Recently, there has been wide concern about the mechanical properties of the repair interface for the magnesium phosphate cement mortar as a repair material with Portland cement concrete pavement. In this paper, based on the previous research results about basalt fiber reinforced and polymer modified magnesium phosphate cement (BFPMPC) mortar, the fracture behavior of the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) for BFPMPC and Portland cement concrete (PCC) was further pursued and studied. Firstly, a nanoindentation test was carried out on the repair interface with creep characteristics. Results showed that a synergistic effect and elastic moduli of multiple ITZs in repair interface were verified and determined. Then, the creep characteristic of ITZ was described by proposed fractional rheology characteristics in BFPMPC-PCC ITZ with further validation by finite element analysis. Finally, the interface fracture model combined with dislocation theory was proposed and analyzed. The results showed that satisfactory agreements had been obtained between the calculated results of interface fracture model and experiments. It was indicated that the fracture essence for BFPMPC-PCC ITZ was revealed by the interface fracture model. This finding, as a novel aspect and insight for interface fracture of bi-cementitious-based materials, was provided and the pursued direction of materials design for interface enhancement in pavement rapid repair was expected.
PriddyL.RushingT.Development of Laboratory Testing Protocol for Rapid-Setting Cementitious Material for Airfield Pavement Repairs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2290: 89–98.
2.
XuB.LothenbachB.LeemannA.WinnefeldF.Reaction Mechanism of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement with High Magnesium-to-Phosphate Ratio. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 108, 2018, pp. 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.013.
3.
QinJ.QianJ.DaiX.YouC.MaH.LiZ.Effect of Water Content on Microstructure and Properties of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement Pastes with Different Magnesia-to-Phosphate Ratios. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 104, No. 6, 2021, pp. 2799–2819. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17695.
4.
LahalleH.Cau Dit CoumesC.MercierC.LambertinD.CannesC.DelpechS.GauffinetS.Influence of the w/c Ratio on the Hydration Process of a Magnesium Phosphate Cement and on Its Retardation by Boric Acid. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 109, 2018, pp. 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.010.
5.
GardnerL. J.BernalS. A.WallingS. A.CorkhillC. L.ProvisJ. L.HyattN. C.Characterisation of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cements Blended with Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 74, 2015, pp. 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2015.01.015.
6.
MoL.LvL.DengM.QianJ.Influence of Fly Ash and Metakaolin on the Microstructure and Compressive Strength of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement Paste. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 111, 2018, pp. 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2018.06.003.
7.
XuB.MaH.ShaoH.LiZ.LothenbachB.Influence of Fly Ash on Compressive Strength and Micro-Characteristics of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement Mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 99, 2017, pp. 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.05.008.
8.
QinJ.DaiF.MaH.DaiX.LiZ.JiaX.QianJ.Development and Characterization of Magnesium Phosphate Cement Based Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 234, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109694.
9.
ZárybnickáL.MácováP.VianiA.Properties Enhancement of Magnesium Phosphate Cement by Cross-Linked Polyvinyl Alcohol. Ceramics International, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2022, pp. 1947–1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.279.
10.
GaoM.ChenB.LangL.MuhammadR. A.Influence of Silica Fume on Mechanical Properties and Water Resistance of Magnesium–Ammonium Phosphate Cement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2020, p. 04019368. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003035.
11.
LahalleH.PatapyC.GlidM.RenaudinG.CyrM.Microstructural Evolution/Durability of Magnesium Phosphate Cement Paste over Time in Neutral and Basic Environments. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 122, 2019, pp. 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.04.011.
12.
LiuF.PanB.ZhouC.ZhangY.Comparative Study on High-Temperature Performance of MPC and BFPMPC. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 11, 2023, p. 04023419. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7/MTENG-16257.
13.
WuQ.HouY.MeiJ.YangJ.GanT.Influence of Synthetic Limestone Sand on the Frost Resistance of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement Mortar. Materials, Vol. 15, No. 19, 2022, p. 6517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196517.
14.
LiuF.PanB.ZhouC.Experimental Study on a Novel Modified Magnesium Phosphate Cement Mortar Used for Rapid Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement in Seasonally Frozen Areas. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2022, p. 04021483. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004121.
15.
LiuR.PangB.ZhaoX.YangY.Effect of Rice Husk Ash on Early Hydration Behavior of Magnesium Phosphate Cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 263, 2020, p. 120180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120180.
