Feasibility of Bridge Deicing Using Geothermal Energy Piles in Different U.S. Climates

Abstract

Geothermal energy piles are an environmentally friendly energy source and an innovative approach to melt snow on the bridge surface and minimize or eliminate the use of deicing salt. However, the application potential of energy piles for bridge deicing or snow melting has not been fully explored for different climates. In this study, the feasibility of using energy piles for bridge deicing in eight cities of the United States was investigated. Temperature response function (G function) method was validated and used to estimate the extracted heat from energy piles installed in the soils with different thermal properties, which was used to heat the bridge deck during snowing. The results of numerical simulation and statistical analysis confirm that the performance of the geothermal deicing system depends on the weather conditions during snowing and thermal properties of soils. The coverage rate of the geothermal system (percentage of snowing time that the geothermal deicing system can keep the bridge surface above 0°C) increases with the increasing air temperature and thermal diffusivities of soils, and decreases with the increasing precipitation rate and wind speed. This deicing method is promising in cities with higher average air temperature and low precipitation rate during snowing.

Keywords

bridge deicing geothermal energy pile thermal response function method thermal resistance theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Koch

G. H.

Brongers

P. H.

Thompson

N. G.

Virmani

Y. P.

Payer

J. H.

Corrosion Costs and Prevention Strategies in the United States. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-156. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002.

Azizinamini

Power

E. H.

Myers

G. F.

Ozyildirim

H. C.

Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Innovative Systems, Subsystems, and Components. Strategic Highway Research Program. Report No. S2-R19A-RW-1. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.

Xiao

Neti

Suleiman

M. T.

Clay

A Modeling Approach of Heat Transfer of Bridges Considering Vehicle-Induced Thermal Effects. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 57, No. 12, 2018, pp. 2851–2869. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0315.1.

Lund

J. W.

Reconstruction of a Pavement Geothermal Deicing System. Geo-Heat Center Quarterly Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1999, pp. 14–17.

Joerger

M. D.

Martinez

F. C.

Electric Heating of I-84 in Ladd Canyon, Oregon. Final Report, SPR 304-461. Oregon Department of Transportation, FHWA, 2006.

Minsk

L. D.

Heated Bridge Technology. Report on ISTEA, Publication No. FHWA-RD-99-158. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.

Zenewitz

J. A.

Survey of Alternatives to the Use of Chlorides for Highway Deicing. Report No. FHWA-RD-77-52. Federal Highway Administration Office of Development, 1977.

Lee

R. C.

Sackos

J. T.

Nydahl

J. E.

Pell

K. M.

Bridge Heating Using Ground-Source Heat Pipes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1984. 962: 51–57.

Cress

M. D.

Heated Bridge Deck Construction and Operation in Lincoln, Nebraska. Proc., IABSE Symposium, San Francisco, 1995, pp. 449–454.

10.

Xie

Beaudion

J. J.

Electrical Percolation Phenomena in Cement Composites Containing Conductive Fibers. Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 31, 1996, pp. 4093–4097. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352673.

11.

Puppala

A. J.

Zhang

Use of Geothermal Energy for Deicing Approach Pavement Slabs and Bridge Decks, Phase 1. No. FHWA/TX-18/0-6872-1. Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, 2017.

12.

Zhang

Das

Peterson

Goering

Comprehensive Evaluation of Bridge Anti-Icing Technologies. Final Report. Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, 2007.

13.

Pourakbar

Khosravi

Plymesser

Perkins

A Feasibility Study of Road Culvert/Bridge Deck Deicing Using Geothermal Energy. Montana Department of Transportation, Task Report 1-Literature Review, 2021.

14.

Bowers

G. A.

Ground-Source Bridge Deck Deicing and Integrated Shallow Geothermal Energy Harvesting Systems. Doctoral dissertation. Virginia Tech, 2016.

15.

Lai

Liu

D. X.

Wang

The Influence of Heat Flux on Melting Ice on Concrete Pavement with Carbon Fiber Heating Wire. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 392, 2018, pp. 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/392/2/022021.

16.

Brandl

Energy Foundations and Other Thermo-Active Ground Structures. Géotechnique, Vol. 56, 2006, pp. 81–122. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.2.81.

17.

Xiao

Neti

Suleiman

M. T.

Clay

Use of Geothermal Deep Foundations for Bridge Deicing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2363: 56–65.

18.

