Accelerating Adoption of Disruptive Technologies: Impact of COVID-19 on Intentions to Use On-Demand Autonomous Vehicle Mobility Services

Abstract

One of the most notable global transportation trends is the accelerated pace of development in vehicle automation technologies. Uncertainty surrounds the future of automated mobility as there is no clear consensus on potential adoption patterns, ownership versus shared use status, and travel impacts. Adding to this uncertainty is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic which has triggered profound changes in mobility behaviors as well as accelerated the adoption of new technologies at an unprecedented rate. Accordingly, this study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people’s intention to adopt the emerging technology of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Using data from a survey disseminated in June 2020 to 700 respondents in the United States, a difference-in-difference regression is performed to analyze the shift in willingness to use AVs as part of an on-demand mobility service before and during the pandemic. The results reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic had a positive and highly significant impact on the intention to use AVs. This shift is present regardless of tech-savviness, gender, or urban/rural household location. Results indicate that individuals who are younger, politically left-leaning, and frequent users of on-demand modes of travel are expected to be more likely to use AVs once offered. Understanding the systematic segment and attribute variation determining the increase in consideration of AVs is important for policy making, as these effects provide a guide to predicting adoption of AVs—once available—and to identify segments of the population likely to be more resistant to adopting AVs.

Keywords

data and data science national and state transportation data and information systems general planning and analysis sustainability and resilience transportation and society transportation and public health transportation choices and behaviors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

SAE International. Taxonomy and Deﬁnitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. J3016 202104. SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 2021.

Faggella

The Self-Driving Car Timeline – Predictions From the Top 11 Global Automakers. Emerj, March 14, 2020. https://emerj.com/ai-adoption-timelines/self-driving-car-timeline-themselves-top-11-automakers/.

Parkin

Clark

Clayton

Ricci

Parkhurst

Understanding Interactions Between Autonomous Vehicles and Other Road Users: A Literature Review. Report. University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, 2016.

Lavasani

Jin

Market Penetration Model for Autonomous Vehicles on the Basis of Earlier Technology Adoption Experience. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2597: 67–74.

Litman

Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Canada, 2017.

Harb

Stathopoulos

Shiftan

Walker

J. L.

What Do we (not) Know About our Future With Automated Vehicles?

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 123, 2021, p. 102948.

Fagnant

D. J.

Kockelman

Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 167–181.

Harper

C. D.

Hendrickson

C. T.

Mangones

Samaras

Estimating Potential Increases in Travel With Autonomous Vehicles for the Non-Driving, Elderly and People With Travel-Restrictive Medical Conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 72, 2016, pp. 1–9.

Bansal

Kockelman

K. M.

Singh

Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 67, 2016, pp. 1–14.

10.

Vallet

Survey: Drivers Ready to Trust Robot Cars?

Fox Business. http://foxbusiness.com/features/survey-drivers-ready-to-trust-robot-cars.

11.

Clipper

The Inﬂuence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Technology: Adoption in Health Care. Nurse Leader, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2020, pp. 500–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2020.06.008. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1541461220301713.

12.

Greenhow

Lewin

Willet

K. B. S.

The Educational Response to Covid-19 Across Two Countries: A Critical Examination of Initial Digital Pedagogy Adoption. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2021, pp. 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1866654.

13.

Belzunegui-Eraso

Erro-Garcés

Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2020, p. 3662.

14.

Liu

People Might Be More Willing to Use Automated Vehicles in Pandemics Like COVID-19. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2022, pp. 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1970432.

15.

World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Brieﬁng on COVID-19, 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19–-11-march-2020. Accessed June 23, 2021.

16.

Sanche

Lin

Y. T.

Romero-Severson

Hengartner

High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1470–1477.

17.

Earl

How Can I Keep From Singing? Being the Church Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Public Theology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2021, pp. 5–24.

18.

Shamshiripour

Rahimi

Shabanpour

Mohammadian

A. K.

How Is COVID-19 Reshaping Activity-Travel Behavior? Evidence From a Comprehensive Survey in Chicago. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 7, 2020, p. 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220301275.

19.

Ozili

P. K.

Arun

Spillover of COVID-19: Impact on the Global Economy. SSRN, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562570.

20.

Brem

Viardot

Nylund

P. A.

Implications of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak for Innovation: Which Technologies Will Improve our Lives?

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 163, 2021, p. 120451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520312774.

21.

Yan

Unprecedented Pandemic, Unprecedented Shift, and Unprecedented Opportunity. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fhbe2.192.

22.

