Use of Traffic Speed Deflectometer Data in Project-Level Pavement Rehabilitation Design

Abstract

Current traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) analyses have focused on the application of pavement structural-condition data at the network level. Pavement management systems use the deflection data to adjust the treatment as determined from the surface deflections and ride quality, resulting in better treatment selection. However, TSD data can also be used at the project level to inform pavement design decisions, though this has yet to be well documented in the U.S. A pilot study was conducted in 2021 to develop a methodology to analyze the TSD data for the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) based on the AASHTO 1993 overlay design methodology. The TSD analysis methodology determines the effective structural number for each TSD datapoint. The results generated from this analysis were used for an ongoing construction project to assess the structural condition of the pavement within the project limits. Grade restrictions on the project presented a challenge in determining limits of pavement reconstruction and pavement overlay. The results of the TSD analysis were used to characterize the effective structural number at a 52 ft interval, allowing for optimization of the limits of pavement reconstruction. This paper presents the TSD analysis methodology used and how SCDOT incorporated the TSD results at the project level to perform rehabilitation designs of an ongoing construction project.

Keywords

infrastructure pavements design and rehabilitation of asphalt pavements pavement design pavement condition evaluation deflectometer ground-penetrating radar

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schmalzer

History of Deflection Testing Devices, Analysis, and Use. In Workshop on the Use of Traffic Speed Deflection Device Data in Network- and Project-Level Pavement Decisions. Transportation Research Circular E-C254. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2019. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec254.pdf.

Nasimifar

Chaudhari

Thyagarajan

Sivaneswaran

Temperature Adjustment of Surface Curvature Index from Traffic Speed Deflectometer Measurements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 11, 2020, pp. 1408–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1546858.

Thyagarajan

Demonstration of TSD Extraction and Processing Tool. Presented to Pavement Structural Evaluation with Traffic Speed Deflection Devices Pooled Fund Group TPF-5(385), Texas, August 17, 2020. https://www.pooledfund.org/Document/Download?id=9152.

Nasimifar

Thyagarajan

Sivanswaran

Pavement Structural Evaluation at Network Level Pavement Management—A Case Study. Proc., International Airfield and Highway Pavements Conference, Chicago, IL, July 21–24, 2019. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784482452.034.

Katicha

Flintsch

Shrestha

Thyagarajan

Demonstration of Network Level Structural Evaluation with Traffic Speed Deflectometer in Virginia. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, July 2017. https://www.pooledfund.org/Document/Download?id=7371.

Katicha

Shrestha

Flintsch

Diefenderfer

Network Level Pavement Structural Testing with the Traffic Speed Deflectometer. Report No. VTRC 21-R4. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, August 2020. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/21-r4.pdf.

Huynh

Gassman

Mullen

Pierce

Chen

Ahmed

Utilization of Traffic Speed Deflectometer for Pavement Management. Final Report, Report No. FHWA-SC-21-04. Federal Highway Administration, Columbia, SC, May 2021. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/56375/dot_56375_DS1.pdf.

Huynh

Mullen

Gassman

Ziehl

Ahmed

Development of Pavement Design and Investigation Strategies for Non-Interstate Routes. Final Report, Report No. FHWA-SC-20-04. Federal Highway Administration, Columbia, SC, August 2020. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54686/dot_54686_DS1.pdf.

Lee

P40 Benefits of Traffic Speed Reflectometer Data in Pavement Analysis. Report N0. TC-710-4-4-9. ARRB Group, Port Melbourne, Australia, 2015.

10.

Bodin

Zhalehjoo

Garton

Improved Methods of Using Pavement Deflection Data in the Design of Rehabilitation Treatments. Report No. AP-T350-19. Austroads Ltd, Sydney, Australia, 2019.

11.

Monoharan

Chai

Chowdhury

Golding

A Study of the Structural Performance of Flexible Pavements Using Traffic Speed Deflectometer. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2018, pp. 1280–1289. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sanaul-Chowdhury/publication/321438904_A_Study_of_the_Structural_Performance_of_Flexible_Pavements_Using_Traffic_Speed_Deflectometer/links/5b1896d9a6fdcca67b62a498/A-Study-of-the-Structural-Performance-of-Flexible-Pavements-Using-Traffic-Speed-Deflectometer.pdf.

12.

Ferne

B. W.

Langdale

Fairclough

Network Implementation of Innovative Structural Condition Assessment at Traffic Speed. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, 2012.

13.

Austroads. Review of the Traffic Speed Deflectograph—Final Project Report. Report No. AP-R395-12. Austroads, Sydney, Australia, 2012.

14.

Pettinari

Baltzer

Kalantari

Jansen

Development of Simplified Models to Assess Pavement Structural Condition on Network Level. In Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railroads and Airfields, Norway, 2022. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.1201/9781003222880-26/development-simplified-models-assess-pavement-structural-condition-network-level-pettinari-baltzer-kalantari-jansen.

15.

Schmalzer

Weitzel

Methods for Calculating Deflections from Traffic Speed Deflectometer Data and Impacts on Pavement Design. In Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railroads and Airfields, Greece, 2017. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781315100333-79/methods-calculating-deflections-traffic-speed-deflectometer-data-impacts-pavement-design-schmalzer-weitzel.

16.

AASHTO. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1993.

17.

Lukanen

Stubstad

Briggs

Temperature Predictions and Adjustment Factors for Asphalt Pavement. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-085. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., June 2000. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/FWDcd/tempred.cfm.

18.

Baus

R. L.

Johnson

A. M.

Flexible Pavement Overlay Design by Dynamic Deflections—Phase II. Report No. SC HPR 554. South Carolina Department of Transportation, Columbia, South Carolina, June 1992.

19.

Tran

N. T.

Robbins

M. M.

Timm

D. H.

Willis

J. R.

Rodezno

Refined Limiting Strain Criteria and Approximate Ranges of Maximum Thicknesses for Designing Long-Life Asphalt Pavements. Report No. NCAT-Report 15-05. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 2015.