The uncertainty of cyclists’ movements has a significant impact on predicting the risk of collisions between cyclists and vehicles. The purpose of this study was to provide a method for assessing collision risk using probability, taking into account the uncertainty of cyclists’ movements. A cyclist model was first developed using a first-order Markov model. Then, based on Monte Carlo sampling, the distribution characteristics of the minimum distance and the time-to-collision (TTC) between the vehicle and the cyclist were extracted. By fitting these features, the probability density functions of the collision distance and TTC were estimated to derive the collision probabilities. The effectiveness of the collision probability prediction model was benchmarked against a deterministic crash risk prediction model (autonomous emergency braking [AEB] system) applied to three real-world cases previously reconstructed in an in-depth crash database. The results show that the collision probability prediction model can effectively predict the risk of collisions between cyclists and vehicles with better accuracy than AEB systems using a fixed trigger threshold. This study is a valuable reference for the development of advanced vehicle collision avoidance systems to protect cyclists and other vulnerable road users.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2018.
2.
ZhaoY.ItoD.MizunoK.AEB Effectiveness Evaluation Based on Car-to-Cyclist Accident Reconstructions Using Video of Drive Recorder. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2019, pp. 100–106.
3.
Ministry of Public Security Traffic Management Bureau. The People’s Republic of China Traffic Accident Statistical Yearbook (2019), Vol. 1. Ministry of Public Security Traffic Management Research Institute, Wuxi, 2020.
4.
EidehallA.PeterssonL.Statistical Threat Assessment for General Road Scenes Using Monte Carlo Sampling. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp. 137–147.
5.
RosénE.Autonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users. Proc., 2013 International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts, Gothenburg, Sweden, 11–13 September, 2013, IRCOBI, Zurich, Switzerland, 2013, pp. 618–627.
6.
TamkeA.DangT.BreuelG.A Flexible Method for Criticality Assessment in Driver Assistance Systems. Proc., 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany, June 5–9, 2011, IEEE, New York, 2011, pp. 697–702.
7.
HorstR. V. D.Time-to-Collision as a Cue for Decision-Making in Braking. In Vision in Vehicles – III (GaleA. G.BrownI. D.HaslegraveC. M.TaylorS. P., eds.), Elsevier Science, Oxford, 1991, pp. 19–26.
8.
HillenbrandJ.SpiekerA. M.KroschelK.A Multilevel Collision Mitigation Approach – Its Situation Assessment, Decision Making, and Performance Tradeoffs. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2006, pp. 528–540.
9.
FergusonD.DarmsM.UrmsonC.KolskiS.Detection, Prediction, and Avoidance of Dynamic Obstacles in Urban Environments. Proc., 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 4–6 June, 2008, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 1149–1154.
10.
KaempchenN.SchieleB.DietmayerK.Situation Assessment of an Autonomous Emergency Brake for Arbitrary Vehicle-to-Vehicle Collision Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2009, pp. 678–687.
11.
BerthelotA.TamkeA.DangT.BreuelG.Handling Uncertainties in Criticality Assessment. Proc., 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany, June 5–9, 2011, IEEE, New York, pp. 571–576.
12.
HuangZ.LiuX.SongX.HeY.Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Pedestrian–Vehicle Collision Considering Uncertainties of Pedestrian Mobility. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2017, pp. 650–656.
13.
KooijJ. F.FlohrF.PoolE. A.GavrilaD. M.Context-Based Path Prediction for Targets with Switching Dynamics. International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 127, No. 3, 2019, pp. 239–262.
14.
ZhouD.MaZ.SunJ.Autonomous Vehicles’ Turning Motion Planning for Conflict Areas at Mixed-Flow Intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, pp. 204–216.
15.
De NicolaoG.FerraraA.GiacominiL.Onboard Sensor-Based Collision Risk Assessment to Improve Pedestrians’ Safety. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 56, No. 5, 2007, pp. 2405–2413.
16.
BarberD.SaadD.Does Extra Knowledge Necessarily Improve Generalization?Neural Computation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1996, pp. 202–214.
17.
BerthelotA.TamkeA.DangT.BreuelG.A Novel Approach for the Probabilistic Computation of Time-to-Collision. Proc., 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcalá de Henares, Spain, 3–7 June, 2012, IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 1173–1178.
18.
