Influence of External Vibration on the Gravitational Flow Characteristics of Cementitious Materials: A Perspective from Application in Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printable concretes require high plastic yield stress to retain the shape of the printed layers, however, to enhance the ease of pumping the cementitious system should have as low a plastic yield stress as possible. To address these opposing needs for printing and pumping, a vibration-based active rheology-controlled system which temporarily reduces the plastic yield stress during pumping has been designed. To study the response of the rheological properties of the cementitious system and its response to vibrations, a test setup which can simulate the vibration that occurs during pumping has been developed. An EN445 flow cone was modified by mounting a frequency-controlled vibration setup. The effect of vibration on the flow initiation, flow topology, and flow rate of cementitious systems with three different water-to-binder ratios, two pozzolans (silica fume and metakaolin), and multiple dosage levels of high-range water reducer and viscosity modifying agents was studied. Results from this study suggest a strong correlation between plastic yield stress, and the frequency and amplitude of vibration with implications for 3D printing.

Keywords

Infrastructure materials properties of concrete and constituent materials admixtures aggregates cement pozzolons micro silica and slag concrete materials rheological properties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mohan

M. K.

Rahul

A. V.

Van Tittelboom

De Schutter

Rheological and Pumping Behaviour of 3D Printable Cementitious Materials with Varying Aggregate Content. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 139, 2021, p. 106258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106258.

Mechtcherine

Bos

F. P.

Perrot

Leal da Silva

W. R.

Nerella

V. N.

Fataei

Wolfs

R. J. M.

Sonebi

Roussel

Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing with Cement-Based Materials – Production Steps, Processes, and Their Underlying Physics: A Review. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 132, 2020, p. 106037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106037.

Vantyghem

De Corte

Shakour

Amir

3D Printing of a Post-Tensioned Concrete Girder Designed by Topology Optimization. Automation in Construction, Vol. 112, 2020, p. 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103084.

Ham

Lee

Project Benefits of Digital Fabrication in Irregular-Shaped Buildings. Advances in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2019, 2019, p. 3721397. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3721397.

Wangler

Lloret

Reiter

Hack

Gramazio

Kohler

Bernhard

, et al. Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges. RILEM Technical Letters, Vol. 1, 2016, p. 67. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16.

Roussel

Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 112, 2018, pp. 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005.

De Schutter

Lesage

Active Control of Properties of Concrete: A (P)Review. Materials and Structures, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2018, p. 123. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1256-2

Tattersall

G. H.

Baker

P. H.

The Effect of Vibration on the Rheological Properties of Fresh Concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 40, No. 143, 1988, pp. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1988.40.143.79.

de Larrard

The Rheology of Fresh High-Performance Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1996, pp. 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00213-8.

10.

Koch

J. A.

Castaneda

D. I.

Ewoldt

R. H.

Lange

D. A.

Vibration of Fresh Concrete Understood Through the Paradigm of Granular Physics. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 115, 2019, pp. 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.005.

11.

Banfill

P. F. G.

Yongmo

Domone

P. L. J.

Relationship Between the Rheology of Unvibrated Fresh Concrete and its Flow Under Vibration in a Vertical Pipe Apparatus. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1999, pp. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1999.51.3.181.

12.

British Standard. Grout for Prestressing Tendons – Specification for Common Grout. Vol. 3, 1997.

13.

Anon. Standard Practice for Shotcrete. 1995, pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0305-20.2.

14.

Agulló

Toralles-Carbonari

Gettu

Aguado

Fluidity of Cement Pastes with Mineral Admixtures and Superplasticizer - A Study Based on the Marsh Cone Test. Materials and Structures, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1999, pp. 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02481631.

15.

Ducoulombier

Mesnil

Carneau

Demont

Bessaies-Bey

Caron

J. -F.

Roussel

The “Slugs-Test” for Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing: Protocol, Analysis and Practical Limits. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 121, 2021, p. 104074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104074.

16.

Frantzis

Baggott

Effect of Vibration on the Rheological Characteristics of Magnesia Phosphate and Ordinary Portland Cement Slurries. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1996, pp. 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(96)85026-5.

17.

Chandra

Björnström

Influence of Cement and Superplasticizers Type and Dosage on the Fluidity of Cement Mortars - Part I. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 32, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1605–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00839-6.

18.

Hassan

A. A. A.

Lachemi

Hossain

K. M. A.

Effect of Metakaolin and Silica Fume on Rheology of Self-Consolidating Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 110, No. 6, 2013, pp. 723–724. https://doi.org/10.14359/51684163.

19.

Kolawole

J. T.

Combrinck

Boshoff

W. P.

Measuring the Thixotropy of Conventional Concrete: The Influence of Viscosity Modifying Agent, Superplasticiser and Water. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 225, 2019, pp. 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.240.