Characteristics of Non-Punitive Employee Safety Reporting Systems for Public Transportation as Abridged from TCRP Report 218

Abstract

The objective of this research is to produce a compilation of best practices used in non-punitive employee safety reporting (ESR) systems at transit agencies, including examples of how ESR systems benefit transit agencies and their employees. This report will support the public transportation industry’s efforts to institute non-punitive ESR as a critical element in safety management systems implementation. The literature review and background research framed the subsequent narrative and findings from interviews with public transportation agencies. For the purposes of this report, the agency that implemented the ESR system determined successful elements. The researchers did not perform a statistical modeling or evaluation method to determine elemental success; rather, success determination stemmed from the implementing agencies. This report also identifies challenges faced through the implementation phases of ESR system deployment, as presented through the literature review and transit agency case studies. Report findings identify benefits associated with wide dissemination of commonly reported hazards and methods to address them, such as the Aviation Safety Reporting System, or the Confidential Close Call Reporting System. There are also recognized benefits in third-party administration and management of ESR systems through reduced likelihoods of associated punitive or retaliatory consequences. Therefore, researchers determined the public transportation industry could benefit from central repository reporting options for hazards and near-miss information aggregation to further support data-driven decision-making. Additionally, industry evidentiary protections would ensure greater reporting. Finally, the public transportation industry would benefit from a non-punitive ESR toolkit or online resource repository that includes samples for agency customization.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

eCFR. Title 49 C.F.R. Part 673—Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans §673.23(b). https://ecfr.io/Title-49/pt49.7.673.

National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad Accident Report: Collision of Two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metrorail Trains near Fort Totten Station Washington, D.C., June 22, 2009. National Transportation Safety Board, 2010, pp. 125–127. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/RAR1002.pdf.

APTA. Safety Management System Manual—Public Passenger Transportation Systems. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., 2016, pp. 8–19.

NASA. ASRS Program Briefing. Aviation Safety Reporting System, 2019, p. 27. https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/docs/ASRS_ProgramBriefing.pdf.

Davey

Kidda

Morrell

Ranney

J. M.

Zuschlag

Confidential Close Call Reporting System (C³RS) Lessons Learned Evaluation—Final Report. Federal Railroad Administration, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2019, pp. 54–55, 124–141.

Establishing a Confidential, Non-Punitive, Close Call Safety Reporting System for the Rail Transit Industry . TRACS Working Group 11-01 Report, July 2012, 2–16, B-5-B-19, C3-C4.

Dekker

S. W. A.

Just Culture: Balancing Safety and Accountability. Ashgate Publishing, Lund University, Sweden, 2007, pp. 43–44, 53–56, 76.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Strengthening the Safety Culture of the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. Transportation Research Board, Marine Board, Board on Human-Systems Integration, Division of Human Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, D.C., 2016.

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. BSEE SAFECOM Summary. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/reports//bsee-safecom-summary-fy-18-a.pdf.

10.

United States Department of Labor. Occupational Safety & Health Administration. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/directives/CPL_02-03-007.pdf.

11.

ASRS. Program Briefing. Aviation Safety Reporting System, NASA, 2019. https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/docs/ASRS_ProgramBriefing.pdf.

12.

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Freedom of Employees in the Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns without Fear of Retaliation; Policy Statement. Federal Register: May 14, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 94). U.S. NRC, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 24336–24340. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oalj/PUBLIC/WHISTLEBLOWER/REFERENCES/FEDERAL_REGISTER/61_24336.

13.

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reporting Safety Concerns to the NRC. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1720/ML17208A272.pdf.

14.

Air Traffic Safety Action Program. https://www.atsapsafety.com/atsap-home/#.

15.

FTA Office of Safety and Oversight. Transit Safety and Oversight Spotlight. Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, pp. 5–6.

16.

U.S. Department of Transportation. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Oil and Gas Production Safety System Events—2017 Annual Report. https://near-miss.bts.gov/2017_SPPE_Annual_Report_Updated_05292018.pdf, accessed August 10, 2019.

17.

FTA. 2019 Joint SSO and RTA Workshop. Employee Safety Reporting Programs. Federal Transit Administration, 2019. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/regulations-and-guidance/safety/133846/2019-jointsso-and-rta-workshop-tso-employee-safety-reporting_2.pdf.

18.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Characteristics and Elements of Non-Punitive Employee Safety Reporting Systems for Public Transportation. Washington, D.C., 2020. https://doi.org/10.17226/25852.

19.

Federal Transit Administration. Close Call Reporting System Program Implementation Plan. FTA BPA Number: DTFT60-10-A-0009. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2012.

20.

Building toward a Strong Safety Culture Within the Bus and Rail Transit Industry. TRACS Working Group 16-01 Final Report, February2017, 15–26.

21.

Hanssen

Morell

J. A.

Thompson

Wallace

Wygant

Confidential Close Call Reporting in the Railroad Industry: A Literature Review to Inform Evaluation. New Vectors, LLC, Altarum, Ann Arbor, MI, 2006, i-28, D-3.

22.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Safety Management Systems for Airports, Volume 2: Guidebook. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 23–92.

23.

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Title 49 CFR 2185.97. Good Faith Challenge Procedures. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=096e6c919391f49c2e71c19e5c78c819&mc=true&node=se49.4.218_197&rgn=div8.