The steady growth of container volume and aggressive shipping alliances have intensified competition among terminals. With the rapid development and application of modern information and communication technology, automation is a great way to promote terminals’ sustainable development. The objectives of this study are to analyze the key factors influencing automation transformation and provide theoretical guidelines for implementing automation transformation. Based on the literature review, the main factors influencing the automation transformation of container terminals are characterized and analyzed. They are divided into four categories: technical feasibility, external promotion, self-constraints, and goals/demand. Thereafter, a novel multi-source data fusion method, the Dempster–Shafer evidence interval method (DSIM) based on Dempster–Shafer evidence theory and interval value, is proposed to fuse conflicting and uncertain opinions among experts. This method is effective for expert opinion elicitation. Using DSIM, the key factors’ relative importance and their relationship are examined based on the opinions of experts in China. The results show that technical feasibility is the most important factor category in the foundation of automation transformation. Finally, a generalized planning framework for constructing automation transformation schemes is established, providing references and suggestions for terminals’ decision-makers.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport, United Nations Publications, New York, 2020.
2.
HaM.-H.YangZ.LamJ. S. L.Port Performance in Container Transport Logistics: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Transport Policy, Vol. 73, 2019, pp. 25–40.
3.
EsselD.JinZ.ZangL.Agyabeng-MensahY.AfumE.BaahC.Assessing the Impact of the Boankra Inland Container Terminal on the Operational Performance of the Seaports of Ghana. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 44, 2022, p. 100832.
4.
SyafiqM.PurwokoA.The Influences of Accessibility, Information Technology and Social Capital on Coastal Development in Indonesia: The Mediating Role of Port Development. Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 223, 2022, p. 106156.
5.
GekaraV. O.Thanh NguyenV.New Technologies and the Transformation of Work and Skills: A Study of Computerisation and Automation of Australian Container Terminals. New Technology, Work & Employment, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2018, pp. 219–233.
6.
HsuW. K. K.HuangS. H. S.HuynhN. T.An Assessment of Operating Efficiency for Container Terminals in a Port–An Empirical Study in Kaohsiung Port Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 46, 2022, p. 100823.
7.
AnY.ParkN.Economic Analysis for Investment of Public Sector’s Automated Container Terminal: Korean Case Study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2021, p. 459.
8.
WangX.DaimT.HuangL.LiZ.ShaikhR.KassiD. F.Monitoring the Development Trend and Competition Status of High Technologies Using Patent Analysis and Bibliographic Coupling: The Case of Electronic Design Automation Technology. Technology in Society, Vol. 71, 2022, p. 102076.
9.
WangN.ChangD.ShiX.YuanJ.GaoY.Analysis and Design of Typical Automated Container Terminals Layout Considering Carbon Emissions. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 10, 2019, p. 2957.
10.
WangN.WuM.YuenK. F.Assessment of Port Resilience Using Bayesian Network: A Study of Strategies to Enhance Readiness and Response Capacities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 237, 2023, p. 109394.
11.
YueL.FanH.MaM.Optimizing Configuration and Scheduling of Double 40 ft Dual-Trolley Quay Cranes and AGVs for Improving Container Terminal Services. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 292, 2021, p. 126019.
12.
Garrido SalsasJ.SauríS.RaventósE.RúaC.TorrentJ.Emerging Trends Defining the Future Role of Ports: Application of the Delphi Method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 571–585.
13.
NaickerR.AllopiD.Improving Performance at the Durban Container Terminal Through Automation. Civil Engineering: Magazine of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2015, pp. 74–76.
14.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport, United Nations Publications, New York, 2018.
15.
XiangX.LiuC.Modeling and Analysis for an Automated Container Terminal Considering Battery Management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 156, 2021, p. 107258.
KavakebS.NguyenT. T.McGinleyK.YangZ.JenkinsonI.MurrayR.Green Vehicle Technology to Enhance the Performance of a European Port: A Simulation Model with a Cost-Benefit Approach. Transportation Research. Part C, Emerging Technologies, Vol. 60, 2015, pp. 169–188.
18.
GharehgozliA. H.VernooijF. G.ZaerpourN.A Simulation Study of the Performance of Twin Automated Stacking Cranes at a Seaport Container Terminal. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 261, No. 1, 2017, pp. 108–128.
19.
LiangC.HuX.ShiL.FuH.XuD.Joint Dispatch of Shipment Equipment Considering Underground Container Logistics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 165, 2022, p. 107874.
20.
PamungkasB.Saut GurningR. O.Analysis of Automation Implementation in Indonesia Container Terminal. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 557, No. 1, 2020, p. 12029.
21.
Camarero OriveA.SantiagoJ. I. P.CorralM. M. E. I.González-CancelasN.Strategic Analysis of the Automation of Container Port Terminals Through BOT (Business Observation Tool). Logistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2020, p. 3.
22.
Burgos GajardoL.TanejaP.van KoningsveldM.Desktop Research into Historic Automation Projects of Brownfield Container Terminals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2022, p. 704.
GhiaraH.TeiA.Port Activity and Technical Efficiency: Determinants and External Factors. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2021, pp. 711–724.
25.
TussyadiahI. P.TuomiA.LingE. C.MillerG.LeeG.Drivers of Organizational Adoption of Automation. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 93(C), 2022, p. 103308.
26.
JiangB.HaiderJ.LiJ.WangY.YipT. L.WangY.Exploring the Impact of Port-Centric Information Integration on Port Performance: The Case of Qingdao Port. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1–26.
27.
BaeH. Y.ChoeR.ParkT.RyuK. R.Comparison of Operations of AGVs and ALVs in an Automated Container Terminal. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2011, pp. 413–426.
