Estimating the Rebound Effect of the U.S. Road Freight Transport

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) road freight sector has continued to grow over recent decades. Growth in road freight could result in more fuel consumption and hence increased greenhouse gas emissions. Policymakers have attempted to manage the growth of energy usage through improved fuel economy based on technological advances. However, such improvements may not lead to anticipated goals because of the rebound effect, where improvements in energy efficiency trigger more travel and energy consumption that offsets energy savings. Thus, this study aims to determine the potential rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in the U.S. road freight sector. Eight fuel cost models are applied and asymmetric price response is incorporated in estimating the U.S. road freight sector’s rebound effect from 1980 to 2016. In addition, a recently developed data envelopment analysis is applied to determine the annual rebound effect in the road freight sector. The results suggest that, after accounting for the asymmetric price response, the average rebound effect of the U.S. road freight sector ranges from 6.9% to 8.8%, a level considerably less than that found for several industrialized countries and emerging economies. However, a considerable increase in the rebound effect has been seen in more recent years. The findings suggest that overlooking the rebound effect in environmental policies could impede the goal of reducing total energy consumption and accompanying emissions. Policymakers should incorporate the rebound effect from efficiency enhancement in policy development and utilize some potential programs to reduce the adverse influence of rebound effect in related policies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). Transportation Statistics Annual Report. 2018. https://www.bts.dot.gov/sites/bts.dot.gov/files/docs/browse-statistical-products-and-data/transportation-statistics-annual-reports/Preliminary-TSAR-Full-2018-a.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2019.

McKinnon

A. C.

Decoupling of Road Freight Transport and Economic Growth Trends in the UK: An Exploratory Analysis. Transport Reviews, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2007, pp. 37–64.

Sorrell

The Rebound Effect: An Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-Wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, London, 2007.

The U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). U.S. Energy Consumption by the Transportation Sector. 2018. https://www.bts.gov/content/us-energy-consumption-transportation-sector. Accessed April 23, 2019.

Sorrell

Stapleton

Rebound Effects in UK Road Freight Transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 63, 2018, pp. 156–174.

IEA. World Energy Outlook. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, 2016.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Fast Facts on Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2017. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions. Accessed August 8, 2019.

C2ES. Global Emissions. 2013. https://www.c2es.org/content/international/emissions. Accessed August 8, 2019.

Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles. Document Citation 76 FR 57106. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2011.

10.

Environmental Protection Agency. Summary of the Energy Independence and Security Act. 2007. https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-energy-independence-and-security-act. Accessed August 10, 2019.

11.

Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Air Act Vehicle and Engine Enforcement Case Resolutions. 2012. https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/2012-clean-air-act-vehicle-and-engine-enforcement-case-resolutions. Accessed July 12, 2019.

12.

Sorrell

Dimitropoulos

The Rebound Effect: Microeconomic Definitions, Limitations and Extensions. Ecological Economics, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2008, pp. 636–649.

13.

Lin

The Rebound Effect for Heavy Industry: Empirical Evidence from China. Energy Policy, Vol. 74, 2014, pp. 589–599.

14.

Stapleton

Sorrell

Schwanen

Estimating Direct Rebound Effects for Personal Automotive Travel in Great Britain. Energy Economics, Vol. 54, 2016, pp. 313–325.

15.

Small

K. A.

Van Dender

Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect. The Energy Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2007.

16.

Llorca

Jamasb

Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effect in European Road Freight Transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 101, 2017, pp. 98–110.

17.

Frondel

Vance

Re-Identifying the Rebound: What about Asymmetry?

The Energy Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2013.

18.

Wang

An Empirical Study of Direct Rebound Effect for Road Freight Transport in China. Applied Energy, Vol. 133, 2014, pp. 274–281.

19.

Clark

Foster

J. B.

William Stanley Jevons and the Coal Question. Organization & Environment, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001, pp. 93–98.

20.

Khazzoom

J. D.

Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances. The Energy Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1980.

21.

Ruzzenenti

Basosi

Modelling the Rebound Effect with Network Theory: An Insight into the European Freight Transport Sector. Energy, Vol. 118, 2017, pp. 272–283.

22.

Matos

F. J.

Silva

F. J.

The Rebound Effect on Road Freight Transport: Empirical Evidence from Portugal. Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2011, pp. 2833–2841.