Vargo

Zhu

Benwell

Yan

Digital Technology Use During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021, pp. 13–24.

23.

Mouratidis

Papagiannakis

COVID-19, Internet, and Mobility: The Rise of Telework, Telehealth, E-Learning, and E-Shopping. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 74, 2021, p. 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103182. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670721004637.

24.

Tahlyan

Said

Mahmassani

Stathopoulos

Walker

Shaheen

For Whom Did Telework not Work During the Pandemic? Understanding the Factors Impacting Telework Satisfaction in the US Using a Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause (MIMIC) Model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 155, 2022, pp. 387–402.

25.

Leonardi

P. M.

COVID-19 and the New Technologies of Organizing: Digital Exhaust, Digital Footprints, and Artiﬁcial Intelligence in the Wake of Remote Work. Journal of Management Studies, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fjoms.12648.

26.

Budd

Miller

B. S.

Manning

E. M.

Lampos

Zhuang

Edelstein

Rees

, et al. Digital Technologies in the Public-Health Response to COVID-19. Nature Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 8, 2020, pp. 1183–1192.

27.

Golinelli

Boetto

Carullo

Nuzzolese

A. G.

Landini

M. P.

Fantini

M. P.

Adoption of Digital Technologies in Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Early Scientiﬁc Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 22, No. 11, 2020, p. e22280. https://doi.org/10.2196/22280. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079693.

28.

Charlebois

Juhasz

Music

Supply Chain Responsiveness to a (Post)-Pandemic Grocery and Food Service E-Commerce Economy: An Exploratory Canadian Case Study. Businesses, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2021, pp. 72–90.

29.

Unnikrishnan

Figliozzi

Exploratory Analysis of Factors Affecting Levels of Home Deliveries Before, During, and Post-COVID-19. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 10, 2021, p. 100402.

30.

Kapser

Abdelrahman

Bernecker

Autonomous Delivery Vehicles to Fight the Spread of Covid-19 – How Do Men and Women Differ in Their Acceptance?

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 148, 2021, pp. 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856421000616.

31.

Barbieri

D. M.

Lou

Passavanti

Hui

Hoff

Lessa

D. A.

Sikka

, et al. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mobility in Ten Countries and Associated Perceived Risk for all Transport Modes. PLOS One, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2021, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245886.

32.

Dingil

A. E.

Esztergár-Kiss

The Inﬂuence of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Mobility Patterns: The First Wave’s Results. Transportation Letters, Vol. 13, No. 5–6, 2021, pp. 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.1901011.

33.

Talebpour

Mahmassani

H. S.

Inﬂuence of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Trafﬁc Flow Stability and Throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 71, 2016, pp. 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X16301140.

34.

Alawadhi

Almazrouie

Kamil

Khalil

K. A.

A Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Inﬂuencing the Adoption of Autonomous Driving. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2020, pp. 1065–1082.

35.

Pigeon

Alauzet

Paire-Ficout

Factors of Acceptability, Acceptance and Usage for Non-Rail Autonomous Public Transport Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review. Transportation Research Part F: Trafﬁc Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 81, 2021, pp. 251–270.

36.

Panagiotopoulos

Dimitrakopoulos

An Empirical Investigation on Consumers’ Intentions Towards Autonomous Driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 95, 2018, pp. 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X1830086X.

37.

Hegner

S. M.

Beldad

A. D.

Brunswick

G. J.

In Automatic We Trust: Investigating the Impact of Trust, Control, Personality Characteristics, and Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations on the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 35, No. 19, 2019, pp. 1769–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353.

38.

Payre

Cestac

Delhomme

Intention to Use a Fully Automated Car: Attitudes and a Priori Acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Trafﬁc Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 27, 2014, pp. 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847814000473.

39.

Nastjuk

Herrenkind

Marrone

Brendel

A. B.

Kolbe

L. M.

What Drives the Acceptance of Autonomous Driving? An Investigation of Acceptance Factors From an End-User’s Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 161, 2020, p. 120319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120319. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520311458.

40.

Ribeiro

M. A.

Gursoy

Chi

O. H.

Customer Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in Travel and Tourism. Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2021, p. 0047287521993578.

41.

Mercer

A. W.

Kreuter

Keeter

Stuart

E. A.

Theory and Practice in Nonprobability Surveys: Parallels Between Causal Inference and Survey Inference. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 81, Supplement 1, 2017, pp. 250–271.

42.

Casler

Bickel

Hackett

Separate but Equal? A Comparison of Participants and Data Gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, Social Media, and Face-to-Face Behavioral Testing. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2013, pp. 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321300160X.

43.

