Existing studies on the heterogeneity in traffic flow have considered either conventional car–truck or conventional vehicle–automated vehicle combinations. Nevertheless, these assumptions are not realistic as there will be possible combinations of cars–trucks and conventional–automated vehicles in the future. This study aims to investigate heterogeneous traffic flow with or without an adaptive cruise control (ACC) system for the pair of a front truck and a rear passenger car. Vissim microscopic traffic simulation software and the HighD dataset were applied. The major findings include the following. (1) The greater the penetration rate of ACC vehicles in the same speed interval, the smaller the space headway of the rear car. (2) Both conventional and ACC cars accelerate or decelerate frequently when their speeds exceed that of the front truck in the car-following state. In the free-flow state, a conventional car keeps a constant speed or accelerates, while an ACC car mainly adopts an acceleration strategy. (3) The variation of speed differences and space headways is smallest when both the front truck and rear car have ACC. (4) The probability of conflicts between the front truck and rear car pair decreases with the increase of market penetration of ACC vehicles. Compared to conventional cars, the rear car equipped with ACC exhibits a lower probability of conflicts. Statistical tests further confirmed the significant differences between any two of the four combinations based on the ACC equipment.
OssenS.HoogendoornS. P.Heterogeneity in Car-Following Behavior: Theory and Empirics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011, pp. 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.05.006
2.
LiuL.ZhuL.YangD.Modeling and Simulation of the Car-Truck Heterogeneous Traffic Flow Based on a Nonlinear Car-Following Model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 273, 2016, pp. 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.10.032
3.
KernerB. S.Effect of Autonomous Driving on Traffic Breakdown in Mixed Traffic Flow: A Comparison of Classical ACC With Three-Traffic-Phase-ACC (TPACC). Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 562, 2021, p. 125315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125315
4.
WangJ.ZhangZ.LiuF.LuG.Investigating Heterogeneous Car-Following Behaviors of Different Vehicle Types, Traffic Densities and Road Types. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 9, 2021, p. 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100315
5.
YangD.JinP.PuY.RanB.Stability Analysis of the Mixed Traffic Flow of Cars and Trucks Using Heterogeneous Optimal Velocity Car-Following Model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 395, 2014, pp. 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.10.017
AghabaykK.SarviM.YoungW.Attribute Selection for Modelling Driver’s Car-Following Behaviour in Heterogeneous Congested Traffic Conditions. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2014, pp. 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2013.787558
8.
AghabaykK.SarviM.YoungW.Understanding the Dynamics of Heavy Vehicle Interactions in Car-Following. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1468–1475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000463
9.
KongD.ListG. F.GuoX.WuD.Modeling Vehicle Car-Following Behavior in Congested Traffic Conditions Based on Different Vehicle Combinations. Transportation Letters, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2018, pp. 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1262979
10.
DuffneyR.BorowskyA.Bar-GeraH.The Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Headway Time on Young-Experienced Drivers’ Overtaking Tendency in a Driving Simulator. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 86, 2022, pp. 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.008
11.
ZhangP.ZhuH.ZhouY.Modeling Cooperative Driving Strategies of Automated Vehicles Considering Trucks’ Behavior. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 585, 2022, p. 126386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126386
12.
GroveK.SoccolichS.EngströmJ.HanowskiR.Driver Visual Behavior While Using Adaptive Cruise Control on Commercial Motor Vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60, 2019, pp. 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.013
13.
DingH.PanH.BaiH.ZhengX.ChenJ.ZhangW.Driving Strategy of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Based on Multiple Preceding Vehicles State Estimation in Mixed Vehicular Traffic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 596, 2022, p. 127154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127154
14.
XieT.LiuY.Impact of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technology on Market Penetration and Route Choices. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 139, 2022, p. 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103646
15.
SinhaA.ChandS.WijayaratnaK. P.VirdiN.DixitV.Crash Severity and Rate Evaluation of Conventional Vehicles in Mixed Fleets With Connected and Automated Vehicles. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 170, 2020, pp. 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.170
16.
ShangM.SternR. E.Impacts of Commercially Available Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles on Highway Stability and Throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 122, 2021, p. 102897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102897
17.
