Given the infrastructure sector development and the worldwide trend to grant infrastructure projects to private investors, a growing number of articles in the literature have been devoted to the issue of evaluating this class of investments. To consider the risk and irreversibility of infrastructure investments, researchers have resorted to the real options approach (ROA), which captures the value of managerial flexibility under uncertainty. This article analyzes the research focus, trends, and design found in the literature devoted to the ROA in infrastructure concession project valuation. The results are presented in a quantitative form. They provide insights that may be of value to researchers, project developers, and policymakers who intend to plan and evaluate infrastructure concession projects.
NarbaevT.De MarcoA.OrazalinN.A Multi-Disciplinary Meta-Review of the Public–Private Partnerships Research. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2020, pp. 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1643033.
2.
CarbonaraN.PellegrinoR.Revenue Guarantee in Public–Private Partnerships: A Win–Win Model. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2018, pp. 584–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1467028.
3.
ChiaraN.GarvinM. J.VecerJ.Valuing Simple Multiple-Exercise Real Options in Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2007, pp. 97–104.
4.
LiuT.BennonM.GarvinM. J.WangS.Sharing the Big Risk: Assessment Framework for Revenue Risk Sharing Mechanisms in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 143, No. 12, 2017, p. 04017086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001397.
5.
ShanL.GarvinM. J.KumarR.Collar Options to Manage Revenue Risks in Real Toll Public-Private Partnership Transportation Projects. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2010, pp. 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.506645.
6.
RoseS.Valuation of Interacting Real Options in a Toll Road Infrastructure Project. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1998, pp. 711–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80098-2.
7.
PellegrinoR.VajdicN.CarbonaraN.Real Option Theory for Risk Mitigation in Transport PPPs. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, pp. 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2012-0027.
8.
MartinsJ.MarquesR. C.CruzC. O.Real Options in Infrastructure: Revisiting the Literature. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2015, p. 04014026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000188.
9.
CopelandT.TufanoP.A Real-World Way to Manage Real Options. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 3, 2004, pp. 90–99.
10.
TrigeorgisL.TsekrekosA. E.Real Options in Operations Research: A Review. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 270, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.055.
11.
BlackF.ScholesM.The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1973, pp. 637–654.
12.
MertonR. C.Theory of Rational Option Pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1973, pp. 141–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003143.
13.
HullJ. C.Options Futures and Other Derivatives. 6th ed. Pearson, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006.
14.
TriantisA.Realizing the Potential of Real Options: Does Theory Meet Practice?Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2005, pp. 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00028.x.
15.
TrigeorgisL.Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
16.
CruzC. O.MarquesR. C.Flexible Contracts to Cope with Uncertainty in Public–Private Partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2013, pp. 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.006.
17.
KozlovaM.Real Option Valuation in Renewable Energy Literature: Research Focus, Trends and Design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 80, 2017, pp. 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.166.
18.
HuangY. L.ChouS. P.Valuation of the Minimum Revenue Guarantee and the Option to Abandon in BOT Infrastructure Projects. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2006, pp. 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500434997.
19.
MarquesN. L.BrandãoL. E. T.GomesL. L.The Rio de Janeiro International Airport Privatization: A Problem of Overbidding?Latin American Business Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2019, pp. 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2019.1624562.
20.
PolatL.BattalU. Ü.Airport Infrastructure Investments and Valuing Expansion Decisions Using the Compound Real Option Approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 91, 2021, p. 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.102011.
21.
DixitR. K.PindyckR. S.Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994.
22.
GarvinM. J.FordD. N.Real Options in Infrastructure Projects: Theory, Practice and Prospects. Engineering Project Organization Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1–2, 2012, pp. 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.632096.
23.
CoxJ. C.RossS. A.RubinsteinM.Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1979, pp. 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1.
24.
BrennanM. J.SchwartzE. S.Finite Difference Methods and Jump Processes Arising in the Pricing of Contingent Claims: A Synthesis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1978, pp. 461–474. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330152.
LongstaffF. A.SchwartzE. S.Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001, pp. 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.1.113.
27.
FuM. C.LapriseS. B.MadanD. B.SuY.WuR.Pricing American Options: A Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation Approaches. Journal of Computational Finance, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2001, pp. 39–88.
28.
Bastian-PintoC. D. L.BrandãoL. E. T.OzorioL. D. M.do PoçoA. F. T.A Parameter Based Approach to Single Factor Stochastic Process Selection for Real Options Applications. The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 27, No. 15, 2021, pp. 1533–1552. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1895859.
29.
CollanM.HaahtelaT.KyläheikoK.On the Usability of Real Option Valuation Model Types Under Different Types of Uncertainty. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016, pp. 18–37.
30.
ZhangS.ChanA. P.FengY.DuanH.KeY.Critical Review on PPP Research–A Search from the Chinese and International Journals. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2016, pp. 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008.
31.
BaoF.ChanA. P.ChenC.DarkoA.Review of Public–Private Partnership Literature from a Project Lifecycle Perspective. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2018, p. 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000424.