Hurley

M. T.

Lei

Pedarla

Puppala

A. J.

Experimental Feasibility Study of a New Attached Hydronic Loop Design for Geothermal Heating of Bridge Decks. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 164, 2020, p. 114507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114507.

19.

Pahud

Hubbuch

Measured Thermal Performances of the Energy Pile System of the Dock Midfield at Zürich Airport. Proc., European Geothermal Congress 2007, Unterhaching, Germany, 2007, pp. 1–7.

20.

You

Cheng

Guo

Yao

Experimental Study on Structural Response of CFG Energy Piles. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 96, 2016, pp. 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.127.

21.

Vasilescu

Design and Execution of Energy Piles: Validation by In-Situ and Laboratory Experiments. Civil Engineering. École centrale de Nantes, 2019. English, NNT: 2019ECDN0015.

22.

Laloui

Sutman

Experimental Investigation of Energy Piles: From Laboratory to Field Testing. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, Vol. 27, 2021, p. 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2020.100214.

23.

Amatya

B. L.

Soga

Bourne-Webb

P. J.

Amis

Laloui

Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour of Energy Piles. Géotechnique, Vol. 62, No. 6, 2012, pp. 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.116.

24.

Rotta Loria

A. F.

Vadrot

Laloui

Analysis of the Vertical Displacement of Energy Pile Groups. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, Vol. 16, 2018, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2018.04.001.

25.

Han

Feasibility of Geothermal Heat Exchanger Pile-Based Bridge Deck Snow Melting System: A Simulation Based Analysis. Renewable Energy, Vol. 101, 2017, pp. 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.062.

26.

Liu

Maghoul

Bahari

Kavgic

Feasibility Study of Snow Melting System for Bridge Decks Using Geothermal Energy Piles Integrated with Heat Pump in Canada. Renewable Energy, Vol. 136, 2019, pp. 1266–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.109.

27.

Xiao

Geothermal Deep Foundations: Bridge Anti-Icing and Thermo-Mechanical Response. Theses and Dissertations. Lehigh University, 2017. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/2885.

28.

Hamada

Saitoh

Nakamura

Kubota

Ochifuji

Field Performance of an Energy Pile System for Space Heating. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 39, 2007, pp. 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.09.006.

29.

Gao

Zhang

Liu

Yang

Numerical and Experimental Assessment of Thermal Performance of Vertical Energy Piles: An Application. Applied Energy, Vol. 85, 2008, pp. 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.02.010.

30.

Jalaluddin

A. M.

Tsubaki

Inoue

Yoshida

Experimental Study of Several Types of Ground Heat Exchanger Using a Steel Pile Foundation. Renewable Energy, Vol. 36, 2011, pp. 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.011.

31.

Park

Lee

S. R.

Yoon

Choi

J. C.

Evaluation of Thermal Response and Performance of PHC Energy Pile: Field Experiments and Numerical Simulation. Applied Energy, Vol. 103, 2013, pp. 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.012.

32.

Man

Yang

Wang

Study on Hybrid Ground-Coupled Heat Pump System for Air-Conditioning in Hot-Weather Areas Like Hong Kong. Applied Energy, Vol. 87, 2010, pp. 2826–2833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.044.

33.

Zhang

Yang

Fang

The Analysis on Solid Cylindrical Heat Source Model of Foundation Pile Ground Heat Exchangers With Groundwater Flow. Energy, Vol. 55, 2013, pp. 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.092.

34.

Loveridge

Powrie

G-Functions for Multiple Interacting Pile Heat Exchangers. Energy, Vol. 64, 2014, pp. 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.014.

35.

Lee

C. K.

Lam

H. N.

A Simplified Model of Energy Pile for Ground-Source Heat Pump Systems. Energy, Vol. 55, 2013, pp. 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.077.

36.

Ghasemi-Fare

Basu

A Practical Heat Transfer Model for Geothermal Piles. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 66, 2013, pp. 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.048.

37.

Cui

Zhu

3D Transient Heat Transfer Numerical Analysis of Multiple Energy Piles. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 134, 2017, pp. 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.032.

38.

Gashti

E. H. N.

Malaska

Kujala

Analysis of Thermo-Active Pile Structures and Their Performance Under Groundwater Flow Conditions. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 105, 2015, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.026.

39.