DavisL. C.The Effects of Mechanical Response on the Dynamics and String Stability of a Platoon of Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 392, No. 17, 2013, pp. 3798–3805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.04.023
18.
TalebpourA.MahmassaniH. S.Influence of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic Flow Stability and Throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 71, 2016, pp. 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007
19.
GunterG.GloudemansD.SternR. E.McQuadeS.BhadaniR.BuntingM.Delle MonacheM. L., et al. Are Commercially Implemented Adaptive Cruise Control Systems String Stable?IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 22, No. 11, 2021, pp. 6992–7003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3000682
20.
MattasK.BotzorisG.PapadopoulosB.ScienceDirect Safety Aware Fuzzy Longitudinal Controller for Automated Vehicles. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 8, No. 4, 2021, pp. 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.12.006
21.
DonàR.MattasK.HeY.AlbanoG.CiuffoB.Multianticipation for String Stable Adaptive Cruise Control and Increased Motorway Capacity Without Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 140, 2022, p. 103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103687
22.
WengJ.MengQ.YanX.Analysis of Work Zone Rear-End Crash Risk for Different Vehicle-Following Patterns. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 72, 2014, pp. 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.003
KrajewskiR.BockJ.KloekerL.EcksteinL.The highD Dataset: A Drone Dataset of Naturalistic Vehicle Trajectories on German Highways for Validation of Highly Automated Driving Systems. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA, 2018, pp. 2118–2125.
25.
DasT.Shoaib SamandarM.RouphailN.Longitudinal Traffic Conflict Analysis of Autonomous and Traditional Vehicle Platoons in Field Tests via Surrogate Safety Measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 177, 2022, p. 106822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106822
26.
MakridisM.MattasK.CiuffoB.ReF.KristonA.MinariniF.RognelundG.Empirical Study on the Properties of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems and Their Impact on Traffic Flow and String Stability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120911047
27.
CiuffoB.MattasK.MakridisM.AlbanoG.AnesiadouA.HeY.JosvaiS., et al. Requiem on the Positive Effects of Commercial Adaptive Cruise Control on Motorway Traffic and Recommendations for Future Automated Driving Systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 130, 2021, p. 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103305
28.
ShiX.LiX.Constructing a Fundamental Diagram for Traffic Flow With Automated Vehicles: Methodology and Demonstration. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 150, 2021, pp. 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.06.011
29.
KhoundP.WillP.TordeuxA.GronwaldF.Unified Framework for Over-Damped String Stable Adaptive Cruise Control Systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 148, 2023, p. 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104039
30.
WiedemannR.Modelling of RTI-Elements on Multi-Lane Roads. In Drive Conference (Brussels, Belgium), 1991.
31.
DuinR. P. W.The Dissimilarity Representation for Pattern Recognition, a Tutorial. Organization, No. contract 213250, 2009, pp. 1–18.
32.
RahmanM. S.Abdel-AtyM.WangL.LeeJ.Understanding the Highway Safety Benefits of Different Approaches of Connected Vehicles in Reduced Visibility Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118776113
33.
HollanderY.LiuR.The Principles of Calibrating Traffic Microsimulation Models. Transportation, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2008, pp. 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9156-2
34.
RahmanM. H.Abdel-AtyM.LeeJ.RahmanM. S.Enhancing Traffic Safety at School Zones by Operation and Engineering Countermeasures: A Microscopic Simulation Approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 94, 2019, pp. 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.04.001
35.
YuR.Abdel-AtyM.An Optimal Variable Speed Limits System to Ameliorate Traffic Safety Risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 46, 2014, pp. 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.05.016
36.
MakridisM.MattasK.AnesiadouA.CiuffoB.OpenACC. An Open Database of Car-Following Experiments to Study the Properties of Commercial ACC Systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 125, 2021, p. 103047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047
37.
MilanésV.ShladoverS. E.Modeling Cooperative and Autonomous Adaptive Cruise Control Dynamic Responses Using Experimental Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001
38.
