Adopting a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Identify Barriers to Electrification of Urban Freight in India

Abstract

The economics and social development of cities depend heavily on urban freight. But, despite its obvious benefits, freight transportation has substantial negative externalities. The electrification of urban freight could help mitigate these. However, there exists a paucity of literature on barriers to the adoption of electric freight in the context of developing countries such as India. The present study intends to bridge this gap. It aims to identify the barriers to the adoption of electric freight vehicles (light commercial vehicles) in urban areas by using a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique. Based on the opinion of 32 experts, it was found that high capital costs, low driving range, and long charging times are the major obstacles to the adoption of electric freight vehicles in India. The results from the present study will assist government officials in identifying bottlenecks and prioritizing strategies for the promotion of electric freight vehicles in India.

Keywords

urban freight transportation city logistics and last mile strategies developing country electric mobility MCDM and decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Singh

Panda

Thakur

Making Liveable Cities: Challenges and Way Forward for India [Internet]. The Energy and Resources institute, 2018. https://www.teriin.org/sites/default/files/2018-11/policy-brief-making-liveable-cities.pdf.

Singh

Vaibhav

Analysis of Electric Vehicle Trends, Development and Policies in India. Case Studies on Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 9, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1180–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.006.

Patil

Majumdar

B. B.

Prioritizing Key Attributes Influencing Electric Two-Wheeler Usage: A Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approach – A Case Study of Hyderabad, India. Case Studies on Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, pp. 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.011.

Saxena

Yadav

Examining the Effect of COVID-19 on Rail Freight Volume and Revenue Using the ARIMA Forecasting Model and Assessing the Resilience of Indian Railways During the Pandemic. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions [Internet], Vol. 7, 2022, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00929-2.

Qamar

Jain

Harikumar

Thakur

Mookherjee

Pal

Road Map for Electrification of Urban Freight in India (Part-I). The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, India, 2020.

Khurana

Kumar

V. V. R.

Sidhpuria

A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2020, pp. 23–34.

Dhar

Pathak

Shukla

P. R.

Electric Vehicles and India’s Low Carbon Passenger Transport: A Long-Term Co-Benefits Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production [Internet], Vol. 146, 2017, pp. 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.111.

Goel

Sharma

Rathore

A. K.

A Review on Barrier and Challenges of Electric Vehicle in India and Vehicle to Grid Optimisation. Transportation Engineering, Vol. 4, 2021, 100057.

Liao

Molin

Timmermans

van Wee

Consumer Preferences for Business Models in Electric Vehicle Adoption. Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 73, 2019, pp. 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.006.

10.

Berkeley

Bailey

Jones

Jarvis

Assessing the Transition Towards Battery Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Level Perspective on Drivers of, and Barriers to, Take up. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet], Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.004.

11.

Tarei

P. K.

Chand

Gupta

Barriers to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production [Internet], Vol. 291, 2021, p. 125847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125847.

12.

O’Neill

Moore

Kelleher

Brereton

Barriers to Electric Vehicle Uptake in Ireland: Perspectives of Car-Dealers and Policy-Makers. Case Studies on Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.12.005.

13.

Skippon

Garwood

Responses to Battery Electric Vehicles: UK Consumer Attitudes and Attributions of Symbolic Meaning Following Direct Experience to Reduce Psychological Distance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 16, No. 7, 2011, pp. 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.005.

14.

Haddadian

Khodayar

Shahidehpour

Accelerating the Global Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Barriers and Drivers. The Electricity Journal, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2015, pp. 53–68.

15.

Saxena

Shrivastava

Examining Factors Affecting the Willingness of Rickshaw Operators to Adopt Battery Operated Rickshaws: The Case of Bhopal, India. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022.

16.

Saxena

Choudhury

Internalizing the Externalities of Urban Private Transport – A Case of Gurugram, National Capital Region, India. Case Studies on Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 10, No. 3, 2022, pp. 1885–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.08.002.

17.