Dupray

Laloui

Kazangba

Numerical Analysis of Seasonal Heat Storage in an Energy Pile Foundation. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 55, 2014, pp. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.004.

40.

Zarrella

De Carli

Galgaro

Thermal Performance of Two Types of Energy Foundation Pile: Helical Pipe and Triple U-Tube. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 61, 2013, pp. 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.032.

41.

Sani

A. K.

Singh

R. M.

Amis

Cavarretta

A Review on the Performance of Geothermal Energy Pile Foundation, its Design Process and Applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 106, 2019, pp. 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.008.

42.

Figueira

J. D.

Bourne-Webb

Freitas

T. B.

A Novel Approach to the Evaluation of Contact Thermal Resistance at Soil-Structure Interfaces. E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 205, 2020, p. 06010. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020506010.

43.

Hellström

Ground Heat Storage, Thermal Analysis of Duct Storage Systems, Theory. Department of Mathematical Physics, University of Lund, Sweden, 1991.

44.

Bergman

T. L.

Lavine

A. S.

Incropera

F. P.

DeWitt

D. P.

. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 7th ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2011.

45.

Loveridge

Powrie

Temperature Response Functions (G-functions) for Single Pile Heat Exchangers. Energy, Vol. 57, 2013, pp. 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.060.

46.

Eskilson

Thermal Analysis of Heat Extraction Boreholes. Doctoral thesis. University of Lund, Department of Mathematical Physics. Lund, Sweden, 1987.

47.

Alberdi-Pagola

Erbs

Lund

Madsen

A Case Study of the Sizing and Optimisation of an Energy Pile Foundation (Rosborg, Denmark). Renewable Energy, Vol. 147, 2020, pp. 2724–2735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.100

48.

Elzeiny

Suleiman

S. T.

Xiao

Qamar

M. A.

Al-Khawaja

. Laboratory-Scale Pull-Out Tests on a Geothermal Energy Pile in Dry Sand Subjected to Heating Cycles. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 57, No. 11, 2020, pp. 1754–1766. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0143.

49.

De Vries

D. A

. Thermal Properties of Soils. In Physics of Plant Environment ( van Wijk

W. R.

ed.), North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1963, pp. 210–236.

50.

Willam

Lee

Kim

Thermal Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Nuclear Power Plants. SESM No. 02-2009. University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, 2009.

51.

ACI Committee 122. Guide to Thermal Properties of Concrete and Masonry Systems. https://worldarchi.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ACI-122.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2020.

52.

Schiavi

3D Simulation of the Thermal Response Test in a U-tube Borehole Heat Exchanger. Proc., COMSOL Conference, Milan, 2009.

53.

Federal Highway Administration. LRFD Steel Girder Superstructure Design Example. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/lrfd/us_ds3.cfm. Accessed 5 July, 2020.

54.

ATC/MCEER Joint Venture. NCHRP 12-49 Comprehensive Specification for the Seismic Design of Bridges. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2002.

55.

Liu

Rees

S. J.

Spitler

J. D.

Modeling Snow Melting on Heated Pavement Surfaces, Part I: Model development. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.06.017.

56.

ASHRAE. Snow Melting and Freeze Protection. ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications, SI Edition, Chapter 51. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA, 2011.

57.

National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). Climate Data Online: Dataset Discovery. Datasets. Climate Data Online (CDO). National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets. Accessed September 16, 2018.

58.

Nofziger

D. L.

Incorporating Temperature Effects on Pesticide Degradation into a Management Model. Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 92–100.

59.

Kavanaugh

Ground Source Heat Pump System Designer Gshp Calc Version 5.0: An Instruction Guide for Using a Design Tool for Vertical Ground-Coupled, Groundwater and Surface Water Heat Pumps Systems. Energy Information Service, Northport, AL, 2010. (Updated May 2012).

60.

Mittereder

Poerschke

Ground Source Heat Pump Sub-Slab Heat Exchange Loop Performance in a Cold Climate. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Office, Golden, CO, 2013.

61.

Park

Lee

Yoon

Choi

62.

Fadejev

Simson

Kurnitski

Haghighat

A Review on Energy Piles Design, Sizing and Modelling. Energy, Vol. 122, 2017, pp. 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.097.

63.

Zeng

Diao

Fang

Heat Transfer Analysis of Boreholes in Vertical Ground Heat Exchangers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 46, 2003, pp. 4467–4481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00270-9.