Bus priority treatments (BPTs) are among the effective alternative solutions that provide significant advantages to urban transport. The literature has revealed some of the benefits of BPTs in various aspects. In this study, the sustainability impact of BPTs on cities has been investigated with numerous interviews. The study has been conducted by considering the economic, social and environmental factors, which are the three main pillars of sustainability, in a balanced way. This study is unique because it focuses on cities with small population and considers the sustainability impact approaches that have not been applied for BPTs in previous studies. The study results show that BPTs have a high potential to positively affect cities, in social, environmental and economic aspects. It is thus concluded that they can provide significant advantages to cities in the three main pillars of sustainability. This study has also revealed that BPTs can contribute positively to the sustainability of small-scale cities as well as medium-/large-scale cities.
BeirãoG.CabralJ. S.Understanding Attitudes Towards Public Transport and Private Car: A Qualitative Study. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2007, pp. 478–489.
2.
Ibarra-RojasO. J.DelgadoF.GiesenR.MuñozJ. C.Planning, Operation, and Control of Bus Transport Systems: A Literature Review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 38–75.
3.
DadashzadehN.ErgunM.Spatial Bus Priority Schemes, Implementation Challenges and Needs: An Overview and Directions for Future Studies. Public Transport, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2018, pp. 545–570.
4.
GulerS. I.MenendezM.Pre-signals for Bus Priority: Basic Guidelines for Implementation. Public Transport, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2015, pp. 339–354.
5.
OakesJ.MetzgerD.Park View Pre-signals in Uxbridge Road, Ealing. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1995, pp. 62–67.
6.
WuJ.HounsellN.Bus Priority Using Pre-signals. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1998, pp. 563–583.
7.
BasbasS.Sustainable Urban Mobility: The Role of Bus Priority Measures. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 102, 2007. pp. 823–834 https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP070782.
8.
HounsellN.ShresthaB.A New Approach for Co-operative Bus Priority at Traffic Signals. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2011, pp. 6–14.
9.
GohK. C. K.CurrieG.SarviM.LoganD.Bus Accident Analysis of Routes With/Without Bus Priority. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 65, 2014, pp. 18–27.
10.
YinM.XuJ.YangZ.Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 10, 2019, p. 2911.
11.
McDonnellS.FerreiraS.ConveryF. J.Impact of Bus Priority Attributes on Catchment Area Residents in Dublin, Ireland. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2006, pp. 137–162.
12.
HounsellN. B.ShresthaB. P.McLeodF. N.PalmerS.BowenT.HeadJ. R.Using Global Positioning System for Bus Priority in London: Traffic Signals Close to Bus Stops. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2007, pp. 131–137.
13.
FurthP. G.CesmeB.RimaT.Signal Priority Near Major Bus Terminal: Case Study of Ruggles Station, Boston, Massachusetts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2192: 89–96.
14.
PetterssonF.SørensenC. H.Why Do Cities Invest in Bus Priority Measures? Policy, Polity, and Politics in Stockholm and Copenhagen. Transport Policy, Vol. 98, 2020, pp. 178–185.
15.
HahnJ. S.KhoS. Y.ChoiK.KimD. K.Sustainability Evaluation of Rapid Routes for Buses With a Network DEA Model. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2017, pp. 659–669.
16.
DEFRA. Stretching the Web. UK Government Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, 2010.
17.
SFC. Sustainability Assessment – Guidelines for Federal Agencies and Other Interested Parties. Swiss Federal Council, Switzerland, 2008.
18.
FurthP. G.MullerT. H.Conditional Bus Priority at Signalized Intersections: Better Service with Less Traffic Disruption. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000. 1731: 23–30.
19.
HeH.GulerS. I.MenendezM.Adaptive Control Algorithm to Provide Bus Priority with a Pre-signal. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 64, 2016, pp. 28–44.
20.
SkabardonisA.Control Strategies for Transit Priority. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2000. 1727: 20–26.
21.
EkeilaW.SayedT.EsaweyM. E.Development of Dynamic Transit Signal Priority Strategy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2111: 1–9.
