Impact of Goods Distribution in the Last Mile: An Investigation in the City of São Paulo

Abstract

The number of goods deliveries made in the city of São Paulo has been rising every year. This growth is caused by new consumption habits, as people increasingly opt for online shopping, having goods delivered to their homes or neighborhood markets. However, these deliveries have become increasingly complex because of several issues found in the last-mile distribution of goods. This research sheds light on the interactions among issues related to truck circulation restrictions, receiver characteristics, accessibility and delivery planning, urban road infrastructure, driver behavior, and safety and risk problems that hamper last-mile delivery distribution. Data were collected (via a questionnaire) from drivers who work in the urban distribution of non-durable consumer goods in the city of São Paulo. From the data, structural equation modeling is proposed to evaluate these interactions. Empirical results demonstrate that “lack of accessibility and delivery planning” and “poor urban road infrastructure” are the elements that have the most impact on the “safety and risk problems in urban freight distribution” from the driver’s point of view. These results also contribute to mapping the main problems encountered in the last-mile delivery distribution in the city of São Paulo.

Keywords

driver perception freight systems human factors of infrastructure design and operations last mile Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)urban freight transportation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ranieri

Digiesi

Silvestri

Roccotelli

A. Review of Last Mile Logistics Innovations in an Externalities Cost Reduction Vision. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2018, P. 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030782.

Sheth

Butrina

Goodchild

McCormack

Measuring Delivery Route Cost Trade-Offs Between Electric-Assist Cargo Bicycles and Delivery Trucks in Dense Urban Areas. European Transport Research Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0349-5.

Nenni

M. E.

Sforza

Sterle

Sustainability-Based Review of Urban Freight Models. Soft Computing, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2019, pp. 2899–2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03786-x.

Melacini

Perotti

Rasini

Tappia

E-Fulfilment and Distribution in Omni-Channel Retailing: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2018, pp. 391–414.

Cardenas

Borbon-Galvez

Verlinden

Van de Voorde

Vanelslander

Dewulf

City Logistics, Urban Goods Distribution and Last Mile Delivery and Collection. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol. 18, No. 1–2, 2017, pp. 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591717736505.

Bosona

Urban Freight Last Mile Logistics—Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Sustainability: A Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 21, 2020, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218769.

Browne

Rizet

Allen

A Comparative Assessment of the Light Goods Vehicle Fleet and the Scope to Reduce its CO₂ Emissions in the UK and France. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 125, 2014, pp. 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.201401.1478.

Holguín-Veras

Leal

J. A.

Sánchez-Diaz

Browne

Wojtowicz

State of the Art and Practice of Urban Freight Management Part I: Infrastructure, Vehicle-Related, and Traffic Operations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 137, 2020, pp. 360–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.037.

Holguín-Veras

Leal

J. A.

Sanchez-Diaz

Browne

Wojtowicz

State of the Art and Practice of Urban Freight Management Part II: Financial Approaches, Logistics, and Demand Management. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 137, 2020, pp. 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.036.

10.

Furquim

de Oliveira

R. L. M.

Vieira

J. G. V.

Retailers and Carriers’ Viewpoint on Sorocaba’s City Logistics: A Spatial Analysis. Urbe, p. 12. http://www.scielo.br/j/urbe/a/zbLvmjsfbKrqhCwKgtBQTYh/. Accessed May 17, 2022.

11.

Vieira

J. G. V.

Fransoo

J. C.

Carvalho

C. D.

Freight Distribution in Megacities: Perspectives of Shippers, Logistics Service Providers and Carriers. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 46, 2015, pp. 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2015.05.007.

12.

Vieira

J. G. V.

Fransoo

J. C.

How Logistics Performance of Freight Operators Is Affected by Urban Freight Distribution Issues. Transport Policy, Vol. 44, 2015, pp. 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2015.06.007.

13.

Dablanc

Freight Transport for Development Toolkit: Urban Freight. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2009.

14.

Buldeo Rai

Verlinde

Macharis

City Logistics in an Omnichannel Environment. The Case of Brussels. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2019, pp. 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.02.002.

15.

Muñuzuri

Larrañeta

Onieva

Cortés

Solutions Applicable by Local Administrations for Urban Logistics Improvement. Cities, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2005, pp. 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2004.10.003.

16.

Cherrett

Allen

McLeod

Maynard

Hickford

Browne

Understanding Urban Freight Activity – Key Issues for Freight Planning. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2012.05.008.

17.