16.
YangJ.ZhenS.WuQ.Effect of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash on Properties of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Paste. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2019, p. 06019013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002923.
17.
LangL.DuanH.ChenB.Experimental Investigation on Concrete Using Corn Stalk and Magnesium Phosphate Cement Under Compaction Forming Technology. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 12, 2020, p. 04020370. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003487.
18.
SeehraS. S.GuptaS.KumarS.Rapid Setting Magnesium Phosphate Cement for Quick Repair of Concrete Pavements—Characterisation and Durability Aspects. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1993, pp. 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(93)90090-V.
19.
ZengX.YuH.Research on Technology of Performance Improvement of Basic Magnesium Sulfate Cement—BMS. Structural Concrete, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2023, pp. 4313–4321. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000165.
20.
QiaoF.ChauC. K.LiZ.Property Evaluation of Magnesium Phosphate Cement Mortar as Patch Repair Material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2010, pp. 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.10.039.
21.
JiangZ.QianC.ChenQ.Experimental Investigation on the Volume Stability of Magnesium Phosphate Cement with Different Types of Mineral Admixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 157, 2017, pp. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.037.
22.
LuX.ChenB.Experimental Study of Magnesium Phosphate Cements Modified by Metakaolin. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 123, 2016, pp. 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.07.092.
23.
LiJ.ZhangW.CaoY.Laboratory Evaluation of Magnesium Phosphate Cement Paste and Mortar for Rapid Repair of Cement Concrete Pavement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 58, 2014, pp. 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.015.
24.
QinJ.QianJ.YouC.FanY.LiZ.WangH.Bond Behavior and Interfacial Micro-Characteristics of Magnesium Phosphate Cement onto Old Concrete Substrate. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 167, 2018, pp. 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.018.
25.
YangQ.ZhangS.WuX.Deicer-Scaling Resistance of Phosphate Cement-Based Binder for Rapid Repair of Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2002, pp. 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00651-2.
26.
YangQ.ZhuB.WuX.Characteristics and Durability Test of Magnesium Phosphate Cement-Based Material for Rapid Repair of Concrete. Materials and Structures, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2000, pp. 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02479332.
27.
YangQ.ZhuB.ZhangS.WuX.Properties and Applications of Magnesia-Phosphate Cement Mortar for Rapid Repair of Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 30, No. 11, 2000, pp. 1807–1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00419-1.
28.
YangN.ShiC.YangJ.ChangY.Research Progresses in Magnesium Phosphate Cement–Based Materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 10, 2014, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000971.
GiraudA.NguyenN. B.GrgicD.Effective Poroelastic Coefficients of Isotropic Oolitic Rocks with Micro and Meso Porosities. International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 58, 2012, pp. 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.03.025.
31.
PiccolroazA.PeckD.WrobelM.MishurisG.Energy Release Rate, the Crack Closure Integral and Admissible Singular Fields in Fracture Mechanics. International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 164, 2021, p. 103487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2021.103487.
32.
HuC.WangC.MaX.ZhuZ.JiangP.MiG.EBSD Study on Magnetic Field Altering Crystal Texture and Grain Growth During Laser-Hybrid Welding. Materials & Design, Vol. 216, 2022, p. 110587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110587.
33.
ZhuX.YuanY.LiL.DuY.LiF.Identification of Interfacial Transition Zone in Asphalt Concrete Based on Nano-Scale Metrology Techniques. Materials and Design, Vol. 129, 2017, pp. 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.015.
34.
FengS.XiaoH.GengJ.Bond Strength Between Concrete Substrate and Repair Mortar: Effect of Fibre Stiffness and Substrate Surface Roughness. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 114, 2020, p. 103746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103746.
35.
FengS.XiaoH.LiY.Influence of Interfacial Parameters and Testing Methods on UHPC–NSC Bond Strength: Slant Shear vs. Direct Tensile Testing. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 131, 2022, p. 104568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104568.
36.
FengS.XiaoH.LiuR.LiuM.The Bond Properties Between Ultra-High-Performance Concrete and Normal Strength Concrete Substrate: Bond Macro-Performance and Overlay Transition Zone Microstructure. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 128, 2022, p. 104436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104436.
37.
