This paper presents the numerical evaluation of structural response and fatigue life of a Reinforced Concrete Dapped-End Girder (RCDEB) and associated fatigue life under fixed pulsating and moving loads. For that, a finite element (FE) model of RCDEB is developed using a three-dimensional FE analysis code, Concrete Model of 3-Dimensions (COM3D), and analyzes the FE model under high-fatigue loads by adopting a certain percentage of verified maximum static capacity of the girder. The COM3D system is activated with a multidirectional active crack approach which considers the space averaging of stress–strain in an element. The experimental validation of the numerical analysis is also performed in the laboratory using a small-scale model of the RCDEB under the fixed pulsating load. The experimental validation demonstrates good agreement with the FE analysis. However, the moving load is not considered in the experimental scheme because of the limitation in the testing facility. Finally, it is found from the FE analysis that the moving load, as compared with the fixed pulsating load, has the greatest effect on fatigue performance of the girder, causing about a three-order reduction in fatigue life at the same percentage static capacity of the girder. An increase in the fatigue life of approximately one order is also recorded in the analysis under the static midpoint load of 350 kN as compared with the moving load. Moreover, it is also observed that the reentrant corner of the RCDEB is more vulnerable to fatigue, implying that the hanger bars close to this corner resisted the stresses after the concrete cracked. As a result, strengthening the reentrant zone is recommended.
JonhsonP. M.CoutureA.NicoletR.Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Collapse of a Portion of the de la Concorde Overpass. Government of Quebec, Quebec, Canada, 2007.
2.
Canadian Standards Association: CSA S6 1966 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, Canada, 1966.
3.
QuadriA. I.FujiyamaC.Bond Loss Response of Reinforced Concrete Dapped-End Beam Subjected to Static and Low Cycle Fatigue Loading. Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2021, pp. 439–444.
4.
ShakirQ. M.Reinforced Concrete Dapped End Beams – State of the Art. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No, 2, 2018, p. 44.
5.
LuW. Y.LinI. J.HwangS. J.LinY. H.Shear Strength of High-Strength Concrete Dapped-End Beams. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 26, No, 5, 2003, pp. 671–680.
6.
MetwallyI. M.Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Deep Beam Reinforced with GFRP Bars. HBRC Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2017, pp. 25–38. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.02.006.
7.
ÖzkılıçY. O.YazmanŞ.AksoyluC.ArslanM. H.GemiL.Numerical Investigation of the Parameters Influencing the Behavior of Dapped End Prefabricated Concrete Purlins With and Without CFRP Strengthening. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 275, No. 1, 2021, p. 122173.
8.
QuadriA. I.FujiyamaC.Numerical Analysis of RC Gerber Bridge Girder Subjected to Fatigue Loading. Proc., 10th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management Life-Cycle Sustainability and Innovations, IABMAS, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2021, pp. 2682–2689.
9.
Moreno-MartínezJ. Y.MeliR.Experimental Study on the Structural Behavior of Concrete Dapped-End Beams. Engineering Structures, Vol. 75, 2014, pp. 152–163.
10.
MattockA. H.ChanT. C.Design and Behavior of Dapped-End Beams. PCI Journal, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1979, pp. 28–45.
11.
ShakirQM.A Review on Structural Behavior, Analysis and Design of RC Dapped End Beams. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 978, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1–16.
12.
MohammedB. S.AswinM.LiewM. S.Prediction of Failure Load of RC and R-ECC Dapped-End Beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 13, 2020, p. e00433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00433.
13.
Mata-FalcónJ.PallarésL.MiguelP. F.Proposal and Experimental Validation of Simplified Strut-and-Tie Models on Dapped-End Beams. Engineering Structures, Vol. 183, 2019, pp. 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.010.
14.
MushatatH. A.AbdulKareemW. S.WanasA. H.Effect of Opening on Strength Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Dapped Ends Beams. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 870, 2020, p. 012078.
15.
WangQ.GuoZ.HoogenboomP. C. J.Experimental Investigation on the Shear Capacity of RC Dapped End Beams and Design Recommendations. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2005, pp. 221–235.
16.
FathallaE.TanakaY.MaekawaK.Fatigue Lifetime Prediction of Newly Constructed RC Road Bridge Decks. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 17, No. 12, 2019, pp. 715–727.
17.
SuryantoB.StaniforthG.KimJ.GebreyouhannesE.ChijiwaN.FujiyamaC.WoodwardP. K.Investigating the Mechanism of Shear Fatigue in Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Pulsating and Moving Loads Using Digital Image Correlation. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 258, 2019, p. 03015.
18.
GebreyouhannesE.KishiT.MaekawaK.Shear Fatigue Response of Cracked Concrete Interface. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008, pp. 365–376.
19.
HiratsukaY.SendaM.FujiyamaC.MaekawaK.Fatigue-Based Structural Behavior of RC Bridge Slabs with Different Loading Histories. Proc., 13th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, EASEC, Hokkaido University, Japan, 2013, pp. 1–8.
20.
YunK. K.ParkC.Probability Fatigue Models of Concrete Subjected to Splitting-Tensile Loads. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2014, pp. 214–222.
21.
AliK.KatsuchiH.YamadaH.Comparative Study on Structural Redundancy of Cable-Stayed and Extradosed Bridges Through Safety Assessment of Their Stay Cables. Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2021, pp. 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.021.
22.
LiJ.HaoY. F.LiuC. Y.XiaoD. D.Numerical Study of the Effect of Fatigue on Impact Performance of RC Beams. Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 66, No. 2, 2023, pp. 346–362.