32.
SongJ.LiY.FengZ.WangH.Cluster Analysis of the Intellectual Structure of PPP Research. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000664.
33.
Akomea-FrimpongI.JinX.Osei-KyeiR.A Holistic Review of Research Studies on Financial Risk Management in Public–Private Partnership Projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28, No. 9, 2021, pp. 2549–2569. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2020-0103.
34.
KeY.WangS.ChanA. P.CheungE.Research Trend of Public-Private Partnership in Construction Journals. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135, No. 10, 2009, pp. 1076–1086.
35.
SongJ.ZhangH.DongW.A Review of Emerging Trends in Global PPP Research: Analysis and Visualization. Scientometrics, Vol. 107, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1111–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1.
36.
CuiC.LiuY.HopeA.WangJ.Review of Studies on the Public–Private Partnerships (PPP) for Infrastructure Projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2018, pp. 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004.
37.
ZhangY. C.LuoW. Z.ShanM.PanD. W.MuW. J.Systematic Analysis of PPP Research in Construction Journals: From 2009 to 2019. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 27, No. 10, 2020, pp. 3309–3339. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0178.
38.
BlankF. F.SamanezC. P.BaidyaT. K. N.DiasM. A. G.Economic Valuation of a Toll Road Concession with Traffic Guarantees and the Abandonment Option. Production, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2016, pp. 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.168713.
39.
LiuF.WangY.LiH.ZhouX.Influence of Cooperative Period of Municipal PPPs on Transaction Cost–A Case Study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2020, pp. 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0286.
40.
ColínF. C.SoliñoA. S.GaleraA. L. L.Default and Abandonment Option in Motorway Concessions. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2017, p. 04016022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000309.
41.
BrandãoL. E. T.Bastian-PintoC.GomesL. L.LabesM.Government Supports in Public–Private Partnership Contracts: Metro Line 4 of the São Paulo Subway System. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2012, pp. 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000095.
42.
JinH.LiuS.SunJ.LiuC.Determining Concession Periods and Minimum Revenue Guarantees in Public-Private-Partnership Agreements. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 291, No. 2, 2021, pp. 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.013.
43.
MarzoukM.AliM.Mitigating Risks in Wastewater Treatment Plant PPPs Using Minimum Revenue Guarantee and Real Options. Utilities Policy, Vol. 53, 2018, pp. 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.06.012.
44.
KimK.ChoH.YookD.Financing for a Sustainable PPP Development: Valuation of the Contractual Rights Under Exercise Conditions for an Urban Railway PPP Project in Korea. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2019, p. 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061573.
45.
Zapata QuimbayoC. A.Mejía VegaC. A.MarquesN. L.Minimum Revenue Guarantees Valuation in PPP Projects Under a Mean Reverting Process. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2019, pp. 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1500024.
46.
ZhangG.GuoJ. E.ChaiG.GongL.WangX.Using Jump-Diffusion Modeling for Valuing Real Options in Infrastructure Projects. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2010, pp. 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-010-0509-1.
47.
AdkinsR.PaxsonD.Sequential Investments with Stage-Specific Risks and Drifts. The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 12, 2017, pp. 1150–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2016.1158728.
48.
SaitoR.De CastroG. N.MezzomoC.SchiozerD. J.Value Assessment for Reservoir Recovery Optimization. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 2–4, 2001, pp. 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00157-7.
49.
JeongJ.JiC.HongT.ParkH. S.Model for Evaluating the Financial Viability of the BOT Project for Highway Service Areas in South Korea. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2016, p. 04015036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000396.
50.
GaudardL.Pumped-Storage Project: A Short to Long Term Investment Analysis Including Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 49, 2015, pp. 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.052.
51.
KitabatakeY.Real Options Analysis of the Minami Alps Forest Road Construction Project: New Valuation Approach to Social Infrastructure Project with Sequential Unit Projects. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2002, pp. 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353925.
52.
RakićB.RađenovićT.Real Options Methodology in Public-Private Partnership Projects Valuation. Economic Annals, Vol. 59, No. 200, 2014, pp. 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1400091R.
53.
RodriguesM. I.SouzaÁ. N. D.JoaquimM. S.SanchesK. L.AraújoJ. B. C. N.Castanheira NetoF.Coelho JuniorL. M.Financial Analysis of Investments in Forest Concession for Amazon Brazilian by Deterministic and Stochastic Methods. Cerne, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2019, pp. 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201925042627.
54.
HuangY. L.PiC. C.Real-Option Valuation of Build-Operate-Transfer Infrastructure Projects Under Performance Bonding. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 140, No. 5, 2014, p. 04013068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000821.
55.
KrügerN. A.To Kill a Real Option–Incomplete Contracts, Real Options and PPP. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.009.
56.
MarquesN. L.Bastian-PintoC. D. L.BrandãoL. E. T.Crossing the Brownian Bridge: Valuing Infrastructure Capacity Expansion Policies as Real Options. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2021, pp. 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1863439.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
