Learning critical concepts that are centered on the analysis, design, and maintenance of transportation infrastructure systems poses a measure of difficulty for undergraduates in engineering. Therefore, hands-on learning pedagogy should be an excellent precursor to increase understanding of these concepts, since the pedagogy incorporates real-life experience in the delivery. This paper describes how a hands-on learning pedagogy called experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) has been used to teach these concepts to undergraduate students at a historically Black university. The research questions are as follows: (1) How well can ECP improve students’ understanding of concepts essential to the analysis and design of transportation infrastructure systems? (2) How has the ECP facilitated the achievement of the learning objectives of these concepts? and (3) Does an ECP increase the engagement of undergraduate students in their transportation infrastructure engineering learning and lead to measurable lasting gains? To answer these research questions, ECP was implemented and assessed when used to teach the concepts of stress and strain utilized in the analysis of bridges and other transportation infrastructure, sound used in the development and design of noise barriers, moisture content in controlling compaction of highway infrastructure systems, and degradation of infrastructure systems exposed to various environmental settings. Assessment results from 92 undergraduates reveal an increase in students’ motivation and cognitive understanding of the relevant concepts, as well as learning gains and an improved success rate compared to the traditional method of teaching.
TularamG. A.Traditional vs Non-Traditional Teaching and Learning Strategies - The Case of E-Learning!International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2018, pp. 129–158.
2.
SerinH.A Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Approaches in Educational Settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018, pp. 164–167.
3.
ScheursJ.DumbraveanuR.A Shift from Teacher Centered to Learner Centered Approach. Learning, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2014, pp. 1–7.
ConnorK. A.NewmanD.GullieK. A.AstatkeY.ChouikhaM. F.KimC. J.NareO. E.AttiaJ. O.AndreiP.HobsonL. D.Experimental Centric Pedagogy in First-Year Engineering Courses. Proc., 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016, p. 26833. http://peer.asee.org/26833. Accessed January 13, 2023.
7.
AstatkeY.ConnorK. A.NewmanD.AttiaJ. O.NareO. E.Growing Experimental Centric Learning: The Role of Setting and Instructional Use in Building Student Outcomes. Proc., 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.
8.
SkulmowskiA.ReyG. D.Embodied Learning: Introducing a Taxonomy Based on Bodily Engagement and Task Integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018, p. 6.
9.
SmyrnaiouZ.SotiriouM.GeorgakopoulouE.PapadopoulouO.Connecting Embodied Learning in Educational Practice to the Realisation of Science Educational Scenarios Through Performing Arts. Inspiring Science Education, Vol. 31, 2016, pp. 31–38.
10.
EkwuemeC. O.EkonE. E.Ezenwa-NebifeD. C.The Impact of Hands-On-Approach on Student Academic Performance in Basic Science and Mathematics. Higher Education Studies, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2015, pp. 47–51.
11.
ZhaS.HeW.Pandemic Pedagogy in Online Hands-on Learning for IT/IS Courses. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2021, p. 13.
12.
SaundersL.WongM. A.Learning Theories: Understanding How People Learn. Instruction in Libraries and Information Centers, Illinois Open Publishing Network, 2020.
13.
WilsonS. M.PetersonP. L.Theories of Learning and Teaching: What Do They Mean for Educators? Working Paper. National Education Association Research Department, Washington, D.C., 2006.
BybeeR. W.TaylorJ. A.GardnerA.Van ScotterP.PowellJ. C.WestbrookA.LandesN.The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. BSCS, Colorado Springs, Co, 2006, pp. 88–98.
16.
MillardD.BerryF.ChouikhaM.Improving Student Intuition Via Rensselaer’s New Mobile Studio Pedagogy. Proc., 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, 2007, pp. 12–862.
17.
Emiola-OwolabiO.Ladeji-OsiasO. J.SekayiD.AdesopeO.Observation of Teaching Approaches in Two Undergraduate Civil Engineering Synchronous Remote Classrooms. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2022, pp. 150–201.
18.
