Convenient transfer between urban rail transit (URT) and feeder modes could be fundamental for improving the URT service. In the field of URT, most studies have attempted to estimate the station choice of sub-trips like access trips and egress trips rather than the whole trip, which may be locally optimal and inconsistent with the traveler’s behavior of maximizing the utility of the whole trip. In this study, we build an integrated generalized cost model for URT to estimate the access and egress station choices of URT travelers from the perspective of the whole trip and apply a genetic algorithm to estimate the model parameters. Data used in this study include a revealed preference (RP) mode chain survey conducted in Nanjing, China, and the travel cost data obtained from an online navigation application program interface (API), thus reducing the transit networking modeling work as the conventional traffic assignment process. The proposed model has promising station choice prediction accuracies for whole trips. The results show that: (a) travelers do not always choose the nearest station, and the whole trip’s generalized cost would affect their choices; (b) travelers make heterogeneous station choices. They have a varied perception of time and fare and are more sensitive to access trips; and (c) in forecasting-oriented applications, the model parameters can be set flexibly, and the model can maintain acceptable forecasting accuracy. The findings contribute to understanding station choice mechanism, transfer optimization, and feeder demand forecast for stations.
HuangD.LiuZ.FuX.BlytheP. T.Multimodal Transit Network Design in a Hub-and-Spoke Network Framework. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2018, pp. 706–735.
4.
ChengL.JinT.WangK.LeeY.WitloxF.Promoting the Integrated Use of Bikeshare and Metro: A Focus on the Nonlinearity of Built Environment Effects. Multimodal Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2022, p. 100004.
5.
YangM.ZhaoJ.WangW.LiuZ.LiZ.Metro Commuters’ Satisfaction in Multi-Type Access and Egress Transferring Groups. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 34, 2015, pp. 179–194.
6.
GuoZ.WilsonN. H.Assessing the Cost of Transfer Inconvenience in Public Transport Systems: A Case Study of the London Underground. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2011, pp. 91–104.
7.
ChengY. H.TsengW. C.Exploring the Effects of Perceived Values, Free Bus Transfer, and Penalties on Intermodal Metro–Bus Transfer Users’ Intention. Transport Policy, Vol. 47, 2016, pp. 127–138.
8.
WardmanM.A Review of British Evidence on Time and Service Quality Valuations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 37, No. 2–3, 2001, pp. 107–128.
9.
TonD.ShelatS.NijënsteinS.RijsmanL.van OortN.HoogendoornS.Understanding the Role of Cycling to Urban Transit Stations Through a Simultaneous Access Mode and Station Choice Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 823–835.
10.
GongX.CurrieG.LiuZ.GuoX.A Disaggregate Study of Urban Rail Transit Feeder Transfer Penalties Including Weather Effects. Transportation, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2018, pp. 1319–1349.
11.
YoungM.BlaineyS.Railway Station Choice Modelling: A Review of Methods and Evidence. Transport Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2018, pp. 232–251.
12.
LiuY.YangD.TimmermansH. J. P.de VriesB.The Impact of the Street-Scale Built Environment on Pedestrian Metro Station Access/Egress Route Choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 87, 2020, p. 102491.
13.
GuoY.HeS. Y.The Role of Objective and Perceived Built Environments in Affecting Dockless Bike-Sharing as a Feeder Mode Choice of Metro Commuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 149, 2021, pp. 377–396.
14.
LiX.DuM.YangJ.Factors Influencing the Access Duration of Free-Floating Bike Sharing as a Feeder Mode to the Metro in Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 277, 2020, p. 123273.
15.
HasselwanderM.BigotteJ. F.AntunesA. P.SiguaR. G.Towards Sustainable Transport in Developing Countries: Preliminary Findings on the Demand for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) in Metro Manila. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 155, 2022, pp. 501–518.
16.
ZhaoJ.ZhangF.TuL.XuC.ShenD.TianC.LiX. Y.LiZ.Estimation of Passenger Route Choice Pattern Using Smart Card Data for Complex Metro Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2017, pp. 790–801.
17.
RaveauS.GuoZ.MuñozJ. C.WilsonN. H. M.A Behavioural Comparison of Route Choice on Metro Networks: Time, Transfers, Crowding, Topology and Socio-Demographics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 66, 2014, pp. 185–195.
18.
LiouP. S.TalvitieA. P.Disaggregate Access Mode and Station Choice Models for Rail Trips. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1974. 526: 42–65.
19.
ChakourV.EluruN.Analyzing Commuter Train User Behavior: A Decision Framework for Access Mode and Station Choice. Transportation, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2014, pp. 211–228.
20.
ChenC.XiaJ.SmithB.OlaruD.TaplinJ.HanR.Influence of Parking on Train Station Choice Under Uncertainty for Park-and-Ride Users. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 5126–5133.
21.
SongY.LiD.CaoQ.YangM.RenG.The Whole Day Path Planning Problem Incorporating Mode Chains Modeling in the Era of Mobility as a Service. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 132, 2021, p. 103360.
22.
TanR.AdnanM.LeeD. H.Ben-AkivaM. E.New Path Size Formulation in Path Size Logit for Route Choice Modeling in Public Transport Networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2538: 11–18.
