RahimzadehB.CollopA. C.Linear Rheological Behavior of Bituminous Paving Materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2004, pp. 212–220.
22.
JafariM.BabazadehA.AflakiS.Effects of Stress Levels on Creep and Recovery Behavior of Modified Asphalt Binders with the Same Continuous Performance Grades. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2505: 15–23.
23.
HossainZ.ZamanM.GhoshP. D.Creep Compliance and Percent Recovery of Oklahoma Certified Binder Using the Multiple Stress Recovery (MSCR) Method. Report No. FHWA-OK-14–19. Federal Highway Administration, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 2015.
24.
BahiaH.TabatabaeeH. A.MandalT.FaheemA.Field Evaluation of Wisconsin Modified Binder Selection Guidelines-Phase II. Report No. 0092-13-02. Wisconsin Highway Research Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2013.
25.
D’AngeloJ.The Relationship of the MSCR Test to Rutting. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 10, 2009, pp. 61–80.
26.
WasageT. L. J.StastnaJ.ZanzottoL.Rheological Analysis of Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) Test. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2011, pp. 561–568.
27.
ASTM D2872-19. Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2872-19.
28.
ASTM D6521-19a. Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6521-19A.
29.
SalehfardR.BehbahaniH.DalmazzoD.SantagataE.Effect of Colloidal Instability on the Rheological and Fatigue Properties of Asphalt Binders. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 281, 2021, p. 122563.
30.
YeganehS.AmeriM.DalmazzoD.SantagataE.Experimental Investigation on the Use of Waste Elastomeric Polymers for Bitumen Modification. Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, 2020, p. 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082671.
31.
HoferK.MirwaldJ.BhasinA.HofkoB.Low-Temperature Characterization of Bitumen and Correlation to Chemical Properties. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 366, 2023, p. 130202.
32.
HofkoB.AlaviM. Z.GrotheH.JonesD.HarveyJ.Repeatability and Sensitivity of FTIR ATR Spectral Analysis Methods for Bituminous Binders. Materials and Structures, Vol. 50, 2017, p. 187. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x.
33.
GundlaA.Understanding Viscoelastic Behavior of Asphalt Binders Through Molecular Structure Investigation. PhD dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe, 2018.
34.
Yousefi RadF.ElwardanyM.CastorenaC.KimY.Evaluation of Chemical and Rheological Aging Indices to Track Oxidative Aging of Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 349–358.
35.
KimY. R.CastorenaC.ElwardanyM.Yousefi RadF.UnderwoodB. S.GundlaA.GudipudiP.FarrarM. J.GlaserR. R.Long-Term Aging of Asphalt Mixtures for Performance Testing and Prediction. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Research Report 871. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2018.
36.
BowersB. F.HuangB.ShuX.MillerB. C.Investigation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Blending Efficiency Through GPC and FTIR. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 50, 2014, pp. 517–523.
37.
YeW. L.JiangW.LiP. F.Analysis of Mechanism and Time-Temperature Equivalent Effects of Asphalt Binder in Short-Term Aging. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 215, 2019, pp. 823–838.
38.
GundlaA.UnderwoodB. S.Molecular Weight Distribution of Asphalt Binders from Laser Desorption Mass Spectroscopy (LDMS) Technique and its Relationship to Linear Viscoelastic Relaxation Spectra. Fuel, Vol. 262, 2020, p. 116444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116444.
39.
BiroS.GandhiT.AmirkhanianS.Determination of Zero Shear Viscosity of Warm Asphalt Binders. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23, 2009, pp. 2080–2086.
40.
De VisscherJ.SoenenH.VanelstraeteA.RedeliusP.A Comparison of the Zero Shear Viscosity from Oscillation Tests and the Repeated Creep Test. Proc., 3rd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Vienna, 2004.
41.
MarasteanuM. O.AndersonD. A.Determination of Asphalt Binders Viscosity from Other Rheological Parameters. Proc., Ninth International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.
42.
AASHTO T350. Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2014.
43.
FahrmeirL.KünstlerR.PigeotI.TutzG.Statistik – Der Weg zur Datenanalyse [Statistic –Pathway to the Data Analysis]. Springer, Berlin, 2007.
44.
PaliukaiteM.VaitkusA.ZofkaA.Evaluation of Bitumen Fractional Composition Depending on the Crude Oil Type and Production Technology. Proc., 9th International Conference Environmental Engineering, Vilnius, Lithuania, May22–23, 2014.
45.
AireyG. Rheological Characteristics of Polymer Modified and Aged Bitumens. Ph. D thesis. The University of Nottingham, 1997.
46.
AshishP. K.SinghD.BohmS.Investigation on Influence of Nanoclay Addition on Rheological Performance of Asphalt Binder. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2017, pp. 1007–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1201522.
47.
KimY. R.CastorenaC.SalehN. F.BraswellE.ElwardanyM.Yousefi RadF.NCHRP 09-54 Extension: Long-Term Aging of Asphalt Mixtures for Performance Testing and Prediction. Submitted to Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2020.
48.
Yousefi RadF.ElwardanyM. D.CastorenaC.KimY. R.Investigation of Proper Long-Term Laboratory Aging Temperature for Performance Testing of Asphalt Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 147, 2017, pp. 616–629.
49.
BehnoodA.OlekJ.Stress-Dependent Behavior and Rutting Resistance of Modified Asphalt Binders: An MSCR Approach. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 157, 2017, pp. 635–646.
50.
MansourkhakiA.AmeriM.HabibpourM.UnderwoodB. S.Chemical Composition and Rheological Characteristics of Binders Containing RAP and Rejuvenator. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2020, pp. 04020026-1:04020026-11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003016.
51.
StempiharJ.GundlaA.UnderwoodB. S.Interpreting Stress Sensitivity in the Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery Test. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2018, pp. 04017283-1:04017283-6.
