Case Study on the Traffic Collision Patterns of E-Scooter Riders

Abstract

In recent years, nonmotorized transportation and micromobility have become increasingly popular in urban areas, and bike sharing and e-scooter usage are more affordable and accessible than ever before. However, users of these modes face several significant challenges, including risky riding behavior and the danger of being involved in collisions or near collisions with other motorists. Because of a lack of relevant data sets, it is difficult to comprehend the underlying causes of e-scooter collisions. This study collected narrative descriptions of 24 e-scooter collisions that occurred in Texas in 2021. The perceptual cycle model (PCM) was applied to these narrative crash reports to analyze the causation patterns of the crash occurrences. The PCM mechanism was applied independently to fatal and injury collisions, and the results were then compared with Haddon’s matrix to develop policy recommendations. The novel approach proposed in this study can be widely utilized by road safety professionals to understand the causal relationships behind other key road safety issues.

Keywords

e-scooter safety perceptual cycle model crash

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Badeau

Carman

Newman

Steenblik

Carlson

Madsen

Emergency Department Visits for Electric Scooter-Related Injuries after Introduction of an Urban Rental Program. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2019, pp. 1531–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.003.

Beck

Barker

Chan

Stanbridge

Emergency Department Impact Following the Introduction of an Electric Scooter Sharing Service. EMA – Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2020, pp. 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13419.

Cicchino

J. B.

Kulie

P. E.

McCarthy

M. L.

Injuries Related to Electric Scooter and Bicycle Use in a Washington, DC, Emergency Department. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2021, pp. 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.1913280.

Cicchino

J. B.

Kulie

P. E.

McCarthy

M. L.

Severity of E-scooter Rider Injuries Associated with Trip Characteristics. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 76, 2021, pp. 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.016.

Namiri

N. K.

Lui

Tangney

Allen

I. E.

Cohen

A. J.

Breyer

B. N.

Electric Scooter Injuries and Hospital Admissions in the United States, 2014–2018. JAMA Surgery, Vol. 155, No. 4, 2020, pp. 357–359. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5423.

Tark

Micromobility Products – Related Deaths, Injuries, and Hazard Patterns 2017–2019. U.S. Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD, 2020.

Yang

Wang

Cai

Xie

Yang

Safety of Micro-Mobility: Analysis of E-scooter Crashes by Mining News Reports. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 143, 2020, article 105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105608.

Shah

N. R.

Aryal

Wen

Cherry

C. R.

Comparison of Motor Vehicle-Involved E-scooter and Bicycle Crashes Using Standardized Crash Typology. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 77, 2021, pp. 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.005.

Karpinski

Bayles

Daigle

Mantine

Characteristics of Early Shared E-scooter Fatalities in the United States 2018–2020. Safety Science, Vol. 153, 2022, article 105811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105811.

10.

Austin Public Health. Dockless Electric Scooter-Related Injuries Study, Austin, Texas: September–November 2018. Austin Public Health, Austin, TX, 2019.

11.

SUMC MLC. E-scooter Pilot Evaluation. 2020. https://learn.sharedusemobilitycenter.org/overview/e-scooter-pilot-evaluation-chicago-il-2020/. Accessed June 26, 2023.

12.

Bekhit

M. N. Z.

Fevre

J. L.

Bergin

C. J.

Regional Healthcare Costs and Burden of Injury Associated with Electric Scooters. Injury, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2020, pp. 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.026.

13.

Nielsen

K. I.

Nielsen

F. E.

Rasmussen

S. W.

Injuries Following Accidents with Electric Scooters. Danish Medical Journal, Vol. 68, No. 2, 2021, pp. 1–7.

14.

Stigson

Malakuti

Klingegård

Electric Scooters Accidents: Analyses of Two Swedish Accident Data Sets. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 163, 2021, article 106466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106466.

15.

Arellano

J. F.

Fang

Sunday Drivers, or Too Fast and Too Furious?

Findings, 2019. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.11210.

16.

Haworth

Schramm

Twisk

Comparing the Risky Behaviours of Shared and Private E-scooter and Bicycle Riders in Downtown Brisbane, Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 152, 2021, article 105981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.105981.

17.

Allem

J. P.

Majmundar

Are Electric Scooters Promoted on Social Media with Safety in Mind? A Case Study on Bird’s Instagram. Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol. 13, 2019, pp. 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.013.

18.

Mitchell

Tsao

Randell

Marks

Mackay

Impact of Electric Scooters to a Tertiary Emergency Department: 8-Week Review after Implementation of a Scooter Share Scheme. EMA – Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2019, pp. 930–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13356.

19.

Blomberg

S. N. F.

Rosenkrantz

O. C. M.

Lippert

Collatz Christensen

Injury from Electric Scooters in Copenhagen: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 12, 2019, e033988. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033988.

20.

Beck

Barker

Chan

A. N.

Stanbridge

Emergency Department Impact Following the Introduction of an Electric Scooter Sharing Service. Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2020, pp. 409–415.

21.

Shah

“Big Data and Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach to Understand Why People Ride E-scooter in Nashville, Tennessee.” Master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, 2020.

22.