Middela

M. S.

Mahesh

Kancharla

S. R.

Ramadurai

Perme

Sripada

S. K.

Devi

Complete LCA of Battery Electric and Conventional Fuel Vehicles for Freight Trips. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 110, 2022, p. 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103398.

18.

Fiori

Marzano

Modelling Energy Consumption of Electric Freight Vehicles in Urban Pickup/Delivery Operations: Analysis and Estimation on a Real-World Dataset. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 65, 2018, pp. 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.020.

19.

de Mello Bandeira

R. A.

Goes

G. V.

Schmitz Gonçalves

D. N.

D’Agosto

M. de A.

de Oliveira

C. M.

Electric Vehicles in the Last Mile of Urban Freight Transportation: A Sustainability Assessment of postal Deliveries in Rio de Janeiro-Brazil. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 67, 2019, pp. 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.017.

20.

Rastani

Yüksel

Çatay

Effects of Ambient Temperature on the Route Planning of Electric Freight Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 74, 2019, pp. 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.025.

21.

Mirhedayatian

S. M.

Yan

A Framework to Evaluate Policy Options for Supporting Electric Vehicles in Urban Freight Transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 58, 2018, pp. 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.11.007.

22.

Taefi

T. T.

Kreutzfeldt

Held

Fink

Supporting the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Urban Road Freight Transport – A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Policy Measures in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet], Vol. 91, 2016, pp. 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.003.

23.

Berkeley

Jarvis

Jones

Analysing the Take up of Battery Electric Vehicles: An Investigation of Barriers Amongst Drivers in the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 63, 2018, pp. 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.016.

24.

She

Z. Y.

Sun

J. J.

Xie

B. C.

What are the Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles? A Survey of Public Perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 56, 2017, pp. 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001.

25.

Noel

Sovacool

B. K.

Why Did Better Place Fail?: Range Anxiety, Interpretive Flexibility, and Electric Vehicle Promotion in Denmark and Israel. Energy Policy [Internet]. Vol. 94, 2016, pp. 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.029.

26.

Biresselioglu

M. E.

Demirbag Kaplan

Yilmaz

B. K.

Electric Mobility in Europe: A Comprehensive Review of Motivators and Barriers in Decision Making Processes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet], Vol. 109, 2018, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.017.

27.

Choi

Yun

A Comparative Study of Initial Cost Recuperation Period of Plug-in Series Hybrid Electric Two-Wheel Vehicles in Southeast Asian Countries. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 24, 2020, pp. 1–10.

28.

Greene

D. L.

Park

Liu

Analyzing the Transition to Electric Drive Vehicles in the U.S. Futures [Internet], Vol. 58, 2014, pp. 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.07.003

29.

Adhikari

Ghimire

L. P.

Kim

Aryal

Khadka

S. B.

Identification and Analysis of Barriers Against Electric Vehicle Use. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 12, 2020, pp. 1–20.

30.

Chhikara

Garg

Chhabra

Karnatak

Agrawal

Factors Affecting Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: An Exploratory Study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 100, 2021, p. 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103084.

31.

Goel

Sharma

Mathiyazhagan

Vimal

K. E. K.

Government is Trying but Consumers are Not Buying: A Barrier Analysis for Electric Vehicle Sales in India. Sustainable Production and Consumption [Internet], Vol. 28, 2021, pp. 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.029.

32.

Nair

Rao

Mishra

Patil

India’s Charging Infrastructure — Biggest Single Point Impediment in EV Adaptation in India. Proc., IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference (ITEC-India), Pune, India, IEEE, New York, NY, 2017, pp. 1–6.

33.

Patil

Majumdar

B. B.

An Investigation on the Key Determinants Influencing Electric Two-Wheeler Usage in Urban Indian Context. Research in Transportation Business & Management [Internet], Vol. 43, 2021, p. 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100693.

34.

