The objective of this study was to identify pedestrian crash hotspots and assess the built environment to identify factors that increase the probability of a roadway corridor becoming a hotspot. Therefore, this research attempted to identify the pedestrian hotspots and then answer the question, do locations with a “specific built environment” have a higher probability of becoming a pedestrian crash hotspot? The study used 4 years of pedestrian crash data (2011 to 2014) from Miami-Dade County, one of the top three leading counties in the United States with the highest pedestrian fatalities. Pedestrian crash hotspots were first identified in the ArcGIS environment, integrating spatial analysis. The Bayesian complementary log-log (cloglog) model was then used to develop a hotspot risk prediction model, in which the likelihood of a corridor becoming a hotspot was linked to the built environment, and to demographic and socioeconomic factors. The density of bus stops, shopping centers, healthcare facilities, hotels, alcohol sales establishments, households without vehicles, traffic volume, presence of sidewalks, and presence of medians were found to significantly increase the likelihood of a corridor becoming a pedestrian crash hotspot. The methodological framework and findings of this study could be used while developing site-specific proactive measures to improve pedestrian safety.
HauleH. J.SandoT.KitaliA. E.RichardsonR.Investigating Proximity of Crash Locations to Aging Pedestrian Residences. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 122, 2019, pp. 215–225.
2.
AboelataM. J.CantorJ.PhanC.VieraS.WatersR.Walk On: Strategies to Promote Walkable Communities. Prevention Institute, Washington, D.C., 2013.
3.
KitaliA. E.KidandoE.SandoT.MosesR.OzguvenE. E.Evaluating Aging Pedestrian Crash Severity with Bayesian Complementary Log–Log Model for Improved Prediction Accuracy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2659: 155–163.
4.
Smart-Growth-America and National-Complete-Street-Coalition. 2020 Dangerous by Design. 2020.
Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Traffic Crash Facts: Annual Report 2018. FLHSMV, Tallahassee, FL, 2019.
7.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Geographic Summary of Pedestrian Traffic Fatalities. DOT HS 812 822. NHTSA, Washington D.C., 2019.
8.
DingC.ChenP.JiaoJ.Non-Linear Effects of the Built Environment on Automobile-Involved Pedestrian Crash Frequency: A Machine Learning Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 112, 2018, pp. 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2017.12.026.
9.
DaiD.JaworskiD.Influence of Built Environment on Pedestrian Crashes: A Network-Based GIS Analysis. Applied Geography, Vol. 73, 2016, pp. 53–61.
10.
MontellaA.A Comparative Analysis of Hotspot Identification Methods. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2010, pp. 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2009.09.025.
11.
XieZ.YanJ.Detecting Traffic Accident Clusters with Network Kernel Density Estimation and Local Spatial Statistics: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 31, 2013, pp. 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2013.05.009.
12.
TruongL. T.SomenahalliS. V.Using GIS to Identify Pedestrian-Vehicle Crash Hot Spots and Unsafe Bus Stops. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2011, pp. 99–114.
13.
UlakM. B.OzguvenE. E.SpainhourL.VanliO. A.Spatial Investigation of Aging-Involved Crashes: A GIS-Based Case Study in Northwest Florida. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 58, 2017, pp. 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.011.
14.
XieZ.YanJ.Kernel Density Estimation of Traffic Accidents in a Network Space. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2008, pp. 396–406.
15.
MohaymanyA. S.ShahriM.MirbagheriB.GIS-Based Method for Detecting High-Crash-Risk Road Segments Using Network Kernel Density Estimation. Geo-spatial Information Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2013, pp. 113–119.
16.
YoungJ.ParkP. Y.Hotzone Identification with GIS-Based Post-Network Screening Analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 34, 2014, pp. 106–120.
17.
BenedekJ.CiobanuS. M.ManT. C.Hotspots and Social Background of Urban Traffic Crashes: A Case Study in Cluj-Napoca (Romania). Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 87, 2016, pp. 117–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.026.
18.
ChimbaD.MusinguziA.KidandoE.Associating Pedestrian Crashes with Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 11–16.
19.
XieK.OzbayK.KurkcuA.YangH.Analysis of Traffic Crashes Involving Pedestrians Using Big Data: Investigation of Contributing Factors and Identification of Hotspots. Risk Analysis, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1459–1476.
20.
KaygisizÖ.HaugerG.Network-Based Point Pattern Analysis of Bicycle Accidents to Improve Cyclist Safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2659: 106–116.
21.
LeeM.KhattakA. J.Case Study of Crash Severity Spatial Pattern Identification in Hot Spot Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 684–695.
22.
OkabeA.SugiharaK.Spatial Analysis Along Networks: Statistical and Computational. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2012.
23.
SatohT.OkabeA.Methods for Finding Hot Spots on a Network. In The Annual Meeting of AAG Meeting, Denver, 2005.
24.
YamadaI.ThillJ. -C.Comparison of Planar and Network K-Functions in Traffic Accident Analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2004, pp. 149–158.
25.
OkabeA.SatohT.SugiharaK.A Kernel Density Estimation Method for Networks, its Computational Method and a GIS-Based Tool. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2009, pp. 7–32.
26.
AndersonT. K.Kernel Density Estimation and K-Means Clustering to Profile Road Accident Hotspots. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 359–364.
27.
PratoC. G.KaplanS.PatrierA.RasmussenT. K.Integrating Police Reports with Geographic Information System Resources for Uncovering Patterns of Pedestrian Crashes in Denmark. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 74, 2019, pp. 10–23.