HanX.HanB.XieH.YanW.YuJ.HeY.YanL.Seismic Stability Analysis of the Large-Span Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Arch Bridge Considering the Long-Term Effects. Engineering Structures, Vol. 268, 2022, p. 114744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114744.
38.
RongX.LiuY.ChenP.LvX.ShenC.YaoB.Prediction of Creep of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Using Back-Propagation Neural Network and Support Vector Machine. Structural Concrete, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2023, pp. 2229–2244. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202200469.
39.
DongW.YuanW.ZhangB.ZhongH.Energy-Based Fracture Criterion of Rock-Concrete Interface Considering Viscoelastic Characteristics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 148, No. 2, 2022, p. 04021155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943.
40.
ZhangZ.YanY.QuZ.GengG.Endowing Strength to Calcium Silicate Hydrate (C-S-H) Powder by High Pressure Mechanical Compaction. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 159, 2022, p. 106858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106858.
41.
ChenX.SunT.SunT.YinH.HouD.Multiscale Modeling of Elastic Modulus across Micro-Meso-Macroscales Based on Grid-Nanoindentation Test for Cementitious Materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2022, p. 04022129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004267.
42.
MallickS.AnoopM. B.Balaji RaoK.Early Age Creep of Cement Paste - Governing Mechanisms and Role of Water-A Microindentation Study. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 116, 2019, pp. 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.12.004.
43.
Irfan-Ul-HassanM.PichlerB.ReihsnerR.HellmichC.Elastic and Creep Properties of Young Cement Paste, as Determined from Hourly Repeated Minute-Long Quasi-Static Tests. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 82, 2016, pp. 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.11.007.
44.
NěmečekJ.Creep Effects in Nanoindentation of Hydrated Phases of Cement Pastes. Materials Characterization, Vol. 60, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2009.04.008.
45.
WangW. H.Correlation Between Relaxations and Plastic Deformation, and Elastic Model of Flow in Metallic Glasses and Glass-Forming Liquids. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 110, No. 5, 2011, p. 053521. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3632972.
46.
SuwanmaneechotP.AiliA.MaruyamaI.Creep Behavior of C-S-H under Different Drying Relative Humidities: Interpretation of Microindentation Tests and Sorption Measurements by Multi-Scale Analysis. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 132, 2020, p. 106036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106036.
47.
LiY.LiY.LiH.Multi-Scale Investigation of Creep Properties of Potassium Magnesium Phosphate Cement. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 48, 2022, p. 103949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103949.
48.
ZhouH. W.WangC. P.HanB. B.DuanZ. Q.A Creep Constitutive Model for Salt Rock Based on Fractional Derivatives. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2011, pp. 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.11.004.
49.
OliverW. C.PharrG. M.An Improved Technique for Determining Hardness and Elastic Modulus Using Load and Displacement Sensing Indentation Experiments. Journal of Material Research, Vol. 7, 1992, pp. 1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1177/003591571901200704.
50.
ASTM International. ASTM E2546-15(2023) Standard Practice for Instrumented Indentation Testing. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Vol. 03.01, 2023, pp. 1–24. http://doi.org/10.1520/E2546-15R23.
51.
LiangS.WeiY.Imperfect Interface Effect on Creep Property of Hardened-Cement Pastes: Investigations from Nano to Micro Scales. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 7, 2020, p. 04020173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003238.
52.
VelezK.MaximilienS.DamidotD.FantozziG.SorrentinoF.Determination by Nanoindentation of Elastic Modulus and Hardness of Pure Constituents of Portland Cement Clinker. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2001, pp. 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00505-6.
53.
SorelliL.ConstantinidesG.UlmF.ToutlemondeF.The Nano-Mechanical Signature of Ultra High Performance Concrete by Statistical Nanoindentation Techniques. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2008, pp. 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.09.002.
54.
ConstantinidesG.The Elastic Properties of Calcium Leached Cement Pastes and Motars: A Multi-Scale Investigation. MIT CEE Report R02-01. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
55.
AckerP.Micromechanical Analysis of Creep and Shrinkage Mechanisms. Creep, Shrinkage and Durability Mechanics of Concrete and Other Quasi-Brittle Materials: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, Vol. 1, 2001, pp. 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.027.
56.
PiastaW.GóraJ.BudzynW.Stress-Strain Relationships and Modulus of Elasticity of Rocks and of Ordinary and High Performance Concretes. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 153, 2017, pp. 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.167.
