The structural capacity of pavement foundation is altered by moisture conditions. Reliable moisture monitoring of geomaterials throughout pavement service life is critical for asset management by transportation agencies. Improved moisture sensing enables transportation officials and practitioners to better understand performance of complex recycled materials under frequent extreme rain events. Although moisture sensing for geomaterials has improved significantly, there are still challenges when using sensors in recycled materials that may contain unhydrated cement, aged asphalt, or both. Challenges include the development of calibration functions that account for the presence of recycled materials and robust installation procedures, as technology was developed mostly for agricultural practices. In this study, a series of experiments were conducted to suggest improvements for installation techniques and data interpretation of soil moisture and water potential sensors. Suggested installation guidelines minimize wash-out and erosion potential at the soil–sensor interface. Experimental results indicate a strong bilinear relation between dielectric of recycled materials and water content, with a region of relatively small change governed by dielectric permittivity of air and a region of rapid change controlled by dielectric permittivity of water. Moreover, it was found that dielectric permittivity is not significantly affected by aggregate internal structure as dielectric for a specific moisture content for different compaction degrees is relatively similar. Furthermore, soil water characteristic curves obtained using the water potential sensor and improved installation technique compare reasonably well with laboratory results obtained with traditional equipment. Reliability of both moisture and water potential sensors was improved with the suggested guidelines.
ChristopherB. R.SchwartzC.BoudreauR.Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements Reference Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2006.
2.
XiaoY.TutumluerE.MishraD. (2015). Performance Evaluations of Unbound Aggregate Permanent Deformation Models for Various Aggregate Physical Properties. Transportation Research Record, 2015. 2525(1): 20–30.
3.
Al-QadiI. L.LahouarS.LouliziA.ElseifiM. A.WilkesJ. A.Effective Approach to Improve Pavement Drainage Layers. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 5, 2004, pp. 658–664.
4.
KhouryN. N.ZamanM. M.Correlation between Resilient Modulus, Moisture Variation, and Soil Suction for Subgrade Soils. Transportation Research Record, 2004. 1874(1): 99–107.
5.
CaryC. E.ZapataC. E. (2011). Resilient Modulus for Unsaturated Unbound Materials. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2011, pp. 615–638.
6.
ErlingssonS.RahmanS.SalourF.Characteristic of Unbound Granular Materials and Subgrades Based on Multi Stage RLT Testing. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 13, 2017, pp. 28–42.
7.
LiC.AshlockJ. C.WhiteD. J.VennapusaP. K.Mechanistic-Based Comparisons of Stabilised Base and Granular Surface Layers of Low-Volume Roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2019, pp. 112–124.
8.
CalhoonT. A.Zegeye-TeshaleE.VelasquezR.CalvertJ.Using Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) to Monitor the Effects of Seasonal Moisture Variation on the Structural Capacity of Pavements. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 351, 2022, pp. 128831.
9.
LekarpF.IsacssonU.DawsonA.State of the Art. I: Resilient Response of Unbound Aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 1, 2000, pp. 66–75.
10.
NazarianS.YuanD.WilliamsR. R.A Simple Method for Determining Modulus of Base and Subgrade Materials. ASTM Special Technical Publication, Vol. 1437, 2003, pp. 152–164.
11.
CaryC. E.ZapataC. E.Enhanced Model for Resilient Response of Soils Resulting from Seasonal Changes as Implemented in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2170, No. 1, 2010, pp. 36–44.
12.
GuF.SahinH.LuoX.LuoR.LyttonR. L.Estimation of Resilient Modulus of Unbound Aggregates Using Performance-Related Base Course Properties. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2015, p. 04014188.
13.
HaiderI.KayaZ.CetinA.HatipogluM.CetinB.AydilekA. H.Drainage and Mechanical Behavior of Highway Base Materials. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 6, 2014, p. 04014012.
14.
TamrakarP.NazarianS.Permanent Deformation and Stiffness of Fouled Ballast Based on Static and Impact Load Tests [C]. In Geo-Structural Aspects of Pavements, Railways, and Airfields. Springs, Colorado, U.S.A., 2019, pp. 1–11.
15.
ARA Inc., Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Champaign. ARA Inc., Albuquerque, NM, 2004.
16.
SalourF.ErlingssonS.Investigation of a Pavement Structural Behaviour during Spring Thaw Using Falling Weight Deflectometer. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2013, pp. 141–158.
17.
RosaM. G.CetinB.EdilT. B.BensonC. H.Freeze–Thaw Performance of Fly Ash–Stabilized Materials and Recycled Pavement Materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2017, p. 04017015.
18.
ValenzuelaY. B.RosasR. S.MazariM.RisseM.Rodriguez-NiklT.Resilience of Road Infrastructure in Response to Extreme Weather Events. In International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure. ASCE, Reston, VA, 2017, pp. 349–360.
19.
KnottJ. F.JacobsJ. M.SiasJ. E.KirshenP.DaveE. V.A Framework for Introducing Climate-Change Adaptation in Pavement Management. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 16, 2019, p. 4382.
20.
Zegeye TeshaleE.ShongtaoD.WalubitaL. F.Evaluation of Unbound Aggregate Base Layers Using Moisture Monitoring Data. Transportation Research Record, 2019. 2673(3): 399–409.
21.
AsadiM.MallickR.NazarianS.Numerical Modeling of Post-Flood Water Flow in Pavement Structures. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 27, 2021, p. 100468.
22.
SharmaV.Methods and Techniques for Soil Moisture Monitoring. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 2018.
23.
ToppG. C.DavisJ. L.AnnanA. P.Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content: Measurements in Coaxial Transmission Lines. Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1980, pp. 574–582.
24.
SmithM. W.TiceA. R.Measurement of Unfrozen Water Content of Soils: Comparison of NMR and TDR Methods. Report No, ADA203082, Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, VA, 1988.
25.
RothK.SchulinR.FlühlerH.AttingerW.Calibration of Time Domain Reflectometry for Water Content Measurement Using a Composite Dielectric Approach. Water Resources Research, Vol. 26, No. 10, 1990, pp. 2267–2273.
26.
OrD.WraithJ. M.Temperature Effects on Soil Bulk Dielectric Permittivity Measured by Time Domain Reflectometry: A Physical Model. Water Resources Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1999, pp. 371–383.
27.
BhuyanH.ScheuermannA.BodinD.BeckerR.Use of Time Domain Reflectometry to Estimate Moisture and Density of Unbound Road Materials: Laboratory Calibration and Field Investigation. Transportation Research Record, 2017. 2655(1): 71–81.
28.
GencD.AshlockJ. C.CetinB.KremerP.Development and Pilot Installation of a Scalable Environmental Sensor Monitoring System for Freeze–Thaw Monitoring under Granular-Surfaced Roadways. Transportation Research Record, 2019. 2673(12): 880–890.
29.
VrtisM.PalekL.WorelB.Capacitance Type Moisture Sensors in Unbound Granular Material of Pavement Structures. In Accelerated Pavement Testing to Transport Infrastructure Innovation (ChabotA.HornychP.HarveyJ.Loria-SalazarL., eds.), Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 583–591.
30.
JonesS. B.FriedmanS. P.Particle Shape Effects on the Effective Permittivity of Anisotropic or Isotropic Media Consisting of Aligned or Randomly Oriented Ellipsoidal Particles. Water Resources Research, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2000, pp. 2821–2833.
31.
HeH.DyckM.Application of Multiphase Dielectric Mixing Models for Understanding the Effective Dielectric Permittivity of Frozen Soils. Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1–22.
32.
HeH.DyckM.ZhaoY.SiB.JinH.ZhangT.WangJ.Evaluation of Five Composite Dielectric Mixing Models for Understanding Relationships between Effective Permittivity and Unfrozen Water Content. Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 130, 2016, pp. 33–42.
33.
OrangiA.NarsilioG. A.WangY. H.RyuD.Experimental Investigation of Dry Density Effects on Dielectric Properties of Soil–Water Mixtures with Different Specific Surface Areas. Acta Geotechnica, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2020, pp. 1153–1172.
34.
AlcívarM.Zurita-SilvaA.SandovalM.MuñozC.SchoebitzM.Reclamation of Saline–Sodic Soils with Combined Amendments: Impact on Quinoa Performance and Biological Soil Quality. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 9, 2018, p. 3083.
35.
MutumbaF. A.ZagalE.GerdingM.Castillo-RosalesD.PaulinoL.SchoebitzM.Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Improved Water Stress Tolerance in Wheat Genotypes. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1080–1096.
36.
ChenY.MarekG. W.MarekT. H.HeflinK. R.PorterD. O.MoorheadJ. E.BrauerD. K.Soil Water Sensor Performance and Corrections with Multiple Installation Orientations and Depths under Three Agricultural Irrigation Treatments. Sensors, Vol. 19, No. 13, 2019, p. 2872.
37.
SinghJ.HeerenD. M.RudnickD. R.WoldtW. E.BaiG.GeY.LuckJ. D.Soil Structure and Texture Effects on the Precision of Soil Water Content Measurements with a Capacitance-Based Electromagnetic Sensor. Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2020, pp. 141–152.
38.
LeeJ. C.EdilT. B.TinjumJ. M.BensonC. H.Quantitative Assessment of Environmental and Economic Benefits of Recycled Materials in Highway Construction. Transportation Research Record, 2010. 2158(1): 138–142.
39.
EdilT. B.TinjumJ. M.BensonC. H.Recycled Unbound Materials Report No. MN/RC 2012-35, Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services, Saint Paul, 2012.
40.
CobanH. S.CetinB.CeylanH.EdilT. B.LikosW. J.Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Recycled Aggregate Base (RAB) Layers and Optimization of Their Design Thicknesses. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2022, pp. 1–20.
41.
CobanH. S.CetinB.CeylanH.EdilT. B.LikosW. J.Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Recycled Aggregates and Preliminary Performance of Recycled Aggregate Base Layers. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2022, p. 04022053.
42.
CobanH. S.CetinB.CeylanH.LikosW.EdilT. B.Effects of Using Recycled Aggregates and Large Stones for Base and Subbase Layers on Modulus Properties of Pavements. In Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV (TutumluerE.NazarianS.Al-QadiI.QamhiaI. I., eds.), Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 363–372.
43.
RahardjoH.VilayvongK.LeongE. C.Water Characteristic Curves of Recycled Materials. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 89–96.
CetinB.CobanH. S.EdilT. B.CeylanH.LikosW. J.ZhengJ.BussA.Determining Pavement Design Criteria for Recycled Aggregate Base and Large Stone Subbase. Report No. NRRA202103. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Office of Policy Analysis, Research & Innovation, Saint Paul, 2021.
47.
AbbasA.FathifazlG.IsgorO. B.RazaqpurA. G.FournierB.FooS.Proposed Method for Determining the Residual Mortar Content of Recycled Concrete Aggregates. Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1–12.