23.

Jin

Kim

A New Approach for Assessing the Macroeconomic Growth Energy Rebound Effect. Applied Energy, Vol. 239, 2019, pp. 192–200.

24.

Bentzen

Estimating the Rebound Effect in U.S. Manufacturing Energy Consumption. Energy Economics, Vol. 12, No.1, 2004, pp. 123–134.

25.

Berkhout

P. H.

Muskens

J. C.

Velthuijsen

J. W.

Defining the Rebound Effect. Energy Policy, Vol. 28, No. 6–7, 2000, pp. 425–432.

26.

Binswanger

Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What about the Rebound Effect?

Ecological Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2001, pp. 119–132.

27.

Gately

Huntington

H. G.

The Asymmetric Effects of Changes in Price and Income on Energy and Oil Demand. The Energy Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2002.

28.

Tone

Dealing with Undesirable Outputs in DEA: A Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) Approach. GRIPS Research Report Series, 2003.

29.

The U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). National Transportation Statistics. 2018. https://www.bts.gov/topics/national-transportation-statistics. Accessed July 10, 2019.

30.

Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL). Freight Analysis Framework Data Tabulation Tool (FAF4). https://faf.ornl.gov/fafweb/Extraction1.aspx. Accessed January 21, 2020.

31.

Wang

Gao

Tang

Yuan

Zuo

Exploring the Direct Rebound Effect of Energy Consumption: A Case Study. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2018, p. 259.

32.

Environmental Protection Agency. History of Reducing Air Pollution from Transportation in the United States. https://www.epa.gov/transportation-air-pollution-and-climate-change/accomplishments-and-success-air-pollution-transportation. Accessed June 27, 2020.

33.

Environmental Protection Agency. Diesel Fuel Standards and Rulemakings. 2006. https://www.epa.gov/diesel-fuel-standards/diesel-fuel-standards-and-rulemakings. Accessed August 10, 2019.

34.

World Bank. GDP per Capita (Current US$)—United States. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2016&locations=US&sta=1980. Accessed January 21, 2020.

35.

The U.S. Census Bureau. Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, & Orders. https://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/historical_data/index.html. Accessed January 21, 2020.

36.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Unemployment Rate. https://www.bls.gov/data/#unemployment. Accessed January 21, 2020.

37.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics Survey (National). https://beta.bls.gov/dataViewer/view/timeseries/CES000000000. Accessed January 21, 2020.

38.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). National Data: Fixed Assets Accounts Tables. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=10&step=2. Accessed January 21, 2020.

39.

Baum

Schaffer

Stillman

IVREG29: Stata Module for Extended Instrumental Variables/2SLS and GMM Estimation (V9). EconPapers, 2015.

40.

Goodwin

Dargay

Hanly

Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel Consumption with Respect to Price and Income: A Review. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2004, pp. 275–292.

41.

Winebrake

J. J.

Green

E. H.

Comer

Corbett

J. J.

Froman

Estimating the Direct Rebound Effect for On-Road Freight Transportation. Energy Policy, Vol. 48, 2012, pp. 252–259.

42.

Hensher

D. A.

Rose

J. M.

Identifying Sources of Systematic Variation in Direct Price Elasticities from Revealed Preference Studies of Inter-City Freight Demand. Transport Policy, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2011, pp. 727–734.

43.

Glaeser

E. L.

Kohlhase

J. E.

Cities, Regions and the Decline of Transport Costs. In Fifty Years of Regional Science (R. J. G. M. Florax, and D. A. Plane, eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 197–228.

44.

Christdis

Leduc

Longer and Heavier Vehicles for Freight Transport. JRC European Commission, 2009, pp. 1–40.

45.

Research and Innovative Technology Administration, and Bureau of Transportation Statistics. United States: 2007: 2007 Economic Census: Transportation: 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Census Bureau, 2010.

46.

Rich

Kveiborg

Hansen

C. O.

On Structural Inelasticity of Modal Substitution in Freight Transport. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2011, pp. 134–146.

47.

Vivanco

D. F.

Kemp

van der Voet

How to Deal with the Rebound Effect? A Policy-Oriented Approach. Energy Policy, Vol. 94, 2016, pp. 114–115.