Aiura

Taniguchi

Planning On-Street Loading-Unloading Spaces Considering the Behaviour of Pickup-Delivery Vehicles. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, 2005, pp. 2963–2974. https://doi.org/10.11175/EASTS.6.2963.

18.

CET-SP. CET - Companhia de Engenharia de Trafego - Caminhões. http://www.cetsp.com.br/consultas/caminhoes/locais-com-restricao-ao-caminhao/zona-de-maxima-restricao-de-circulacao-zmrc.aspx.

19.

Holguín-Veras

Necessary Conditions for Off-Hour Deliveries and the Effectiveness of Urban Freight Road Pricing and Alternative Financial Policies in Competitive Markets. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2008, pp. 392–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2007.10.008.

20.

Holguín-Veras

Encarnación

González-Calderón

C. A.

Winebrake

Wang

Kyle

Herazo-Padilla

, et al. Direct Impacts of Off-Hour Deliveries on Urban Freight Emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 61, 2018, pp. 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.013.

21.

Dias

J. M.

Sobanski

G. B.

da Silva

J. E. A. R.

de Oliveira

L. K.

Vieira

J. G. V.

Are Brazilian Cities Ready to Develop an Efficient Urban Freight Mobility Plan?

Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2018, pp. 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.010.003.ao07.

22.

Stathopoulos

Valeri

Marcucci

Stakeholder Reactions to Urban Freight Policy Innovation. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 22, 2012, pp. 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2011.11.017.

23.

Woxenius

Directness as a Key Performance Indicator for Freight Transport Chains. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012, pp. 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RETREC.2012.03.007.

24.

Castro

J. T.

Kuse

Impacts of Large Truck Restrictions in Freight Carrier Operations in Metro Manila. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, 2005, pp. 2947–2962.

25.

de Vasconcellos

E. A

. Transport Metabolism, Social Diversity and Equity: The Case of São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2005, pp. 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.007.

26.

Gatta

Marcucci

Urban Freight Transport and Policy Changes: Improving Decision Makers’ Awareness via an Agent-Specific Approach. Transport Policy, Vol. 36, 2014, pp. 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2014.09.007.

27.

Yannis

Golias

Antoniou

Effects of Urban Delivery Restrictions on Traffic Movements. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060600905566.

28.

Kin

Ambra

Verlinde

Macharis

Tackling Fragmented Last Mile Deliveries to Nanostores by Utilizing Spare Transportation Capacity - A Simulation Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 3, 2018, p. 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030653.

29.

Dablanc

Goods Transport in Large European Cities: Difficult to Organize, Difficult to Modernize. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.005.

30.

Kin

Verlinde

Macharis

Sustainable Urban Freight Transport in Megacities in Emerging Markets. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 32, 2017, pp. 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2017.03.011.

31.

Doshi

Trivedi

M. M.

Tactical Driver Behavior Prediction and Intent Inference: A Review. Proc., IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, ITSC, Washington, D.C., IEEE, New York, 2011, pp. 1892–1897. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2011.6083128.

32.

Kim

Goodchild

Boyle

L. N.

Empirical Analysis of Commercial Vehicle Dwell Times Around Freight-Attracting Urban Buildings in Downtown Seattle. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 147, 2021, pp. 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.019.

33.

de Abreu e Silva

Alho

A. R.

Using Structural Equations Modeling to Explore Perceived Urban Freight Deliveries Parking Issues. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 102, 2017, pp. 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2016.08.022.

34.

Chiara

G. D.

Cheah

Azevedo

C. L.

Ben-Akiva

M. E.

Ben

M. E.

Azevedo

C. L.

A Policy-Sensitive Model of Parking Choice for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Areas. Transportation Science, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 606–630. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2019.0970.

35.

Iwan

Kijewska

Johansen

B. G.

Eidhammer

Małecki

Konicki

Thompson

R. G.

Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Unloading Bays Based on Cellular Automata Simulation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 61, 2018, pp. 104–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.020.

36.

Manzano Dos Santos

Sánchez-Díaz

Exploring Carriers’ Perceptions About City Logistics Initiatives. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2547: 66–73.

37.

Chiara

G. D.

Krutein

K. F.

Ranjbari

Goodchild

Understanding Urban Commercial Vehicle Driver Behaviors and Decision Making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 608–619.

38.

Malik

Sánchez-Díaz

Tiwari

Woxenius

Urban Freight-Parking Practices: The Cases of Gothenburg (Sweden) and Delhi (India). Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 24, 2017, pp. 37–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.05.002.

