This study uses survival analysis to estimate the lifetime of Swedish asphalt paved roads. The roads were separated by binder type, such as unmodified bitumen and polymer-modified bitumen (PMB). Road pavements with PMB were compared to equivalent roads with regard to annual average daily traffic, heavy vehicles, road type, road width, speed limit, construction year, region, bearing capacity, pavement type, stone size, and rut bottom distance. The analysis was based on almost 500,000 records of pavement maintenance and road condition measurements from the Swedish Transport Administration’s Pavement Management System database, dating back as far as the 1970s. The results showed that PMB in the surface layer was expected to extend road lifetimes by 15% compared with bitumen. PMB in the underlying layer gave an 8% increase in life expectancy compared with unmodified bitumen. PMB in both layers gave a 24% increase in expected road lifetime compared with unmodified bitumen in both layers.
CarpenterS. H.VanDamT.Laboratory Performance Comparisons of Polymer-Modified and Unmodified Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Transportation Research Record 66th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Board, Washington, D.C., 1987.
2.
GoodrichJ. L.Asphalt and Polymer Modified Asphalt Properties Related to the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixes (With Discussion). Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc, St Paul, MN, Vol. 57, 1988.
3.
KhattakM. J.BaladiG. Y.Fatigue and Permanent Deformation Models for Polymer-Modified Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 1767: 135–145.
4.
RoqueR.BirgissonB.DrakosC.SholarG.Guidelines for Use of Modified Binders. Technical Report. Federal Highway Administration, 2005.
5.
HabboucheJ.HajjE. Y.SebaalyP. E.PiratheepanM.A Critical Review of High Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binders and Mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2020, pp. 686–702.
6.
QiX.SebaalyP. E.EppsJ. A.Evaluation of Polymer-Modified Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1995, pp. 117–124.
7.
MaccarroneS.HolleranG.GnanaseelanG. P.Properties of Polymer Modified Binders and Relationship to Mix and Pavement Performance (With Discussion and Closure). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 64, 1995, pp. 209–240.
ChenJ.-S.WangT. J.LeeC.-T.Evaluation of a Highly-Modified Asphalt Binder for Field Performance. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 171, 2018, pp. 539–545.
10.
ZhuJ.BirgissonB.KringosN.Polymer Modification of Bitumen: Advances and Challenges. European Polymer Journal, Vol. 54, 2014, pp. 18–38.
11.
Von QuintusH. L.MallelaJ.BuncherM.Quantification of Effect of Polymer-Modified Asphalt on Flexible Pavement Performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2001: 141–154.
12.
Transport Analysis. Vehicles Kilometres on Swedish Roads. 2022:12. Transport Analysis, 2022.
13.
Swedish Transport Administration. Vägtrafiklaster – Tunga fordons vikt i rörelse allning Nationell sammanstätprogram, Korttidsmätningar (7 dygn), År 2015 – 2020. (2021:139). Swedish Transport Administration, 2021.
14.
GrönvallP.Undersökning av däcktyp i Sverige: vintern 2020 (januari–mars). 2020:160. Technical Report. Swedish Transport Administration, 2020.
15.
Swedish Transport Administration. Överbyggnad väg, Dimensionering och utformning. TRVINFRA-00224. Swedish Transport Administration, 2022.
16.
European Committee for Standardization. Bitumen and Bituminous Binders – Determination of Needle Penetration. EN 14026:2015. European Committee for Standardization, 2015.
17.
SvensonK.Estimated Lifetimes of Road Pavements in Sweden Using Time-to-Event Analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 140, 2014, p. 11.
18.
Swedish Transport Vägytemätning med Administration. vägnätsmätning medmätbil. 115:2004. Swedish Transport Vägytemätning med Administration, 2005.
19.
SvensonK.LiY.MacuchovaZ.RönnergårdL.Evaluating Needs of Road Maintenance in Sweden With the Mixed Proportional Hazards Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2589: 51–58.
20.
KleinJ. P.MoeschbergerM. L.Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data, Vol. 1230, Springer, New York, 2003.
21.
GharaibehN. G.DarterM. I.Probabilistic Analysis of Highway Pavement Life for Illinois. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1823: 111–120.
22.
SmithK. L.Titus-GloverL.RaoS.Von QuintusH.StanleyM.Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of SMA Pavement and SMA Application Guidelines. Technical Report. Wisconsin Highway Research Program, 2006.
23.
DoM.Comparative Analysis on Mean Life Reliability With Functionally Classified Pavement Sections. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, 2011, pp. 261–270.
24.
NilssonJ.-E.SvensonK.HaraldssonM.Estimating the Marginal Costs of Road Wear. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 139, 2020, pp. 455–471.
25.
Swedish Transport Administration. Maintenance Standard for Paved Roads 2011. TRV 2012:049. Swedish Transport Administration, 2012.
26.
JacobsonT.WågbergL.-G.Developing and Upgrading of a Prediction Model of Wear Caused by Studded Tyres and an Overview of the Knowledge of the Factors Influencing the Wear. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping, Vol. 2007, p. 7.
