This paper investigated the rheological performance of the combination of ethylene methyl acrylate and glycidyl methacrylate—EMA-GMA (reactive polymer)—and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) associated with polyphosphoric acid (PPA116%) in the modification of an asphalt binder (PG 64-XX). Tests such as performance grade (PG), multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR), linear amplitude sweep (LAS), and master curve vary the EMA-GMA and PPA116% contents to obtain an ideal composition to provide a high-performance asphalt binder and thus compare with an unmodified asphalt binder and a styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) modified asphalt binder. The results showed that the asphalt binder stiffness improved as the EMA-GMA and PPA116% content increased. The PG temperature increased with the addition of PPA116% content in the asphalt binder samples, being most significant with the use of 1.8% of EMA-GMA. The addition of the combined polymers decreased the susceptibility to rut and improved the elastic recovery of the asphalt binder PG 64-XX, but only the samples with 1.8% EMA-GMA showed higher elastic recovery than the SBS-modified binder. PPA116% provided benefits in damage resistance at all strain levels; however, more was observed in samples subject to minor strains. The incorporation of 1.8% EMA-GMA, 0.3% HDPE, and 0.5% PPA116% was the one that presented the most improvements, without presenting gelation, in the performance of the asphalt binder in relation to stiffness and elasticity with increasing temperature. Thus, the use of these polymers in this composition can be a good alternative to regions with high temperatures, such as the northeast region of Brazil.
GuptaA.Lastra-GonzalezP.Rodriguez-HernandezJ.GonzálezM. G.Castro-FresnoD.Critical Assessment of New Polymer-Modified Bitumen for Porous Asphalt Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 307,2021, p. 124957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124957.
2.
RiveraC.CaroS.Arámbula-MercadoE.SánchezD. B.KarkiP.Comparative Evaluation of Ageing Effects on the Properties of Regular and Highly Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 302, 2021, p. 124163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124163.
3.
LuX.IsacssonU.EkbladJ.Influence of Polymer Modification on Low Temperature Behaviour of Bituminous Binders and Mixtures. Materials and Structures, Vol. 36, 2003, pp. 652–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479497.
4.
AflakiS.HajikarimiP.Implementing Viscoelastic Rheological Methods to Evaluate Low Temperature Performance of Modified Asphalt Binders. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 36, 2012, pp. 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.076.
5.
ZaniL.GiustozziF.HarveyJ.Effect of Storage Stability on Chemical and Rheological Properties of Polymer-Modified Asphalt Binders for Road Pavement Construction. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 145, 2017, pp. 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.014.
6.
LiuH.ChenZ.WangY.ZhangZ.HaoP.Effect of Poly Phosphoric Acid (PPA) on Creep Response of Base and Polymer Modified Asphalt Binders/Mixtures at Intermediate-Low Temperature. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 159, 2018, pp. 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.087.
7.
PolaccoG.FilippiS.MerusiF.StastnaG.A Review of the Fundamentals of Polymer-Modified Asphalts: Asphalt/Polymer Interactions and Principles of Compatibility. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 224, 2015, pp. 72–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2015.07.010.
8.
GamaD. A.RosaJ. M.De MeloT. J. A.RodriguesJ. K. G.Rheological Studies of Asphalt Modified With Elastomeric Polymer. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 106, 2016, pp. 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.142.
9.
GeD.YanK.YouL.WangZ.Modification Mechanism of Asphalt Modified With Sasobit and Polyphosphoric Acid (PPA). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 143, 2017, pp. 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.043.
10.
XiaoF.AmirkhanianS.WangH.HaoP.Rheological Property Investigations for Polymer and Polyphosphoric Acid Modified Asphalt Binders at High Temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 64, 2014, pp. 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.082.
11.
JassoM.HamplR.VacinO.BakosD.StastnaJ.ZanzottoL.Rheology of Conventional Asphalt Modified With SBS, Elvaloy and Polyphosphoric Acid. Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 140, 2015, pp. 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.002.
12.
PereiraG. S.MoralesA. R.Modification of Thermal and Rheological Behavior of Asphalt Binder by the Addiction of an Ethylene-Methyl Acrylate-Glycidyl Metacrylate Terpolymer and Polyphosphoric Acid. Polímeros, Vol. 27, 2017, pp. 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.2460.
13.
SinghD.HabalA.AshishP. K.KatawareA.Evaluating Suitability of Energy Efficient and Anti-Stripping Additives for Polymer and Polyphosphoric Acid Modified Asphalt Binder Using Surface Free Energy Approach. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 158, 2018, pp. 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.079.
14.
LesueurD.The Colloidal Structure of Bitumen: Consequences on the Rheology and on the Mechanisms of Bitumen Modification. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 145, 2009, pp. 42–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011.
15.
GamaD. A.YanY.RodriguesJ. K. G.RoqueR.Optimizing the Use of Reactive Terpolymer, Polyphosphoric Acid and High-Density Polyethilene to Achieve Asphalt Binders With Superior Performance. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 169, 2018, pp. 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.206.
16.
BulatovicV. O.RekV.MarkovicJ.Rheological Properties of Bitumen Modified With Ethylene Butylacrylate Glycidylmethacrylate. Polymer Engineering & Science, Vol. 54, 2014, pp. 1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.23649.
17.
ASTM. D 6373: Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
18.
ASTM. D 7643-16: Standard Practice for Determining the Continuous Grading Temperatures and Continuous Grades for PG Graded Asphalt Binders. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
19.
ASTM. D 7405-15: Standard Test Method for Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
20.
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). TP 101: Standard Method of Test for Estimating Fatigue Resistance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep. Test Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, Washington, D.C., 2018.
21.
HintzC.BahiaH.Simplification of Linear Amplitude Sweep Test and Specification Parameter. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2370: 10–16.
22.
PamplonaT.NuñezY. M. J.FaxinaL. A.Recent Developments in Fatigue Tests on Asphalt Binders. Revista Transportes, Vol. 22, 2014, pp. 12–25. (in Portuguese) https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v22i3.682.
23.
NuñezJ. Y. M.DomingosM. D. I.FaxinaA. L.Susceptibility of Low-Density Polyethylene and Polyphosphoric Acid-Modified Asphalt Binders to Rutting and Fatigue Cracking. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.002.
24.
ShirodkarP.MehtaY.NolanA.DahmK.DusseauR.McCarthyL.Characterization of Creep and Recovery Curve of Polymer Modified Binder. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 34, 2012, pp. 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.018.
25.
DomingosM. D. I.FaxinaA. L.Rheological Analysis of Asphalt Binders Modified With Elvaloy® Terpolymer and Polyphosphoric Acid on the Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery Test. Materials and Structures, Vol. 48, 2015, pp. 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0242-y.
26.
ZhangF.HuC.The Research for SBS and SBR Compound Modified Asphalts With Polyphosphoric Acid and Sulfur. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 43, 2013, pp. 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.001.
27.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. T 350: Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.
28.
SinghD.AshishP. K.KatawareA.HabalA.Evaluating Performance of PPA-and-Elvaloy-Modified Binder Containing WMA Additives and Lime Using MSCR and LAS Tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, 2017, p. 04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001934.
29.
TeymourpourP.BahiaH.Linear Amplitude Sweep Test: Binder Grading Specification and Field Validation. Presented at Binder Expert Task Group Meeting, Baton Rouge, LA, 2014.
