Given the lack of protective structural barriers and advanced restraints, motorcyclists are vulnerable road users. In 2020 in the United States, motorcycle-involved fatalities occurred 28 times more frequently per vehicle mile traveled than passenger car occupant fatalities, causing 5,579 motorcycle-related fatalities—the highest number of motorcyclists killed since 1975. By identifying patterns and relationships between key contributing factors, strategies for reducing motorcycle crashes can be developed. In addition to current efforts, additional research must be conducted using innovative avenues, with increased funding. Bayesian networks can better discover the relationships between potential speed compliance variables. This study used six years (2014 to 2019) of motorcycle crash data in Louisiana to determine the conditional probabilities of the influential factors. In addition to the high contribution of alcohol involvement, two-way undivided roadways, 35 to 44 year-old drivers involved in improper driving behaviors, and crash types are the underlying factors associated with a considerable increase in motorcycle crash severity. The findings of this study can also be used for decision making and strategy development for motorcycle safety.
KoskiT.NobleJ. M.Bayesian Networks, An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, England, 2009.
3.
GarcesG.RakotondranaivoA.BonjourE.Improving Users’ Product Acceptability: An Approach based on Bayesian Networks and A Simulated Annealing Algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 54, No. 17, 2016, pp. 5151–5168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1156183
4.
ChenZ.(David) FanW.A Multinomial Logit Model of Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Severity in North Carolina. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.10.001.
5.
MedinaA. M. F.SotoJ. C. T.Roadway Factors Associated with Motorcycle Crashes, ITE Technical Conference and Exhibit, FL, April 4–6, 2011.
6.
KostyniukL. P.NationA. D.Transportation Research Institute. Motorcycle Crash Trends in Michigan: 2001-2005, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, 2005.
7.
NaumannR. B.DellingerA. M.WestB. A.AnnestJ. L.RyanG. W.Motorcycle Injuries across the USA, 2001–2008: Injury Comparisons and Projections. Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, 2010, pp. A81–A82.
8.
EustaceD.IndupuruV. K.HoveyP.Identification of Risk Factors Associated with Motorcycle-Related Fatalities Ohio. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 7, 2011, pp. 474–480.
9.
RybG. E.DischingerP. C.KuferaJ. A.KernsT. J.Trends in Motorcycle Injuries, Deaths and Case Fatality Rates in the U.S.A. Population. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, Vol. 53, 2009, pp. 2.
10.
ChengW.GillG. S.SakraniT.DasuM.ZhouJ.Predicting Motorcycle Crash Injury Severity Using Weather Data and Alternative Bayesian Multivariate Crash Frequency Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 108, 2017, pp. 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.032.
11.
DasS.DuttaA.DixonK.Minjares-KyleL.GilletteG.Using Deep Learning in Severity Analysis of At-Fault Motorcycle Rider Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672(34): 122–134.
12.
WaseemM.AhmedA.SaeedT. U.Factors Affecting Motorcyclists’ Injury Severities: An Empirical Assessment Using Random Parameters Logit Model with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 123, 2019, pp. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.022.
13.
ShaheedM. S.GkritzaK.A Latent Class Analysis of Single-Vehicle Motorcycle Crash Severity Outcomes. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 2, 2014, pp. 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2014.03.002.
14.
Pour-RouholaminM.JalayerM.ZhouH.Modelling Single-Vehicle, Single-Rider Motorcycle Crash Injury Severity: An Ordinal Logistic Regression Approach. International Journal of Urban Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2017, pp. 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2017.1311801.
15.
ChenS. -J.ChenC. -Y.LinM. -R.Risk Factors for Crash Involvement in Older Motorcycle Riders. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 111, 2018, pp. 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.006.
16.
VajariM. A.AghabaykK.SadeghianM.ShiwakotiN.A Multinomial Logit Model of Motorcycle Crash Severity at Australian Intersections. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 73, 2020, pp. 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.008.
17.
AgyemangW.AdanuE. K.JonesS.Understanding the Factors That Are Associated with Motorcycle Crash Severity in Rural and Urban Areas of Ghana. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2021, 2021, 6336517. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6336517.
18.
TamakloeR.DasS.AidooE. N.ParkD.Factors Affecting Motorcycle Crash Casualty Severity at Signalized and Non-Signalized Intersections In Ghana: Insights From A Data Mining And Binary Logit Regression Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 165, 2022, p. 106517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106517.
19.
TruongL. T.NguyenH. T. T.TayR.A Random Parameter Logistic Model of Fatigue-Related Motorcycle Crash Involvement in Hanoi, Vietnam. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, 105627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105627.
20.
WaliB.KhattakA. J.KhattakA. J.A Heterogeneity Based Case-Control Analysis of Motorcyclist’s Injury Crashes: Evidence from Motorcycle Crash Causation Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 119, 2018, pp. 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.024.
21.
ChawlaH.KaracaI.SavolainenP. T.Contrasting Crash- and Non-Crash-Involved Riders: Analysis of Data from the Motorcycle Crash Causation Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2673, No. 7, 2019, pp. 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119851722.
22.
DasS.DuttaA.TsapakisI.Topic Models from Crash Narrative Reports of Motorcycle Crash Causation Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2675, No. 9, 2021, pp. 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211002523.
23.
FriedmanN.GeigerD.GoldszmidtM.Bayesian Network Classifiers. Machine Learning, Vol. 29, 1997, pp. 131–163.
HowardR.MathesonJ.Influence Diagrams. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA, 1984.
26.
PearlJ.Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Networks of Plausible Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos, 1988.
27.
ShachterR.Model Building with Belief Networks and Influence Diagrams. In Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications (EdwardsW.MilesR.Jr.Von WinterfeldtD., eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. 177–207.
28.
DasS.GonzalezJ.LiuJ.KongX.Encroachment-related Work zone Crash Injury Analysis using Data-driven Bayesian Network. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC, IEEE, New York, 2023.
LauritzenS. L.The EM Algorithm for Graphical Association Models with Missing Data. Computational Statistics& Data Analysis, Vol. 19, 1995, pp. 191–201.
31.
KutelaB.DasS.DadashovaB.Mining Patterns of Autonomous Vehicle Crashes Involving Vulnerable Road Users to Understand the Associated Factors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 165, 2022, 106473.
32.
DasS.BrimleyB.LindheimerT.PantA.Safety Impacts of Reduced Visibility in Inclement Weather. Center for Advancing Transportation Leadership and Safety (ATLAS Center). UTC Center, Michigan, 2017.
33.
SheykhfardA.HaghighiF.FountasG.DasS.KhanpourA.How do Driving Behavior and Attitudes toward Road Safety Vary between Developed and Developing Countries? Evidence from Iran and the Netherlands. Journal of Safety Research, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.02.005.
34.
DasS.TsapakisI.Interpretable Machine Learning Approach in Estimating Traffic Volume on Low-Volume Roadways. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, pp. 76–88.