23.
AswinM.MohammedB. S.LiewM. S.SyedZ. I.Shear Failure of RC Dapped-End Beams. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2015, 2015, pp. 1–11.
24.
FathallaETanakaYMaekawaKRemaining fatigue life assessment of in-service road bridge decks based upon artificial neural networks. Engineering Structures. 2018;171:602–616. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.122.
25.
Farreras-AlcoverI.ChryssanthopoulosM. K.AndersenJ. E.Regression Models for Structural Health Monitoring of Welded Bridge Joints Based on Temperature, Traffic and Strain Measurements. Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2015, pp. 648–662.
26.
Farreras-AlcoverI.ChryssanthopoulosM. K.AndersenJ. E.Data-Based Models for Fatigue Reliability of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks Based on Temperature, Traffic and Strain Monitoring. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 95, 2017, pp. 104–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.019.
27.
FujiyamaC.TangX. J.MaekawaK.AnX. H.Pseudo-Cracking Approach to Fatigue Life Assessment of RC Bridge Decks in Service. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2013, pp. 7–21.
28.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures Design, Vol. 15. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, 2007.
29.
GebreyouhannesE.ChijiwaN.FujiyamaC.MaekawaK.Shear Fatigue Simulation of RC Beams Subjected to Fixed Pulsating and Moving Loads. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2008, pp. 215–226.
30.
El-KashifK. F.MaekawaK.Time-Dependent Nonlinearity of Compression Softening in Concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2004, pp. 233–247.
31.
GallegoJ. M.ZanuyC.AlbajarL.Shear Fatigue Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Elements Without Shear Reinforcement. Engineering Structures, Vol. 79, 2014, pp. 45–57. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.005.
32.
RollerJ. J.RussellH. G.BruceR. N.Fatigue Endurance of High-Strength Prestressed Concrete Bulb-Tee Girders. PCI Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2007, pp. 30–42.
33.
ArockiasamyM.BadveA. P.RaoB. V.ReddyD. V.Fatigue Strength of Joints in a Precast Prestressed Concrete Double Tee Bridge. PCI Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1991, pp. 84–97.
34.
QuadriA. I.FujiyamaC.Response of Reinforced Concrete Dapped-End Beams Exhibiting Bond Deterioration Subjected to Static and Cyclic Loading. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2021, pp. 536–554.
35.
SchlaichJ.SchaeferK.JenneweinM.Toward a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete. PCI Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1987, pp. 74–150.
36.
ReineckK.-H.SP-208: Strut-And-Tie Models. In (ReineckK.-H., ed.), ACI Symposium Publication, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002, p. 242.
37.
El-MetwallyS. E.-D.ChenW.-F.Structural Concrete: Strut-and-Tie Models for Unified Design. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2018.
38.
MattockA. H.Strut-and-Tie Models of Dapped-End Beams. Concrete International, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2012, pp. 35–40.
39.
OviedoR.GutiérrezS.Santa MaríaH.Experimental Evaluation of Optimized Strut-and-Tie Models for a Dapped Beam. Structural Concrete, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 469–480.
40.
QuadriA. I.Strut and Tie Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams Under Static and Fixed Pulsating Loading. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2020, pp. 306–312.
41.
SyedZ. I.HejahE. S.MohamedO. A.Modelling of Dapped-End Beams Under Dynamic Loading. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2017, pp. 242–247.
42.
MaekawaK.ToongoenthongK.GebreyouhannesE.KishiT.Direct Path-Integral Scheme for Fatigue Simulation of Reinforced Concrete in Shear. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 159–177.
43.
MaekawaK.PimanmasA.OkamuraH.Nonlinear Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, 2003.
44.
MaekawaK.SoltaniM.IshidaT.ItoyamaY.Time-Dependent Space-Averaged Constitutive Modeling of Cracked Reinforced Concrete Subjected to Shrinkage and Sustained Loads. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2006, pp. 193–207.
45.
OkamuraH.UedaT.Fatigue Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Shear Force. Fatigue of Steel and Concrete Structures, 1982, pp. 415–422.
46.
AwadM. E.-M.Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Plain Concrete Subjected to High Repeated and Sustained Loads. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1971.
47.
LiuF.ZhouJ.Fatigue Strain and Damage Analysis of Concrete in Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Constant Amplitude Fatigue Loading. Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2016, 2016, p. 7.
48.
AllicheA.Damage Model for Fatigue Loading of Concrete. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 26, No. 9, 2004, pp. 915–921.
49.
CachimP. B.FigueirasJ. A.PereiraP. A. A.Fatigue Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete in Compression. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2002, pp. 211–217.
50.
LiuF.ZhouJ.Research on Fatigue Strain and Fatigue Modulus of Concrete. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2017, 2017, pp. 1–7.
51.
Eurocode 2. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. Vol. EN 1992-1-, British Standard EN 1992-1-1. 2008.
52.
FujiyamaC.KobayashiK.ZhanJ.MaekawaK.Fatigue Life Simulation of RC Bridge Slab with Initial Defects Under Water. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 14, 2011, pp. 1897–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.238.
53.
QuadriA. I.Behavior of Disturbed Region of RC Precast Beams Upgraded with Near Surface Mounted CFRP Fiber. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 24, 2023, pp. 1859–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00605-5.
54.
ShakirQ. M.AlliweR.Upgrading of Deficient Disturbed Regions in Precast RC beams with Near Surface Mounted (NSM) Steel Bars. Journal of Materials and Engineering, Vol. 7, 2020, pp. 167–184.