Sankaran

Venkatesan

Prabhahar

Range Anxiety on Electric Vehicles in India -Impact on Customer and Factors Influencing Range Anxiety. Materials Today: Proceedings [Internet], Vol. 33, 2020, pp. 895–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.423.

35.

Singh Patyal

Kumar

Singh Kushwah

Modeling Barriers to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Indian Perspective. Energy [Internet], Vol. 237, 2021, p. 121554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121554.

36.

Verma

Khan

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Bengaluru. Transportation in Developing Economies [Internet], Vol. 6, No. 2, 2020, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-020-0100-x.

37.

Jaiswal

Kaushal

Kant

Kumar Singh

Consumer Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles: Insights and Evidence from Indian Sustainable Transportation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change [Internet], Vol. 173, 2021, p. 121089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121089.

38.

Bhattacharyya

S. S.

Thakre

Exploring the Factors Influencing Electric Vehicle Adoption: An Empirical Investigation in the Emerging Economy Context of India. Foresight, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2020, pp. 311–326.

39.

Saaty

T. L.

A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1977, pp. 234–281.

40.

Yadav

Seth

Desai

T. N.

Application of Hybrid Framework to Facilitate Lean Six Sigma Implementation: A Manufacturing Company Case Experience. Production Planning & Control [Internet], Vol. 29, No. 3, 2018, pp. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1402134.

41.

Durán

Aguilo

Computer-Aided Machine-Tool Selection Based on a Fuzzy-AHP Approach. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1787–194.

42.

Kilincci

Onal

S. A.

Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection in a Washing Machine Company. Expert Systems with Applications [Internet], Vol. 38, No. 8, 2011, pp. 9656–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.159.

43.

Ayağ

Özdemir

R. G.

A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Machine Tool Alternatives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2006, pp. 179–190.

44.

Chan

F. T. S.

Kumar

Tiwari

M. K.

Lau

H. C. W.

Choy

K. L.

Global Supplier Selection: A Fuzzy-AHP Approach. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46, No. 14, 2008, pp. 3825–3857.

45.

Mahtani

U. S.

Garg

C. P.

An Analysis of Key Factors of Financial Distress in Airline Companies in India Using Fuzzy AHP Framework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet], Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.016.

46.

Chin

K. S.

Yang

Chan

C. Y. P.

Tsui

K. L.

Y.-L.

Identifying Passengers’ Needs in Cabin Interiors of High-Speed Rails in China Using Quality Function Deployment for Improving Passenger Satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet], Vol. 119, 2019, pp. 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.004.

47.

Madanu

S. K.

Mattingly

S. P.

Kam

K. A.

Ardekani

S. A.

Integrated Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Framework for Evaluating High-Speed Passenger Rail Corridor Alternatives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2499: 1–9.

48.

Yang

Chen

Tang

Analysis of the Safety Factors of Municipal Road Undercrossing Existing Bridge Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 915–928.

49.

Dang

V. T.

Wang

Van-Thac Dang

An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, No. 16, 2019, pp. 1–21.

50.

Emrouznejad

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2017, pp. 1–408.

51.

Dobrovolskienė

Tamošiūnienė

An Index to Measure Sustainability of a Business Project in the Construction Industry: Lithuanian Case. Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–14.

52.

Patel

S. J.

Patel

C. R.

A Stakeholders Perspective on Improving Barriers in Implementation of Public Bicycle Sharing System (PBSS). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice [Internet], Vol. 138, 2020, pp. 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.007.

53.

Duleba

Moslem

Sustainable Urban Transport Development with Stakeholder Participation, an AHP-Kendall Model: A Case Study for Mersin. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 10, 2018, p. 3647.

54.

Hagman

Ritzén

Stier

J. J.

Susilo

Total Cost of Ownership and its Potential Implications for Battery Electric Vehicle Diffusion. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 18, 2016, pp. 11–17.

55.

Furch

Konečný

Krobot

Modelling of Life Cycle Cost of Conventional and Alternative Vehicles. Scientific Reports [Internet], Vol. 12, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14715-8.

56.