57.
SunX.GaoZ.CaoP.ZhouC.Mechanical Properties Tests and Multiscale Numerical Simulations for Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 202, 2019, pp. 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.01.018.
58.
DasS.YangP.SinghS. S.MertensJ. C. E.XiaoX.ChawlaN.NeithalathN.Effective Properties of a Fly Ash Geopolymer: Synergistic Application of X-Ray Synchrotron Tomography, Nanoindentation, and Homogenization Models. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 78, 2015, pp. 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.004.
59.
YangC. C.Effect of the Interfacial Transition Zone on the Transport and the Elastic Properties of Mortar. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2003, pp. 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2003.55.4.305.
60.
LiuF.PanB.ZhouC.Multilayer Microstructure Characterization of the Interfacial Transition Zone Between Polymer-Modified Magnesium Phosphate Cement and Portland Cement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2022, p. 04022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004137.
61.
LiY.ZhangG.WangZ.GuanZ.Experimental-Computational Approach to Investigate Compressive Strength of Magnesium Phosphate Cement with Nanoindentation and Finite Element Analysis. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 190, No. 100, 2018, pp. 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.145.
62.
LiangS.WeiY.Effects of Water-to-Cement Ratio and Curing Age on Microscopic Creep and Creep Recovery of Hardened Cement Pastes by Microindentation. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 113, 2020, p. 103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103619.
63.
WeiY.KongW.WangY.ShaA.Multifunctional Application of Nanoscratch Technique to Characterize Cementitious Materials. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 140, 2021, p. 106318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106318.
64.
FarmanM.AslamM.AkgülA.JaradF.On Solutions of the Stiff Differential Equations in Chemistry Kinetics with Fractal-Fractional Derivatives. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 7, 2022, p. 071007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054347.
65.
WangJ.ZhouY.Mittag-LefflerUlam Stabilities of Fractional Evolution Equations. Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2012, pp. 723–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.10.009.
66.
HyunH. C.RickheyF.LeeJ. H.HahnJ. H.LeeH.Characteristics of Indentation Cracking Using Cohesive Zone Finite Element Techniques for Pyramidal Indenters. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 51, No. 25–26, 2014, pp. 4327–4335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.08.019.
67.
HyunH. C.RickheyF.LeeJ. H.KimM.LeeH.Evaluation of Indentation Fracture Toughness for Brittle Materials Based on the Cohesive Zone Finite Element Method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 134, 2015, pp. 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.013.
68.
LiuF.PanB.CaoP.ZhouC.Multi-Scale Characterization on Behaviors of the Interface Between Magnesium Phosphate Cement and Portland Cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 275, 2021, p. 122139.
69.
ZaniM.FanteriaD.CatapanoA.MontemurroM.A Consistent Energy-Based Cohesive Zone Model to Simulate Delamination Between Differently Oriented Plies. Composite Structures, Vol. 282, 2022, p. 115042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115042.
70.
ChenS.ChenH.MitsumeN.MoritaN.BuiT. Q.GaoW.YoshimuraS.A Nodal-Based Lagrange Multiplier/Cohesive Zone Approach for Dynamic Interfacial Cracking Analysis of Thin-Walled Laminated Composite Structures. Composite Structures, Vol. 256, 2021, p. 113112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113112.
71.
NieY.XieT. Y.ChenG. M.ZhaoX. Y.LvJ. B.A 2D Generic Multi-Surface Cohesive Zone Model for Simulating FRP-to-Concrete Mixed-Mode Debonding Failure. Composite Structures, Vol. 296, 2022, p. 115890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115890.
72.
ZhangZ.SchererG.Prud’hommeR.Adhesion and Bonding Between Steel Pipe and Cement/Spacer/Mud System. Proc., 9th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures, Berkeley, CA, 2016.
73.
Martínez-PañedaE.CuestaI. I.FleckN. A.Mode II Fracture of an Elastic-Plastic Sandwich Layer. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2020, p. 031001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044898.
74.
ChuH. J.WangJ.BeyerleinI. J.PanE.Dislocation Models of Interfacial Shearing Induced by an Approaching Lattice Glide Dislocation. International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 41, 2013, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.08.005.
75.
ChenB. T.HuC. T.LeeS.Dislocations near a Sliding Interface. International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 36, 1998, pp. 1011–1034.