28.
DongN.MengF.ZhangJ.WongS. C.XuP.Towards Activity-Based Exposure Measures in Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian–Motor Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 148, 2020, p. 105777.
29.
HwangJ.JohK.WooA.Social Inequalities in Child Pedestrian Traffic Injuries: Differences in Neighborhood Built Environments Near Schools in Austin, TX, USA. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 6, 2017, pp. 40–49.
30.
HuL.WuX.HuangJ.PengY.LiuW.Investigation of Clusters and Injuries in Pedestrian Crashes Using GIS in Changsha, China. Safety Science, Vol. 127, 2020, p. 104710.
31.
DasS.AshrafS.DuttaA.TranL.-N.Pedestrians Under Influence (PUI) Crashes: Patterns From Correspondence Regression Analysis. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 75, 2020, pp. 14–23.
32.
MuniraS.SenerI. N.DaiB.A Bayesian Spatial Poisson-Lognormal Model to Examine Pedestrian Crash Severity at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105679.
33.
UkkusuriS.Miranda-MorenoL. F.RamaduraiG.Isa-TavarezJ.The Role of Built Environment on Pedestrian Crash Frequency. Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2011.09.012.
34.
ChenP.ZhouJ.Effects of the Built Environment on Automobile-Involved Pedestrian Crash Frequency and Risk. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2016, pp. 448–456.
35.
RankavatS.TiwariG.Pedestrians Risk Perception of Traffic Crash and Built Environment Features – Delhi, India. Safety Science, Vol. 87, 2016, pp. 1–7.
36.
LeeS.YoonJ.WooA.Does Elderly Safety Matter? Associations between Built Environments and Pedestrian Crashes in Seoul, Korea. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 105621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105621.
37.
SuJ.SzeN. N.BaiL.A Joint Probability Model for Pedestrian Crashes at Macroscopic Level: Roles of Environment, Traffic, and Population Characteristics. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 150, 2021, p. 105898.
38.
MurphyB.LevinsonD. M.OwenA.Evaluating the Safety In Numbers Effect for Pedestrians at Urban Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2017.06.004.
39.
CaiQ.LeeJ.EluruN.Abdel-AtyM.Macro-Level Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis: Incorporating Spatial Spillover Effects in Dual State Count Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 93, 2016, pp. 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2016.04.018.
40.
ChimbaD.EmaasitD.CherryC. R.PannellZ.Patterning Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics Affecting Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Frequency. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
41.
ChangD.National Pedestrian Crash Report. HS-810 968. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Washington, D.C., 2008.
42.
CliftonK. J.Kreamer-FultsK.An Examination of the Environmental Attributes Associated with Pedestrian–Vehicular Crashes near Public Schools. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 708–715.
43.
CliftonK. J.BurnierC. V.AkarG.Severity of Injury Resulting from Pedestrian–Vehicle Crashes: What Can We Learn from Examining the Built Environment?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2009, pp. 425–436.
44.
CottrillC. D.(Vonu) Thakuriah.P.Evaluating Pedestrian Crashes in Areas with High Low-Income or Minority Populations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1718–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AAP.2010.04.012.
45.
LaScalaE. A.GerberD.GruenewaldP. J.Demographic and Environmental Correlates of Pedestrian Injury Collisions: A Spatial Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2000, pp. 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00100-1.
46.
DaiD.Identifying Clusters and Risk Factors of Injuries in Pedestrian–Vehicle Crashes in a GIS Environment. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 206–214.
47.
SpainhourL. K.WoottonI. A.SobanjoJ. O.BradyP. A.Causative Factors and Trends in Florida Pedestrian Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1982: 90–98.
HuangH.ChinH. C.HaqueMd. M.Severity of Driver Injury and Vehicle Damage in Traffic Crashes at Intersections: A Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.002.
53.
SoroW. L.WayoroD.A Bayesian Analysis of the Impact of Post-Crash Care on Road Mortality in Sub-Saharan African Countries. IATSS Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2017, pp. 140–146.
54.
ShankarV. N.SittikariyaS.ShyuM. -B.Some Insights on Roadway Infrastructure Design for Safe Elderly Pedestrian Travel. IATSS Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 21–26.
55.
BürknerP. -C.Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package Brms. The R Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2018, p. 395. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017.
56.
WilliamsR.Marginal Effects for Continuous Variables. University of Notre Dame, 2018.
57.
DissanayakeS.RoyU.Crash Severity Analysis of Single Vehicle Run-off-Road Crashes. Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol. 4, 2013, pp. 1–10.
58.
KimK.PantP.YamashitaE.Accidents and Accessibility: Measuring Influences of Demographic and Land Use Variables in Honolulu, Hawaii. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2147: 9–17.
59.
OsamaA.SayedT.Macro-Spatial Approach for Evaluating the Impact of Socio-Economics, Land Use, Built Environment, and Road Facility on Pedestrian Safety. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 44, No. 12, 2017, pp. 1036–1044.
60.
Greater Miami Convention & Visitors Bureau. Greater Miami and the Beaches. Bank of America Financial Center, Miami, FL, n.d.
61.
SingletonP. A.ParkK.LeeD. H.Varying Influences of the Built Environment on Daily and Hourly Pedestrian Crossing Volumes at Signalized Intersections Estimated From Traffic Signal Controller Event Data. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 93, 2021, p. 103067.