22.
ChristofaE.SkabardonisA.Traffic Signal Optimization with Application of Transit Signal Priority to an Isolated Intersection. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2259: 192–201.
23.
HuJ.ParkB. B.LeeY. J.Coordinated Transit Signal Priority Supporting Transit Progression Under Connected Vehicle Technology. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 55, 2015, pp. 393–408.
24.
LeeY. J.DadvarS.HuJ.ParkB. B.Transit Signal Priority Experiment in a Connected Vehicle Technology Environment. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 143, No. 8, 2017, p. 05017005.
25.
DasD.AltekarN. V.HeadK. L.SaleemF.Traffic Signal Priority Control Strategy for Connected Emergency Vehicles with Dilemma Zone Protection for Freight Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 499–517.
26.
GulerS. I.MenendezM.Analytical Formulation and Empirical Evaluation of Pre-signals for Bus Priority. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 64, 2014, pp. 41–53.
27.
GulerS. I.GayahV. V.MenendezM.Bus Priority at Signalized Intersections with Single-Lane Approaches: A Novel Pre-signal Strategy. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 63, 2016, pp. 51–70.
28.
BhattacharyyaK.MaitraB.BoltzeM.Implementation of Bus Priority with Queue Jump Lane and Pre-signal at Urban Intersections with Mixed Traffic Operations: Lessons Learned?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 646–657.
29.
SunY.LiJ.WeiX.JiaoY.Tandem Design of Bus Priority Based on a Pre-Signal System. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 18, 2021, p. 10109.
30.
EichlerM.DaganzoC. F.Bus Lanes with Intermittent Priority: Strategy Formulae and an Evaluation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 40, No. 9, 2006, pp. 731–744.
31.
SakamotoK.AbhayanthaC.KubotaH.Effectiveness of Bus Priority Lane as Countermeasure for Congestion. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2034: 103–111.
32.
HadasY.NahumO. E.Urban Bus Network of Priority Lanes: A Combined Multi-Objective, Multi-Criteria and Group Decision-Making Approach. Transport Policy, Vol. 52, 2016, pp. 186–196.
33.
WuW.HeadL.YanS.MaW.Development and Evaluation of Bus Lanes with Intermittent and Dynamic Priority in Connected Vehicle Environment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2018, pp. 301–310.
34.
LevinsonH. S.ZimmermanS.ClingerJ.RutherfordG. S.Bus Rapid Transit: An Overview. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, p. 1.
35.
ZhouG.GanA.Performance of Transit Signal Priority with Queue Jumper Lanes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1925: 265–271.
36.
TruongL. T.CurrieG.SarviM.Analytical and Simulation Approaches to Understand Combined Effects of Transit Signal Priority and Road-Space Priority Measures. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 74, 2017, pp. 275–294.
37.
KishimotoP. N.KarplusV. J.ZhongM.SaikawaE.ZhangX.ZhangX.The Impact of Coordinated Policies on Air Pollution Emissions from Road Transportation in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 54, 2017, pp. 30–49.
38.
WaltonK.HollandT.WilliamsM.Risk of Public Health from Transport Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Its Control Strategies. Transport, Vol. 53, No. 25, 2021, p. 9.
39.
LyuP.WangP. S.LiuY.WangY.Review of the Studies on Emission Evaluation Approaches for Operating Vehicles. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2021, pp. 493–509.
40.
StyhreL.WinnesH.BlackJ.LeeJ.Le-GriffinH.Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships in Ports – Case Studies in Four Continents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 54, 2017, pp. 212–224.
41.
BanisterD.The Climate Crisis and Transport. Transport Reviews, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2019, pp. 565–568.
42.
HoffmannC.AbrahamC.WhiteM. P.BallS.SkipponS. M.What Cognitive Mechanisms Predict Travel Mode Choice? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Transport Reviews, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2017, pp. 631–652.
43.
AbbasiM.HosseinlouM. H.JafarzadehFadakiS.An Investigation of Bus Rapid Transit System (BRT) Based on Economic and Air Pollution Analysis (Tehran, Iran). Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020, pp. 553–563.
44.
StefaniecA.HosseiniK.XieJ.LiY.Sustainability Assessment of Inland Transportation in China: A Triple Bottom Line-Based Network DEA Approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 80, 2020, p. 102258.
45.
LucasK.Providing Transport for Social Inclusion Within a Framework for Environmental Justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2006, pp. 801–809.
46.
LucasK.MarsdenG.BrooksM.KimbleM.Assessment of Capabilities for Examining Long-Term Social Sustainability of Transport and Land Use Strategies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2013: 30–37.
47.
LucasK.JonesP.Social Impacts and Equity Issues in Transport: An Introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 21, 2012, pp. 1–3.
48.
GolubA.MartensK.Using Principles of Justice to Assess the Modal Equity of Regional Transportation Plans. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 10–20.
49.
VenterC.JenningsG.HidalgoD.Valderrama PinedaA. F.The Equity Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of the Evidence and Implications for Sustainable Transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2018, pp. 140–152.
50.
LitmanT.BrenmanM.A New Social Equity Agenda for Sustainable Transportation. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2012.
51.
ShirmohammadliA.LouenC.ValléeD.Exploring Mobility Equity in a Society Undergoing Changes in Travel Behavior: A Case Study of Aachen, Germany. Transport Policy, Vol. 46, 2016, pp. 32–39.
52.
BagdatliM. E. C.Niğde ili toplu taşıma sistemlerinin yolcu talepleri açısından incelenmesi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, pp. 405–413. (in Turkish)
53.
MeekS.IsonS.EnochM.Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future Roles of UK Bus-Based Park and Ride. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2009, pp. 468–475.
54.
LitmanT.If Health Matters. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2017.
55.
BojkovićN.MacuraD.Pejčić-TarleS.BojovićN.A Comparative Assessment of Transport-Sustainability in Central and Eastern European Countries with a Brief Reference to the Republic of Serbia. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2011, pp. 319–344.
56.
MarsdenG.KimbleM.NellthorpJ.KellyC.Sustainability Assessment: The Definition Deficit. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2010, pp. 189–211.
57.
ChowJ. Y.HernandezS. V.BhagatA.McNallyM. G.Multi-Criteria Sustainability Assessment in Transport Planning for Recreational Travel. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2013, pp. 151–175.
58.
OlofssonZ.HiseliusL.VárhelyiA.Development of a Tool to Assess Urban Transport Sustainability: The Case of Swedish Cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2016, pp. 645–656.
59.
StegL.GiffordR.Sustainable Transportation and Quality of Life. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2005, pp. 59–69.
60.
MameliF.MarlettoG.Can National Survey Data Be Used to Select a Core Set of Sustainability Indicators for Monitoring Urban Mobility Policies?International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2014, pp. 336–359.
61.
KarjalainenL. E.JuholaS.Urban Transportation Sustainability Assessments: A Systematic Review of Literature. Transport Reviews, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2021, pp. 659–684.
62.
GardnerK.CobainP. A.Bus Priorities: A Solution to Urban Congestion?Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, Vol. 123, No. 4, 1997, pp. 205–212.
63.
SohailM.MaunderD. A. C.CavillS.Effective Regulation for Sustainable Public Transport in Developing Countries. Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2006, pp. 177–190.
64.
HaqueM. M.ChinH. C.DebnathA. K.Sustainable, Safe, Smart—Three Key Elements of Singapore’s Evolving Transport Policies. Transport Policy, Vol. 27, 2013, pp. 20–31.
AkbiyikliR.EatonD.DikmenS. U.Achieving Sustainable Construction Within Private Finance Initiative (PFI) Road Projects in the UK. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2012, pp. 207–229.
68.
RothsteinH.DownerJ.Renewing Defra: Exploring the Emergence of Risk-Based Policymaking in UK Central Government. Public Administration, Vol. 90, No. 3, 2012, pp. 781–799.
69.
TauringanaV.ChithamboL.The Effect of DEFRA Guidance on Greenhouse Gas Disclosure. The British Accounting Review, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2015, pp. 425–444.
70.
FreedmanR. L.Indigenous Wild Food Plants in Home Gardens: Improving Health and Income - with the Assistance of Agricultural Extension. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 63–71.
71.
Allen-SchultE.HazardJ. L.Ethical Issues in Transport; the US National Transportation Study Commission: Congressional Formulation of Policy. Transport Policy and Decision Making, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1982, pp. 17–49.
72.
KilsbyD.Ethical Challenges and Professional Responses of Travel Demand Forecasters - Review. Transport Engineering in Australia, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2006, pp. 13–18.
73.
BelfrageS.HanssonS. O.Ethical Problems in Traffic Research. Proc., Transport Research Arena, Göteborg, Sweden, Swedish Road Administration, 2006.
74.
AppleyardB.LevinsonD.RiggsW.Street Rights and Livability: Ethical Frameworks to Guide Planning, Design, and Engineering. No. 19-03097. Presented at 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2019.
75.
PáezA.TrépanierM.MorencyC.Geodemographic Analysis and the Identification of Potential Business Partnerships Enabled by Transit Smart Cards. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 7, 2011, pp. 640–652.
76.
MaX.KarimpourA.WuY. J.Statistical Evaluation of Data Requirement for Ramp Metering Performance Assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 141, 2020, pp. 248–261.
77.
ZhangS.YangY.ZhenF.LobsangT.LiZ.Understanding the Travel Behaviors and Activity Patterns of the Vulnerable Population Using Smart Card Data: An Activity Space-Based Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 90, 2021, p. 102938.
78.
ChakravartiI. M.LahaR. G.RoyJ.Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley, New York, NY, 1967.
79.
PrattJ. W.GibbonsJ. D.Kolmogorov-Smirnov Two-Sample Tests. In Concepts of Nonparametric Theory (PrattJ. W.GibbonsJ. D., eds.), Springer, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 318–344.
80.
ShiauT. A.LiuJ. S.Developing an Indicator System for Local Governments to Evaluate Transport Sustainability Strategies. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 34, 2013, pp. 361–371.
81.
GuiverJ.LumsdonL.WestonR.FergusonM.Do Buses Help Meet Tourism Objectives? The Contribution and Potential of Scheduled Buses in Rural Destination Areas. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2007, pp. 275–282.
82.
LitmanT.Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2009. http://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdf.
83.
JeonC. M.AmekudziA. A.GuenslerR. L.Evaluating Plan Alternatives for Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2010, pp. 227–247.
84.
JeonC. M.AmekudziA. A.GuenslerR. L.Sustainability Assessment at the Transportation Planning Level: Performance Measures and Indexes. Transport Policy, Vol. 25, 2013, pp. 10–21.
85.
BuzásiA.CseteM.Sustainability Indicators in Assessing Urban Transport Systems. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2015, pp. 138–145.
86.
TalanA.PathakA. N.TyagiR. D.The Need, Role and Significance of Sustainability. In Sustainability: Fundamentals and Applications (SurampalliR.ZhangT.GoyalM. K.BrarS.TyagiR, eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, NJ, 2020, pp. 21–41.
87.
KennedyC. A.A Comparison of the Sustainability of Public and Private Transportation Systems: Study of the Greater Toronto Area. Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 4, New Jersey, NJ, 2002, pp. 459–493.
88.
SmithT. W.AxonC. J.DartonR. C.A Methodology for Measuring the Sustainability of Car Transport Systems. Transport Policy, Vol. 30, 2013, pp. 308–317.
89.
KumarA.AnbanandamR.Development of Social Sustainability Index for Freight Transportation System. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 210, 2019, pp. 77–92.
90.
LindauL. A.dos Santos SennaL. A.StrambiO.MartinsW. C.Alternative Financing for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): The Case of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2008, pp. 54–60.
91.