JulierS.UhlmannJ. K.A General Method for Approximating Nonlinear Transformations of Probability Distributions. Technical Report. Robotics Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford1996.
19.
KöhlerS.GoldhammerM.BauerS.DollK.BrunsmannU.DietmayerK.Early Detection of the Pedestrian’s Intention to Cross the Street. Proc., 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Anchorage, AK, 16–19 September, 2012, IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 1759–1764.
20.
GoldhammerM.GerhardM.ZernetschS.DollK.BrunsmannU.Early Prediction of a Pedestrian’s Trajectory at Intersections. Proc., 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), The Hague, the Netherlands, 6–9 October, 2013, IEEE, New York, 2013, pp. 237–242.
21.
KellerC. G.GavrilaD. M.Will the Pedestrian Cross? A Study on Pedestrian Path Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2014, pp. 494–506.
22.
LambertA.GruyerD.Saint PierreG.NdjengA. N.Collision Probability Assessment for Speed Control. Proc., 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Beijing, China, 12–15 October, 2008, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 1043–1048.
23.
GaoH.SuH.CaiY.WuR.HaoZ.XuY.WuW.WangJ.LiZ.KanZ.Trajectory Prediction of Cyclist Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network and Long Short-Term Memory Model at Unsignalized Intersections. Science China Information Sciences, Vol. 64, No. 7, 2021, pp. 1–13.
24.
StelletJ. E.SchumacherJ.BranzW.ZöllnerJ. M.Uncertainty Propagation in Criticality Measures for Driver Assistance. Proc., 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Seoul, South Korea, 28 June–1 July2015, IEEE, New York, 2015, pp. 1187–1194.
25.
SchubertR.RichterE.WanielikG.Comparison and Evaluation of Advanced Motion Models for Vehicle Tracking. Proc., 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, Cologne, Germany, 30June–3July, 2008, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 1–6.
26.
RasmussenC.WilliamsC.Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
27.
AlthoffM.StursbergO.BussM.Reachability Analysis of Linear Systems with Uncertain Parameters and Inputs. Proc., 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, 12–14 December, 2007, IEEE, New York, 2007, pp. 726–732.
28.
AlthoffM.StursbergO.BussM.Verification of Uncertain Embedded Systems by Computing Reachable Sets Based on Zonotopes. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2008, pp. 5125–5130.
29.
AsarinE.DangT.FrehseG.GirardA.Le GuernicC.MalerO.Recent Progress in Continuous and Hybrid Reachability Analysis. Proc., 2006 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Munich, Germany, 4–6 October, 2006, IEEE, New York, 2006, pp. 1582–1587.
30.
HanY.HeW.ShiL.WuH.PanD.HuangH.Helmet Protective Performance via Reconstruction of Electric Two-Wheeler Rider’s Head-to-Ground Impact Accidents. International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2019, pp. 493–504.
31.
PanD.HanY.JinQ.WuH.HuangH.Study of Typical Electric Two-Wheelers Pre-Crash Scenarios Using K-Medoids Clustering Methodology Based on Video Recordings in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 160, 2021, pp. 1–11.
32.
WuH.HanY.PanD.WangB.HuangH.MizunoK.ThomsonR.The Head AIS 4+ Injury Thresholds for the Elderly Vulnerable Road User Based on Detailed Accident Reconstructions. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Vol. 9, 2021, pp. 1–11.
33.
JeppssonH.LubbeN.Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for Cyclists: Effect of Brake Deceleration and Sensor Field-of-View on Accidents, Injuries and Fatalities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 142, 2020, pp. 1–15.
34.
EdwardsM.NathansonA.WischM.Estimate of Potential Benefit for Europe of Fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) Systems for Pedestrian Protection to Passenger Cars. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 15, Supplement 1, 2014, pp. S173–S182.
35.
HausS. H.SheronyR.GablerH. C.Estimated Benefit of Automated Emergency Braking Systems for Vehicle–Pedestrian Crashes in the United States. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, Supplement 1, 2019, pp. S171–S176.
LenardJ.Badea-RomeroA.DantonR.Typical Pedestrian Accident Scenarios for the Development of Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocols. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 73–80.
38.
HuangZ.WangJ.PiL.SongX.YangL.LSTM Based Trajectory Prediction Model for Cyclist Utilizing Multiple Interactions with Environment. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 112, 2021, pp. 1–11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