28.
ChenD.SongD.YangZ.A Review of the Literature on the Belt and Road Initiative with Factors Influencing the Transport and Logistics. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2021, pp. 1–18.
29.
ZhengS.LuoM.Competition or Cooperation? Ports’ Strategies and Welfare Analysis Facing Shipping Alliances. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 102429.
30.
WanZ.ZhangT.ShaM.GuoW.JinY.GuoJ.LiuY.Evaluation of Emission Reduction Strategies for Berthing Containerships: A Case Study of the Shekou Container Terminal. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 299, 2021, p. 126820.
31.
WangK. Y.WenY.YipT. L.FanZ.Carrier-Shipper Risk Management and Coordination in the Presence of Spot Freight Market. Transportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 149, 2021, p. 102287.
32.
XieF.WangC.XuL.Whether to Invest in Terminal Efficiency: A Perspective Considering Customer Preference and Capital Constraint in Competitive Environment?Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 205, 2021, p. 105563.
33.
KaliszewskiA.KozłowskiA.DąbrowskiJ.KlimekH.Key Factors of Container Port Competitiveness: A Global Shipping Lines Perspective. Marine Policy, Vol. 117, 2020, p. 103896.
34.
ZhuS.ZhengS.GeY. E.FuX.SampaioB.JiangC.Vertical Integration and its Implications to Port Expansion. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2019, pp. 920–938.
35.
Kokkoniemi-TarkkanenH.HorsmanheimoS.GrudnitskyA.MoisioM.LiZ.UusitaloM. A.SamardzijaD.HärkönenT.Yli-PaunuP.Enabling Safe Wireless Harbor Automation Via 5G URLLC. Proc., 2019 IEEE 2nd 5G World Forum (5GWF), IEEE, New York, 2019, pp. 403–408.
36.
Martín-SoberónA. M.MonfortA.SapiñaR.MonterdeN.CalduchD.Automation in Port Container Terminals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 160, 2014, pp. 195–204.
37.
KuoS.-Y.LinP.-C.Determinants of Green Performance in Container Terminal Operations: A Lean Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 275(C), 2020, p. 123105.
38.
Martínez-MoyaJ.Vazquez-PajaB.Gimenez MaldonadoJ. A.Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions of Port Container Terminal Equipment: Evidence from the Port of Valencia. Energy Policy, Vol. 131, 2019, pp. 312–319.
39.
CalatayudA.MonsrealM.ManganJ.VillaJ.Benefits of Technology Adoption for Enhanced Integration of Port–Hinterland Operations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 606–615.
40.
DempsterA. P.Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1967, pp. 325–339.
41.
ShaferG.A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, NJ, 1976.
42.
LiuD.ZhangJ.JinJ.DaiY.LiL.A New Approach of Obstacle Fusion Detection for Unmanned Surface Vehicle Using Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory. Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 119, 2022, p. 103016.
43.
FeiL.DengY.A New Divergence Measure for Basic Probability Assignment and Its Applications in Extremely Uncertain Environments. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2019, pp. 584–600.
44.
ZadehL. A.A Simple View of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence and Its Implication for the Rule of Combination. AI Magazine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1986, p. 85.
45.
YagerR. R.On the Dempster-Shafer Framework and New Combination Rules. Information Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1987, pp. 93–137.
46.
DuboisD.PradeH.Representation and Combination of Uncertainty with Belief Functions and Possibility Measures. Computational Intelligence, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1988, pp. 244–264.
47.
SmetsP.The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1990, pp. 447–458.
48.
LefèvreE.ElouediZ.How to Preserve the Conflict as an Alarm in the Combination of Belief Functions?Decision Support Systems, Vol. 56, 2013, pp. 326–333.
49.
XiaoF.Multi-Sensor Data Fusion Based on the Belief Divergence Measure of Evidences and the Belief Entropy. Information Fusion, Vol. 46, 2019, pp. 23–32.
50.
MurphyC. K.Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–9.
51.
YongD.WenKangS.ZhenFuZ.QiL.Combining Belief Functions Based on Distance of Evidence. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 489–493.
52.
ZhangZ.LiuT.ChenD.ZhangW.Novel Algorithm for Identifying and Fusing Conflicting Data in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2014, pp. 9562–9581.
53.
JousselmeA.-L.GrenierD.BosséÉ.A New Distance Between Two Bodies of Evidence. Information Fusion, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2001, pp. 91–101.
54.
LiuW.Analyzing the Degree of Conflict Among Belief Functions. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 170, No. 11, 2006, pp. 909–924.
55.
YuanK.XiaoF.FeiL.KangB.DengY.Conflict Management Based on Belief Function Entropy in Sensor Fusion. SpringerPlus, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–12.
56.
GuoX.XinX.Partial Entropy and Relative Entropy of Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2005, pp. 97–102.
57.
YagerR. R.Entropy and Specificity in a Mathematical Theory of Evidence. International Journal of General System, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1983, pp. 249–260.
58.
DengY.Deng Entropy: A Generalized Shannon Entropy to Measure Uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence, 2015. https://vixra.org/abs/1502.0222.
59.
FalletG.DuvalC.SimonC.WeberP.IungB.Expert Judgments Collecting and Modeling: Application to the Integrated Risks Analysis (IRA) Methodology. Proc., 2011 3rd International Workshop on Dependable Control of Discrete Systems, IEEE, New York, 2011, pp. 72–77.
60.
GuoP.TanakaH.Decision Making with Interval Probabilities. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 203, No. 2, 2010, pp. 444–454.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