JamesR. M.MelsonC.HuJ.BaredJ.Characterizing the Impact of Production Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow: An Investigation. Transportmetrica B, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 992–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2018.1540951
39.
CalvertS. C.SchakelW. J.van LintJ. W. C.Will Automated Vehicles Negatively Impact Traffic Flow?Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2017, 2017, p. 3082781. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3082781
40.
KestingA.TreiberM.SchönhofM.HelbingD.Adaptive Cruise Control Design for Active Congestion Avoidance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2008, pp. 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.12.004
41.
TreiberM.KestingA.Traffic Flow Dynamics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013, Berlin, 2013.
42.
GuériauM.BillotR.El FaouziN. E.MonteilJ.ArmettaF.HassasS.How to Assess the Benefits of Connected Vehicles? A Simulation Framework for the Design of Cooperative Traffic Management Strategies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 67, 2016, pp. 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.020
43.
LiY.WangH.WangW.XingL.LiuS.WeiX.Evaluation of the Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Reducing Rear-End Collision Risks on Freeways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 98, 2017, pp. 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.015
PunzoV.ZhengZ.MontaninoM.About Calibration of Car-Following Dynamics of Automated and Human-Driven Vehicles: Methodology, Guidelines and Codes. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 128, 2021, p. 103165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103165
46.
HeY.MontaninoM.MattasK.PunzoV.CiuffoB.Physics-Augmented Models to Simulate Commercial Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 139, 2022, p. 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103692
47.
YangC.MattinglyS. P.Microscopic Simulation Model (VISSIM) Calibration for Freeways With Managed Lanes. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 1351–1363.
48.
QinD.WangX.TarkoA. P.GuoQ.Lizarazo-JimenezC.Consistency Analysis of Drivers’ Car-Following Behaviors. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 149, No. 4, 2023, p. 04023010. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-7513.
49.
ApostolakisT.MakridisM. A.KouvelasA.AmpountolasK.Energy-Based Assessment and Driving Behavior of ACC Systems and Humans Inside Platoons. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 24, No. 11, 2023, pp. 12726–12735. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2023.3285296
50.
BhamG. H.BenekohalR. F.A High Fidelity Traffic Simulation Model Based on Cellular Automata and Car-Following Concepts. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2002.05.001
51.
ZhongZ.LeeE. E.NejadM.LeeJ.Influence of CAV Clustering Strategies on Mixed Traffic Flow Characteristics: An Analysis of Vehicle Trajectory Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 115, 2020, p. 102611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102611
52.
GopikaU.AshalathaR.Car Following Analysis Using DGPS Data. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Vol. 5, 2018, pp. 1–8.
53.
MathewT. V.RavishankarK. V. R.Car-Following Behavior in Traffic Having Mixed Vehicle-Types. Transportation Letters, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2011, pp. 109–122. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2011.03.02.109-122
54.
MahmudS. M. S.FerreiraL.HoqueM. S.TavassoliA.Micro-Simulation Modelling for Traffic Safety: A Review and Potential Application to Heterogeneous Traffic Environment. IATSS Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2019, pp. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2018.07.002
55.
WenX.CuiZ.JianS.Characterizing Car-Following Behaviors of Human Drivers When Following Automated Vehicles Using the Real-World Dataset. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 172, 2022, p. 106689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106689
56.
ChenY.SunX.ZhongL.ZhangG.Speed Difference and its Impact on Traffic Safety of One Freeway in China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2038: 105–110. https://doi.org/10.3141/2038-14
57.
PanT.LamW. H. K.SumaleeA.ZhongR.Multiclass Multilane Model for Freeway Traffic Mixed With Connected Automated Vehicles and Regular Human-Piloted Vehicles. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2021, pp. 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2019.1573858
58.
AliG.McLaughlinS.AhmadianM.Quantifying the Effect of Roadway, Driver, Vehicle, and Location Characteristics on the Frequency of Longitudinal and Lateral Accelerations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 161, 2021, p. 106356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106356
59.
LiQ.YaoH.LiX.A Matched Case-Control Method to Model Car-Following Safety. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2022, p. 2055198. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2022.2055198
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
