Several studies have determined the positive effect of head-up display (HUD) graphic warning to support collision avoidance. However, the visual complexity of the graphic warning may overburden the driver. Design principles and empirical evidence suggest that animation and border designs may increase visual saliency and reduce the visual complexity of graphic warnings. This study aimed to examine the effects of animation (within-subject factors: animated/non-animated) and border (within-subject factors: with/without border) on drivers’ attention and driving performance. Thirty drivers (19 females) experienced five warning conditions (the no-warning condition was the baseline condition) in simulated driving conditions. The results showed the positive effects of animation and border designs on the visual detection time (animation: 25.64% reduction; border: 6.73% reduction) and attention allocation strategies (animation: 9.53% less dwell time on the warning; border: 6.62% less dwell time on the warning) when compared with the original HUD warning. We only observed a positive effect of borders on brake reaction time (17.14% reduction). However, the positive effect of the border design on brake reaction time was only observed in the non-animated warning condition, and not in the animated warning condition. A limitation of the study is that the results were generated from young and inexperienced drivers, and they should be generalized to other driver groups only with caution. Overall, we recommend using non-animated warnings with borders in conditions that require fast reactions, and animated warnings with borders in conditions that require a superior attention strategy.
SmileyA.BrookhuisK.Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety. Road Users and Traffic Safety. Van Gorcum & Comp BV, Assen, Netherlands, 1987.
4.
WinklerS.KazaziJ.VollrathM.How to Warn Drivers in Various Safety-Critical Situations—Different Strategies, Different Reactions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 410–426.
5.
NaujoksF.NeukumA.Specificity and Timing of Advisory Warnings Based on Cooperative Perception. In Mensch & Computer Workshopband (ButzA.SchlichterJ.KochM., eds.), De Gruyter, Munich, 2014, pp. 229–238.
6.
LundqvistL. M.ErikssonL.Age, Cognitive Load, and Multimodal Effects on Driver Response to Directional Warning. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 76, 2019, pp. 147–154.
7.
ChangS. H.LinC. Y.HsuC. C.FungC. P.HwangJ. R.The Effect of a Collision Warning System on the Driving Performance of Young Drivers at Intersections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 12, No 5, 2009, pp. 371–380.
8.
AbeG.RichardsonJ.Alarm Timing, Trust and Driver Expectation for Forward Collision Warning Systems. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2006, pp. 577–586.
NoyY. I.LemoineT. L.KlachanC.BurnsP. C.Task Interruptability and Duration as Measures of Visual Distraction. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2004, pp. 207–213.
11.
GabbardJ. L.FitchG. M.KimH.Behind the Glass: Driver Challenges and Opportunities for AR Automotive Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2014, pp. 124–136.
12.
CharissisV.PapanastasiouS.VlachosG.Interface Development for Early Notification Warning System: Full Windshield Head-Up Display Case Study. In Human-Computer Interaction Interacting in Various Application Domains (JackoJ. A., ed.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 683–692.
13.
YangZ.ShiJ.ZhangY.WangD.LiH.WuC.ZhangY.WanJ.Head-Up Display Graphic Warning System Facilitates Simulated Driving Performance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2019, pp. 796–803.
14.
HajiseyedjavadiF.ZhangT.AgrawalR.KnodlerM.FisherD.SamuelS.Effectiveness of Visual Warnings on Young Drivers Hazard Anticipation and Hazard Mitigation Abilities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 116, 2018, pp. 41–52.
15.
HäuslschmidR.OsterwaldS.LangM.ButzA.Augmenting the Driver’s View with Peripheral Information on a Windshield Display. Proc., 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’15), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015, pp. 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1145/2678025.2701393.
16.
LiuY. C.WenM. H.Comparison of Head-Up Display (HUD) vs. Head-Down Display (HDD): Driving Performance of Commercial Vehicle Operators in Taiwan. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 61, No. 5, 2004, pp. 679–697.
17.
SmithM.StreeterJ.BurnettG.GabbardJ. L.Visual Search Tasks: The Effects of Head-Up Displays on Driving and Task Performance. Proc., 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’15), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015, pp. 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799291.
18.
BoltonA.BurnettG.LargeD. R.An Investigation of Augmented Reality Presentations of Landmark-Based Navigation Using a Head-Up Display. Proc., 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’15), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2015, pp. 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799253.
19.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D.Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2004, pp. 611–624.
20.
GuoH.ZhaoF.WangW.JiangX.Analyzing Drivers’ Attitude towards HUD System Using a Stated Preference Survey. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 6, 2014, p. 380647.
21.
SchwarzF.FastenmeierW.Augmented Reality Warnings in Vehicles: Effects of Modality and Specificity on Effectiveness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 101, 2017, pp. 55–66.
22.
WogalterM. S.Communication-Human Information Processing (C-HIP) Model. In Forensic Human Factors and Ergonomics (WogalterM. S., ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018, pp. 33–49.
23.
EndsleyM. R.Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1995, pp. 32–64.
24.
FrickeN.ThüringM.Complementary Audio-Visual Collision Warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 53, No. 23, 2009, pp. 1815–1819.
25.
YangZ.ShiJ.WuB.MaS.KangC.ZhangW.LiH.WuC.Effect of Warning Graphics Location on Driving Performance: An Eye Movement Study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 36, No. 12, 2020, pp. 1–11.
26.
KieferR. J.LeBlancD.PalmerM. D.SalingerJ.DeeringR. K.ShulmanM.Development and Validation of Functional Definitions and Evaluation Procedures for Collision Warning/Avoidance Systems. Report No.: DOT HS 808 964. August 1999. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/2319. Accessed July 20, 2022.
27.
LernerN. D.DekkerD.SteinbergG. V.HueyR. W.Comsis Corporation. Inappropriate Alarm Rates and Driver Annoyance. Report No.: DOT HS 808 533. February 1996. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13303. Accessed July 20, 2022.
28.
WangY.WuB.MaS.WangD.GanT.LiuH.YangZ.Effect of Mapping Characteristic on Audiovisual Warning: Evidence from a Simulated Driving Study. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 99, 2022, p. 103638.
29.
FaradayP.SutcliffeA.Multimedia: Design for the “Moment.”Proc., 5th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1997, pp. 183–192.
30.
RashidR.WogalterM.Effects of Warning Border Color, Width, and Design on Perceived Effectiveness. In Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety II (DasB.KarwowskiW., eds.), IOS Press and Ohmsha, Louisville, KY, 1997, pp. 455–456.
31.
WogalterM. S.ConzolaV. C.Smith-JacksonT. L.Research-Based Guidelines for Warning Design and Evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2002, pp. 219–230.
YoungS. L.Increasing the Noticeability of Warnings: Effects of Pictorial, Color, Signal Icon and Border. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1991, pp. 580–584. https://doi.org/10.1518/107118191786754662.
34.
CampbellJ. L.RichardC. M.BrownJ. L.McCallumM.Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned. Report No.: HS 810 697. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, January 2007.
35.
YoungS. L.Increasing the Noticeability of Warnings: Effects of Pictorial, Color, Signal Icon and Border. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 35, No. 9, 1991, pp. 580–584.
36.
KraftA. K.MaagC.BaumannM.Comparing Dynamic and Static Illustration of an HMI for Cooperative Driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105682.
37.
BedersonB. B.BoltmanA.Does Animation Help Users Build Mental Maps of Spatial Information?Proc. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis’99), IEEE, New York, 1999, pp. 28–35.
38.
BoucheixJ. M.LoweR. K.PutriD. K.GroffJ.Cueing Animations: Dynamic Signaling Aids Information Extraction and Comprehension. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 25, 2013, pp. 71–84.
39.
RieberL. P.KiniA. S.Theoretical Foundations of Instructional Applications of Computer-Generated Animated Visuals. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1991, pp. 83–88.
CianL.KrishnaA.ElderR. S.A Sign of Things to Come: Behavioral Change through Dynamic Iconography. The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2015, pp. 1426–1446.
42.
ChangB. W.UngarD.Animation: From Cartoons to the User Interface. Proc., 6th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface software and technology, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1993, pp. 45–55.
43.
HöfflerT. N.LeutnerD.Instructional Animation versus Static Pictures: A Meta-Analysis. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2007, pp. 722–738.
44.
ChengS. Y.DoshiA.TrivediM. M.Active Heads-Up Display Based Speed Compliance Aid for Driver Assistance: A Novel Interface and Comparative Experimental Studies. Proc., IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IEEE, New York, 2007, pp. 594–599.
45.
JeihaniM.BanerjeeS.AhangariS.BrownD. D.The Potential Effects of Composition and Structure of Dynamic Message Sign Messages on Driver Behavior Using a Driving Simulator. August2018. https://trid.trb.org/view/1563607. Accessed April 19, 2021.
46.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM.von der HeydtR.A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception: I. Perceptual Grouping and Figure–Ground Organization. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 138, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1172–1217.
47.
ZielinskaO. A.WogalterM. S.MayhornC. B.A Perceptual Analysis of Standard Safety, Fluorescent, and Neon Colors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1879–1883.
48.
AdamsA. S.EdworthyJ.Quantifying and Predicting the Effects of Basic Text Display Variables on the Perceived Urgency of Warning Labels: Tradeoffs Involving Font Size, Border Weight and Colour. Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 11, 1995, pp. 2221–2237.
49.
SkinnerN. P.LaPlummT. T.BulloughJ. D.Warning Light Flash Frequency as a Method for Visual Communication to Drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 88–93.
50.
WangM. J.LiY. C.ChenF.How Can We Design 3D Auditory Interfaces Which Enhance Traffic Safety for Chinese Drivers?Proc., 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012, pp. 77–83.
51.
GrahamR.Use of Auditory Icons as Emergency Warnings: Evaluation within a Vehicle Collision Avoidance Application. Ergonomics, Vol. 42, No. 9, 1999, pp. 1233–1248.
52.
NeesM. A.HelbeinB.PorterA.Speech Auditory Alerts Promote Memory for Alerted Events in a Video-Simulated Self-Driving Car Ride. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 58, No. 3, 2016, pp. 416–426.
WanJ.WuC.ZhangY.The Effect of Lead Time of Collision Warning Messages on Driver Performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2014, pp. 2088–2092.
55.
YanX.ZhangY.MaL.The Influence of In-Vehicle Speech Warning Timing on Drivers’ Collision Avoidance Performance at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 51, 2015, pp. 231–242.
56.
InhoffA. W.Two Stages of Word Processing During Eye Fixations in the Reading of Prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1984, pp. 612–624.
57.
RaynerK.CastelhanoM.Eye Movements. Scholarpedia, Vol. 2, No. 10, 2007, p. 3649.
58.
NaujoksF.KieselA.NeukumA.Cooperative Warning Systems: The Impact of False and Unnecessary Alarms on Drivers’ Compliance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 97, 2016, pp. 162–175.
59.
WangM.Generalized Estimating Equations in Longitudinal Data Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments. Advances in Statistics, Vol. 2014, 2014, p. e303728.
60.
ReinolsmannN.AlhajyaseenW.BrijsT.PirdavaniA.HussainQ.BrijsK.Investigating the Impact of a Novel Active Gap Metering Signalization Strategy on Driver Behavior at Highway Merging Sections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 78, 2021, pp. 42–57.
61.
BoucartM.LenobleQ.QuettelartJ.SzaffarczykS.DespretzP.ThorpeS. J.Finding Faces, Animals, and Vehicles in Far Peripheral Vision. Journal of Vision, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2016, p. 10.
62.
FademrechtL.BülthoffI.de la RosaS.Action Recognition in the Visual Periphery. Journal of Vision, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2016, p. 33.
63.
StrasburgerH.RentschlerI.JüttnerM.Peripheral Vision and Pattern Recognition: A Review. Journal of Vision, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2011, p. 13.
64.
MooreC. M.EgethH.Perception without Attention: Evidence of Grouping under Conditions of Inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1997, pp. 339–352.
65.
NygårdG. E.LooyT. V.WagemansJ.The Influence of Orientation Jitter and Motion on Contour Saliency and Object Identification. Vision Research, Vol. 49, No. 20, 2009, pp. 2475–2484.
66.
CastellottiS.MontagniniA.Del VivaM. M.Early Visual Saliency Based on Isolated Optimal Features. Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 15, 2021, p. 483.
67.
OrquinJ. L.LagerkvistC. J.Effects of Salience Are Both Short- and Long-Lived. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 160, 2015, pp. 69–76.
68.
GalleyN.BetzD.BiniossekC.Fixation Durations: Why Are They So Highly Variable? In Advances in Visual Perception Research (HeinenT., ed.), Nova Science, New York, NY, 2015, pp. 83–106.
69.
LyuN.DengC.XieL.WuC.DuanZ.A Field Operational Test in China: Exploring the Effect of an Advanced Driver Assistance System on Driving Performance and Braking Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 65, 2019, pp. 730–747.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
