Vertical vehicle feet/floor interface vibrations are typically not used to indirectly estimate road roughness. The relation for vehicle floor vibrations, the International Roughness Index (IRI), vehicle speed, and road roughness vertical displacement spectrum according to the ISO 8608: 2016 standard was previously derived only for the simulation of a reference quarter-car model. It was estimated using the in situ measurement of vibrations of a person sitting in a passenger car for different vehicle and road categories, vehicle speed, and road roughness. Vibrations at the feet/floor interface and seat surface of a seated passenger were evaluated with the frequency-weighted root-mean-square vertical acceleration according to the ISO 2631-1: 1997 standard. The results indicated that the simulated results for the quarter-car model may have substantially underestimated the ratio between the vehicle floor vibrations of a seated person and the IRI, but they were similar to seat surface vibrations.
MerrittD. K.ChangG. K.RutledgeJ. L.Best Practices for Achieving and Measuring Pavement Smoothness, A Synthesis of State-of-Practice. FHWA/LA.14/550. Transtec Group, Austin, TX, 2015.
2.
MúčkaP.International Roughness Index Specifications Around the World. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2017, pp. 929–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1197144.
3.
Road and airfield surface characteristics - Test methods. Part 5: Determination of longitudinal unevenness indices. EN 13036-5. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2019.
4.
Standard Practice for Computing International Roughness Index of Roads From Longitudinal Profile Measurements. E1926-08. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015. http://doi.org/10.1520/E1926-08R15.
5.
Mechanical Vibration and Shock – Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration – Part 1: General Requirements. ISO 2631-1. International Standards Organisation (ISO), Geneve, 1997.
6.
AhlinK.GranlundN. O. J.Relating Road Roughness and Vehicle Speeds to Human Whole Body Vibration and Exposure Limits. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2002, pp. 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430210001701.
7.
Mechanical Vibration — Road Surface Profiles — Reporting of Measured Data. ISO 8608. International Standards Organisation (ISO), Geneve, 2016.
8.
AbAzizS. A.NuawiM. Z.Mohd NorM. J.Predicting Whole-Body Vibration (WBV) Exposure of Malaysian Army Three-Tonne Truck Drivers Using Integrated Kurtosis-Based Algorithm for Z-Notch Filter Technique 3D (Ikaz 3D). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 52, 2016, pp. 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.08.008.
9.
Abouel-SeoudS. A. H.Assessment of Passenger Ride Comfort During Vertical Vibration of Mid-Size Saloon and Off-Road Vehicles on Asphalt Roads. International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1–2, 2014, pp. 39–46. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.6.1-2.06.
10.
Abouel-SeoudS. A. H.Control of Driver Whole-Body Vibration Ride Comfort in Agricultural Tractor. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2019, pp. 40–51.
11.
Abouel-SeoudS. A. H.Vibration Behaviour Control of a Fabricated One-Passenger Electric Vehicle With Either Mechanical or Air Suspension. The International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2020, pp. 293–303. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2020.25.31444.
12.
De la Hoz-TorresM. L.Aguilar-AguileraA. J.Martínez-AiresM. D.RuizD. P.Assessment of Whole-Body Vibration Exposure Using ISO2631-1: 2008 and ISO2631-5: 2018 Standards. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Vol. 259, No. 5, 2019, pp. 4511–4520.
13.
NahviH.FouladiM. H.NorM. M.Evaluation of Whole-Body Vibration and Ride Comfort in a Passenger Car. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2009, pp. 143–149. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2009.14.3245.
14.
NorM. J. M.FouladiM. H.NahviH.AriffinA. K.Index for Vehicle Acoustical Comfort Inside a Passenger Car. Applied Acoustics, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2008, pp. 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.11.001.
15.
Measurement and Evaluation of Pavement Roughness Using Profilograph GE (in Slovak). TP 04/2012, Ministerstvo dopravy, vystavby a regionalneho rozvoja (MDVaRR), Bratislava, Slovakia, 2012.
16.
Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces With an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling Reference. ASTM E950/E950M-09. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
17.
SayersM. W.On the Calculation of International Roughness Index From Longitudinal Road Profile. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1995. 1501: 1–12.
18.
MúčkaP.Simulated Road Profiles According to ISO 8608 in Vibration Analysis. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2018, pp. 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160265.
19.
AndrenP.Power Spectral Density Approximations of Longitudinal Road Profiles. International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 40, No. 1–3, 2006, pp. 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2006.008450.
