Abstract
Decades of literature in traffic crash modeling show the popularity of generalized linear models (GLMs). However, because of the failure to accommodate spatial heterogeneity, parameters estimated with these models are inconsistent and inefficient. In light of that, this study aims to investigate the spatial heterogeneity of crashes aggregated at roadway segment levels using geographically weighted Poisson regression (GWPR) and two variants of the geographically weighted negative binomial regression (GWNBR) model. The results indicate: (i) the GWNBR model with global dispersion parameter outperforms conventional Poisson, GWPR, and negative binomial (NB) models; (ii) the performance of the GWNBR model further enhances as the dispersion parameter becomes spatially non-stationary; (iii) tests of spatial heterogeneity and autocorrelation reveal the existence of non-stationarity and less than 1% likelihood of randomness; and (iv) median of parameter estimates reveal a positive association between crashes and posted speed limit, number of lanes, number of three-leg intersections, number of access points, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The study concludes that, when spatial heterogeneity is evident, conventional GLMs should be avoided to circumvent the futile estimation of parameters on the arterial segments. The findings are expected to contribute to the small pool of literature on spatial non-stationarity of parameters in segment-based aggregation, identification and selection of segments with similar influence factors in corridor-level studies, and spatial analysis of arterial crashes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