KolbB.1984. Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: a comparative review. Brain research reviews, 8(1), pp.65–98.
19.
IkirikoS.WemidaA.EfeS.ShokouhianM.OwolabiO.“Kemi” Ladeji-OsiasJ.Home-Based Cantilever Beam Experiment for Civil Engineering Undergraduate Students. Proc., Best in 5 Minutes: Demonstrating Interactive Teaching Activities, American Society for Engineering Education, Virtual On line, 2021, pp. 1–24.
20.
DeaconuM.CicanG.CristeaL.Noise Impact Mitigation of Shopping Centres Located near Densely Populated Areas for a Better Quality of Life. Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 18, 2020, p. 6484.
DrakeK. J.A Semi-Autonomous Sensor Station for Remote Assessment of Soil Quality in Rooftop Gardens and Agricultural Farmlands. PhD thesis. Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 2020.
23.
NormanJ. M.HoughtalenR. J.JohnstonW. A.Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts. Report No. FHWA-NHI-01-020. United States. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Bridge Technology, Washington, D.C., 2001.
24.
HunterJ. G.Jr.KangD. H.BundyM. M.Identification of Techniques to Meet pH Standard During In-Stream Construction. Report No. MD-14-SP109B4D. Maryland State Highway Administration, Office of Policy & Research, Baltimore, MD, 2014.
25.
ThurstonR. V.RussoR. C.VinogradovG.Ammonia Toxicity to Fishes. Effect of pH on the Toxicity of the Unionized Ammonia Species. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 15, No. 7, 1981, pp. 837–840.
26.
Kelly AddyM.Linda GreenM.Elizabeth HerronM.pH and Alkalinity, URI Watershed Watch Program; Department of Natural Resources Science, College of the Environment and Life Sciences, University of Rhode Island. 2004. https://web.uri.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1667/pHalkalinityFINAL.pdf.
GarciaT.PintrichP. R.Assessing Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in the Classroom Context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge (M.BirenbaumDochyF. J. R. C., eds.), Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996, pp. 319–339. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3_12. Accessed January 22, 2023.
29.
TaylorR.Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) Using Reliability Generalization Techniques to Assess Scale Reliability. PhD thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, 2012.
30.
LitmanJ. A.SpielbergerC. D.Measuring Epistemic Curiosity and its Diversive and Specific Components. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2003, pp. 75–86.
31.
LiM.ArmstrongS. J.The Relationship Between Kolb’s Experiential Learning Styles and Big Five Personality Traits in International Managers. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 86, 2015, pp. 422–426.
32.
SmithM. K.JonesF. H. M.GilbertS. L.WiemanC. E.The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2013, pp. 618–627.
33.
VelascoJ. B.KnedeisenA.XueD.VickreyT. L.AbebeM.StainsM.Characterizing Instructional Practices in the Laboratory: The Laboratory Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 93, No. 7, 2016, pp. 1191–203.
34.
GnanavelS.SreekrishnaM.DuraiMuruganN.JaeyalakshmiM.LoksharanS.The Smart IoT Based Automated Irrigation System using Arduino UNO and Soil Moisture Sensor. In 2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), IEEE, 2002, pp. 188–191.
35.
OwensD. C.SadlerT. D.BarlowA. T.Smith-WaltersC.Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Research in Science Education, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2020, pp. 253–277.
36.
ArmbrusterP.PatelM.JohnsonE.WeissM.Active Learning and Student-Centered Pedagogy Improve Student Attitudes and Performance in Introductory Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2009, pp. 203–213.
37.
PirkerJ.Riffnaller-SchieferM.GütlC.Motivational Active Learning: Engaging University Students in Computer Science Education. Proc., 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education, Uppsala, Sweden, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2014, pp. 297–302.
YukhymenkoM. A.BrownS. W.LawlessK. A.BrodowinskaK.MullinG.Thematic Analysis of Teacher Instructional Practices and Student Responses in Middle School Classrooms with Problem-Based Learning Environment. Global Education Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2014, pp. 93–110.