Fernandez-SanchezG.Fernandez-HerediaA.Strategic Thinking for Sustainability: A Review of 10 Strategies for Sustainable Mobility by Bus for Cities. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 11, 2018, p. 4282.
92.
HassanS. A.HamzaniI. N. S.SabliA.SukorN. S. A.Bus Rapid Transit System Introduction in Johor Bahru: A Simulation-Based Assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 8, 2021, p. 4437.
93.
LitmanT.When Are Bus Lanes Warranted? Considering Economic Efficiency, Social Equity and Strategic Planning Goals. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada2015. http://www.vtpi.org/blw.pdf.
94.
MahmoudiR.Shetab-BoushehriS. N.EmrouznejadA.Sustainability in the Evaluation of Bus Rapid Transportation Projects Considering Both Managers and Passengers Perspectives: A Triple-Level Efficiency Evaluation Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 16, No. 12, 2022, pp. 1059–1077.
95.
BagdatliM. E. C.IpekF.Transport Mode Preferences of University Students in Post-COVID-19 Pandemic. Transport Policy, Vol. 118, 2022, pp. 20–32.
96.
MayA. D.Urban Transport and Sustainability: The Key Challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2013, pp. 170–185.
97.
RaskinP. D.ElectrisC.RosenR. A.The Century Ahead: Searching for Sustainability. Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 8, 2010, pp. 2626–2651.
98.
MüllerM.ReutterP. O.Course Change: Navigating Urban Passenger Transport Toward Sustainability Through Modal Shift. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2022, pp. 719–743.
99.
SiragusaC.TuminoA.MangiaracinaR.PeregoA.Electric Vehicles Performing Last-Mile Delivery in B2C E-Commerce: An Economic and Environmental Assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2022, pp. 22–33.
100.
PotterS.Exploring Approaches Towards a Sustainable Transport System. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2007, pp. 115–131.
101.
HickmanR.AshiruO.BanisterD.Transport and Climate Change: Simulating the Options for Carbon Reduction in London. Transport Policy, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2010, pp. 110–125.
102.
BrandC.CluzelC.AnableJ.Modeling the Uptake of Plug-In Vehicles in a Heterogeneous Car Market Using a Consumer Segmentation Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 97, 2017, pp. 121–136.
103.
ContiB.Modal Shift and Interurban Mobility: Environmentally Positive, Socially Regressive. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 69, 2018, pp. 234–241.
104.
SchwanenT.Achieving Just Transitions to Low-Carbon Urban Mobility. Nature Energy, Vol. 6, No. 7, 2021, pp. 685–687.
105.
VasconcellosE. A.Urban Transport Environment and Equity: The Case for Developing Countries. Routledge, London, 2001.
106.
Paget-SeekinsL.Meeting Multiple Sustainability Goals: Non-motorized Access and Non-work Trip Usage on Public Transit. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2012, pp. 174–194.
107.
CurrieG.TruongL.De GruyterC.Regulatory Structures and Their Impact on the Sustainability Performance of Public Transport in World Cities. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 69, 2018, pp. 494–500.
108.
BagdatliM. E. C.Fuzzy Logic-Based Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Road Pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, ASCE, Vol. 144, No. 4, 2018, p. 04018050.
109.
BağdatlıM. E. C.AkbıyıklıR.DemirA.Utilisation of Intelligent Systems in the Economical Evaluation of Transportation Projects. The Online Journal of Science and Technology, TOJSAT, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2015, pp. 78–84.
110.
BağdatliM. E. C.YildirimM. Ş.Karayolu üstyapılarındaki bozulmaların bakım maliyetlerine etkisi. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2017, pp. 102–111. (in Turkish)
111.
BağdatlıM.AkbıyıklıR.Ulaştırma yapıları ekonomik analizlerinde iskonto oranı: bir durum çalışması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2015, pp. 67–74. (in Turkish)
112.
BağdatlıM. E. C.AkbıyıklıR.PapageorgiouE. I.A Fuzzy Cognitive Map Approach Applied in Cost–Benefit Analysis for Highway Projects. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2017, pp. 1512–1527.