Mathew

J. K.

Liu

Seeder

Bullock

D. M.

Analysis of E-scooter Trips and Their Temporal Usage Patterns. ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers), Vol. 89, No. 6, 2019, pp. 45–49.

23.

Brownson

A. B.

Fagan

P. V.

Dickson

Civil

I. D.

Electric Scooter Injuries at Auckland City Hospital. The New Zealand Medical Journal, Vol. 132, No. 1505, 2019, pp. 62–72.

24.

Tuncer

Laurier

Brown

Licoppe

Notes on the Practices and Appearances of E-scooter Users in Public Space. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 85, 2020, article 102702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102702.

25.

Curl

Fitt

Attitudes to and Use of Electric Scooters in New Zealand Cities [Data set]. 2019. https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Attitudes_to_and_use_of_Electric_Scooters_in_New_Zealand_Cities/8056109. Accessed June 26, 2023.

26.

Sikka

Vila

Stratton

Ghassemi

Pourmand

Sharing the Sidewalk: A Case of E-scooter Related Pedestrian Injury. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1807.e5–1807.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.017.

27.

Neisser

Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1976.

28.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

Why Did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model. Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2012, pp. 300–315.

29.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

What Is on Your Mind? Using the Perceptual Cycle Model and Critical Decision Method to Understand the Decision-Making Process in the Cockpit. Ergonomics, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2013, pp. 1232–1250.

30.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

The Process of Processing: Exploring the Validity of Neisser’s Perceptual Cycle Model with Accounts from Critical Decision-Making in the Cockpit. Ergonomics, Vol. 58, No. 6, 2015, pp. 909–923.

31.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

The Development of the Schema–Action–World (SAW) Taxonomy for Understanding Decision Making in Aeronautical Critical Incidents. Safety Science, Vol. 99, Part A, 2017, pp. 23–35.

32.

Banks

V. A.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

Driver Error or Designer Error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to Explore the Circumstances Surrounding the Fatal Tesla Crash on 7th May 2016. Safety Science, Vol. 108, 2018, pp. 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.023.

33.

Scott-Parker

Curran

Rune

Lord

Salmon

P. M.

Situation Awareness in Young Novice Ambulance Drivers: So Much More Than Driving. Safety Science, Vol. 108, 2018, pp. 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.016.

34.

Revell

K. M. A.

Richardson

Langdon

Bradley

Politis

Thompson

Skrypchuck

O’Donoghue

Mouzakitis

Stanton

N. A.

Breaking the Cycle of Frustration: Applying Neisser’s Perceptual Cycle Model to Drivers of Semi-Autonomous Vehicles. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 85, 2020, article 103037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103037.

35.

Damman

Steen

A Socio-Technical Perspective on the Scope for Ports to Enable Energy Transition. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 91, 2021, article 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102691.

36.

Debnath

Hasanat-E-Rabbi

Hamim

O. F.

Hoque

M. S.

McIlroy

R. C.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

An Investigation of Urban Pedestrian Behaviour in Bangladesh Using the Perceptual Cycle Model. Safety Science, Vol. 138, 2021, article 105214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105214.

37.

Shao

Zhang

A Socio-Technical Transition Path for New Energy Vehicles in China: A Multi-Level Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 172, 2021, article 121007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121007.

38.

Ceylan

B. O.

Akyuz

Arslan

Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) Approach to Analyse Socio-Technical Systems of Ship Allision in Narrow Waters. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 239, 2021, article 109804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109804.

39.

McKerral

Pammer

Identifying Objective Behavioural Measures of Expert Driver Situation Awareness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 163, 2021, article 106465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106465.

40.

Duarte

S.-P.

de Sousa

J. P.

de Sousa

J. F.

Designing Urban Mobility Policies in a Socio-Technical Transition Context. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 62, 2022, pp. 17–24.

41.

Tawfeek

M. H.

Perceptual-Based Driver Behaviour Modelling at the Yellow Onset of Signalised Intersections. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2022, pp. 404–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2020.1783414.

42.

Hamim

O. F.

Hasanat-E-Rabbi

Debnath

Hoque

M. S.

McIlroy

R. C.

Plant

K. L.

Stanton

N. A.

Taking a Mixed-Methods Approach to Collision Investigation: AcciMap, STAMP-CAST and PCM. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 100, 2022, article 103650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103650.

43.

Haddon

Jr. Kelley

A. B.

Reducing Highway Losses: A Logical Framework for Categorizing Highway Safety Phenomena and Activity. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1972, pp. 193–207.

44.

Zube

Daldrup

Lau

Maatz

Tank

Steiner

Schwender

Hartung

E-scooter Driving under the Acute Influence of Alcohol—A Real-Driving Fitness Study. International Journal of Legal Medicine, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2022, pp. 1281–1290.

45.

Uluk

Lindner

Dahne

Bickelmayer

J. W.

Beyer

Slagman

Jahn

Willy

Moeckel

Gerlach

E-scooter Incidents in Berlin: An Evaluation of Risk Factors and Injury Patterns. Emergency Medicine Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2022, pp. 295–300.

46.

Henje

Stenberg

Lundalv

Carlsson

Obstacles and Risks in the Traffic Environment for Users of Powered Wheelchairs in Sweden. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 159, 2021, article 106259.