39.

Schmid

Wang

X. C.

Conway

Commercial Vehicle Parking Duration in New York City and its Implications for Planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 116, 2018, pp. 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.06.018.

40.

Castro

J. T.

Kuse

Hyodo

A Study on the Impact and Effectiveness of the Truck Ban Scheme in Metro Manila. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2003, pp. 2177–2192.

41.

Morganti

Dablanc

Fortin

Final Deliveries for Online Shopping: The Deployment of Pickup Point Networks in Urban and Suburban Areas. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 11, 2014, pp. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2014.03.002.

42.

Ahmed

Roorda

M. J.

Modeling Freight Vehicle Type Choice Using Machine Learning and Discrete Choice Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211044462.

43.

Furquim

T. S. G.

Vieira

J. G. V.

Oliveira

R. M.

Restrições de Carga Urbana e Desafios Logísticos: Percepção de Varejistas e Motoristas Em Sorocaba. Transportes, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2018, pp. 142–156. https://doi.org/10.14295/TRANSPORTES.V26I1.1354.

44.

Forza

Survey Research in Operations Management: A Process-Based Perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2002, pp. 152–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414310.

45.

Leung

S. O.

A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales. Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2011, pp. 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.580697.

46.

Leung

S. O.

Can Likert Scales Be Treated as Interval Scales?—A Simulation Study. Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2017, pp. 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775.

47.

Aharonovitz

M. C. S.

Vieira

J. G. V.

Suyama

S. S.

How Logistics Performance is Affected by Supply Chain Relationships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2018, pp. 284–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-09-2016-0204.

48.

Tabachnick

Fidell

L. S.

Using Multivariate Statistics, 7th ed. Pearson, Boston, MA, 2019.

49.

Peng

D. X.

Lai

Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2012, pp. 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002.

50.

Hair

J. F.

Ringle

C.M.

Sarstedt

PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011, pp. 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.

51.

Hair

J. F.

Hult

G. T. M.

Ringle

Sarstedt

Danks

Ray

Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature, Berlin, Germany, 2021.

52.

Chin

W. W.

Newsted

P. R.

Structural Equation Modeling Analysis With Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares. In Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (R. H. Hoyle, ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999, pp. 307–341.

53.

Chin

W. W.

The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, Vol. 295, No. 2, 1998, pp. 295–336.

54.

Hair

J. F.

Jr. Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2009.

55.

Hair

J. F.

Sarstedt

Hopkins

Kuppelwieser

V. G.

Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2014, pp. 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.

56.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F

. Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, p. 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.

57.

Leguina

A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). International Journal of Research & Method in Education, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2015, pp. 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806.

58.

Helm

Eggert

Garnefeld

Modeling the Impact of Corporate Reputation on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Using Partial Least Squares. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares ( Vinzi

V. E.

Chin

Henseler

Wang

, eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_23.

59.

Tenenhaus

Vinzi

V. E.

Chatelin

Y. M.

Lauro

PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2005, pp. 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005.

60.

Cohen

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York, NY, 1988.

61.

Ávila

M. M.

Moreno

E. F.

Aplicación de La Técnica PLS-SEM En La Gestión Del Conocimiento: Un Enfoque Técnico Práctico / Application of the PLS-SEM Technique in Knowledge Management: A Practical Technical Approach. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, Vol. 8, No.16, 2018, pp. 130–164. https://doi.org/10.23913/RIDE.V8I16.336.

62.

Ringle

Wende

Will

SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. University of Hamburg, Germany, 2005.

63.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 63, 2012, pp. 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-120710-100452.

64.

São Paulo (SP). Cidades e Estados. IBGE. https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/sp/sao-paulo.html.

65.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2007, pp. 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.

66.

Erdfelder

FAul

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.414.1149.

67.

Wetzels

Odekerken-Schröder

Van Oppen

Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009, p. 177. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284.

68.

Janjevic

Winkenbach

Characterizing Urban Last-Mile Distribution Strategies in Mature and Emerging E-Commerce Markets. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 133, 2020, pp. 164–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.003.

69.

Blanco

E. E.

Fransoo

J. C.

Reaching 50 Million Nanostores. Retail Distribution in Emerging Megacities. Working Paper WP 2013-01-40. Beta Research School, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, 2013, pp. 1–19.

70.

Kladeftiras

Antoniou

Simulation-Based Assessment of Double-Parking Impacts on Traffic and Environmental Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2390: 121–130.