Smith

N. A.

Sabat

I. E.

Martinez

L. R.

Weaver

A Convenient Solution: Using MTurk to Sample From Hard-to-Reach Populations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2015, p. 220.

44.

Kees

Berry

Burton

Sheehan

An Analysis of Data Quality: Professional Panels, Student Subject Pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2017, pp. 141–155.

45.

Dllu. Waymo Chrysler Paciﬁca in Los Altos. Wikipedia, 2017. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waymo_Chrysler_Pacifica_in_Los_Altos,_2017.jpg.

46.

Rahi

Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2017, pp. 1–5.

47.

Harb

Xiao

Circella

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Walker

J. L.

Projecting Travelers Into a World of Self-Driving Vehicles: Estimating Travel Behavior Implications via a Naturalistic Experiment. Transportation, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2018, pp. 1671–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9937-9.

48.

Said

Soria

Stathopoulos

Shifting Mobility Behaviors in Unprecedented Times: Intentions to Use On-Demand Ride Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2108.02324, 2021.

49.

Palan

Schitter

Proliﬁc.ac—A Subject Pool for Online Experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Vol. 17, 2018, pp. 22–27.

50.

U.S. Census Bureau. ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates. https://data.census.gov/mdat/#/search?ds=ACSPUMS5Y2019.

51.

Pew Research Center. The American Trends Panel (Waves 59 to 79). Report. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C., 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/our-methods/us-surveys/the-american-trends-panel/.

52.

Wasserman

Andrews

Saenger

Cohen

Flinn

Tatarsky

2020 National Popular Vote Tracker. The Cook Political Report With Amy Walter, Arlington, VA, 2020. https://www.cookpolitical.com/2020-national-popular-vote-tracker.

53.

Heen

Lieberman

J. D.

Miethe

T. D.

A Comparison of Different Online Sampling Approaches for Generating National Samples. Center for Crime and Justice Policy, Vol. 1, No. 9, 2014, pp. 1–8.

54.

Zhang

Gearhart

Collecting Online Survey Data: A Comparison of Data Quality Among a Commercial Panel & MTurk. Survey Practice, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1–10.

55.

Huff

Tingley

“Who Are These People?” Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents. Research & Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2015, p. 2053168015604648.

56.

U.S. Census Bureau. Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2019 Inﬂation-Adjusted Dollars), 2019 5-Year Estimates. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=income&y=2019&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S1901.

57.

Batool

Ghulam

Hayat

M. A.

Naeem

M. Z.

Ejaz

Imran

Z. A.

Spulbar

Birau

Gorun

T. H.

How COVID-19 Has Shaken the Sharing Economy? An Analysis Using Google Trends Data. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2021, pp. 2374–2386.

58.

Wing

Simon

Bello-Gomez

R. A.

Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research. Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2018, pp. 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpublhealth-040617-013507.

59.

Greene

W. H.

Hensher

D. A.

Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.

60.

Brown

M. W.

Cudeck

Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Testing Structural Equation Models, Vol. 154, 1993, pp. 136–162.

61.

Bentler

P. M.

Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1999, pp. 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

62.

Schumacker

Lomax

A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, 2004. https://books.google.com/books?id= tFF4AgAAQBAJ.

63.

Chen

Chan

A. H.

A Review of Technology Acceptance by Older Adults. Gerontechnology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1–12.

64.

Lavieri

P. S.

Garikapati

V. M.

Bhat

C. R.

Pendyala

R. M.

Astroza

Dias

F. F.

Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2665: 1–10.

65.

Niño

Harris

Drawve

Fitzpatrick

K. M.

Race and Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Perceived Threats and Fear of COVID-19: Evidence From Two National Data Sources. SSM - Population Health, Vol. 13, 2021, p. 100717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100717. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827320303542.

66.

Mack

E. A.

Miller

S. R.

Chang

C.-H.

Van Fossen

J. A.

Cotten

S. R.

Savolainen

P. T.

Mann

The Politics of New Driving Technologies: Political Ideology and Autonomous Vehicle Adoption. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 61, 2021, p. 101604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101604. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585321000435.

67.

Hsiehchen

Espinoza

Slovic

Political Partisanship and Mobility Restriction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Health, Vol. 187, 2020, pp. 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.009. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350620303772.

68.

Kyriakidis

Happee

de Winter

Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5000 Respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Trafﬁc Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 32, 2015, pp. 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847815000777.

69.

Koul

Eydgahi

The Impact of Social Inﬂuence, Technophobia, and Perceived Safety on Autonomous Vehicle Technology Adoption. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2020, pp. 133–142.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB