Balanced Mix Design Production Analysis of Asphalt Mixtures in Vermont

Abstract

Performance testing has been recognized by state highway agencies and the asphalt paving industry as an important tool to complement volumetric properties for improving asphalt pavement performance. Thus, the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) began evaluating the Hamburg wheel-tracking test in 2015, Illinois flexibility index test in 2018, and indirect tensile cracking test in 2020 as steps toward balanced mix design (BMD) implementation. These tests were conducted on reheated common plant-produced asphalt mixtures for multiple shadow projects, and the results were analyzed to determine the typical production variability observed in the performance testing results. Production variability is important to assess potential specifications in field production, especially for statistical quality acceptance procedures, such as percent within limits. Based on the percent within limit analysis, most of the modified Type IVS (i.e., 9.5 mm) mixtures would be acceptable based on the proposed performance requirements, while those found not acceptable were close to meeting the performance requirements and would need minimal adjustments. The lot data was further examined to generate typical lot production variability values for potential use in specification development. The information from this research effort will help VTrans achieve its goal to move beyond solely volumetric properties for asphalt mixture design and acceptance and serve as an example for other agencies exploring the implementation of BMD for improving asphalt pavement performance.

Keywords

infrastructure materials asphalt materials selection and mix design balanced/performance engineered mixture design asphalt mixture evaluation and performance asphalt mixture performance tests

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO PP 105: Standard Practice for Balanced Design of Asphalt Mixtures, Washington, D.C., 2020.

Yin

West

R. C.

Balanced Mix Design Resource Guide. NAPA Information Series 143. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Greenbelt, MD, 2021.

McCarthy

Callans

Quigley

Scott

S. V.

III . NCHRP Synthesis 492: Performance Specifications for Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_492.pdf.

Williams

B. A.

Willis

J. R.

Carter Ross

Asphalt Pavement Industry Survey on Recycled Materials and Warm-Mix Asphalt Usage: 2018. Information Series 138. National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), Lanham, MD, 2019.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Nener-Plante

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-02. University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Nener-Plante

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-03. University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development (LaDOTD). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-04. University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Nener-Plante

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-05. University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-06.University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

10.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Nener-Plante

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-07. University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

11.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Nener-Plante

Case Studies on the Implementation of Balanced Mix Design and Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixtures: Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Report No. WRSC-TR-21-08. University of Nevada, Reno, 2021.

12.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 324: Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures, Washington, D.C., 2019.

13.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 393: Determining the Fracture Potential of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Illinois Flexibility Index Test (I-FIT), Washington, D.C., 2021

14.

Mogawer

Bennert

Framework of Asphalt Balanced Mix Design (BMD) for New England Transportation Agencies, Report No. NETCR116. New England Transportation Consortium, Augusta, ME, 2020.

15.

Vermont Agency of Transportation. Project Special Provision. In Section 900 – Superpave Bituminous Concrete Pavement, Performance Engineered Method, 2019.

16.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO R 30: Mixture Conditioning of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), Washington, D.C., 2019

17.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 308: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method, Washington, D.C., 2018.

18.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 166: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (G_mb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens, Washington, D.C., 2016.

19.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 209: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (G_mm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures, Washington, D.C., 2020.

20.

Maine Department of Transportation. Special Provision. In Section 401 – Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement: HMA Hamburg Wheel Track Specification, 2019.

21.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Standard Specification for Highways and Bridges. In Section M3 – Asphaltic Materials: Hot Mix Asphalt Mixture Design Specification, 2022.

22.

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D8225: Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test at Intermediate Temperature, Washington, D.C., 2019.

23.

Burati

J. L.

Weed

R. M.

Hughes

C. S.

Hill

H. S.

Optimal Procedures for Quality Assurance Specifications. Report Number: FHWA-RD-02-095. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA, 2003.

24.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO M 332: Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder Using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test, Washington, D.C., 2021.