20.
SteinG. J.ChmúrnyR.RosíkV.Measurement and Analysis of Low Frequency Vibration. Measurement Science Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2007, pp. 47–50.
21.
SteinG. J.ChmúrnyR.RosíkV.Compact Vibration Measuring System for In-Vehicle Applications. Measurement Science Review, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2011, pp. 154–159. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10048-011-0030-1.
22.
Mechanical Vibration — Laboratory Method for Evaluating Vehicle Seat Vibration — Part 1. ISO 10326-1. International Standards Organisation (ISO), Geneve, 2016.
23.
CovaciuD.PredaI.CiolanG.GPS Based Data Acquisition System for Mobile Applications. Acta Technica Jaurinensis, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2011, pp. 453–464.
24.
GagnonL.DoréG.RichardM. J.An Overview of Various New Road Profile Quality Evaluation Criteria: Part 2. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 9, 2015, pp. 784–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.960998.
25.
Golubović-BugarskiV.PetkovićS.ĐurićŽ.JotićG.Vibration Comfort of the Vehicle Expressed by Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility. Mobility & Vehicle Mechanics, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24874/mvm.2019.45.01.01.
26.
MaedaS. Comparison of 12 Axes Vibration Data on the Different Kinds of Vehicle Seats According to the ISO 2631-1 Standard. In Proc., 5th International Conference on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA 2004) (PuntonetC. G.PrietoA., eds.), Granada, Spain, September 22–24, 2004, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/b100528.
27.
MarjanenY. Validation and Improvement of the ISO 2631-1 (1997) Standard Method for Evaluating Discomfort From Whole-Body Vibration in a Multi-Axis Environment. PhD thesis. Loughborough University, 2010.
28.
PaddanG. S.GriffinM. J.Effect of Seating on Exposures to Whole-Body Vibration in Vehicles. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 253, No. 1, 2002, pp. 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.4257.
29.
ParkS. J.SubramaniyamM.Ride Quality Investigation of Passenger Cars on Different Road Conditions. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2013, pp. 389–396.
30.
KırbaşU.Determination of Ride Comfort Thresholds Based on International Roughness Index for Asphalt Concrete Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2021, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.2011279.
31.
MúčkaP.International Roughness Index Thresholds Based on Whole-Body Vibration in Passenger Cars. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 305–320.
32.
AleadelatW.KsaibatiK.WrightC. H.SahaP.Evaluation of Pavement Roughness Using an Android-Based Smartphone. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, Vol. 144, No. 3, 2018, p. 04018033. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000058.
33.
YuQ.FangY.WixR.Pavement Roughness Index Estimation and Anomaly Detection Using Smartphones. Automation in Construction, Vol. 141, 2022, p. 104409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104409.
34.
ThiandeeP.WitchayangkoonB.SirimontreeS.LertworawanichP.An Experiment on Measurement of Pavement Roughness via Android-Based Smartphones. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 10, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2019.114.
35.
MengL.YangS.YangH.XiaoF.The Crowdsourcing-Based Estimation and Display of Rural Highway Condition From Smartphone Sensors Under Natural Driving. In CICTP 2017: Transportation Reform and Change—Equity, Inclusiveness, Sharing, and Innovation (WangH.SunJ.LuJ.ZhangL.ZhangY.FangS. E., eds.), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2018, pp. 5015–5026. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480915.012.
36.
ZengH.ParkH.SmithB. L.ParkanyE.Feasibility Assessment of a Smartphone-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, 2018, pp. 3120–3129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1008-9.
37.
BisconsiniD. R.NúñezJ. Y. M.NicolettiR.JúniorJ. L. F.Pavement Roughness Evaluation With Smartphones. International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, Vol. 7, No. 72, 2018, pp. 43–53.
38.
ChouC. P.SiaoG. J.ChenA. C.LeeC. C.Algorithm for Estimating International Roughness Index by Response-Based Measuring Device. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, Vol. 146, 2020, p. 04020031. https://doi.org/10.1061/jpeodx.0000183.
39.
WangG.BurrowM.GhataoraG.Study of the Factors Affecting Road Roughness Measurement Using Smartphones. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 26, 2020, p. 04020020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000558.
40.
MúčkaP.Passenger Car Vibration Dose Value Prediction Based on ISO 8608 Road Surface Profiles. SAE International Journal of Vehicle Dynamics, Stability, and NVH, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2021, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4271/10-05-04-0029.