Barter

G. E.

Tamor

M. A.

Manley

D. K.

West

T. H.

Implications of Modeling Range and Infrastructure Barriers to Adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2502: 80–88.

57.

Morrissey

Weldon

O’Mahony

Informing the Strategic Rollout of Fast Electric Vehicle Charging Networks with User Charging Behavior Data Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2572: 9–19.

58.

Singh

Mishra

Banerjee

Analysis of Retrofit and Scrappage Policies for the Indian Road Transport Sector in 2030. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 233–246.

59.

Ghosh

Sarkar

Examining the Cost-Effectiveness of Electric Vehicle Policy in India. Transportation Planning and Technology [Internet], Vol. 45, No. 8, 2022, pp. 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2022.2132948.

60.

Holjevac

Cheli

Gobbi

A Simulation-Based Concept Design Approach for Combustion Engine and Battery Electric Vehicles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 233, No. 7, 2019, pp. 1950–1967.

61.

Galvin

Energy Consumption Effects of Speed and Acceleration in Electric Vehicles: Laboratory Case Studies and Implications for Drivers and Policymakers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Internet], Vol. 53, 2017, pp. 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.020.

62.

Saxena

Gupta

Carpooling: Who is Closest to Adopting it? An Investigation into the Potential Car-Poolers Among Private Vehicle Users: A Case of a Developing Country, India. Transport Policy [Internet], Vol. 135, 2023, pp. 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.007.

63.

Kumar

Sah

Singh

A. R.

Deng

Kumar

Bansal

R. C.

A Review of Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Towards Sustainable Renewable Energy Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 69, 2017, pp. 596–609.

64.

Manupati

V. K.

Ramkumar

Samanta

A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for the Urban Renewal in Southern India. Sustainable Cities and Society [Internet], Vol. 42, 2018, pp, 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.011.

65.

Yannis

Kopsacheili

Dragomanovits

Petraki

State-of-the-Art Review on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in the Transport Sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) [Internet], Vol. 7, No. 4, 2020pp. 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005.

66.

Karaaslan

Noori

Lee

J. Y.

Wang

Tatari

Abdel-Aty

Modeling the Effect of Electric Vehicle Adoption on Pedestrian Traffic Safety: An Agent-Based Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 93, 2018, pp. 198–210.

67.

Pardo-Ferreira

M. C.

Torrecilla-García

J. A.

de las Heras-Rosas

Rubio-Romero C

New Risk Situations Related to Low Noise from Electric Vehicles: Perception of Workers as Pedestrians and Other Vehicle Drivers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 18, 2020, pp. 1–16.

68.

Saxena

Texting and Crossing: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to Model the Psychological and Demographic Factors Related to Pedestrians’ Use of Cell Phone for Texting at Crosswalks in Developing Country. IATSS Research [Internet], Vol. 47, No. 1, 2023, pp. 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.01.003.

69.

Saxena

Assessing the Factors Affecting the Perceived Crossing Speed of Pedestrians and Investigating the Direct and Indirect Effects of Crash Risk Perception on Perceived Crossing Speed. Journal of Transport & Health [Internet], Vol. 28, 2023, p. 101541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101541.

70.

Saxena

Is Street Design and Infrastructure Perceived Differently by Persons of Different Ages, Genders, and Hierarchy of Street?

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions [Internet], Vol. 7, 2022, p. 278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00880-2.

71.

Saxena

Yadav

A. K.

Clustering Pedestrians’ Perceptions Towards Road Infrastructure and Traffic Characteristics. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion [Internet], Vol. 30, No. 1, 2023, pp. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2022.2112234.

72.

Tiwari

Urban Safety: Transport Infrastructure Design Principles. VRUs & Urban Transport Infrastructure. Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Program (TRIPP)/Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), New Delhi, India, 2014.

73.

Tiwari

Bangdiwala

Saraswat

Gaurav

Survival Analysis: Pedestrian Risk Exposure at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2007, pp. 77–89.