23.
NielsenO. A.EltvedM.AndersonM. K.PratoC. G.Relevance of Detailed Transfer Attributes in Large-Scale Multimodal Route Choice Models for Metropolitan Public Transport Passengers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 147, 2021, pp. 76–92.
24.
ChoS. H.ShinD.Estimation of Route Choice Behaviors of Bike-Sharing Users as First-and Last-Mile Trips for Introduction of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS). KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2022, pp. 3102–3113.
25.
DiX.LiuH. X.Boundedly Rational Route Choice Behavior: A Review of Models and Methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 85, 2016, pp. 142–179.
26.
JánošíkováĽ.SlavíkJ.KohániM.Estimation of a Route Choice Model for Urban Public Transport Using Smart Card Data. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 37, No. 7, 2014, pp. 638–648.
27.
ZhaoJ.ZhangF.TuL.XuC.ShenD.TianC.LiX. Y.LiZ.Estimation of Passenger Route Choice Pattern Using Smart Card Data for Complex Metro Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2016, pp. 790–801.
28.
ChenE.ZhangW.YeZ.YangM.Unraveling Latent Transfer Patterns Between Metro and Bus from Large-Scale Smart Card Data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2020, pp. 3351–3365.
29.
LaiJ.WuD.Travel Route Identification Method of Subway Passengers Based on Mobile Phone Location Data. Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2013, p. 583.
30.
DuncanL. C.WatlingD. P.ConnorsR. D.RasmussenT. K.NielsenO. A.Path Size Logit Route Choice Models: Issues with Current Models, a New Internally Consistent Approach, and Parameter Estimation on a Large-Scale Network with GPS Data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 135, 2020, pp. 1–40.
31.
ChenE.StathopoulosA.NieY.Transfer Station Choice in a Multimodal Transit System: An Empirical Study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 165, 2022, pp. 337–355.
32.
BohannonR. W.Comfortable and Maximum Walking Speed of Adults Aged 20–79 Years: Reference Values and Determinants. Age and Ageing, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1997, pp. 15–19.
33.
JensenP.RouquierJ. B.OvtrachtN.RobardetC.Characterizing the Speed and Paths of Shared Bicycle Use in Lyon. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2010, pp. 522–524.
34.
PanwaiS.DiaH.Comparative Evaluation of Microscopic Car-Following Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005, pp. 314–325.
Ansari EsfehM.WirasingheS. C.SaidiS.KattanL.Waiting Time and Headway Modelling for Urban Transit Systems – A Critical Review and Proposed Approach. Transport Reviews, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2021, pp. 141–163.
37.
TaoT.WangJ.CaoX.Exploring the Non-Linear Associations Between Spatial Attributes and Walking Distance to Transit. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 82, 2020, p. 102560.
38.
ZhaoP.LiS.Bicycle-Metro Integration in a Growing City: The Determinants of Cycling as a Transfer Mode in Metro Station Areas in Beijing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 99, 2017, pp. 46–60.
39.
WangR.ChenF.LiuX.LiuX.LiZ.ZhuY.A Matching Model for Door-to-Door Multimodal Transit by Integrating Taxi-Sharing and Subways. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2021, p. 469.
40.
TannerJ. C.Factors Affecting the Amount of Travel. Road Research Laboratory, Technical Paper No. 51. H.M. Stationery Office, London, 1961.
41.
GoodwinP. B.Generalised Time and the Problem of Equity in Transport Studies. Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1974, pp. 1–23.
42.
NagurneyA.DongJ.A Multiclass, Multicriteria Traffic Network Equilibrium Model with Elastic Demand. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 445–469.
43.
Department for Transport. TAG UNIT M3.2 Public Transport Assignment. Department for Transport, London, 2020.
44.
KumarM.HusainM.UpretiN.GuptaD.Genetic Algorithm: Review and Application. SSRN, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529843.
45.
ZhangM.YangM.LiY.ChenJ.LeiD.Optimal Electric Bus Scheduling with Multiple Vehicle Types Considering Bus Crowding Degree. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 149, No. 2, 2023, p. 04022138.
46.
KatochS.ChauhanS. S.KumarV.A Review on Genetic Algorithm: Past, Present, and Future. Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 80, No. 5, 2021, pp. 8091–8126.
47.
McFaddenD.Disaggregate Behavioral Travel Demand's RUM Side: A 30-Year Restrospective. Presented at the International Association of Travel Behavior Analysts, Brisbane, Australia, 2000.
48.
DingH. Y.Research on Urban Multi-Modal Public Transit Network Fast Construction Method and Assignment Model. PhD dissertation. Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2018.
49.
HassanatA.AlmohammadiK.AlkafaweenE. A.AbunawasE.HammouriA.PrasathV. S.Choosing Mutation and Crossover Ratios for Genetic Algorithms—A Review with a New Dynamic Approach. Information, Vol. 10, No. 12, 2019, p. 390.
50.
WuX.Research on the Influence of Crossover Probability and Mutation Probability in GA-SVM Model. Proc., IEEE 9th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC), Beijing, China, 2019.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
